More spin and BS from the great lawyer making a divine judgement that recording another's conversation without warning and consent does not apply to rich people that the ignorant masses wish to persecute.

And let's not forget those league players, the elite members of the ignorant that has this ability to further the prosperity of mankind by being able to handle some ball. All to keep the truly ignorant masses of dubious worth entertained and paying through the nose for frivolities when most can't even afford basics without it being stolen from others.

But then what can one expect, the entitlement crowd is entitled to those $300 Reeboks as worn by some stupid a$$ playing ball. After all that EBT card looks better with Reeboks.

The world of the privileged, the leaders of the ignorant masses that bestow millions on their privileged. But then if the ignorant masses are kept entertained, they will have no excuse to gain knowledge, after all, how much knowledge does one need to spend entitlement funds?

"I've come to realize that the biggest problem anywhere in the world is that people's perceptions of reality are compulsively filtered through the screening mesh of what they want, and do not want, to be true." - Travis Walton

Truth is universal, it exists for those searching for it. It does not remain occulted for those wanting to be enlightened. It is only those desiring to remain ignorant, the refusal of the truth, that it does not manifest itself.



Romans 2:1
"You, therefore, have no excuse, you who pass judgment on someone else, for at whatever point you judge another, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things."

But it is the ignorant masses that pass judgement, not against an immoral act, but against those they deem necessary for such an act to regarded as immoral, a very small percentage of those actually committing such acts. It is not used to condemn the immorality of the act, but to condemn a person the ignorant masses believe should be reduced in their eyes to below their level.



The ignorant spend so much time elevating those not worthy of praise to lofty levels and then decry the morality of that same man when they are just being the same person. So who really is the guilty party? The man of transgressions that finally is exposed or the ignorant that declared that person as their representative? I would say not the man of transgressions as nothing has changed there, his immoral acts are no different that those represented. The whole affair is but the ignorant masses showing displeasure not in the act but that the rumors have now been proven true, a disillusionment on the sanity of immoral acts.



Only to those seeking the truth, otherwise there is just the ignorant masses refusing to accept truth, but always willing to condemn or defend, truth or not.

The dynamic of CARE, what we care about on a day-to-day basis acts as a driving force of our thoughts and actions. Therefore, care can be seen as the ultimate generator of the quality of our experience. This principle was often referred to as the generative principle, the word generating is derived from the Latin verb genere, which means "to create".

What we care enough about to put our will behind is ultimately what gets created in the world. The world is the way that it is because most people do not care enough (even if they SAY they want things to be different) to change it through their actions.

To ignore, remaining ignorant, is just how this world has arrived at this point in history. It is reminiscent that what happens in the microcosm happens in the macrocosm, one just being the reflection of the other.

Ada hominem does not apply unless there is a fallacy and the truth can never be deemed a fallacy.

I was responding to a fallacy.

Are you in the wrong thread, I haven't seen any fallacy related to yourself in this one.