100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: What do you think is a Viable Global Community. | |
|---|---|
|
|
 No,the towers were an act of terrorism.The UN is there in the hopes of stopping another World War scenario like what started the Great War and WW2 ,when countries stopped talking and started allying up into groups. Terrorism is new to Americans but not to the rest of the world. Ask the British. There is no "silver bullet"cure Its just something you have to deal with the best you canThe UN isnt there to coordinate wars.It is there to facilitate communication and humanitarian efforts and small scale peacekeeping (like in parts of Africa). The world is better with it than without it. Its not a goverment.Its a relationship. You got to look past the propaganda some countries put out occasionally because they dont get their way sometimes. The right wing goverment here didnt like the UN because they didnt always get their way (just most of the time).its not fair to always expect other countries to agree with you 100% of the time.
Countries are lined up in groups... NATO, UN, EU, TALIBAN, AL-QUAIDA, PLO, etc... (PLEASE someone correct me if I am wrong) these are all groups with military or equivalent forces that are currently engaging each other... are they not? If the UN is there to prevent allying into groups to make war then it has failed miserably. But I digress... What do you think the North Korean citizens would want that would make them sincerly join a world community? Study the history of the lead up to the Great War and WW2 to see how the entangling alliances led to those conflicts. Taliban,Al-qaida,and PLO arnt countries. UN is a forum. NATO is a pact. No ,they are not all engaging each other in war. And the main thing the North Koreans want is FOOD. I do not think we are ready to have a world community.This was supposed to be a theoretical discussion about what a viable world goverment would look like (I thought)when the world is actually ABLE to form one.Youre a smart guy Adventure (smarter than most) and nobody knows everything so I am sure you will understand when I tell you it could help you a lot to research some of this stuff. I know you won't have any problems understanding it,and I am not trying to say you will neccessarily agree with me on everything I have said.I mean it respectfully.
Point... I must be too much of a foward thinker... I feel the citizens of this world are not only ABLE to bring about a true world government but ready... In a hypothetical way... What do you think a world constitution should contain as its principles? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No,the towers were an act of terrorism.The UN is there in the hopes of stopping another World War scenario like what started the Great War and WW2 ,when countries stopped talking and started allying up into groups. Terrorism is new to Americans but not to the rest of the world. Ask the British. There is no "silver bullet"cure Its just something you have to deal with the best you canThe UN isnt there to coordinate wars.It is there to facilitate communication and humanitarian efforts and small scale peacekeeping (like in parts of Africa). The world is better with it than without it. Its not a goverment.Its a relationship. You got to look past the propaganda some countries put out occasionally because they dont get their way sometimes. The right wing goverment here didnt like the UN because they didnt always get their way (just most of the time).its not fair to always expect other countries to agree with you 100% of the time.
Countries are lined up in groups... NATO, UN, EU, TALIBAN, AL-QUAIDA, PLO, etc... (PLEASE someone correct me if I am wrong) these are all groups with military or equivalent forces that are currently engaging each other... are they not? If the UN is there to prevent allying into groups to make war then it has failed miserably. But I digress... What do you think the North Korean citizens would want that would make them sincerly join a world community? Study the history of the lead up to the Great War and WW2 to see how the entangling alliances led to those conflicts. Taliban,Al-qaida,and PLO arnt countries. UN is a forum. NATO is a pact. No ,they are not all engaging each other in war. And the main thing the North Koreans want is FOOD. I do not think we are ready to have a world community.This was supposed to be a theoretical discussion about what a viable world goverment would look like (I thought)when the world is actually ABLE to form one.Youre a smart guy Adventure (smarter than most) and nobody knows everything so I am sure you will understand when I tell you it could help you a lot to research some of this stuff. I know you won't have any problems understanding it,and I am not trying to say you will neccessarily agree with me on everything I have said.I mean it respectfully.
Point... I must be too much of a foward thinker... I feel the citizens of this world are not only ABLE to bring about a true world government but ready... In a hypothetical way... What do you think a world constitution should contain as its principles? Basically like the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. Except actually go by it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No,the towers were an act of terrorism.The UN is there in the hopes of stopping another World War scenario like what started the Great War and WW2 ,when countries stopped talking and started allying up into groups. Terrorism is new to Americans but not to the rest of the world. Ask the British. There is no "silver bullet"cure Its just something you have to deal with the best you canThe UN isnt there to coordinate wars.It is there to facilitate communication and humanitarian efforts and small scale peacekeeping (like in parts of Africa). The world is better with it than without it. Its not a goverment.Its a relationship. You got to look past the propaganda some countries put out occasionally because they dont get their way sometimes. The right wing goverment here didnt like the UN because they didnt always get their way (just most of the time).its not fair to always expect other countries to agree with you 100% of the time.
Countries are lined up in groups... NATO, UN, EU, TALIBAN, AL-QUAIDA, PLO, etc... (PLEASE someone correct me if I am wrong) these are all groups with military or equivalent forces that are currently engaging each other... are they not? If the UN is there to prevent allying into groups to make war then it has failed miserably. But I digress... What do you think the North Korean citizens would want that would make them sincerly join a world community? Study the history of the lead up to the Great War and WW2 to see how the entangling alliances led to those conflicts. Taliban,Al-qaida,and PLO arnt countries. UN is a forum. NATO is a pact. No ,they are not all engaging each other in war. And the main thing the North Koreans want is FOOD. I do not think we are ready to have a world community.This was supposed to be a theoretical discussion about what a viable world goverment would look like (I thought)when the world is actually ABLE to form one.Youre a smart guy Adventure (smarter than most) and nobody knows everything so I am sure you will understand when I tell you it could help you a lot to research some of this stuff. I know you won't have any problems understanding it,and I am not trying to say you will neccessarily agree with me on everything I have said.I mean it respectfully.
Point... I must be too much of a foward thinker... I feel the citizens of this world are not only ABLE to bring about a true world government but ready... In a hypothetical way... What do you think a world constitution should contain as its principles? Basically like the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. Except actually go by it.
Yeah... Except actually go by it... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How would you handle the vote in a global community?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How would you handle the vote in a global community? Like we do here and in most legitiment western democratic countries. And with paper ballots and oversight.I'm not saying that I actually think the world can trust each other enough to do it yet though.
|
|
|
|
|
