Topic: 'Quid Pro Quo' for Access to White House | |
---|---|
Former Dem. Congressman Kennedy Alleges 'Quid Pro Quo' for Access to White House
Access to the Obama White House is in direct correlation to the amount of money donated to the president's reelection effort and the Democratic party, the New York Times reports today. The Times reports: "those who donated the most to Mr. Obama and the Democratic Party since he started running for president were far more likely to visit the White House than others. Among donors who gave $30,000 or less, about 20 percent visited the White House, according to a New York Times analysis that matched names in the visitor logs with donor records. But among those who donated $100,000 or more, the figure rises to about 75 percent. Approximately two-thirds of the president’s top fund-raisers in the 2008 campaign visited the White House at least once, some of them numerous times." But the most explosive allegation in the news story comes from former Democratic congressman Patrick Kennedy, son of the late Ted Kenney, who calls what the Obama White House is doing "quid pro quo." Patrick J. Kennedy, the former representative from Rhode Island, who donated $35,800 to an Obama re-election fund last fall while seeking administration support for a nonprofit venture, said contributions were simply a part of “how this business works.” “If you want to call it ‘quid pro quo,’ fine,” he said. “At the end of the day, I want to make sure I do my part.” “I know that they look at the reports,” he said, referring to records of campaign donations. “They’re my friends anyway, but it won’t hurt when I ask them for a favor if they don’t see me as a slouch.” Literally translated, "quid pro quo" means "something for something." As in, if you want something from the Obama White House, then give something (e.g., cash). http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/former-dem-congressman-kennedy-alleges-quid-pro-quo-access-white-house_637051.html |
|
|
|
This is how every administration has done it. It's how business has always worked. No different in the White House, than when I used complimentary box-seat ball game tickets to woo prospective clients.
|
|
|
|
This is how every administration has done it. It's how business has always worked. No different in the White House, than when I used complimentary box-seat ball game tickets to woo prospective clients. Ms. Bush has been to the White House at least nine times during his term, taking lobbyists along on a few occasions, joining an invitation-only forum about intellectual property, and making social visits with influential friends. At the same time, she and her husband, Dwight, have donated heavily to the president’s re-election effort: Mr. Bush gave $35,800 on the day of his wife’s White House meeting last year, and Ms. Bush contributed the same amount a month later. In November, they hosted a $17,900-a-plate fund-raiser at their home, where Mr. Obama complained that the nation’s capital should be more “responsive to the needs of people, not the needs of special interests.” “That is probably the biggest piece of business that remains unfinished,” the president said, as about 45 guests dined under a backyard tent. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/15/us/politics/white-house-doors-open-for-big-donors.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all?src=tp You can say it is business as usual all you want, but at the end of the day this man won election based on his hope and change nonsense. He promised transparency and an end to lobbyist influence on policy decisions. Obviously, he only meant lobbyists or special interest groups that didn't provide large campaign donations.. |
|
|
|
Much like Solyndra who donated a TON to his campaigns and then they scam the Government from contracts Obama gave them then declared bankrupcy.
|
|
|