Community > Posts By > DaddyTime

 
DaddyTime's photo
Sat 02/11/12 01:03 AM
What the age's round there, is it
a younger crowd or is it suitable
for all ages.

Feel kind of awkward if I was
the only slightly older person.

(very Slightly, I am not old damn it lmfao)

DaddyTime's photo
Sat 02/11/12 12:58 AM
Grape peeler

DaddyTime's photo
Sat 02/11/12 12:57 AM
This happened I was there, Only I escaped
the others died honorably.

DaddyTime's photo
Sat 02/11/12 12:56 AM
I like the people so far, they just don't like me..they call me fugly.

DaddyTime's photo
Sat 02/11/12 12:52 AM
Thinking is overrated so I wouldn't worry about it,
I am here because it's the only place I could find
with a forum.

This dating thing that's just a bonus,come for
the fun don't need any other reason.

As for being confused that will simply help
you fit in more around here lol.

(Whats mocospace?)

DaddyTime's photo
Sat 02/11/12 12:41 AM

Will do. As long as people(specifically pedos) don't try anything smart, then it should be alright.


Technically since you're 18 they would
not be pedo's, simply perverts.

This is a dating site so you will
always find a few weirdos, but for
the most part people here are pretty
decent.

Stick to the forums as much as
possible, much easier to get to
know people and make friends.

Good luck

DaddyTime's photo
Sat 02/11/12 12:36 AM

to me i think we should be ourselves anywhere we are.whether online or not.how i wish to find someone who is truthful,sincere and open minded.


We all ask that, I have not found
someone like this yet. I hope to
one day but till then I always
know I can trust myself.

DaddyTime's photo
Sat 02/11/12 12:34 AM
I am not 18 - 25 but welcome to mingle anyway waving

DaddyTime's photo
Sat 02/11/12 12:01 AM
Edited by DaddyTime on Sat 02/11/12 12:13 AM
lying is boring, the truth is way more fun.

I do not see the point of lying online,
there is to much deception in real life,
no reason to hide who you are online.

personally I don't care what anyone online
thinks of me, as I don't know them and
will likely never meet them. their opinion
simply does not matter. Online in my opinion
is the only place one can safely be themselves.

For a site such as this what it is way more
beneficial as a potential match knows what
to expect. lie and you could lose that special
someone upon meeting, then all is lost and for what?

Nah I am me, love me or hate me, I am who I am.

(Note: most people in real life are no different
then online people their opinions simply don't
matter. best to be who you are and tell the truth
and not worry what others may think.)

DaddyTime's photo
Fri 02/10/12 10:36 PM
Edited by DaddyTime on Fri 02/10/12 10:37 PM

Well, the one time I drove stoned I nearly ran a red light. And no, you don't necessarily drive slower. You just let it flow, ya know? Whatever speed seems to be cool.

I will never get in a car with a stoned driver again, me or anyone else.


lol I am stoned now and I am perfectly fine,
would have no issue's driving anywhere, over
indulgence of any substance can cause negative
results. Like driving home after an all you can
eat restaurant, I am sure way more red lights
are run there lol.

DaddyTime's photo
Fri 02/10/12 10:04 PM

we pay the cost to be the boss,,,,


:banana: :banana:


:laughing: frustrated

DaddyTime's photo
Fri 02/10/12 10:02 PM


Driving while high on pot nearly doubles the chance of getting into a crash, say researchers from Halifax's Dalhousie University.


Chea, otay.
WTF ever that place even is..


The authors of the paper, which is published in the online edition of the British Medical Journal, reviewed nine previous studies involving 49,411 people.


..the British? Really...
...don't they drive on the opposite side of the street?


They say previous research didn't take into account the consumption of alcohol or other drugs, and so didn't provide a clear picture of the effect of smoking marijuana alone.


..this makes sense to you?


One such study published in October, the Cross Canada Report on Student Alcohol and Drug Use, reported that more Canadian teens than ever before are drinking and smoking pot and then getting behind the wheel, often within an hour of indulging.


Two problems with this.

1. Drunk driving has a history of death and chaos. Also bar fights, brawls, domestic disputes; and IMO, might be nearing the top of causes for orphanage's to be over packed.

2. ..so this study, if actually doing what it says it should be recording data for; this would only be true in young adults? What group? 16-18? Even sober, that age group has the highest rate of car accidents and incidents. It's neck and neck with the senior citizens who can't see right.


The Dalhousie researchers, isolating marijuana consumption, found that drivers who smoke within three hours of driving are nearly twice as likely to cause a crash. The risk is even higher for those aged 35 and under.


I STILL call BS.

..do Canadian's really have 35 year old students? o.o


More than 10% of adults in Canada and about a third of young people 16-25 report using pot in the past year, according to the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in Toronto.


..that's news to you?

Legalize it and find out how many their really is.

Then you'd have something to really write about.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

My comments: Since alcohol is a factor they can not say that it
is the pot that causes this effect. If doing a study on a substance
you can not toss in another substance and judge the results of the 1st.


..it was clarifying later that original tests in fact were done with both substances; however, they changed this and tested solely on marijuana.


Alcohol is well known to cause adverse affect, so they can not say that it is the pot, the could say pot and alcohol cause this effect
but that is not what they are saying. The are saying that you could not properly judge the effects of pot with out the addition of alcohol.


No they didn't. Here:

"The Dalhousie researchers, isolating marijuana consumption, found that drivers who smoke within three hours of driving are nearly twice as likely to cause a crash. The risk is even higher for those aged 35 and under."

They say previous research didn't take into account the consumption of alcohol or other drugs, and so didn't provide a clear picture of the effect of smoking marijuana alone.


..read one up.



That said i have driven with a lot of smokers and not once had any fears, I have been afraid many times getting in car's with drunks.


..agreed.


"The Dalhousie researchers, isolating marijuana consumption, found that drivers who smoke within three hours of driving are nearly twice as likely to cause a crash. The risk is even higher for those aged 35 and under."

I have read this many times and do not know how I misread this part that many times.

makes most of my comments void, would still drive
with a stoner over a drunk any day.


DaddyTime's photo
Fri 02/10/12 07:46 PM

Seriously though, I do feel that her tech. privileges should be revoked until she learns how to use it properly.

When I have kids, you better believe it's going to be like the KGB and CIA in my house. It's not a trust issue, it's a safety issue.


sounds like a president, you can also
declare war on their bedroom to get at
their oil.

DaddyTime's photo
Fri 02/10/12 07:09 PM




Older kids don't have well padded behinds, so are you saying that you only believe in hitting tiny kids with diapers?

...on their well padded behinds?





the gluteus maximus is a well padded muscle, regardless of age,,,


youtube yourself "spanking" some babies you'll be famous.



I wouldnt spank a baby,, generally spanking has to accompany an ability to use logic at some level,, which babies dont generally have

in our family,, age four and up (school aged) is when spanking is an option

and, just like 'time outs' , the number would be more consistent with the age so twenty would be far too many,,,,,


I think I would need a demonstration, like you spank me
so i know exactly what you're talking about.

DaddyTime's photo
Fri 02/10/12 07:02 PM


Older kids don't have well padded behinds, so are you saying that you only believe in hitting tiny kids with diapers?

...on their well padded behinds?





the gluteus maximus is a well padded muscle, regardless of age,,,


youtube yourself "spanking" some babies you'll be famous.

DaddyTime's photo
Fri 02/10/12 06:58 PM

Older kids don't have well padded behinds, so are you saying that you only believe in hitting tiny kids with diapers?

...on their well padded behinds?




lmfao you made me picture her beating a little baby
like the judge beat his daughter.


DaddyTime's photo
Fri 02/10/12 06:57 PM





I know many arent from the same culture

but its known as a 'spanking'


nothing to be executed over,,,,

20 whacks is about right for breaking the law when your dad is a judge,,,,but all the pausing made it worse





that is not spanking, he did not use his hand once.

A spanking is giving you're kid a swat on the ***
to get them moving. not a beating with weapons.


laugh laugh

Don't get her started.....


I am enjoying my debate with her.





I hear ya. Go for it.
msharmony and i have debated
this topic before..
we've been down this road.

That happens after a few years here...:smile: drinker




one day I may enter the religion and politics sections,
but for now debates of this nature are less stressful
but normally I would love nothing more then to go there
and stat my opinions on a few topics.

DaddyTime's photo
Fri 02/10/12 06:53 PM


Yep she believes in hitting little kids. laugh

I don't.

These days, just take away their computers, or their texting privileges, that is torture enough for them. laugh



I believe in 'hitting' them on their well padded behinds with a hand or belt,, sure do

not to be confused with ANY OTHER kind of hitting, like punching or slapping or kicking,,,etc,,,,,


slapping is kinda what you do when you spank..just saying

DaddyTime's photo
Fri 02/10/12 06:52 PM




I know many arent from the same culture

but its known as a 'spanking'


nothing to be executed over,,,,

20 whacks is about right for breaking the law when your dad is a judge,,,,but all the pausing made it worse





Here is a scenario for you..


The Judge gets two weeks jail and he is put in a cell with some guys that are in for selling or using some dope for instance.

They are shown this video ...guess what happens.


Forget the jail scenario.


Lets just go down the pub. and show the video with him present



well drunkards and prisoners probably dont need alot of enticing to fight,,,



So you assume that all people that frequent a pub are drunkards ...any way you know what I mean so.

What do you mean by from different culture. This is American culture?

Over to you Daddy Time...drinker waving


I agree with her statement and point out that that is the point lol

Kinda like putting a pedo in gen pop, you want them to get whats coming.

DaddyTime's photo
Fri 02/10/12 06:46 PM



I know many arent from the same culture

but its known as a 'spanking'


nothing to be executed over,,,,

20 whacks is about right for breaking the law when your dad is a judge,,,,but all the pausing made it worse





that is not spanking, he did not use his hand once.

A spanking is giving you're kid a swat on the ***
to get them moving. not a beating with weapons.


laugh laugh

Don't get her started.....


I am enjoying my debate with her.


1 2 5 6 7 9 11 12 13 24 25