Well I cant possibly say this any better than a poster from the linked sight..



Sadly most Republicans will blame Obama rather then look at the years 2001 to January 2009. Romney and his handlers as well as the Republican party care about one thing, getting elected or re-elected. The Republican party will change history as many times as needed to insure the voters are given the same big lie. It was Goering who said if you tell the people the same big lie often enough the lie becomes a truth. Obama inherited a mess from Bush, yet you ask a Republican "what about Bush" and the common reply is "Who is Bush". You do not see Bush off the Crawford range, you do not see him endorsing anyone. He is a plague best left hidden. Thank you for a great piece Mr. Krugman.

It was not demolished "from the top down." Even the NIST report acknowledges that. I guess you didn't even read that. I have repeated several times why there was textbook reasons to investigate for and suspect explosives and you guys continue to just ignore my posts and the evidence. Also, you are assuming certain types of explosives would have to have been used, and that they had to be installed a certain way and that had to be very loud-- as if this was your normal run of the mill controlled demolition. It was not. This attack was pulled off not by Muslim fanatics but by a very high tech organization of world terrorists who could have access to technology you would not suspect.

Explosions were heard and felt on the bottom lower floors by witnesses BEFORE THE PLANES HIT THE TOWER -- and they were reported. Testimony was just completely ignored. That is not a proper investigation. That is cover-up. Just because the planes hit the towers at the higher floors does not mean that is what caused the collapse. (That was more like a distraction.)

Another good reason for investigating and looking for explosives other than the fact that the manual requires it, is that the first attack on the towers used explosives. (It's called M.O.)

But as I said, they didn't even look. They didn't examine the real evidence, they came to their conclusions via computer simulation. That is not scientific and that can easily be compromise according to what kind information they program into it. They admitted that they did not even know much about the building being up to code.

Anyway it is clear that none of the so-called scientists want to challenge the status quo even though the Bush administration has compromised the whole scientific community. If this is not corrected, scientists will have no clout whatsoever in the future and no one will listen to them when they are under the control of the administration.

Just how stupid does Mitt Romney think we are? If you’ve been following his campaign from the beginning, that’s a question you have probably asked many times.

But the question was raised with particular force last week, when Mr. Romney tried to make a closed drywall factory in Ohio a symbol of the Obama administration’s economic failure. It was a symbol, all right — but not in the way he intended.

First of all, many reporters quickly noted a point that Mr. Romney somehow failed to mention: George W. Bush, not Barack Obama, was president when the factory in question was closed. Does the Romney campaign expect Americans to blame President Obama for his predecessor’s policy failure?
http://readersupportednews.org/off-site-opinion-section/72-72/11088-focus-how-stupid-does-romney-think-we-are

Did we live in the same country in the Bush years?

Lets see Dan rather gets fired for exposeing Bush's preferential treatment when he was in the "Air National Guard" Lost his job over a falsified document but the fact remained Bush did not finish his military obligation. "free pass"for the coked up fly boy.

So, who do you think runs the world?

Your lacking in imagination again Mr Conrad and you failed to follow the link provided again no big suprise.

From what I read it was the US army that stumbled apon the black op and of course was not informed to look the other way

again here is the link you will notice it isnt at Rense or Al Martin who ever he is. http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_12-8-2003_pg1_9


SO it looks like they tried to plant WMDS and failed at least tht is what the available evidence points too.

Being a rational adult I would assume if this DOD insider was makeing things up she would probably be in jail but they would have to prove she invented the whole thing and apparently they cant or wont even try.

Just another win for me no big deal I am getting used to it.

Virtually anyone who has ever solved a crime is a "conspiracy theorist."

Because of the lack of a reason to suspect explosives. You just keep ignoring these facts. Its not hard to comprehend. To get to the supports they would have to ship down walls and use tons of explosives and wires. There is no way that would go unnoticed and would take tons of time. There would also be cascading explosions heard for miles around. When i was in Korea they were blowing some stuff up in the mountain near my gfs parents house and it woke me up every morning. That was just a little tnt and not nearly equal to what would be used to take down a building.

The loose affiliation of millionaires and billionaires have a vested interest in keeping us in line, that is a given.

As far as our Governments are concerned we are all uninformed.

Some of us Question that information.

Others simply accept what they are told.

You are assuming the wrong motive for 9/11. It was not specifically to create a wave of support for the invasion of Iraq. I don't know where that ridiculous theory came from. It does not even make a lot of sense.

One motive, and a very obvious one, is that 9/11 was the primary event that allowed the Patriot act to pass very quickly. The patriot act gives the office of the President sweeping powers which will pave the way for the future dictator of this country and maybe the world.

It had nothing to do with Iraq. That was a bonus for Bush and Americans were riled up and just wanted to kick some butt. People are so easy to manipulate into war.... its sad.



The Bush administration was not smart enough to plan that. They were not smart enough to plan 9/11 either. They were just following orders from the COMPANY. THE COMPANY is responsible for the attack on 9/11.

NIST'S IGNORING OF PHYSICAL EVIDENCE FOR EXPLOSIVES.

The evidence for explosives that NIST ignored consists of two general types, testimonial and physical.

There were seven features of the collapse of WTC7 that are also common features of controlled implosions, namely that the collapse began at the bottom, started suddenly, was total, was vertical, occured in virtual free fall, involved the pulverization of much of the concrete, and resulted in a relatively small pile of debris.

These features, which can all be seen in videos of WTC7's collapse, are acknowledged by NIST. But there are two other features, which can also be seen on videos that NIST does not acknowledge: apparent demolition squibs and windows that were blown out at the onset of the collapse.

Defenders of the official account typically try to claim that these high-velocity ejections of debris were simply caused by compression after the floors began to collapse. NIST gave this explanation as to why the "puffs of smoke" as it called them, did not provide evidence of controlled demolition:

"The falling mass of the building compressed the air ahead of it - much like the action of a piston - forcing smoke and debris out the windows as the stories below failed sequentially."

However this explanation for the apparent demolition squibs from the Twin Towers does not fit the descriptions given by several witnesses. For example, firefighter James Curran said: "I looked back and I heard like every floor went chu-chu-chu...Everything was getting blown out of the floor before it actually collapsed."

If material was being blown out from floors before the floors collapsed, then the ejections cannot be explained as resulting from compressed air caused by the collapse.

Videos of the collapses of the Twin Towers show that bursts of debris ejected from point-like sources sometimes occurred on floor LONG before the collapse front reached them. Some of the bursts occurred "at levels twenty to thirty floors below a "collapse" front.

This same problem exists with regard to the bursts of debris ejected during the collapse of WTC7. "The bursts coming from the upper floors of WTC7 occurred at a time when the upper floors have evidently not moved relative to one another."

The official reports lack an explanation for these squibs. This remains true today. NIST, in fact, did not even try to explain the apparent squibs coming out of WTC7. There is not a single instance in their 729 page reportof the word "squib." or "puff."

This question is also not addressed in its "Questions and Answers" about the NIST WTC7 Investigation.

So having given an inadequate explanation of the squibs that appeared during the collapses of the Twin Towers, NIST simply ignored the squibs that are visible in videos of the collapse of WTC7.

Who said a Conspiracy-Theory has to be rational?

All y ou realy need to understand this distorted article above is within the text itself, I qoute from above.

"although Melley doesn't present any empirical data to show that conspiracy thinking has been increasing for these reasons"

nuff said.

Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11?

Yes 89% 9447 votes

No 11% 1201 votes
Total: 10648 votes

http://www.cnn.com/POLLSERVER/results/14340.exclude.html

its funny how they treat the 911 skepetics like they are some type of fringe minority when in fact this poll indicates the exact opposit. But of course that would be reality based thinking something that is clearly lacking in many posters.