1 2 9 10 11 13 15 16 17 24 25
Topic: 911 truth movement
madisonman's photo
Fri 01/11/08 12:35 PM
Edited by madisonman on Fri 01/11/08 01:07 PM

Guitarjizzard...
I think you and madisonman are working in shifts to keep this thread alive. I'll leave it now so it may die.
how many times have you said thatnoway

madisonman's photo
Sat 01/12/08 02:01 AM
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6529813972926262623

madisonman's photo
Sun 01/13/08 05:10 PM
Japanese Senator Questions 9/11
By Alan Miller

On January 11th 2008, Fujita Yukihisa made a 30 minute presentation at the House of Councillors (equivalent to the U.S. Senate). He directly questioned the official version of 9/11 in a session with Japanese Prime Minister Fukuda Yasuo and members of his Cabinet.

Fujita is a member of the opposition party, Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ). He was elected to the House of Councillors in 2007. He is a former Member of the House of Representative and Former Vice Director General of the International Department of the Democratic Party of Japan.

Fujita emphasized that there was never an official police investigation into the deaths of the 24 Japanese citizens who were killed on 9/11.

He stated that many in the US doubt the official version of 9/11 and numerous individuals have collected evidence that contradicts the government's version, which can be seen on many websites.

During his speech, an aide showed several larges photos of:
- the Pentagon entry and exit hole and a scale overlay of a 757
- the flight path towards the Pentagon
- the WTC Twin Towers exploding
- the WTC 7 collapse
- the early announcment of the collapse of WTC 7 by the BBC and CBS

He demanded further investigation of 9/11.

http://www.911blogger.com/node/13354

no photo
Mon 01/14/08 01:48 PM
Bush is Satan on Earthdevil

mnhiker's photo
Mon 01/14/08 06:20 PM
No, he's just Mephistopheles.

You must be thinking of Cheney. :tongue:

smo's photo
Mon 01/14/08 07:29 PM
EX-ItalianPresident:Intel Agencies Know 9/11 An Inside Job . Man Who Blew The Whistle on Gladio Tells Italy's Largest Newspaper Attacks Were Run by CIA,Mossad .by Paul Joseph Watson, Dec 4 ,2007 ""and that this was common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies"

mnhiker's photo
Mon 01/14/08 07:31 PM
There should be a
separate forum
for conspiracy
theories. ohwell

madisonman's photo
Tue 01/15/08 02:07 PM

There should be a
separate forum
for conspiracy
theories. ohwell
that label is a brain freeze...do you realy buy into the official version of 911 totaly? to have doubts doesnt make you a conspiracy theorist...our government has lied alot to the american people I can give you many examples but the 911 truthers are a huge we dont believe every theory out there but the japanes parliment recently had issues with it as well ....................................................Below is a transcript of testimony in the Japanese Parliament that was broadcast live nationwide on NHK television. The Member of Parliament talking about 911 is Yukihisa Fujita from the Democratic Party of Japan. After the testimony Mr. Fujita says he got lots of phone calls from other members of Parliament thanking him for having the bravery to bring up 911 in Parliament. He also got one death threat.

Meanwhile, I asked the Foreign Correspondents Club of Japan to invite him for a press conference. Each of several attempts to send an e-mail to the FCCJ about this resulting in my hotmail account freezing and my computer crashing. Also, it was amazing to watch the shameless verbal acrobatics of American corporate journalists trying to prevent this press conference from taking place. Fortunately, journalists from the rest of the world supported a press conference and we will try to get it to take place as soon as possible.

The secret government's control of Japan is falling apart. A few weeks ago one of Japan's leading commercial TV networks also broadcast a 911 truth program during prime time. One other national network and several local networks have also broadcast such programs.

The people of Japan do not want to finance genocidal mass murderers any more///

Head of the committee: We will now begin the first session of the defense and foreign affairs committee.

We will now start discussing the special anti-terror law. .We now call on Mr. Yukihisa Fujita

Fujita standing in front of microphone: .

This will be the last televised broadcast of this committee for so I would like to talk about the origin of the war on terrorism which was the attacks of 911. On September 11 of 2002 I went to a theater house for a charity concert to help build a school in Afghanistan. They chose to have the charity concert on that day as a gesture of respect for the dead. Normally 911 commemorative events are for the people who died in New York but the people who held this event decided that more innocent people died as a result of 911 in Afghanistan than in New York. So they built a grade school near where the statue of Buddha was destroyed in Bamiyan. The name of the school is "the school of hope." They also lit candles to commemorate the dead both in Afghanistan and in New York in the year 2002, one year after the attacks. So, when discussing these anti-terror laws we should ask ourselves, what was 911, what is terrorism? So today, I would like to talk about the beginning of the war on terror.

So, I would like to ask the people who call this law an anti-terror law to realize that the biggest victim of the war on terrorism has been Afghanistan so I believe helping the people of Afghanistan should be our biggest priority. I would like to ask Mr. Inuzuka about this.


Tadashi Inuzuka walking to the microphone:
As Mr. Fujita says the main purpose of this law is to provide peace and security to Afghanistan. And, as he says, the biggest sufferers have been the people of Afghanistan. Afghanistan has 1.7 times the land area of Japan and 20 some million people live there. Also, because of a drought on the Eurasian continent close to 5 million have died due to water shortages. Even now 1 million people live close to the main battlegrounds. So, the main purpose is to provide stability to those war zones so in that context what should Japan do? However, instead of providing support by providing fuel to the U.S. forces we at the Democratic Party have decided that providing water is more important. The philosophy behind our anti-terror law is to get the ruling party to help deal with this problem.

Head of the committee: Mr. Fujita

Mr. Fujita:

I would like to talk about the origins of this war on terrorism. You may recall that in November I asked you if terrorism was war or if it was a crime. And the whole start of this war on terrorism was 911. What I want to know is if this event was caused by Al Qaeda or not. So far the only thing the government has said is that we think it was caused by Al Qaeda because President Bush told us so. We have not seen any real proof that it was Al Qaeda. I would like to know why the Prime Minister thinks it was the Taliban who was responsible for 911. Committee Chief, I want to ask the Prime Minister because he was chief cabinet officer at the time.


Prime Minister Fukuda:

Since the attacks we have communicated with the U.S. government and other governments at different levels and exchanged information. According to secret information obtained by our government and reports put together by foreign governments the 911 attacks were carried out by the international terrorist organization known as Al Qaeda.

Mr. Fujita:

So, you are talking about both secret and disclosed information. My question is has the Japanese government carried out its own investigation using the police and other resources? It is a crime so surely an investigation needs to be carried out. When a Japanese journalist was shot in Myanmar you carried out an investigation. In the same way over 20 Japanese people died on 911 so surely the government carried out its own investigation and decided that Al Qaeda was responsible. So, what kind of investigation did you carry out? At the time you were Chief Cabinet Secretary so surely you would know better than anybody so I want to ask you about your investigation.

Prime Minister Fukuda:

After the 911 attacks the National Police Agency sent an emergency anti-terror team to New York. They met with U.S. government officials and gathered information about missing Japanese.

Mr. Fujita:

So you are saying over 20 people died as a result of a crime and most of those people were working in New York. Also there were some Japanese who died in the four airplanes that were hijacked. I would like to know exactly how many people died in the buildings and how many died in the airplanes. I also want to know how you confirmed this. I would like the Foreign Minister to answer for me.

Foreign Minister Masahiko Komura standing at right in front of microphone:

We found the bodies of over a dozen Japanese following the simultaneous terror attacks carried out on September 11 2001. We were also informed about the death of 11 more people by the U.S. authorities. In total 24 Japanese died in those attacks. Of those 2 were in the airplanes.

Mr. Fujita:

I would like to ask what flights the two Japanese who died in the airplanes were on and how you determined who they were. If the foreign minister does not know it is OK to get a bureaucrat to answer:

Foreign Ministry division chief Ryoji Tanizaki:

Since this a question of fact, I will answer. As the Foreign Minister said, of the 24 people who died two were on the airplanes. One of them was on United Flight 93 and the other was on American airlines flight 11.As for how we know this, well I do not have the information in front of me but we were told by U.S. authorities and, in general, they use DNA testing. So we believe that is how we know about those two people.

Mr. Fujita:

So you are saying you do not know because you do not have the documents. Also, you say you believe there was DNA testing but you do not know. So what I want to say today is that this was a crime and crimes are supposed to be investigated. So the government needs to inform the victims families of the results of their investigation. Also, instead of just observing the anniversary of 911 every year you must be gathering information and reacting to it. So, during the past six years have you been supplying the families of the deceased with information? I would like to ask the Foreign Minister to answer.

Foreign Minister Masahiko Komura:

So you do not want to ask any more about how we confirmed the deaths of Japanese but want to know about reports to the victims families? We provided the families with information about the bodies and about compensation funds. Also, for the 13 Japanese whose remains we found, we helped the families deal with the bodies. We also financial support visits to the World Trade Center site for the families on every anniversary.

Mr. Fujita:

Since I do not have much time I would like to ask about the suspicious information being uncovered and the doubts people world wide are having about the events of 911. Many of these doubters are very influential people. In such circumstances I believe the Japanese government, which claims the attacks were carried out by Al Qaeda, should be providing the victims families with this new information. In that context I would like to ask several questions.

First of all I would like to get all members of the committee to look at this panel and look at the pictures I have provided you with. This is concrete evidence in the form of photographs and other types of information. The first photograph has computer graphics attached to show how large the plane that hit the Pentagon was. A 757 is quite a large airplane with a width of 38 meters. So as you can see even though such a large plane hit the pentagon there is only a hole that is too small for the airplane. This is a photograph taken of firemen at work and you can also see there is no damage of the sort an airplane that large should make. I would also like you to look at the lawn in front and notice that there are no airplane parts on it. Let us now look at the third picture, which is also of the pentagon taken from a U.S. TV news report has captions that show the roof of the Pentagon is still intact. Again even though a huge airplane is supposed to have hit, there is not enough corresponding damage. Now let us move to the next photograph. Here is a photograph of a hole, as Minister Komura knows the Pentagon is a very strong building with many walls. Yet the airplane has pierced them. But as you know, airplanes are made of the lightest possible material. An airplane made of such light material could not make a hole like that. Next I would like to show a photograph of how the airplane hit the building. The airplane made a U-turn, avoiding the Defense Secretary's office and hitting the only part of the Pentagon that had been specially reinforced to withstand a bomb attack.

Also, in the middle of page five we have a comment from a U.S. airforce official. He says I have flown the two types of airplane used on 911 and I cannot believe it would be possible for someone who is flying one for the first time to be able to carry out such a maneuver. Also, as you know, they have not recovered the flight recorders from most of these 4 airplanes. Also, there were more than 80 security cameras at the Pentagon but they have refused to release almost all of the footage. In any case, as you have just seen there is no picture of the airplane or of its wreckage in any of these photographs. It is very strange that no such pictures have been shown to us.

As you know Japan's self-defense forces have their headquarters in Ichigaya. Can you imagine if an airplane hit a major city, if an hour and a half after an airplane hit New York that an airplane could hit the Pentagon? In such a situation how could our allies allow such an attack to take place. I would like the Defense Minister to answer this.

Defense Minister Fuyushiba Ishiba:

I have not prepared so I will have to answer ad-lib. If such a situation took place then the airforce would send fighters up to shoot down any airplanes. This is what happened with an attack on the German constitutional court. In the case of Japan our reaction would depend on what kind of airplane it was, who was flying it and what their purpose was. However, according to our laws it might be hard to order an airplane to be shot down just because it was flying at a low level. We would probably have self-defense forces fly with it and ask for a cabinet decision. Since an airplane would have many people on board we would have do discuss what to do. This happened a long time ago but a Cesna airplane was flown into the house of a person called Yoshio Kodama. There was also an All Japan Airways flight bound for Hakodate that was hijacked and had the pilot killed. It would be best if such a thing never happened but we need to prepare new laws for such situations and discuss them in Parliament.

Mr. Fujita:

Since we are running out of time I would like to present a new piece of evidence. Please look at this panel. The first picture is one you see often of the two towers that were hit by hijacked airplanes. I could understand if this happened right after the airplanes hit but here we can see large piece of material flying a large distance through the air. Some flew 150 meters. You can objects flying in this picture as if there was an explosion. Here is a picture I took from a book. This lets you see how far the objects flew. The third picture is of a fireman who was involved in the rescue talking about a series of explosions in the building that sounded like a professional demolition. We cannot present video today so I have written a translation of what the fireman said. Here his is saying "it went boom boom boom like explosions were going off."

Here is something said by a Japanese research team of officials from the fire department and the construction ministry. The interviewed a Japanese survivor who said that while she was fleeing there were explosions. This testimony appears in a report prepared with the aid of the construction ministry and the fire department. Now I would like you to see the following picture. Normally it is said that the twin towers collapsed because they were hit by airplanes. However, one block away from the twin towers is building number 7. It can be seen in the following map a block away from the WTC. This building collapsed 7 hours after the WTC buildings were attacked. If I could show you a video it would be easy to understand but take a look at this photograph. This is a 47 story building that fell in this manner (He drops and object to demonstrate). The building falls in five or six seconds. It is about the same speed as an object would fall in a vacuum. This building falls like something you would see in a Kabuki show. Also if falls while keeping its shape. Remember it was not hit by an airplane. You have to ask yourself if a building could fall in that manner due to a fire after 7 hours. Here we have a copy of the 911 commission report. This is a report put out by the U.S. government in July of 2004 but this report does not mention the collapse of the building I just described. It is not mentioned at all in here (he waves the book). FEMA also issued a report but they also fail to mention this building. Many people believe, especially after seeing the story about building number 7, that something is strange. Since this is an incident where many people died people think is should be investigated.

We are running out of time but I would also like to mention the put options. Just before the 911 attacks, ie on September 6th, 7th and 8th there were put options put out on the stocks of the two airlines United and American that were hit by hijackers. There were also put options on Merril Lynch, one of the biggest WTC tenants. In other words somebody had insider information and made a fortune selling put options of these stocks. The head of Germany's Bundesbank at the time, who is equivalent to the Governor of the Bank of Japan, said there are lots of facts to prove the people involved in the terror attacks profited from insider information. He said there was lots of suspicious trading involving financial companies etc prior to the attacks. The had of the Bundesbank was willing to say this much. I would like to ask the Finance Minster about these put options. Did the government of Japan know about this, and what do you think about this? I would like to ask Finance Minister Nukaga about this.

Finance Minister Fukushiro Nukaga:

I was in Burkina Fasso in Africa when I heard about this incident. I decided to fly immediately to the U.S. but when I got to Paris I was told there were no flights to America. So I only heard what was reported later about the facts. I know there have been reports about the points you raise. So we made it obligatory that people provide ID for securities transactions and for suspicious transactions to be reported and we made it a crime to provide money to terrorist organizations. We believe the international financial system should not be abused. In any case, terrorism is a horrible thing and must be condemned. This type of terrorism cannot be stopped by one country but needs to be stopped by international society.

Mr. Fujita:

I would like to ask finance specialist Mr. Asao to tell me about put options. A group of people with large amounts of money, clear insider information and financial expertise would have been necessary for such a thing to take place. Could a few terrorists in Afghanistand and Pakistan carry out such a sophisticated and large scale set of transactions? I would like to ask Mr. Asao to respond.

Keiichiro Asao:

I understand put options are a deal to sell stocks at a fixed price. In this case somebody must have had insider information to carry out such transactions because nobody could normally predict these airlines would have their planes hijacked. So, I believe this was certainly a case of insider trading.

Mr. Fujita:

Prime Minister, you were Chief Cabinet Secretary at the time and as somebody has already noted, this was an incident of the sort that humanity had never previously experienced. Also, there appears to be a lot more information about this incident coming out now than came out in the months after the attacks. Now that we are an internet and visual society, this information is being made public so if we look at the situation now, the whole starting point for these two laws , the start of the war on terror itself, as you have seen from the information I have presented, has not been properly investigated or analyzed. So I do not believe the government has acted properly by investigating this incident or asking the U.S. government for an explanation. So far we have not started refueling U.S. ships yet so I think we need to go back to the beginning and not just simply and blindly trust the U.S. government explanation and indirect information provided by them. There were too many victims so I think we need to start again from the beginning. We need to ask who the real victims of this war on terrorism are. I think the citizens of the world are its victims. Here in Japan we have disappearing pensions and disappearing records about victims of Hepatitis C contaminated blood but everything I have presented on facts and confirmable evidence. Let us talk about the vanishing black boxes, vanishing airplanes and vanishing remains. Also lots of the remains of these buildings have disappeared. Even FEMA says that prevented it from carrying out a proper investigation. We need to look at this evidence and ask ourselves what the war on terrorism really is. I can see the ministers nodding in agreement but I would like to ask Prime Minister Fukuda. Please look at me. I have heard that when you were Chief Cabinet Minister at the time you felt many strange things about these attacks. Do you not think it was strange?

Prime Minister Fukuda:

I never said I thought it was strange.

Mr. Fujita:

Prime Minister what about the origin of the war on terror and the idea of whether it is right or wrong to participate in it? Is there really a reason to participate in this war on terror? Do we really need to participate? I would also like to ask about how to really stop terrorism.

Prime Minister Fukuda:

We believe based on evidence provided to us by the U.S. government that the attacks of 911 were carried out by Al Qaeda. We need to put an end to Al Qaeda terrorism. That is why international society is united in the fight against terrorism. Here, concerning a law passed by the Democratic Party last year and based on UN resolution 16595. This is a resolution passed in response to the terrorist attacks on the U.S. So you passed the law agreeing with the UN didn't you?

Mr Fujita:

Did you confirm about the bodies and the facts behind the resolution because that is why you claim to be participating in this war on terrorism. So I believe to end terrorism we need to pass a law that actually helps the people of Afghanistan. I would like Mr. Inuzuka to talk about the law and about the fight against terrorism.

Tadashi Inuzuka:

Among the many problems raised by MP Fujita the thing we need to worry most about is that the people in Afghanistan can live in peace and without worries. That is the core of the issue of ending terrorism. Without discussing this but just operating behind the back lines by supplying oil and not thinking about the entire situation or the people involved it is nonsense to debate this law. This law should be made for peace and security in Afghanistan. Our country needs to pass a real anti-terror law.


http://benjaminfulford.com/Transcript%20of%20Japanese
%20Parliamentary%20discussion%20of%20911.html

http://www.rense.com/general80/testi.htm



madisonman's photo
Tue 01/15/08 02:08 PM
Here it is on UTUBE Japanese Parliament 911 Expose - Vid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghxyVNfuqxk

MirrorMirror's photo
Tue 01/15/08 03:00 PM

9/11 is a propaganda tool used by the government.

I don't think that they planned it, but I'm sure there were warning sings that it was going to happen, but they were too busy filling their pockets, and planning to fill their pockets even more that they just didn't care.
drinker

mnhiker's photo
Tue 01/15/08 06:01 PM
Well as I noted before
there are a lot of
unanswered questions
about 9/11 but that
doesn't necessarily
mean it was some kind
of a nefarious plot
by the government
to spread fear and
panic.

Think of the logistics
it would take to cover
up something of that
magnitude.

I suppose money can
buy a lot of silence
but sooner or later
someone would squeal.

wiley's photo
Tue 01/15/08 06:14 PM
Edited by wiley on Tue 01/15/08 06:16 PM
Who are you guys kidding? If the government couldn't keep their NSA program a secret (for a duration of less than two years, mind you...), what makes anybody think they would be able to keep a controlled demo (9/11) a secret for over six years? The government is inept doing legitimate business as it is.

There is absolutely no "truth" in the truther movement. It's just a bunch of conspiracy nuts on a witch hunt.

madisonman's photo
Tue 01/15/08 06:48 PM
Edited by madisonman on Tue 01/15/08 07:03 PM
Well no one ever heard of the Manhatten Project untill after we dropped an atomic bomb. personaly I dont dismiss things out of hand we recently learned that the gulf of tonkin was a staged event to allow vietnam to escalate. I am not saying because of this 911 is true but it does give some type of gage as to how far elements of the government/military industrial complex will go to achieve an end

spqr's photo
Wed 01/16/08 05:03 PM
Think of a pearl Harbour** of our times, they needed an xcuse to act their agenda, they let one happen.
Or they created the organization that made it happen trough proxies.
Always ask: QUi Prodest? Who has been / is benefitting from the situation?


**Since I cannot believe that during a world war you park your whole combat fleet in one port without even a scout plane 50 miles out, wow what a strategic move!
As I can't believe no one spots an entire Japanese fleet sailing toward US coasts? What happened to the intelligence? All asleep during a world war?




mrtxstar's photo
Wed 01/16/08 05:54 PM
For those about to engage in the (futile) attempt to debate believers in "conpiracy," be prepared to enter a place where logic and reason have no meaning - and where the rules for debate are not the same for both sides.

"Conpiracy" believers usually feel that they are in a privileged position when it comes to debate. Being in possession of a "revealed truth", they tend to feel that anyone who does not share their beliefs is obliged to defend their skepticism. This is expressed as a set of (until now) unwritten rules of debate that place the skeptic and rationalist in an inferior position.

As with the lottery, this should be done for entertainment only - you have about the same chance of changing a "true
believer's" mind as you have of winning the lottery. That said, it CAN be fun, if you have the right attitude and know the
rules.

Here are the unspoken ground rules that the "conpiracy" believers impose on any debate:

[1] The experts you quote are corrupt, short-sighted, narrow-minded reactionaries. The experts they quote are altruistic,
visionary, open-minded progressives.

[2] In "conpiracy", everyone is a victim - of corrupt politicans, polluting corporations, government, etc. Their delusions are never caused by their own lifestyle choices (e.g. drug abuse, too little exercise, drinking too much, etc.), genetics or random chance. And their beliefs in "conpiracy" are most definitely NOT psychosomatic or imaginary. To even imply
otherwise is a serious breach of etiquette.

[3] "Victims" of a "conpiracy", or having a family member (e.g. parent, spouse, etc.) that are "victims" of a "conpiracy" are unimpeachable expert on that "conpiracy". Any lack of formal education, training or expertise is more than compensated by intimate knowledge as a conpiracy believer.

[4] Scientific method is merely a ploy to keep the truth of "conpiracy" hidden so that corrupt politicans and "Big Government" can continue to profit from human misery. This is no different from the oil companies and auto manufacturers that have hidden the secret of cars that run on water or get 2000 miles to the gallon of gasoline.

[5] Peer-reviewed scientific journals are part of a massive "conspiracy" to suppress "conpiracy" data. Forcing "conpiracy" practitioners to show their data is categorically unfair - they are much too busy saving lives to be bothered with proving what they already know is true.

[6] No matter how outrageous their claim is, it is true unless you can prove it false.

[7] You can never prove any "conpiracy" claim false because you are "biased" (i.e. you don't already believe them). Only a
person who is "open-minded" (see below) can evaluate their claims in a fair and impartial manner.

[8] "Open-minded" means "willing to permanently suspend disbelief." If you insist on holding on to your old, outmoded
ideas (such as chemistry, biology, physics, anatomy, physiology or even simple logic), you will be blind to their new truth.

[9] Their anecdotes and testimonials are equivalent to (if not superior to) your data. After all, everybody knows that data
can be faked (and that people never, ever lie).

[10] The fact that politicans, government contractors make money is proof that they are all evil, corrupt and will do anything for a buck (US dollar). When "conpiracy" practitioners make money, they are just getting what they
deserve for "helping" so many people.

[11] "Tolerance", for you, means swallowing their line of "reasoning" without complaint (or gagging). For them, "tolerance" means letting you get in a few words when they take a breath. You'll know that the debate is over when they call you a "nazi" (or similar epithet) - it's just their little way of showing tolerance for other points of view.

[12] You can't convince them, so don't try to - just enjoy the game. The "conpiracy" believers desperately want to be taken
seriously, so don't get defensive - it just gives them credibility in the eyes of the public. Try laughing instead. There will probably be other people listening that may see the logic in your reasoning, so your efforts are not in vain.

madisonman's photo
Wed 01/16/08 06:06 PM
we are discussing the weird events of 911 not area 51 and alien bodies.

mrtxstar's photo
Wed 01/16/08 07:46 PM

we are discussing the weird events of 911 not area 51 and alien bodies.

No matter the conspiracy.....the rules are now written for all to heed.laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh

mnhiker's photo
Wed 01/16/08 07:58 PM
mrtxstar,

There is one rule you forgot to mention.

Sometimes it is better to sit back and
let someone else do the bickering than
wasting time and mental energy doing
the bickering yourself.

Just sit back and enjoy the show!! laugh laugh laugh

Zapchaser's photo
Wed 01/16/08 08:46 PM
Edited by Zapchaser on Wed 01/16/08 08:50 PM

we are discussing the weird events of 911 not area 51 and alien bodies.


Hey! Easy now! The 9/11 plot was born in Area 51 and the domesticated aliens from Roswell were tasked to carry it out in order to test our experimental "mobile home missile" technology. If you play the 9/11 video backward and slow the playback speed down, you will clearly see what appears to be a 16' wide Fleetwood, complete with the optional aluminum skirting and a pot of flowers sitting on the hitch as it strikes the first tower. (Under an electron microscope the Bush Cheney bumper sticker is clearly visible) Wow! Can you see how easy it would be to hide ICBM's in mobile home parks? ICBM silo's in the north and the new MX missiles in the south's abundance of mobile home parks? Brilliant..... absolutely brilliant. But keep this to yourself and don't be so flippant about Area 51. glasses

Chazster's photo
Wed 01/16/08 08:54 PM
This discussion reminds me of that South Park episode... its ok if so many people believe in the conspiracy theory because 1/4 of americans are retarded. laugh

1 2 9 10 11 13 15 16 17 24 25