I highly recommend everyone see this. Mr. Null who has a PHD in Interdisciplinary Studies, as well as a Bachelor of Science Degree, did this speaking out at an assembly hearing in New York on October 13th. He really did his homework on this, and some of you would be very surprised to hear some of what he found. Besides the vaccine part, there's a portion where he talks about the costs for making some of the most popular drugs in America, vs. how much we the consumer pay. You will be blown away at the difference.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3XlJB7J5-o&feature=player_embedded

There's 2 other parts to this that can be found on the side so you are aware.

Youtube

Yeah so what? What's your point?

The accuracy on youtube cannot be verified. It is an artists site to express themselves.

So if you have an opinion on what was written/shown/said/made please share it but the accuracy of youtube is questionable.


No offense intended of course.

None taken, but I do think it's rather closed minded to not even watch the video yourself before making an opinion on it. Just cause it's youtube or some other site, doesn't make it unvalid neccessarily.

operative word necessarily

I understand some videos/sources can be false or what have you, but not everything is. It drives me nuts that every time something comes from youtube or wherever online that isn't "mainstream", it's automatically assumed as wrong or biased. That's what you call group think. A person should read/view things with an open mind, and then draw their own conclusions from what they saw, as opposed to simply discrediting something without even bothering to take a look.

dude, breathe, relax

You can only supply what information or data you deem important or pertinent, you cannot expect others to view it the same. Stop jumping to conclusions, Dragon expressed her view, I agreed with both hence the word necessarily, doesn't mean I'm going to watch the video. Some videos on you tube are ok by me others suck. JMO


*edit

I am not one to follow any group or anyone period, hence your group think notion does not apply

I just get annoyed sometimes, and for the record the last comment really wasn't directed at you, but rather how stuff like this is seen in general. Far too often, someone will be shown something from a source outside of the mainstream media and immediately discredit it because of where it came from. So I didn't mean that to be a shot at you, just an air of frustration about the system in general, sorry if you took it different.

Gary Null is awesome, I listen to his raio show occasionaly.
www.garynull.com

I remember he tried to publicly reach out to Patrick Swayze when he first got cancer. Obviously, Swayze didn't take him up on his offer and became the poster-boy for the huge TV Cancer fake fundraiser instead. He could still be alive if he'd made the right choice.

Null also spearheaded the lawsuit against the state of New York on behalf of the medical workers who don't want to be forcibly vaccinated.

I think they just won. Major victory.

Hmmm.... Mainstream media is awfully quiet on THAT story.

Along those same lines, remember Jimmy Valvano, aka Jimmy V in the early 1990's? Same thing, guy gets cancer, guy dies and said death ends up being used as the basis to start a big phony money making cancer fund. There really is nothing new under the sun.

Listen, Youtube is a video sharing site. That means, you will find videos recorded from CNN, articles radioshows and so on. Youtube offers opinions just like many tv news channels aren't really news, but frickin' pulbic entertainment. Let it be CNN or Fox.

You have to draw your own conclusion from others opinion and form your own. This has been the greatest difficulty to many people.

Someone has to chew the food for them, spit it out, and attach an instruction manual how to swallow it.

What is the truths, what are the facts, that comes down to you and your own idea of life. Just because CNN (AOL Time Warner company) has a channel that shows news around the world, if they would really only show news, the damn thing would be about 4-5 hrs with 10 minute updates. But because they invite various "experts" and "politicians", they attach their opinion to various news or happenings, but it won't make it any more "truer" or it won't make them "truth tellers".

There are places more risky for valid news or valid information. Youtube is individuals making video, copying and editing video, copying valid video and editing it to fit their personal agenda, entertainment or whatever.

Youtube videos are not verifiable where they come from, where they have been, who has edited them, why they were made that way, what agenda they follow, etc...

Not a very good source for valid information.

Sharing videos for fun would be a more accurate description.

As for the Gary Null guy, if he is claiming he could have saved Swayze then I know he is a kook. Noone of any merit says they can save others in any way. They can offer information, advice, techniques, etc... but that is still no quarentee of saving others.

People save themselves. People who seek information and understanding save themselves, using the information and positive attitudes. Help from modern medicine is one possible road or one link in a combination avenues for them to take on their survival journey.

You do realize there are things out there that can cure cancer naturally don't you? I can back this up too, I'm not spouting off bull here. When it comes to saving Swayze, this is what is meant.

Do you think mainstream media is any better? By your definition, the CNN's, the FOX (or Faux in my mind) News's and the like can do the very same thing no? There can be agendas or biases found in any news source, what you have to be able to do is tell the difference between what is what. But it needs to be based on the merit of the particular piece of information itself, what's presented, what isn't, and so on.

And in my estimation at least, you are more likely to find more accurate truths further away from the mainstream then not. Now, does that mean all of them are gonna be accurate? No it doesn't, that's where we have to use our heads and sort out everything we are told before accepting or rejecting it. But the least one can do, is give the information presented a chance before crucifying it. I don't think we do it hardly enough when it comes to the online sources, and do it a little too much with the mainstream to where we are afraid to even question what is told.