2 Next
Topic: alright say... you are having a personal
no photo
Thu 08/21/14 09:53 AM
do you believe it is healthy to see that person every waking minute ...?

If you are "healthy," the relationship is "healthy," the level of communication is "healthy," then it doesn't matter if you see that person every waking minute or not.

Otherwise in practical reality this situation seems like it would only arise in 1 of 2 ways.
1. A change. From not being around that person every waking minute, to every waking minute. This would indicate something may not be healthy and communication wasn't all that healthy, requiring behavioral change to make up for it as a means of communication.

2. A change. From being around them constantly, to not being around them constantly, and maybe (or not) back to constantly, forcing someone to notice and qualify the other person as being around them "every waking minute," which brings doubt to the relationship highlighting a potential "unhealthy" area.

Otherwise you are asking from a 3rd person observer perspective.
And what may not be healthy for you doesn't mean it's not healthy for someone else.
Which makes any universal answer of what is "healthy" meaningless for you to apply to your own life in any practical way, and simply turns you into an a-hole if you try to apply your judgment to the relationships of other people.

would you wish to be with them constantly around the house or work together come home together...?

I don't understand the limits of what you are asking.
Is one person taking a dump and holding a flashlight while the other is describing the turd before it's time to switch?

That's what "constantly" implies.

Rather than just one watching t.v. in the living room while the other one does whatever they are doing, they are "together," but doing their own ****?

no photo
Thu 08/21/14 11:43 AM
I think the optimum situation is one where you could stand being around someone all day, but you both have separate interests and callings.

Usually, I definitely would never advise just being with one person all the time. As was said before as a reply, 'familiarity breeds contempt'.

Beachfarmer's photo
Thu 08/21/14 12:00 PM


Sorry...not fluent in Wisconsonese.


You need to learn it then.
bigsmile

I think I may.

bashajones's photo
Thu 08/21/14 12:53 PM



Sorry...not fluent in Wisconsonese.


You need to learn it then.
bigsmile

I think I may.


Need a tutor?

Beachfarmer's photo
Thu 08/21/14 12:59 PM
I'd love one!!!!.....blushing even though I toot pretty well myself.

mysticalview21's photo
Thu 08/21/14 02:01 PM
Edited by mysticalview21 on Thu 08/21/14 02:03 PM


would you wish to be with them constantly around the house or work together come home together...?

I don't understand the limits of what you are asking.
Is one person taking a dump and holding a flashlight while the other is describing the turd before it's time to switch?

That's what "constantly" implies.

Rather than just one watching t.v. in the living room while the other one does whatever they are doing, they are "together," but doing their own ****? right... same day end... day out ...



not holding the flash light for each other lol
1 ... always with them 24/7 same space ->house ...
2... always living together and working together all the time ... go to work with them ...come home with them.. doing almost everything together ...

I agree sometimes long ago couples would be together always especially if they worked a farm ... one example ...









faitzz's photo
Fri 08/22/14 05:08 AM
:)

2 Next