Excellent idea, let's address the symptom, punish the least likely to effect the outcome and sweep the problem under the carpet.

One word: GOVERNMENT

Oh, that is just.... absolutely hilarious!!!

"Society will develop a new kind of servitude which covers the surface of society with a network of complicated rules, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate. It does not tyrannise but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd."
― Alexis de Tocqueville

A statist is an individual who erroneously believes that there is such a thing as "authority" vested in certain human beings magically giving them the "right to rule" over other people. This "authority" means that certain people who we call "government", have the "moral right" to issue commands to those whom they rule (those under their "jurisdiction"), and that their "subjects" (slaves) have a "moral obligation" to obey the arbitrary dictates set by their masters. Most simply put, a statist is someone who believes in the legitimacy of slavery.

Nothing more readily exemplifies this principle than the modern united States system of education. We surrender our next generation, the whole future to the "government". But when the result is as should be expected, the masses whale at the unfairness of receiving that which they asked for.

You're kidding, right? Didn't think so, sad. A side show does not a circus make. Convenient though.

Not nearly as bad as common core history:

You Won't Believe What We Found in Another 'Widely Adopted' High School Textbook

And to imagine, this is before common core. Can one imagine the result when the next layer, common core is added.

Back in the mid-1990s, the illustrious British introduced a process called ISO 9001, the alignment of business to greatness by way of processes, not necessarily great but repeatable processes. Didn't really matter if it was right, so long as the process was repeatable.

So called education was aligned to this standard, producing little trained monkeys. And to imagine an education system could be any other than what it is, is to imagine the impossible.

"The only thing that is more expensive than education is ignorance."
― Benjamin Franklin

That is easy, just spend more money. Build bigger school board buildings, pay larger salaries to school board members, increase the pay for all the administrators. But above all, get behind that common core movement so the government can have total control.

And then we can have a nation of the totally stupid instead of just well indoctrinated idiots. After all just how much further is there to go? This is but a nation that believes education is tremendous student debt and no knowledge. A nation so enslaved, there is no concept of what it takes to be free.

However, very few realize the real question, what remains when one has a concept that fast food is a career and no one can afford hamburger?

Actually you would be wrong again as usual. Another case where the emotion rules and one goes off half cocked without doing their homework.

As to the works of Mark Passio, you have clearly demonstrated you know absolutely nothing about them much less the man himself. And from his teachings, you are not one he would appreciate I share with anything not readily available with.

And in your mind, I would prefer to be discredited. But I do love the apparent effect I have upon you and will continue for the future. I will take every opportunity to expose all those little snafus of misinformation.

But in the infamous words of Mark:

Human beings should consider with great care their sources for information. By refusing to present certain information, and by influencing people to dismiss certain information as unimportant or unnecessary to consider, many modern institutions seek to control human perceptions and therefore to limit what human beings may come to understand.

By the way, Mark's thinking is very much in align with mine, but he is much better at etymology than myself. So your objection isn't so much the sourcing but the absolute fear of the information itself.

Tell you what, I'm due to go back and review some other works of his that I haven't been to in a while. I pass along some notes on that without cites also as his material is all CopyLeft.

What law is it that most people break? I never break laws but I totally ignore statutes. Is that what you are referring?

You do know what a law is, don't you? Trayvon and Brown broke laws. They instigated violence and paid the price. The victims are the ones persecuted by the public for justifiable actions.

One had to go through a trial that could have resulted in being caged for most of his life, why? To please some repressed slaves that can't accept reality. Wilson at least was spared that travesty but still has had his life ruined.

Read all about it, he has resigned because he is worthless as an officer for the wrong reason.

So anyone that debases your frivolous spin is an internet thug but thugs that act in a criminal manner are victims.

Glad to see you clarify your outlook on matters in general so openly.

It should seem so from the vast volume of information released. When that criminal claiming to be the thugs mother's ME agrees with the physical evidence of the ME, sort of displaces doubt.

Thugs, the victims are the beings they destroy. And you care less about all those others, they are but convenient because of the thugs. How many threads have you started over the thugs? And not one over the others....

If you don't know then it would just be a waste of time explaining it.

But here, the Washington Post has encapsulated it very nicely. The physical evidence in the Michael Brown case supported the officer (updated with DNA evidence}

But what the hey you probably know somebody that knows somebody that knows somebody that saw the whole thing and physical evidence shouldn't be that important anyway, should it?

And now because of hundreds of idiots that believe protest with some thug as a hero, involves the right to burn and pillage, there are many families in Ferguson that have had their lives destroyed.

Ah, your rancor finally instills a moment of truth.

Really, shall we name names? Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown come to mind, but then how can they be thugs, they are black. And if you live by violence and are black, I guess that changes the meaning of a thug.

And you felt so wrong I'm sure you made a banner and immediately ran into the street to protest.

Twist, twist, twist, spin, spin, spin. Will the truth ever be let in?

When you commit violence against an armed individual, you should expect to be shot. But then you do defend every little thug in the news, so long as they are black. Would this be racist tendencies? I would think so.

So your take is that justice is not blind and should be slanted to the color of the skin. If your white, any transgression should be punished but if you're black all transgression should be forgiven regardless of the facts.

And if you daughter give marks like the officer, then I would suggest that perhaps child protective services needs to investigate as that would be a beating. But then what do the doctors know (Officer Wilson’s medical records released) they were there but what are they to argue with your conjecture?

You are absolutely right, there are many instances of police brutality that should be pursued and protested but this is purely a case of racism.

If you stop and look at the matter, there have been few mentions of the thug but the mass media and Odumbo keep trying to portray an innocent young man with his hands in the air.

And while the cop is not an innocent individual as he has been shown to be a sociopathic authoritarian and should perhaps seek other career opportunities, there is no need to destroy him over this thug.

That is but your twist and contains no truth. Once you attack an officer and touch his gun, you should expect to die.

And this is absolute racism at it's finest.

Well, the only thing here is the agreement to disagree.



Au contraire, any usurpation of anothers right is an injury. This was not a mere criticism but a demand that use of Odumbo was childish and the application of an arcane label but intensifies that injury.



Again, an area where we are to the point of agreeing to disagree. In the area of language, English has three dialects, the slang of the streets, the formal and informal language of society and the language of law. While most think they understand, in reality they stand under that which they ill understand what they have chosen.