Topic: Illegal Immigrants/Criminals being rewarded for breaking Law | |
---|---|
Bag and tag em ![]() |
|
|
|
Bag and tag em ![]() That's it?? How do you feel about this statement? "We feel that a pathway to citizenship would reward those who have violated our laws." |
|
|
|
"not very many countries permit convicted criminals to immigrate to their country "
IF that is the case, they should also not allow them to visit and spend their money here. If he had NEVER been allowed in, we would not have a child. If his record were such an issue, he should have been denied entry in the first place so a child would not have been brought into the world. To allow him to come , spend his money, make a child ,, and then tell him he cannot live with his child,,,is ridiculous. |
|
|
|
Bag and tag em ![]() That's it?? How do you feel about this statement? "We feel that a pathway to citizenship would reward those who have violated our laws." I dont even know what bag and tag refers to, but I agree people should have to follow the laws that everyone else have to follow and should not be excused from the consequences of choosing otherwise. |
|
|
|
"not very many countries permit convicted criminals to immigrate to their country " IF that is the case, they should also not allow them to visit and spend their money here. If he had NEVER been allowed in, we would not have a child. If his record were such an issue, he should have been denied entry in the first place so a child would not have been brought into the world. To allow him to come , spend his money, make a child ,, and then tell him he cannot live with his child,,,is ridiculous. what is keeping his child from being with him can not the child go to his country along with the childs mother if she wants |
|
|
|
Bag and tag em ![]() That's it?? How do you feel about this statement? "We feel that a pathway to citizenship would reward those who have violated our laws." I dont even know what bag and tag refers to, but I agree people should have to follow the laws that everyone else have to follow and should not be excused from the consequences of choosing otherwise. Tag = put an identification on the toe of the dead person. Bag them = put the dead person in a bag. |
|
|
|
"not very many countries permit convicted criminals to immigrate to their country " IF that is the case, they should also not allow them to visit and spend their money here. If he had NEVER been allowed in, we would not have a child. If his record were such an issue, he should have been denied entry in the first place so a child would not have been brought into the world. To allow him to come , spend his money, make a child ,, and then tell him he cannot live with his child,,,is ridiculous. what is keeping his child from being with him can not the child go to his country along with the childs mother if she wants I know a few Mexicans who have pumped out Anchor babies, gotten caught and deported. They take their kid with them. According to some lame-a$$ interpretation of an ancient amendment, the kid is automatically given citizenship. That does not give the parents rights to be here. When the kid is old enough, the kid can come be a citizen. The parents, no can do. |
|
|
|
"not very many countries permit convicted criminals to immigrate to their country " IF that is the case, they should also not allow them to visit and spend their money here. If he had NEVER been allowed in, we would not have a child. If his record were such an issue, he should have been denied entry in the first place so a child would not have been brought into the world. To allow him to come , spend his money, make a child ,, and then tell him he cannot live with his child,,,is ridiculous. what is keeping his child from being with him can not the child go to his country along with the childs mother if she wants I know a few Mexicans who have pumped out Anchor babies, gotten caught and deported. They take their kid with them. According to some lame-a$$ interpretation of an ancient amendment, the kid is automatically given citizenship. That does not give the parents rights to be here. When the kid is old enough, the kid can come be a citizen. The parents, no can do. that ammendment was implemented just after the civil war for the purpose of giving citizenship to thos just getting out of slavery as to avoid the problem of people without a country (after all the united states imported most of those that would use said ammendment) trouble is they did not put in an expiration date you know like july 4th 1868 but hey what do i know |
|
|
|
"not very many countries permit convicted criminals to immigrate to their country " IF that is the case, they should also not allow them to visit and spend their money here. If he had NEVER been allowed in, we would not have a child. If his record were such an issue, he should have been denied entry in the first place so a child would not have been brought into the world. To allow him to come , spend his money, make a child ,, and then tell him he cannot live with his child,,,is ridiculous. what is keeping his child from being with him can not the child go to his country along with the childs mother if she wants No. The childs mother has other children and family and a job and education that she cant just up and leave. The father of the child is there by himself and can easily uproot, which was the plan from the start until immigration said no. |
|
|
|
I think it would be GREAT to make immigration laws a bit less RESTRICTIVE and then apply them to ALL not born in the USA and wishing to come here. |
|
|
|
Edited by
sweetboy3030
on
Wed 09/30/09 12:29 PM
|
|
"not very many countries permit convicted criminals to immigrate to their country " IF that is the case, they should also not allow them to visit and spend their money here. If he had NEVER been allowed in, we would not have a child. If his record were such an issue, he should have been denied entry in the first place so a child would not have been brought into the world. To allow him to come , spend his money, make a child ,, and then tell him he cannot live with his child,,,is ridiculous. |
|
|
|
Bag and tag em ![]() That's it?? How do you feel about this statement? "We feel that a pathway to citizenship would reward those who have violated our laws." I dont even know what bag and tag refers to, but I agree people should have to follow the laws that everyone else have to follow and should not be excused from the consequences of choosing otherwise. |
|
|
|
I think it would be GREAT to make immigration laws a bit less RESTRICTIVE and then apply them to ALL not born in the USA and wishing to come here. On top of all that, we don't have the jobs or other resources to accomadate 20+ million Illegals. See numbersusa. Yes, we need to allow a restricted number of Legal Migrant workers. It doesn't matter how long or how many family an Illegals has. They are all aware that they were breaking the Law when they jumped the border and that eventually would be found out and there would be consequences. |
|
|
|
I think it would be GREAT to make immigration laws a bit less RESTRICTIVE and then apply them to ALL not born in the USA and wishing to come here. On top of all that, we don't have the jobs or other resources to accomadate 20+ million Illegals. See numbersusa. Yes, we need to allow a restricted number of Legal Migrant workers. It doesn't matter how long or how many family an Illegals has. They are all aware that they were breaking the Law when they jumped the border and that eventually would be found out and there would be consequences. |
|
|
|
"not very many countries permit convicted criminals to immigrate to their country " IF that is the case, they should also not allow them to visit and spend their money here. If he had NEVER been allowed in, we would not have a child. If his record were such an issue, he should have been denied entry in the first place so a child would not have been brought into the world. To allow him to come , spend his money, make a child ,, and then tell him he cannot live with his child,,,is ridiculous. what is keeping his child from being with him can not the child go to his country along with the childs mother if she wants No. The childs mother has other children and family and a job and education that she cant just up and leave. The father of the child is there by himself and can easily uproot, which was the plan from the start until immigration said no. so because it is easier for one parent than the other the children should suffer the not having a male role in their life and a father for one of them what country is the father from (or is he in) if you are educated and well versed you should do well there it is not immigrations job to make it easier for anyone you either do what needs to be done to be a single famliy unit or you don't his banishment is a consequence of his actions should he be exempt of consequences but I agree people should have to follow the laws that everyone else have to follow and should not be excused from the consequences of choosing otherwise. |
|
|
|
how unchristian like you must under stand that to give help to emigrant s on a religious reason . the people must be coming because they are going to die in there own country . these illegals are only here to get a raise in there pay . if they weren't so weak they could ban together in mex and get the money there .instead of crawling here after we fought and won a decent wage and move in and take the jobs at a lower rate and defeating what we had fought for . |
|
|
|
"not very many countries permit convicted criminals to immigrate to their country " IF that is the case, they should also not allow them to visit and spend their money here. If he had NEVER been allowed in, we would not have a child. If his record were such an issue, he should have been denied entry in the first place so a child would not have been brought into the world. To allow him to come , spend his money, make a child ,, and then tell him he cannot live with his child,,,is ridiculous. what is keeping his child from being with him can not the child go to his country along with the childs mother if she wants No. The childs mother has other children and family and a job and education that she cant just up and leave. The father of the child is there by himself and can easily uproot, which was the plan from the start until immigration said no. thats one of those things the courts call tough sh** . |
|
|
|
aw mexico . there only export is people . doesn't that mean THEY *UCK FOR A LIVING ..
|
|
|
|
Tough S*** illiegals, follow the law, or F*** off.
|
|
|