100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: If HE had a Daughter, She'd Look like Sheffy | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
,, the rules change so much around here,, its just hard for me to keep up my bad,,, It isn't the rules that change, a much more basic concept of which is naught understood... And "bad" wouldn't be the proper descriptor. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of course they don't change
that is why I will point out how average and ordinary soldiers are whenever I see threads placing them on some 'seperatist' special podium for their service no reason at all to show them anymore reverence than any civilian,, that's what I have been told,,,,,,such thinking I think is said to be a 'brain fart' so I will refrain from such thinking in the future,, soldiers are nothing special,,, ,contrary to what I thought |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
what is tasteless about saying it wasn't smart? is that just continued obsession over my personal lack of passion about the flag, or ANY flag,,,? Twist, twist,twist. Spin, spin, spin. Twist, spin, spin, twist. Then deny. The right to entitlement but a denial of the sacred emblem of that that provides those entitlements. The right to be subdivided into a class segregated from the mainstream and then to cry foul when treated differently. The right to deprive others of their rights and then cry victim when they object. This could go on and on, but I think it pretty much describes the philosophy you propose, that of the freeloader. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Thu 02/27/14 10:09 AM
|
|
not smart if she is truly a soldier but if she is a soldier, kudos to her for doing what so many others never would (signing her life into the hands of someone else) Excuse me, is this really supposed to make sense? Not smart but kudos. And what is with the signing life into hands of others? IF SHE IS A SOLDIER (wearing the uniform isn't proof that you are actually enlisted) , what she did was not smart IF SHE IS A SOLDIER, kudos to her for stepping up to the 'protection of our rigts',, that soldiers are supposed to be revered for when you join the military, you agree to place your life in the hands and under the command of someone else,, literally, in the circumstance that there is war or battle,,,, ,,easier to understand? cause I used words my six year old would comprehend,,, Can anyone really be so literally misinformed? A soldier makes a commitment to serve their country, it's people, to defend/honor the Constitution and the flag. They are subject to the UCMJ as we are subject to laws. How is serving in the military putting your life in someone elses hands any more so than any normal person living under the laws of any government, civilian or otherwise? please explain that brain fart? ok, so, being a soldier is NO different than any other occupation people hold, so soldiers should receive no special appreciation or honor ,, the rules change so much around here,, its just hard for me to keep up my bad,,, Your lack of honor and respect amazes me! Your arrogance astounds me. Your confrontational, baiting replies however, along with a picture that never changes (this is basically a dating site and you claim to be unpartnered), controversy on every "hot button" topic about liberty, freedoms, rights, government or policy, yet posting to topics you claim no care or real knowledge of in general, and the number of posts in such a limited time, all leads me to wonder what your agenda/truth is...... and why you are really here A troll by any other name....... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of course they don't change that is why I will point out how average and ordinary soldiers are whenever I see threads placing them on some 'seperatist' special podium for their service no reason at all to show them anymore reverence than any civilian,, that's what I have been told,,,,,,such thinking I think is said to be a 'brain fart' so I will refrain from such thinking in the future,, soldiers are nothing special,,, ,contrary to what I thought Twist, twist, twist, spin, spin, spin, does it ever stop? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol
looky, looky, more irrelevant tangents was ANY of that supposed to be a response to 'what is tasteless about saying it wasn't smart?' 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have no problem believing that someone would hide in their car instead of saluting the flag. But to be in the military and post on the internet that you're doing that everyday has to take a level of stupidity that is likely to get her killed in battle. I'm pretty sure enemies aren't going to just let her be if they come charging and find her hiding in a fox hole. hahaha I will salute the emblem of my free country at anytime it is appropriate according to ceremony and I will honor it always. However, I will never honor a flag with gold fringe, an Admiralty flag, the flag of war. Personally I prefer my icon, the Merchant flag, the flag of peace. 
The Mystery of the Forgotten U.S. Flag Revealed. "The first authorization of a U.S. flag came about on June 14th, 1777, when Congress directed that a U.S. flag consist of 13 stripes, alternating red and white; that a union be 13 stars, white in a blue field, representing a new Constellation. Through usage, horizontal stripes were adopted for use over military posts and vertical stripes adopted for use over civilian posts. Most flag purchase orders were for the military version by the Federal government. Out paced by military purchases, civil flag orders were almost non-existent as the cost was far more than most Americans could afford. Sightings of the Civilian Flag were rarely seen until U.S. Customs adopted the Civil Flag in it's enforcement of tax collection and inspection in ports as opposed to acts of war against merchant ships. I wasn't even thinking of someone making a statement against a government they feel is unjust. I was mostly just thinking of lazy people who would rather put out more effort to hide in their cars then to stand up for one minute with their hand on their chest while reciting some words. I understood that answer but thought it needed amplification, my thoughts not a degradation of yours. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not smart if she is truly a soldier but if she is a soldier, kudos to her for doing what so many others never would (signing her life into the hands of someone else) Excuse me, is this really supposed to make sense? Not smart but kudos. And what is with the signing life into hands of others? IF SHE IS A SOLDIER (wearing the uniform isn't proof that you are actually enlisted) , what she did was not smart IF SHE IS A SOLDIER, kudos to her for stepping up to the 'protection of our rigts',, that soldiers are supposed to be revered for when you join the military, you agree to place your life in the hands and under the command of someone else,, literally, in the circumstance that there is war or battle,,,, ,,easier to understand? cause I used words my six year old would comprehend,,, Can anyone really be so literally misinformed? A soldier makes a commitment to serve their country, it's people, to defend/honor the Constitution and the flag. They are subject to the UCMJ as we are subject to laws. How is serving in the military putting your life in someone elses hands any more so than any normal person living under the laws of any government, civilian or otherwise? please explain that brain fart? ok, so, being a soldier is NO different than any other occupation people hold, so soldiers should receive no special appreciation or honor ,, the rules change so much around here,, its just hard for me to keep up my bad,,, Your lack of honor and respect amazes me! Your arrogance astounds me. Your confrontational, baiting replies however, along with a picture that never changes (this is basically a dating site and you claim to be unpartnered), controversy on every "hot button" topic about liberty, freedoms, rights, government or policy, yet posting to topics you claim no care or real knowledge of in general, and the number of posts in such a limited time, all leads me to wonder what your agenda/truth is...... and why you are really here hey, IM just trying to learn I suggested giving a soldier some credit for enlisting and taking on the job and I was met once again with name calling and rejection of my opinion so IM trying to update it to one that a soldier SHOULDNT get that credit,, according to YOUR response,,lol thats nothing but respect for someone elses opinion,, yours,,
perhaps people shouldn't be so focused on disagreeing just to disagree and we wouldn't repeatedly end up in these conundrums,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not smart if she is truly a soldier but if she is a soldier, kudos to her for doing what so many others never would (signing her life into the hands of someone else) She just killed her future and nullified any pride associated with being a soldier. Your comments are so uninformed and tasteless, not to mention WRONG, but then we are well aware of your own indifference to our flag and its symbolism. what is tasteless about saying it wasn't smart? is that just continued obsession over my personal lack of passion about the flag, or ANY flag,,,? Tasteless because you condemn with one side of your mouth while honoring with the other. Is there no end to the controversy and baiting you feed on? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Thu 02/27/14 10:18 AM
|
|
not smart if she is truly a soldier but if she is a soldier, kudos to her for doing what so many others never would (signing her life into the hands of someone else) Excuse me, is this really supposed to make sense? Not smart but kudos. And what is with the signing life into hands of others? IF SHE IS A SOLDIER (wearing the uniform isn't proof that you are actually enlisted) , what she did was not smart IF SHE IS A SOLDIER, kudos to her for stepping up to the 'protection of our rigts',, that soldiers are supposed to be revered for when you join the military, you agree to place your life in the hands and under the command of someone else,, literally, in the circumstance that there is war or battle,,,, ,,easier to understand? cause I used words my six year old would comprehend,,, Can anyone really be so literally misinformed? A soldier makes a commitment to serve their country, it's people, to defend/honor the Constitution and the flag. They are subject to the UCMJ as we are subject to laws. How is serving in the military putting your life in someone elses hands any more so than any normal person living under the laws of any government, civilian or otherwise? please explain that brain fart? ok, so, being a soldier is NO different than any other occupation people hold, so soldiers should receive no special appreciation or honor ,, the rules change so much around here,, its just hard for me to keep up my bad,,, Your lack of honor and respect amazes me! Your arrogance astounds me. Your confrontational, baiting replies however, along with a picture that never changes (this is basically a dating site and you claim to be unpartnered), controversy on every "hot button" topic about liberty, freedoms, rights, government or policy, yet posting to topics you claim no care or real knowledge of in general, and the number of posts in such a limited time, all leads me to wonder what your agenda/truth is...... and why you are really here hey, IM just trying to learn I suggested giving a soldier some credit for enlisting and taking on the job and I was met once again with name calling and rejection of my opinion so IM trying to update it to one that a soldier SHOULDNT get that credit,, according to YOUR response,,lol thats nothing but respect for someone elses opinion,, yours,,
perhaps people shouldn't be so focused on disagreeing just to disagree and we wouldn't repeatedly end up in these conundrums,,, No, what you are doing is trolling, baiting.... does it pay well? Only a fool can't see the obvious |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
people are complex
they can do BOTH condemnable things and honorable things life is amazing that way,,, her choice to neglect her responsibility in a public manner was not smart her choice to enlist was respectable sorry if it seems 'tasteless' to not view things through an all or nothing lens where everything and everybody is either perfect or corrupt,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not smart if she is truly a soldier but if she is a soldier, kudos to her for doing what so many others never would (signing her life into the hands of someone else) Excuse me, is this really supposed to make sense? Not smart but kudos. And what is with the signing life into hands of others? IF SHE IS A SOLDIER (wearing the uniform isn't proof that you are actually enlisted) , what she did was not smart IF SHE IS A SOLDIER, kudos to her for stepping up to the 'protection of our rigts',, that soldiers are supposed to be revered for when you join the military, you agree to place your life in the hands and under the command of someone else,, literally, in the circumstance that there is war or battle,,,, ,,easier to understand? cause I used words my six year old would comprehend,,, Can anyone really be so literally misinformed? A soldier makes a commitment to serve their country, it's people, to defend/honor the Constitution and the flag. They are subject to the UCMJ as we are subject to laws. How is serving in the military putting your life in someone elses hands any more so than any normal person living under the laws of any government, civilian or otherwise? please explain that brain fart? I know that when my older brother joined the army he had to sign a contract I think for 4 years that pretty much says he had to be there for that time and if he tried to leave he would go to prison or face some form of punishment. So under that understanding and knowledge I would say you are signing a chunk of your life over to the military branch you sign up for. What I didn't like was finding out that there had been something passed that meant the government could and did actually double the amount of time my brother had to serve. While when he was done he did sign back up for another term. I think it was BS to pass something that made it so you would have to do double the time you agreed to. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not smart if she is truly a soldier but if she is a soldier, kudos to her for doing what so many others never would (signing her life into the hands of someone else) But in that case,let her act like a Soldier,not like a spoilt Brat! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not smart if she is truly a soldier but if she is a soldier, kudos to her for doing what so many others never would (signing her life into the hands of someone else) But in that case,let her act like a Soldier,not like a spoilt Brat! agreed, it was unwise and immature, she looks an age where she has time to continue learning and maturing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not smart if she is truly a soldier but if she is a soldier, kudos to her for doing what so many others never would (signing her life into the hands of someone else) Excuse me, is this really supposed to make sense? Not smart but kudos. And what is with the signing life into hands of others? IF SHE IS A SOLDIER (wearing the uniform isn't proof that you are actually enlisted) , what she did was not smart IF SHE IS A SOLDIER, kudos to her for stepping up to the 'protection of our rigts',, that soldiers are supposed to be revered for when you join the military, you agree to place your life in the hands and under the command of someone else,, literally, in the circumstance that there is war or battle,,,, ,,easier to understand? cause I used words my six year old would comprehend,,, Can anyone really be so literally misinformed? A soldier makes a commitment to serve their country, it's people, to defend/honor the Constitution and the flag. They are subject to the UCMJ as we are subject to laws. How is serving in the military putting your life in someone elses hands any more so than any normal person living under the laws of any government, civilian or otherwise? please explain that brain fart? I know that when my older brother joined the army he had to sign a contract I think for 4 years that pretty much says he had to be there for that time and if he tried to leave he would go to prison or face some form of punishment. So under that understanding and knowledge I would say you are signing a chunk of your life over to the military branch you sign up for. What I didn't like was finding out that there had been something passed that meant the government could and did actually double the amount of time my brother had to serve. While when he was done he did sign back up for another term. I think it was BS to pass something that made it so you would have to do double the time you agreed to. ty perhaps I should just email you my opinion so you can post it and the topic can continue maturely ,,, 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A troll by any other name....... I don't think troll, she actually believes what she posts. She represents the state of affairs of this country today. And what would that state be, the rights of the individual to entitlements. Unlike us, she is far too young to be retired. She doesn't seem to have the where with all nor intelligence to be independently wealthy so subsistence must come from somewhere. And from the amount of time spent here, it sure isn't from a job so that only leaves one source that I believe has been owned many times in her posts. Now that leads back to the original claim, the state of affairs of this country today. Should the individual be blamed or are there other causes? I believe the root cause lies within the education system that provides no education, just indoctrination. And this is not just here, it is prevalent around the world. This world that now has but two classes: the elitist and the masses that serve them. The free thinking and self serving class is doomed to extinction unless things can be turned around. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not smart if she is truly a soldier but if she is a soldier, kudos to her for doing what so many others never would (signing her life into the hands of someone else) Excuse me, is this really supposed to make sense? Not smart but kudos. And what is with the signing life into hands of others? IF SHE IS A SOLDIER (wearing the uniform isn't proof that you are actually enlisted) , what she did was not smart IF SHE IS A SOLDIER, kudos to her for stepping up to the 'protection of our rigts',, that soldiers are supposed to be revered for when you join the military, you agree to place your life in the hands and under the command of someone else,, literally, in the circumstance that there is war or battle,,,, ,,easier to understand? cause I used words my six year old would comprehend,,, Can anyone really be so literally misinformed? A soldier makes a commitment to serve their country, it's people, to defend/honor the Constitution and the flag. They are subject to the UCMJ as we are subject to laws. How is serving in the military putting your life in someone elses hands any more so than any normal person living under the laws of any government, civilian or otherwise? please explain that brain fart? I know that when my older brother joined the army he had to sign a contract I think for 4 years that pretty much says he had to be there for that time and if he tried to leave he would go to prison or face some form of punishment. So under that understanding and knowledge I would say you are signing a chunk of your life over to the military branch you sign up for. What I didn't like was finding out that there had been something passed that meant the government could and did actually double the amount of time my brother had to serve. While when he was done he did sign back up for another term. I think it was BS to pass something that made it so you would have to do double the time you agreed to. When I joined the USAF I agreed to the 4 year active duty commitment and was told that after my separation I would be on inactive ready reserve for an additional 4 years. I think that is now called individual ready reserve and I am not sure what the amount of time on it is.. If during a time of war I could be called back to active duty regardless if I wanted to or not. That is part of the deal when you join. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US citizens have an 8 year obligation to serve.
Draft, ya serve, I believe, was two years. Enlistment for four. Even discharged vets can be recalled to serve. Eight year obligation. It's a very old law. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlike us,
nuff said I TOTALLY AGREE,, thank goodness,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I know that when my older brother joined the army he had to sign a contract I think for 4 years that pretty much says he had to be there for that time and if he tried to leave he would go to prison or face some form of punishment. So under that understanding and knowledge I would say you are signing a chunk of your life over to the military branch you sign up for. What I didn't like was finding out that there had been something passed that meant the government could and did actually double the amount of time my brother had to serve. While when he was done he did sign back up for another term. I think it was BS to pass something that made it so you would have to do double the time you agreed to. I don't know about anything new because I have never bothered to check as it really don't apply to me. But I can comment of days of old, when the country was still using the draft that you owed 7 years as a part of citizenship (probably one of those privileges bestowed by the 14th Amendment). In the Vietnam era, you were most likely going to be drafted in the Army or Marines for a period of 2 years, but when discharged had an obligation of 5 more years in the reserves and cloud be recalled to active duty if the military desired. But now with all the hidden statutes going on, who knows they amy just claim you until death, the one they cause. |
|
|
|
|
