You can learn a lot using someone's name and email address, you just need to know what you are doing and use common sense.



Remember when I said "Men should have reproductive rights. "? No man should have to pay to support another man's child, unless he so chooses.



I'm going to chalk this up to cultural differences or language barrier.

What I meant with that idiom is that I wouldn't go out of my way to help her. If she showed up asking for money or support, I wouldn't give it to her, no matter how badly off she was. I wouldn't want to see her die and if she were literally on fire, I would do whatever I could to put out the fire. Do you understand now? I don't think anyone deserves to be murdered violently because he or she has a moral failing. You are the hypocrite. You are fine with a married man putting babies into every single woman on the street, he deserves some minor punishment, but then the women should be violently executed.

That is absolutely true. Emotions are a response, to an event, object or person, you can channel that response into the emotional category you choose.

It's pretty standard to Google a person before the first date.



Men should have reproductive rights. If a man is just trying to get some, he shouldn't be stuck with an 18 year baby mortgage. If he was married to the woman or the child was planned, then he should have to take the children part of the time or pay the mother child support. It's really not that hard. You don't have to go around murdering people with rocks to make sure a kid gets three square meals a day and clean socks.



You want to execute women in a horrible and painful way, but you are upset that I wouldn't help a woman who had mistreated me? lol You are a funny guy.

Only in every possible way.

Everyone always comments on the 72 virgins, but they forget the 600 beautiful white boys who are like pearls and will do anything the man wants. For me, that's more twisted that 72 women, virgins or not.

Now with a record and he/she would be easily found in an offender database. Then it's "buyer beware".



Are you really saying that we should murder women "for the children"?



It's an idiom, I was being literal. I mean "I wouldn't go out of my way to help her, but I also don't wish her dead".

I've got a great idea, why don't guys stop acting like dogs and screwing every woman who is willing? And women should stop having sex with every guy they meet. And anyone who has sex with another person has to reap the personal consequences of: catching an STD, spreading an STD to another person, ruining families. All terrible things, but none deserving of the death penalty.

My best friend is gay. He told me about an Arab Muslim he dated, who told him homosexual sex is REALLY common in the Middle East. Most of the men there do it at some point or another. It's only a crime to be the bottom, they never prosecute the tops.

Kind of the same thing here, only the woman is persecuted aggressively. It truly is a "boys will be boys" attitude over there.

I believe in redemption, mercy and forgiveness, so I don't really support the death penalty. I believe that everyone should have every opportunity to come to the lord, prisons exist for a reason: to hold criminals.

She would spend her time in prison, which would amount to decades, be released and have a restraining order on her for her victims, just like any other sex offender would. If she ended up on my door-step, it would be a violation of her parole and back to prison with her. This is in a more perfect world, obviously.

A woman's tears and begging has no effect on me, I know that it is manipulation with no real emotion. I can see through it. So even in this imperfect world, I wouldn't piss on such a woman if she was on fire, but I wouldn't wish her dead either.

Then she should be charged with the following:
* knowingly transmitting an STD for each STD
* Paternity fraud

Conviction on the first would have her listed as a registered sex offender and carry a fine and jail time. Conviction on the second would result in loss of property, jail time and restitution.

Should she be brutally murdered? No, we aren't animals.

You are both right. There is as much justice in Shariah as there are unicorns in a pineapple.

So this isn't really a reboot? Or are they redefining the term to mean "a continuation of a movie series with a whole new cast and new characters"?

We saw how down and out the boys were at the beginning of GB2, I think GB3 should be them going belly up, selling the business to the ladies and they struggle to make ends meet.

I'm neutral on the cast, other than McCarthy. "I'm a fat, gross woman" seems to be the only joke in her comedy repertoire.

No, makes sense to me. Where do you live? Isn't saying something like that a death sentence in some places?

Would it show love of God to destroy his temple or to allow it to fall into disrepair?

The limbic system is used for feeling emotions and women use it more than men, this part of the brain is only found in mammals.

The neocortex is the part of the brain that allows higher thought and only exists in higher mammals.

Both men and women use the amygdala (the so-called reptile brain), but use it differently. In a stressful situation, women think and observe more, men react more. This is because when our male ancestors were in a dangerous situation, it might be a pack of wolves or a cave bear attacking them, no time for thought.

While the woman's brain is silent, the males has increased the processing of emotions and decreased activity in the amygdala means that a man is less guarded and more vulnerable.

Lara, your account has been deactivated, get in touch with me when you re-activate.

Adios amigos.

Are you saying that relationship problems are black and white? Any relationship problem is exclusively caused by one person in the relationship? That is both incredibly simplistic and unrealistic, so I believe I must be misunderstanding you.

That makes no sense. If every experience for you were transcendent, then none of them would be.

Fat cannot literally be turned into muscle. When you are fat, your muscles are marbled like good beef. You have fat tissue inside the muscle itself. During the reconfiguration process, your body starts replacing some of that fat inside your muscles with more muscle tissue. Because the muscle building process is slower than the fat burning process, your overall weight will stay the same or decrease during reconfiguration, but very rarely will it go up.

I was beginning to wonder if anyone else had seen it.