100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Flat Earth | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Still waiting for a photo of 'the edge' and stories of happens to people who 'fall off'. Curious that the media have never, ever, produced any such picture or story!  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What makes you think there is an edge?...
Do you believe that space is infinite? Well, I'm here to tell you that there is no such thing as space... Earth is Infinite and there are many lands beyond the so called poles that you are not allowed to explore... you are on a need to know basis and that is why you are kept on an imaginary finite ball ... a 'prison' planet ONLY Secret Society Military personell 'pretend to go to space.. and keep you watching Star Trek, and other Hollywood productions. There has never been one single authentic photograph of Earth from space, or in it's totality. Go ahead and try to find one... verify it's authenticity by running it through a photo forensic program ... you will discover they are ALL CGI and paintings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have lived by the ocean all of my life. I don't need to watch t.v. or read books to know the Earth is not flat.
I have been on the water myself, in my own boat, to the same points where I saw ships begin shrinking on the horizon. I have seen the land shrink on the horizon. All I need is binoculars or a telescope, and I can measure the change. From that change, I can use my own math to calculate the curve of the Earth. This is how I can observably prove that the science we are taught is correct. 'Nuff said. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm amused at your non ability to think for yourselves
to do any real research... but I do realize that you are preoccupied with your BALLS ... foot balls, basket balls, golf balls, globes, and ...'y'no ... yer balls I'm seeking an intelligent being who knows what real science is... not theories, not speculation but physics... water always seeks level.. and the Earth is allegedly 70% covered with water. Gyroscopes, compasses, periscopes, sundials, and lighthouses can ONLY work on a flat plane Look at the old raised relief flat topographical maps and lay one down flat pour water on it and it will seek level ... next pour water on a spinning globe.. it will fly off |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A quote from the flat earth society: Is flat earth theory connected to a religion? Flat earth theory is neither officially nor unofficially associated with any religion. Throughout the ages various religious institutions have championed a flat earth model for the world. Unfortunately this leaves us with the vestigial thought that flat earth theory and religions are symbiotic. They are not, even though many religions today, both mainstream and otherwise, still teach its followers that the world is flat. While they are not incorrect, believing in a flat earth isn't contingent upon believing in a deity or being a part of any religion. real Flat Earthers dont follow the Flat Earth Society... that is what is known as controlled opposition.. they do not represent what we have studied and tested and proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A quote from the flat earth society: Is flat earth theory connected to a religion? Flat earth theory is neither officially nor unofficially associated with any religion. Throughout the ages various religious institutions have championed a flat earth model for the world. Unfortunately this leaves us with the vestigial thought that flat earth theory and religions are symbiotic. They are not, even though many religions today, both mainstream and otherwise, still teach its followers that the world is flat. While they are not incorrect, believing in a flat earth isn't contingent upon believing in a deity or being a part of any religion. real Flat Earthers dont follow the Flat Earth Society... that is what is known as controlled opposition.. they do not represent what we have studied and tested and proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please provide proof.
Not links. Not books. Not youtube videos. But your own proof. From you. Nobody else. Provide a thorough logical analysis, using the laws of logic. Don't show us name-calling or subjective assumptions about people you don't even know. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please provide proof. Not links. Not books. Not youtube videos. But your own proof. From you. Nobody else. Provide a thorough logical analysis, using the laws of logic. Don't show us name-calling or subjective assumptions about people you don't even know. it's common sense... pure simple physics.. observable testable and repeatable I have posted plenty of leads for you to vet out... now get busy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To everyone who is trying to say that YouTube is not credible and cannot be used.
It's literally ridiculous I have to explain this to you.... YOUTUBE IS NOT A SOURCE. It is simply a medium in which is used to transfer and spread information. A source is the actual content that is contained in the material and where it came from including authors. You can also find sources listed in the description below the video. ....lol there are not little elves sitting in the back of a sweat shop recording videos for YouTube. If the source is valid then YES THE YOUTUBE VIDEO IS A GREAT WAY TO SHOW OTHERS YOUR PERSPECTIVE AND GIVE THEM VISUALS and YES it is VALID. ....... And the same thing applies to MEMES which are simply pictures with words as a description. If you've ever read a book you will find the same exact structure words and pictures. Visual aids are extremely helpful with comprehension. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You need to get away from your computer more and quit diving down those deep dark rabbit hole
 You must have hit your head on the way down one  Get on a plane and take a trip then tell me the earth is flat. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Earthica
on
Sun 04/07/19 03:29 PM
|
|
You need to get away from your computer more and quit diving down those deep dark rabbit hole You must have hit your head on the way down one Get on a plane and take a trip then tell me the earth is flat. High altitude baloons at 120thousand feet record 360 degree footage completely level.... curvature has never been seen from any elevation... and the only photos that show curvature are with a fish eye lens ... nice try.. but you're delusional Next time you are on a plane.. look out the windows on BOTH sides and you will quickly realize that the horizon is at eye LEVEL ... if you were on a ball the horizon would fall away from you in all directions.. but it doesnt .. it remains at your eye LEVEL no matter how high you ascend.. learn about physics bro If you THINK you see curvature it is because the windows are slightly convex to follow the hull of the plane... plus they are designed with multiple panes... watch a few videos and you will see that the same curvature that you THINK you see up in the air.. you will also see on the ground before the plane even takes off... lmao! Man you people are slow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please provide proof. Not links. Not books. Not youtube videos. But your own proof. From you. Nobody else. Provide a thorough logical analysis, using the laws of logic. Don't show us name-calling or subjective assumptions about people you don't even know. it's common sense... pure simple physics.. observable testable and repeatable I have posted plenty of leads for you to vet out... now get busy And you completely dodged the request. How utterly predictable. The only conclusion to be drawn from this is that YOU have no PERSONAL proof or observations. Only the "hearsay" of others. I'm sorry, but the BURDEN OF EVIDENCE falls upon you, not us. You are the one trying to change common belief. You say it's so obvious and easy, yet you have furnished NONE OF YOUR OWN PROOF. Typical brainwashing tactics. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
‘This report derives and defines a set of linearized system matrices for a rigid aircraft of constant mass, flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat, nonrotating earth.’
Here is another government document, this time from the FAA, entitled … that makes a Flat Earth reference. On page 32, It states … So in other words, for all intents and purposes, unless you are traveling at above Mach 3, or intend to travel into low Earth orbit or higher, then you should just consider the earth to be flat. But if the Earth was truly curved then this would not work. For example if you were flying from Sydney, on the east coast of Australia to Perth in Western Australia you would have to travel a distance of 2034 miles. The alleged Earth curvature over that distance should be 522.37 miles. That means that unless the pilot constantly dipped the nose of the plane down towards the ground as he flew, by the time he reached Perth he would be flying at an altitude of 522.37 miles or 2,758,113 feet higher than he should be! This fact alone proves the EARTH IS FLAT! You can download the document directly from the FAA here. https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ang/offices/tc/about/campus/faa_host/labs/tgf/media/AircraftDynamicsModel.pdf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Earthica
on
Sun 04/07/19 03:47 PM
|
|
I suggest you read all of my posts here before you keep repeating the same things that have already been addressed
no one is claiming there is an edge... where did you get that idea? The Earth does not move... the sky does everything thing you see in the sky is part of earth... not the other way around the sun and moon are not millions of miles away... they are exactly where they appear to be... close and local... look at how shadows behave... there are hundreds of real observations and tests you can do ships do not disappear over any imaginary curve... get a telescope... wait for the ship to disappear beyond your line of sight convergence... then zoom in on it.. it will come back into view, HULL AND ALL (depending on visibility clarity why cant we see Hawaii from California?... lmao you cant see to the end of a long hallway... learn about perspective and how the eyes work before you get your foot stuck in your throat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeez
 . I want me somma what you been smokin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please provide proof. Not links. Not books. Not youtube videos. But your own proof. From you. Nobody else. Provide a thorough logical analysis, using the laws of logic. Don't show us name-calling or subjective assumptions about people you don't even know. it's common sense... pure simple physics.. observable testable and repeatable I have posted plenty of leads for you to vet out... now get busy And you completely dodged the request. How utterly predictable. The only conclusion to be drawn from this is that YOU have no PERSONAL proof or observations. Only the "hearsay" of others. I'm sorry, but the BURDEN OF EVIDENCE falls upon you, not us. You are the one trying to change common belief. You say it's so obvious and easy, yet you have furnished NONE OF YOUR OWN PROOF. Typical brainwashing tactics. the onus of proof is on the one making the claim... not the one denying it get your facts straight |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you beLIEve you live on a globe... then get the money
"$10,000(TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS) CASH, WILL BE awarded to ANYONE who can provide ONE piece of FACTUAL and IRREFUTABLE evidence to support two things. A). The CURVATURE of the alleged spinning ball earth B). The MOTION of the alleged spinning ball earth" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4OGSbaQ5jI&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR3qAQ8GsX759UpmJqsXs1JLtC7ADEqGLCw2m6Uo3S_ZE_CUbgYlldSZ8pA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
‘This report derives and defines a set of linearized system matrices for a rigid aircraft of constant mass, flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat, nonrotating earth.’ Here is another government document, this time from the FAA, entitled … that makes a Flat Earth reference. On page 32, It states … So in other words, for all intents and purposes, unless you are traveling at above Mach 3, or intend to travel into low Earth orbit or higher, then you should just consider the earth to be flat. But if the Earth was truly curved then this would not work. For example if you were flying from Sydney, on the east coast of Australia to Perth in Western Australia you would have to travel a distance of 2034 miles. The alleged Earth curvature over that distance should be 522.37 miles. That means that unless the pilot constantly dipped the nose of the plane down towards the ground as he flew, by the time he reached Perth he would be flying at an altitude of 522.37 miles or 2,758,113 feet higher than he should be! This fact alone proves the EARTH IS FLAT! You can download the document directly from the FAA here. https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ang/offices/tc/about/campus/faa_host/labs/tgf/media/AircraftDynamicsModel.pdf  Not even close to what that report is saying. Anything under Mach 3 cannot escape gravity, and therefore effectively follows a linear trajectory because they fly at a specific cruising altitude. Meanwhile, craft that can achieve sub-orbital, orbital, or even escape velocities follow a ballistic trajectory like ICBMs, rockets, or the space shuttle. Back in the 1980s, Lockheed was developing a ballistic airliner that could go from NYC to LA in 45 minutes. Why would they waste billions of dollars in R&D if they were privy to proof of a Flat Earth? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
hardBNhard
on
Sun 04/07/19 04:16 PM
|
|
What i want to know is if the world is flat(un-plausible)
How thick is the core ? And why do volcanoes errupt up instead of burning it way out the bottom ? Dont get me started on tectonic plates and there movements . Can you explain that genius ? Now gimme my 10 grand 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
‘This report derives and defines a set of linearized system matrices for a rigid aircraft of constant mass, flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat, nonrotating earth.’ Here is another government document, this time from the FAA, entitled … that makes a Flat Earth reference. On page 32, It states … So in other words, for all intents and purposes, unless you are traveling at above Mach 3, or intend to travel into low Earth orbit or higher, then you should just consider the earth to be flat. But if the Earth was truly curved then this would not work. For example if you were flying from Sydney, on the east coast of Australia to Perth in Western Australia you would have to travel a distance of 2034 miles. The alleged Earth curvature over that distance should be 522.37 miles. That means that unless the pilot constantly dipped the nose of the plane down towards the ground as he flew, by the time he reached Perth he would be flying at an altitude of 522.37 miles or 2,758,113 feet higher than he should be! This fact alone proves the EARTH IS FLAT! You can download the document directly from the FAA here. https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ang/offices/tc/about/campus/faa_host/labs/tgf/media/AircraftDynamicsModel.pdf Not even close to what that report is saying. Anything under Mach 3 cannot escape gravity, and therefore effectively follows a linear trajectory because they fly at a specific cruising altitude. Meanwhile, craft that can achieve sub-orbital, orbital, or even escape velocities follow a ballistic trajectory like ICBMs, rockets, or the space shuttle. Back in the 1980s, Lockheed was developing a ballistic airliner that could go from NYC to LA in 45 minutes. Why would they waste billions of dollars in R&D if they were privy to proof of a Flat Earth? You would do well to learn the word, "allegedly" your so called authorities have an agenda the Earth is way bigger and has endless resources and lands that are hidden from you ... you are on a need to know basis According to Admiral Byrd who has explored the north and south poles "There is an Area As Big As The United States on the Other Side of the South Pole" (dont believe me?... you can hear him say it yourself in a 1950's interview) Here's a photo of him from that interview, sitting in front of a Flat Earth map https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Finfoclinic.co.za%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F01%2FCaptain-Bird-FE-MAP-BACK-GROUND.jpg&f=1 and here's yer girlfriend https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.pinimg.com%2F736x%2F1d%2Fe4%2F2d%2F1de42da7dd2c5a3ef699adc281e0cb12--flat-earth-proof-globe-earth.jpg&f=1 |
|
|
|
|
