100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: guys vs girls - part 111 | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
no david if someone makes a mistake and the count is off it goes to the other side, you cant change that. Change that? Since when has such a rule been in place? On several occasions, a new male participant mistakenly counted upward, and a female participant corrected the count by making the male's count a downward count. Since Part 1 of this game is no longer available, I can't tell who started this game and established the rules. Does anyone know who started this game, and is that person still playing? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can anyone else here confirm the existence of the rule that michele63 talked about earlier? I can't find any evidence of its existence outside of her posts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nope^^^^
659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nope^^^^ 659 So, is the rule that michele63 talked about earlier not real? 658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it doesn't make sense to me....we have always corrected it before....why change now.....newbies need to learn the game and sometimes posts happen at the same time...so the number count needs to be corrected.....seems fair to me....
659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it doesn't make sense to me....we have always corrected it before....why change now.....newbies need to learn the game and sometimes posts happen at the same time...so the number count needs to be corrected.....seems fair to me.... 659 Well, it is too late this time to undo the result of that pseudo-rule. 658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
|
