100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: OK. So This Might Have Them Looking... | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
Kings_Knight
on
Wed 06/09/10 01:43 PM
|
|
Doesn't make you right still. Diversity is embracing all cultures and recognizing that all people are important. There is nothing weakening about that, it is a strengthening attribute. No ... they're NOT. The concept of 'cultural equivalence' is just as big a load of crap as is the myth of the 'value' of 'diversity'. I will NEVER equate the value of MY culture so as to put it on the same level as that of a tribe of people who still dwell in mud huts or worship goat gods. This, along with other culture- and nation-destroying myths, is all part of an organized plan to play the game of 'frog-in-the-pot'. If the frog's suddenly thrown into boiling water, he jumps out. if he's put into the pot and the water temp is slowly raised, by the time he realizes he's being killed, it's too late. So no, all cultures and all peoples are NOT equally important or worthy of being elevated to the same level. 'Diversity' and 'cultural equivalence' do NOT 'strengthen' anything - they are part of the process of weakening a target (namely, the United States of America) for destruction. You are wrong still. Wow. I've been ripped to intellectual shreds with the razor-sharp claws in that reply ... I'll just go over here in the corner and bleed quietly ... I didn't count on power like that from you ... and it was so ... umm ... what? ... 'focused' in the way it went point-by-point to my weak spots ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone can get elected if they promise to give money to the right people and lie with a straight face.    Well said 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doesn't make you right still. Diversity is embracing all cultures and recognizing that all people are important. There is nothing weakening about that, it is a strengthening attribute. No ... they're NOT. The concept of 'cultural equivalence' is just as big a load of crap as is the myth of the 'value' of 'diversity'. I will NEVER equate the value of MY culture so as to put it on the same level as that of a tribe of people who still dwell in mud huts or worship goat gods. This, along with other culture- and nation-destroying myths, is all part of an organized plan to play the game of 'frog-in-the-pot'. If the frog's suddenly thrown into boiling water, he jumps out. if he's put into the pot and the water temp is slowly raised, by the time he realizes he's being killed, it's too late. So no, all cultures and all peoples are NOT equally important or worthy of being elevated to the same level. 'Diversity' and 'cultural equivalence' do NOT 'strengthen' anything - they are part of the process of weakening a target (namely, the United States of America) for destruction. You are wrong still. Wow. I've been ripped to intellectual shreds with the razor-sharp claws in that reply ... I'll just go over here in the corner and bleed quietly ... I didn't count on power like that from you ... and it was so ... umm ... what? ... 'focused' in the way it went point-by-point to my weak spots ... Wrong is wrong, doesn't need much explaining. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Winx I am just honest with myself.I suppose the 96% of the black voters that voted for Obama are also wrong?I don't care if it is PC or not.From what I have learned in my life is that the strongest leaders of both the Christian faith and who are running this country are white males. Why everyone gives minorites a free pass for voting for their own but you call white males racist for voting for white males is so hypocritical it is stomach turning.It's fine for the blacks to only votes for blacks but for the whites to only votes for whites your the scum of the earth. Please spare me the idiotic,unrealistic,and holier than thou soap box speech that only you and one other person care about. To vote for a person because of there race or religion is almost as bad as not voting for a person because of their race or religion. I think the black people that voted for Obama because he is black are just as bad as the wight people who voted for Mcain because he is wight. We need to look past race and religion look for quality today. I would vote for an black Iraqi Muslim woman if she was the most qualified. I don't care who that pisses off. Well number I have been involved in politics a long time and your a fool if you think that the best person for the job is always the best way to vote.Just because someone is doing a good job that doesn't mean that the majority of the people under that person is happy.A person could be doing a good job running a city but how many people are going to be happy paying 13% sales tax?Permits to have garage sales,not being able to wash your car in your own driveway,not smoking on public beaches,and hundreds of other idiotic laws that I have dealt with that made me think I was living in Communist China all because I thought I was voting for the best person for the job. I vote for the person who has my best interest in mind not for the person most qualified.I am going to vote for a person who is pro military,pro America,and pro Christianity.That is my ideal leader and that is what I am looking for. I am curious , where does christianity fall on that list? Would you vote for a black christian before a white atheist? Of course I would vote for a black Christian before a white atheist.However if there was a black Christian and a white Christian both running I would probably vote for the white Christian. Aye and you do realize that you voted for a white/black man that is Christian/Islamic and born in three different places. This whole conversation is re-dic-u-lus. Tell you what... I think that the actuall problem is he is to tall  . I have decided that from now on I will only vote for short people. Tall people do silly things in office. This makes about as much sense as voting for a race, creed, etc... It's been the tall people all along. I should have guessed that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doesn't make you right still. Diversity is embracing all cultures and recognizing that all people are important. There is nothing weakening about that, it is a strengthening attribute. No ... they're NOT. The concept of 'cultural equivalence' is just as big a load of crap as is the myth of the 'value' of 'diversity'. I will NEVER equate the value of MY culture so as to put it on the same level as that of a tribe of people who still dwell in mud huts or worship goat gods. This, along with other culture- and nation-destroying myths, is all part of an organized plan to play the game of 'frog-in-the-pot'. If the frog's suddenly thrown into boiling water, he jumps out. if he's put into the pot and the water temp is slowly raised, by the time he realizes he's being killed, it's too late. So no, all cultures and all peoples are NOT equally important or worthy of being elevated to the same level. 'Diversity' and 'cultural equivalence' do NOT 'strengthen' anything - they are part of the process of weakening a target (namely, the United States of America) for destruction. You are wrong still. Wow. I've been ripped to intellectual shreds with the razor-sharp claws in that reply ... I'll just go over here in the corner and bleed quietly ... I didn't count on power like that from you ... and it was so ... umm ... what? ... 'focused' in the way it went point-by-point to my weak spots ... Wrong is wrong, doesn't need much explaining. And yet again ... wow ... I can only admire by how much you surpass your teachers ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Winx I am just honest with myself.I suppose the 96% of the black voters that voted for Obama are also wrong?I don't care if it is PC or not.From what I have learned in my life is that the strongest leaders of both the Christian faith and who are running this country are white males. Why everyone gives minorites a free pass for voting for their own but you call white males racist for voting for white males is so hypocritical it is stomach turning.It's fine for the blacks to only votes for blacks but for the whites to only votes for whites your the scum of the earth. Please spare me the idiotic,unrealistic,and holier than thou soap box speech that only you and one other person care about. To vote for a person because of there race or religion is almost as bad as not voting for a person because of their race or religion. I think the black people that voted for Obama because he is black are just as bad as the wight people who voted for Mcain because he is wight. We need to look past race and religion look for quality today. I would vote for an black Iraqi Muslim woman if she was the most qualified. I don't care who that pisses off. Well number I have been involved in politics a long time and your a fool if you think that the best person for the job is always the best way to vote.Just because someone is doing a good job that doesn't mean that the majority of the people under that person is happy.A person could be doing a good job running a city but how many people are going to be happy paying 13% sales tax?Permits to have garage sales,not being able to wash your car in your own driveway,not smoking on public beaches,and hundreds of other idiotic laws that I have dealt with that made me think I was living in Communist China all because I thought I was voting for the best person for the job. I vote for the person who has my best interest in mind not for the person most qualified.I am going to vote for a person who is pro military,pro America,and pro Christianity.That is my ideal leader and that is what I am looking for. I am curious , where does christianity fall on that list? Would you vote for a black christian before a white atheist? Of course I would vote for a black Christian before a white atheist.However if there was a black Christian and a white Christian both running I would probably vote for the white Christian. Aye and you do realize that you voted for a white/black man that is Christian/Islamic and born in three different places. This whole conversation is re-dic-u-lus. Tell you what... I think that the actuall problem is he is to tall . I have decided that from now on I will only vote for short people. Tall people do silly things in office. This makes about as much sense as voting for a race, creed, etc... It's been the tall people all along. I should have guessed that. I thought it was the short people. Remember the song "Short People" from the 70s by Randy Newman?  Each person is going to find a reason to not vote for who they aren't going to vote for. Some people will use valid reasons or political reasons and others will not. I have yet to see how race would effect someone's performance in that area. Character, motivation, education, diplomacy, strength, etc... and not particularly in that order are important. But race is not. |
|
|
|
|
