Previous 1
Topic: Picturesque Deception
msharmony's photo
Thu 06/07/12 06:42 PM
a picture is worth a thousand words and as many rumors

here is a popular image doctored or lied about to shine negative attention upon someone




no photo
Thu 06/07/12 07:09 PM
Edited by Spidercmb on Thu 06/07/12 07:21 PM
Bush should have never gone there. He put the lives of all those kids in danger and he's the president, not some celebrity to go around entertaining kids.

But yeah, that's a partisan and nasty thing for people to do.

Sojourning_Soul's photo
Thu 06/07/12 08:21 PM
Edited by Sojourning_Soul on Thu 06/07/12 08:21 PM

BUSH WAS STUPID....BUT HE WOULD HAVE NOTICED IF THE PICTURES WERE UPSIDE DOWN! laugh

oops Didn't mean to scream it!....sorry

Peccy's photo
Thu 06/07/12 08:25 PM
What does an old pic like that have to do with anything going on today? Oh, I think I see, trying to distract the public from current events by bringing up Bush's blunders, which were many. But it hasn't been his watch for over three years!

boredinaz06's photo
Thu 06/07/12 10:02 PM







Obama will go down as the worst president in America's 235 year history, somewhere out there is a smiling Jimmy Carter!

msharmony's photo
Fri 06/08/12 01:08 AM
Edited by msharmony on Fri 06/08/12 01:12 AM

What does an old pic like that have to do with anything going on today? Oh, I think I see, trying to distract the public from current events by bringing up Bush's blunders, which were many. But it hasn't been his watch for over three years!



I originally posted this in general, but it was moved, I imagine because,,,

the thread is not merely 'current events', its called
Politics
Current News
AND
Events

lol, actually I consider it politics and the point was about how people use phony and invented drama to tarnish politicians

I chose Bush(the whole point being some painted this as a blunder when I dont believe it ever was) because I was sure that if I used some from OBAMA, the usual folks who never do anything but criticize him would go on a tangent about how I never do anything but defend him,,,


and look,, the tangent was achieved anyhow,,,,,,laugh laugh

msharmony's photo
Fri 06/08/12 01:10 AM

Bush should have never gone there. He put the lives of all those kids in danger and he's the president, not some celebrity to go around entertaining kids.

But yeah, that's a partisan and nasty thing for people to do.


by that logic, Presidents put EVERYONE in danger anytime they travel anywhere

its a huge boost to children to be able to meet and interact with such public figures,,,

msharmony's photo
Fri 06/08/12 01:10 AM








Obama will go down as the worst president in America's 235 year history, somewhere out there is a smiling Jimmy Carter!


hardly

there is no standard by which he is even close to the worst,,,,

Optomistic69's photo
Fri 06/08/12 03:44 AM








Obama will go down as the worst president in America's 235 year history, somewhere out there is a smiling Jimmy Carter!




That is a pretty wild statement by any stretch of one's imagination.


josie68's photo
Fri 06/08/12 03:57 AM

I would swap Obama in a second for our prime minister.
I would vote for him:wink:

Sojourning_Soul's photo
Fri 06/08/12 05:55 AM









Obama will go down as the worst president in America's 235 year history, somewhere out there is a smiling Jimmy Carter!


hardly

there is no standard by which he is even close to the worst,,,,


Not with your rose colored glasses firmly in place perhaps!

He's worse than Shrub, on a par with the terrorist Cheney (who agrees with him on much....says a lot!). That puts him pretty low by ANY standard!

willing2's photo
Fri 06/08/12 06:24 AM
Edited by willing2 on Fri 06/08/12 07:09 AM









Obama will go down as the worst president in America's 235 year history, somewhere out there is a smiling Jimmy Carter!


hardly

there is no standard by which he is even close to the worst,,,,

UMMMMM.
Carter comes to mind.
Jimmy might thank him personally.
rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl

Along with his senile VP, Biden.

Here is part of a recent speech.

Joe Biden gave a speech to graduating high school students in the baseball stadium of MLB's Marlins.
He told the crowd that if he and Obamadolph get reelected, we would be able to grow crops without soil, water, or fertilizer.

And you liberals believe him!
Here is his quote:
BIDEN: (shouting) Imagine a world in which hunger is vanquished by crops that don't depend on the soil or water or fertilizer or pesticides to thrive! They're just around the corner. Imagine famine being a memory -- and with it, the end of so much war and conflict that plagues so much parts of the world! Imagine a day when the lightweight materials, cleaner fuels, [and] advanced engines simultaneously make our air cleaner -- allowing us to go the equivalent of hundreds of miles to the gallon. And maybe, most importantly, freeing us from our dependence on foreign oil and all that entails for a nation.

no photo
Fri 06/08/12 06:34 AM


Bush should have never gone there. He put the lives of all those kids in danger and he's the president, not some celebrity to go around entertaining kids.

But yeah, that's a partisan and nasty thing for people to do.


by that logic, Presidents put EVERYONE in danger anytime they travel anywhere

its a huge boost to children to be able to meet and interact with such public figures,,,


The President's job isn't to "boost" children. And the President DOES put everyone in danger when he travels. That's why he is surrounded by Secret Service, to protect him. All those kids were on their own if something happened.

Sojourning_Soul's photo
Fri 06/08/12 07:28 AM
Edited by Sojourning_Soul on Fri 06/08/12 07:34 AM



Bush should have never gone there. He put the lives of all those kids in danger and he's the president, not some celebrity to go around entertaining kids.

But yeah, that's a partisan and nasty thing for people to do.


by that logic, Presidents put EVERYONE in danger anytime they travel anywhere

its a huge boost to children to be able to meet and interact with such public figures,,,


The President's job isn't to "boost" children. And the President DOES put everyone in danger when he travels. That's why he is surrounded by Secret Service, to protect him. All those kids were on their own if something happened.


Ya gotta remember spider...Shrub wasn't a thinker! That's why we got a Cheney & Co. dictatorship for 8 years...under daddy Bushes direction of course! Cheney didn't care about anyone but himself!

Now they're grooming the spineless Robme and Bilderberg has already chosen his VP....but the people will get a vote (or the illusion of one) for whoever the MSM sells them!

They pushed their agenda too hard with Obozo and the people want that puppet gone..... enter Robme....the new face of Bilderberg!

no photo
Fri 06/08/12 07:34 AM
Edited by Spidercmb on Fri 06/08/12 07:39 AM




Bush should have never gone there. He put the lives of all those kids in danger and he's the president, not some celebrity to go around entertaining kids.

But yeah, that's a partisan and nasty thing for people to do.


by that logic, Presidents put EVERYONE in danger anytime they travel anywhere

its a huge boost to children to be able to meet and interact with such public figures,,,


The President's job isn't to "boost" children. And the President DOES put everyone in danger when he travels. That's why he is surrounded by Secret Service, to protect him. All those kids were on their own if something happened.


Ya gotta remember spider...Shrub wasn't a thinker! That's why we got a Cheney & Co. dictatorship for 8 years...under daddy Bushes direction of course! Cheney didn't care about anyone but himself!

Now they're grooming the spineless Robme and Bilderberg has already chosen his VP....but the people will get a vote (or the illusion of one) for who the MSM sells them!


A few things: I don't respect people who make jokes about the names of their political opponents. It's very childish and seems more like a grade school taunt than anything else. Second: Cheney supports gay marriage, he was very public about that when he left office, but while in office he followed the Presidents lead. Clearly Cheney wasn't in charge. You have no proof of it, it's just convenient to attack the former president as being a moron and claim that the VP was the power behind the throne. Because that way, you demonize two people for the price of one and it's an unfalsifiable conspiracy theory. How can anyone prove to the closed minded that Cheney wasn't the President's puppet master? I'm sure you'll find a way to squirm out of any argument or logical pitfall in which you find yourself.

"Why didn't Cheney make the Bush Administration come out for gay marriage?...Because Cheney wanted Shrub to think he was in charge!"

Whatever.

Sojourning_Soul's photo
Fri 06/08/12 07:37 AM





Bush should have never gone there. He put the lives of all those kids in danger and he's the president, not some celebrity to go around entertaining kids.

But yeah, that's a partisan and nasty thing for people to do.


by that logic, Presidents put EVERYONE in danger anytime they travel anywhere

its a huge boost to children to be able to meet and interact with such public figures,,,


The President's job isn't to "boost" children. And the President DOES put everyone in danger when he travels. That's why he is surrounded by Secret Service, to protect him. All those kids were on their own if something happened.


Ya gotta remember spider...Shrub wasn't a thinker! That's why we got a Cheney & Co. dictatorship for 8 years...under daddy Bushes direction of course! Cheney didn't care about anyone but himself!

Now they're grooming the spineless Robme and Bilderberg has already chosen his VP....but the people will get a vote (or the illusion of one) for who the MSM sells them!


A few things: I don't respect people who make jokes about the names of their political opponents. It's very childish and seems more like a grade school taunt than anything else. Second: Cheney supports gay marriage, he was very public about that when he left office, but while in office he follow the Presidents lead. Clearly Cheney wasn't in charge. You have no proof of it, it's just convenient to attack the former president as being a moron and present the VP as the power behind the throne. Because that way, you demonize two people for the price of one and it's an unfalsifiable conspiracy theory. How can anyone prove to the closed minded that Cheney wasn't the President's puppet master? I'm sure you'll find a way to squirm out of any argument or logical pitfall in which you find yourself.

"Why didn't Cheney make the Bush Administration come out for gay marriage?...Because Cheney wanted Shrub to think he was in charge!"

Whatever.


Whatever........you can go back to your koolaid...

no photo
Fri 06/08/12 07:41 AM

Whatever........you can go back to your koolaid...


That's not the first time that clear and rational thinking was disparaged and it won't be the last. There will always be people who can't accept reality, so they have to create bizarre scenarios to explain the world.

Sojourning_Soul's photo
Fri 06/08/12 08:26 AM
Edited by Sojourning_Soul on Fri 06/08/12 08:58 AM


Whatever........you can go back to your koolaid...


That's not the first time that clear and rational thinking was disparaged and it won't be the last. There will always be people who can't accept reality, so they have to create bizarre scenarios to explain the world.


Bush was a religious man, not very bright, who was fed scripture by Rummy, Cheney and the rest about how he was meant to cleanse the world of evil.

His speeches and opinions were prepared for him to justify those actions, and he actually believed he was doing good in the world for those actions.

I really pity him. He was played by his own father as a puppet/fall guy, knowing he would be protected from harm, but needed to carry out the family agenda/fued against Saddam. That's why Cheney was chosen as VP, to keep a watchful eye on daddys little disappointment/idiot, and keep him in line.

They wouldn't even let him be questioned by the 9/11 commission they controlled alone, refused to let him testify under oath because of his religous morals, fearing he may "leak" a truth perhaps?

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying he had anything to do with 9/11, just that he may have known something he didn't realize was important.

Daddy Bush, Cheney, both CIA heads, Haliburton, Wall Street, banker ties, Bilderberg, CFR, and Tri-lateral connections. Rummy, Powell, Rice, and the rest, all subscribers to the Wolfowitz doctrine and principles for a New American Century.... kind of sounds like Robmes campaign slogan don't you think?

Mitt Romney’s current argument-in-a-phrase, plastered on his own signs and banners seems to be: “Believe in America.” I’m not sure what that’s supposed to mean, except that it’s calculated to be utterly unobjectionable and comes off as synthetic and conventional. In that sense, it’s also a pretty good reflection of Mr. Romney’s candidacy to date.

Obamas "Foreward" has ties to the Hitler Youth Movement, and Marxist slogans and banners.... very much indicative of his rule and direction for the future of Amerika!

The Ron Paul 2012 campaign slogan is “Restore America Now” .... seems he is more intent on returning to what made us a great nation, rather than wanting to impose new hardships, and restrict liberties under someones "personal ideas" of hope and change!


boredinaz06's photo
Fri 06/08/12 09:02 AM









Obama will go down as the worst president in America's 235 year history, somewhere out there is a smiling Jimmy Carter!


hardly

there is no standard by which he is even close to the worst,,,,



This was originally written for baby Bush, but it definitely fits this regime.

Ministry-New World Order


All the locals hide their tears of regret
Open fire 'cos I love you to death
Sky high with a heartache of stone
You'll never see me 'cos I'm always alone

How to love without a trace of dissent
I'll buy the torture 'cos you pay for the rent
Tied high with a broken command
You're all alone to the promised land

I'm in love with this malicious intent
You've been taken but you don't know it yet
What you will know must never live to be found
'Cos it's the subject of the eyes of the clown

What we are looking at
Is good and evil, right and wrong
A new world order

A new world order
A new world order
A new world order
We're not about to make that same mistakes right

A new world order
A new world order
A new world order



msharmony's photo
Fri 06/08/12 05:08 PM
That's not the first time that clear and rational thinking was disparaged and it won't be the last. There will always be people who can't accept reality, so they have to create bizarre scenarios to explain the world.



QUOTED FOR SWEET IRONY AND HUMOR

this should be the BYLINE for the political and religious threads,,,,,laugh laugh laugh laugh

Previous 1