100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Carson Aide :Truth Bomb Sharpton At Gathering | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
In the 2008 campaign cycle, Hilary Clinton frequently played on the race and "perceived" religion of her opponent. Referring to him as, "Obama bin Laden". A "Bagger Vance" reference, or two And, at least one known reference to "Sambo". strange,that with all this,and the known Fact how LBJ and his Party tried to derail the Civil-Rights Legislation,African Americans are still clinging to that Party! Then their Leader talking about "Bitter Clingers"! 
When Lyndon Baines Johnson was preparing to sign the civil rights bill into law, his exact words were, "Signin' this here document, will lock down the (insert racial slur here) vote for the democratic party, for the next 200 years!" That speech was televised at the time! I've seen the clip of the footage, only twice in my lifetime. Johnson was smiling when he made that speech, as he said those words. when democrats had a stronghold on the rebel states much has changed,, this isn't lyndons times,,,  Define ' Rebel States ' 
ie... confederate states The 13 states that made up the Confederate States of America were North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, Texas, Florida, Virginia, Tennessee, Arkansas, Kentucky and Missouri. Kentucky and Missouri never officially seceded from the Union. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Fri 04/15/16 10:16 PM
|
|
http://www.factcheck.org/2008/04/blacks-and-the-democratic-party/ Since 1964 republicans haven't gotten more than 15% of the black vote in a presidential election. Since 1964 blacks have overwhelmingly voted for and identified as democrats. Keep spinning. SMH spin is insisting that correlation and causation are the same goldwater, Nixon, Nixon, Ford,Reagan, Reagan, bush,dole, bush, bush, McCain, Romney considering the options,,,, voting the better candidate had everything to do with the individual and little with the party Yeah sure it has everything to do with the individual and not the parties......Howard Stern's interview of people in Harlem showed that wasn't the case with the INDIVIDUALS he interviewed who had NO idea about the platforms of the candidates. You won't accept FACTS even when the facts definitively prove your premise is wrong. Now you are spinning away from the original discussion which was the correlation of the black vote and which party they vote for. You are the one trying to spin the discussion, as you always do when you are proven wrong, and inserting the causation of the vote. You are also saying that the reason most blacks vote democratic is because the Democrat is "better candidate" which is subjective, not definitive. Elections results show that the Democrat wasn't the better candidate among those you listed. well, if some people that Stern interviewed were clueless, that's proof that the black demographic is too  
I didn't at all deny a correlation , I denied that it is evidence of blind party loyalty,,,, blacks vote in many other elections comparatively to anyone else based upon political philosophy, not party the candidate that supports their political priorities will be elected when there are only 2 candidates, at the end of the day,,,its not rocket science to know they will work to forward the party platforms,, which either do or don't line up with voters priorities and the CANDIDATE whose focus lines with the voters priorities will get the vote REGARDLESS of party affiliation if not, you would have to believe trump would be able to run and win support of democrats if running under democratic ticket and Hilary would run and win support of republicans if running republican which, to me, is a ridiculous and insane assumption there is nothing definitive in politics and voting except people of all races have political priorities and vote for the CANDIDATE who shares those priorities prior to the sixties that may have been the republicans,, but as their platform of priorities shifted, so did their demographic support at least at the level of the highest position in the land the 'better' candidate at that level is the one whose campaign priorities connect with the voters,, plain and simple |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the 'better' candidate at that level is the one whose campaign priorities connect with the voters,, plain and simple
NO. The better candidate wants what is best for the entire nation, & it's citizens, in the present & future. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.factcheck.org/2008/04/blacks-and-the-democratic-party/ Since 1964 republicans haven't gotten more than 15% of the black vote in a presidential election. Since 1964 blacks have overwhelmingly voted for and identified as democrats. Keep spinning. SMH spin is insisting that correlation and causation are the same goldwater, Nixon, Nixon, Ford,Reagan, Reagan, bush,dole, bush, bush, McCain, Romney considering the options,,,, voting the better candidate had everything to do with the individual and little with the party Yeah sure it has everything to do with the individual and not the parties......Howard Stern's interview of people in Harlem showed that wasn't the case with the INDIVIDUALS he interviewed who had NO idea about the platforms of the candidates. You won't accept FACTS even when the facts definitively prove your premise is wrong. Now you are spinning away from the original discussion which was the correlation of the black vote and which party they vote for. You are the one trying to spin the discussion, as you always do when you are proven wrong, and inserting the causation of the vote. You are also saying that the reason most blacks vote democratic is because the Democrat is "better candidate" which is subjective, not definitive. Elections results show that the Democrat wasn't the better candidate among those you listed. well, if some people that Stern interviewed were clueless, that's proof that the black demographic is too
I didn't at all deny a correlation , I denied that it is evidence of blind party loyalty,,,, blacks vote in many other elections comparatively to anyone else based upon political philosophy, not party the candidate that supports their political priorities will be elected when there are only 2 candidates, at the end of the day,,,its not rocket science to know they will work to forward the party platforms,, which either do or don't line up with voters priorities and the CANDIDATE whose focus lines with the voters priorities will get the vote REGARDLESS of party affiliation if not, you would have to believe trump would be able to run and win support of democrats if running under democratic ticket and Hilary would run and win support of republicans if running republican which, to me, is a ridiculous and insane assumption there is nothing definitive in politics and voting except people of all races have political priorities and vote for the CANDIDATE who shares those priorities prior to the sixties that may have been the republicans,, but as their platform of priorities shifted, so did their demographic support at least at the level of the highest position in the land the 'better' candidate at that level is the one whose campaign priorities connect with the voters,, plain and simple You called it RHETORIC that black people vote primarily for Democrats. That was denying there is a correlation between the Democrats and the black vote. I said statistics show that they do vote primarily for Democrats. You said you wanted to see those statistics. I posted a link showing those statistics and that showed the party loyalty of the black voting block by how they SELF identified as Democrat. You appear to dislike the FACTS that showed your premise that it was just rhetoric so you chose to ignore the truth and start spinning to drive the conversation in another direction....which is to be expected with you since it's your MO. You can ride your merry-go-round and keep spinning. I proved my point, which was that it isn't rhetoric that blacks vote primarily for Democrats. END OF REPORT. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LBJ was prophetic,albeit crude!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.factcheck.org/2008/04/blacks-and-the-democratic-party/ Since 1964 republicans haven't gotten more than 15% of the black vote in a presidential election. Since 1964 blacks have overwhelmingly voted for and identified as democrats. Keep spinning. SMH spin is insisting that correlation and causation are the same goldwater, Nixon, Nixon, Ford,Reagan, Reagan, bush,dole, bush, bush, McCain, Romney considering the options,,,, voting the better candidate had everything to do with the individual and little with the party Yeah sure it has everything to do with the individual and not the parties......Howard Stern's interview of people in Harlem showed that wasn't the case with the INDIVIDUALS he interviewed who had NO idea about the platforms of the candidates. You won't accept FACTS even when the facts definitively prove your premise is wrong. Now you are spinning away from the original discussion which was the correlation of the black vote and which party they vote for. You are the one trying to spin the discussion, as you always do when you are proven wrong, and inserting the causation of the vote. You are also saying that the reason most blacks vote democratic is because the Democrat is "better candidate" which is subjective, not definitive. Elections results show that the Democrat wasn't the better candidate among those you listed. well, if some people that Stern interviewed were clueless, that's proof that the black demographic is too
I didn't at all deny a correlation , I denied that it is evidence of blind party loyalty,,,, blacks vote in many other elections comparatively to anyone else based upon political philosophy, not party the candidate that supports their political priorities will be elected when there are only 2 candidates, at the end of the day,,,its not rocket science to know they will work to forward the party platforms,, which either do or don't line up with voters priorities and the CANDIDATE whose focus lines with the voters priorities will get the vote REGARDLESS of party affiliation if not, you would have to believe trump would be able to run and win support of democrats if running under democratic ticket and Hilary would run and win support of republicans if running republican which, to me, is a ridiculous and insane assumption there is nothing definitive in politics and voting except people of all races have political priorities and vote for the CANDIDATE who shares those priorities prior to the sixties that may have been the republicans,, but as their platform of priorities shifted, so did their demographic support at least at the level of the highest position in the land the 'better' candidate at that level is the one whose campaign priorities connect with the voters,, plain and simple You called it RHETORIC that black people vote primarily for Democrats. That was denying there is a correlation between the Democrats and the black vote. I said statistics show that they do vote primarily for Democrats. You said you wanted to see those statistics. I posted a link showing those statistics and that showed the party loyalty of the black voting block by how they SELF identified as Democrat. You appear to dislike the FACTS that showed your premise that it was just rhetoric so you chose to ignore the truth and start spinning to drive the conversation in another direction....which is to be expected with you since it's your MO. You can ride your merry-go-round and keep spinning. I proved my point, which was that it isn't rhetoric that blacks vote primarily for Democrats. END OF REPORT. rubbish, no matter how many times you repeat it there are many more elections than presidential , in the presidential elections,, blacks, like everyone else, vote the CANDIDATE,, not the party no spin people in my area go to the mcdonalds in this area,, but not blindly if the mcdonalds closed, they would then be going to the next nearest mcdonalds political philosophy is like that mcdonalds,, people aren't choosing blindly, people are choosing based on how that mcdonalds fits their geography to tell black folks to have the candidate earn their vote, is a condescending assumption that they are not doing so already to use the argument that they have been voting the democratic candidate only because of the party they belong to,, is nonsense as I said before, people who believe such nonsense, therefore have to believe if Clinton suddenly ran republican and trump ran democrat,, he would blindly get the support of minorities such a leap of logic is insane,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blacks vote for democrats for one reason... they get more free stuff from Democrats... plain and simple of course our in house NAN rep will disagree with this, but what else could that person actually do.. but disagree. yes, what else could someone who is actually a member of said group do but disagree with a condescending and false stereotype,,,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blacks vote for democrats for one reason... they get more free stuff from Democrats... plain and simple of course our in house NAN rep will disagree with this, but what else could that person actually do.. but disagree. yes, what else could someone who is actually a member of said group do but disagree with a condescending and false stereotype,,,
------------ It is NOT condescending or a false stereotype if it true. It is your ' victimization ' voice talking. Examples: It use to be... Perhaps still is... Most doctors are Republican Most lawyers are Democract Most Jews are Demonstrat Most middle class & above whites are Protestant & Republican. NO ONE was or is offended However.. You posted out here 2-3 times that Trump supporters are mostly ' White, middle class, uneducated, blue collar, racist men' NOW that is insulting, raciest, stereotyping, & a also a lie. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blacks vote for democrats for one reason... they get more free stuff from Democrats... plain and simple of course our in house NAN rep will disagree with this, but what else could that person actually do.. but disagree. yes, what else could someone who is actually a member of said group do but disagree with a condescending and false stereotype,,,
------------ It is NOT condescending or a false stereotype if it true. It is your ' victimization ' voice talking. Examples: It use to be... Perhaps still is... Most doctors are Republican Most lawyers are Democract Most Jews are Demonstrat Most middle class & above whites are Protestant & Republican. NO ONE was or is offended However.. You posted out here 2-3 times that Trump supporters are mostly ' White, middle class, uneducated, blue collar, racist men' NOW that is insulting, raciest, stereotyping, & a also a lie.
and being that it is not true,, it is condescending and a false stereotype the statement had nothing to do with demographic statistics the statement was that there was 'one and only one reason' a false and condescending stereotype where are the studies saying blacks only vote because of free stuff? I have posted several sources with polls and studies of the racial demographics, educational demographic, financial,and occupational demographics(all measurable and documented) nothing offensive in any of it and based upon measurable standards something totally different than basically saying people are just wanting free stuff |
|
|
|
|
