100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Admit It, Ladies, You Don't Want "Smart" | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Right now, I'd settle for someone with a mere 140 IQ. Provided she knew how to use apostrophes.  Right now, there are 173 people reading that remark and taking it totally seriously. It must be rough living after a humorectomy. I know my humor and my humor is dry sarcasm. i love it. I like to say "Topical satire is wasted on the wasted." I know what satire is but topical satire you have got me confused. OK, let's say relevant to the venue at hand -- like if I post something about dating issues on a dating site, it's presumably topical. Assuming I'm holding up a fish in my profile pic, which I'm not. There's another project, yup. LOL @ LEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right now, I'd settle for someone with a mere 140 IQ. Provided she knew how to use apostrophes. Right now, there are 173 people reading that remark and taking it totally seriously. It must be rough living after a humorectomy. I know my humor and my humor is dry sarcasm. i love it. I like to say "Topical satire is wasted on the wasted." I know what satire is but topical satire you have got me confused. OK, let's say relevant to the venue at hand -- like if I post something about dating issues on a dating site, it's presumably topical. Assuming I'm holding up a fish in my profile pic, which I'm not. There's another project, yup. so it's based upon assumptions then? satirical assumptions. or did i miss the point unless you mean it's just satire based upon the subject then i get it now. It's based on making fun of stuff. I prefer to focus on the really obvious things because -- ostensibly, anyway -- more people will get it. It hasn't worked out that way in real life, though. Like if I say I HAVE THREE PAIRS OF BROWN SHOES AND THEY ARE MY WORLD, half of the people will just think I'm hung up on shoes or something. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right now, I'd settle for someone with a mere 140 IQ. Provided she knew how to use apostrophes. Right now, there are 173 people reading that remark and taking it totally seriously. It must be rough living after a humorectomy. I know my humor and my humor is dry sarcasm. i love it. I like to say "Topical satire is wasted on the wasted." I know what satire is but topical satire you have got me confused. OK, let's say relevant to the venue at hand -- like if I post something about dating issues on a dating site, it's presumably topical. Assuming I'm holding up a fish in my profile pic, which I'm not. There's another project, yup. LOL @ LEX How is it that you always understand this stuff? You might want to think about teaching a class....!! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i get the jokes it's all sarcasm. Sarcasm is my thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we can reason against truth[living in peace with one another]without seeing walking in our biases of what we think to comprehend. the more study I delve into it seems there is not a lot of footing for much of any ones theories of thought mine inclusive. no digs intended just throwing it out there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we can reason against truth[living in peace with one another]without seeing walking in our biases of what we think to comprehend. the more study I delve into it seems there is not a lot of footing for much of any ones theories of thought mine inclusive. no digs intended just throwing it out there. Haha! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodness...I think youve been meeting the wrong women.  From the sounds of women you describe having contact with this would be my question; or why in the world would you pick them in the first place? Or; maybe they are not all that impressed with your intlligence combined with your personality. I tend to agree if someone is suggesting you need to be more like Ward Cleaver maybe they are suggesting you get a "job" if nothing else and office to go to to get out of their hair so they don't have to listen to you 24/7. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodness...I think youve been meeting the wrong women. From the sounds of women you describe having contact with this would be my question; or why in the world would you pick them in the first place? Or; maybe they are not all that impressed with your intlligence combined with your personality. I tend to agree if someone is suggesting you need to be more like Ward Cleaver maybe they are suggesting you get a "job" if nothing else and office to go to to get out of their hair so they don't have to listen to you 24/7. Nobody has ever had to listen to me 24/7 -- I'm always the "listener," and my partner does 90% of the talking. And I've had "jobs" where I was at an office, or something along those lines, and it hasn't made a bit of difference. The Ward Cleaver reference is intended to convey a guy who unquestioningly carries out the prerequisite husband/father role with no hint of an inkling that there might be other alternatives. It isn't about that, it has never been about that, not for me, anyway. It's about the idea that (with one exception) I've been unable to find a partner who didn't feel the need to define herself as an adjunct to other people. The point of the thread is that, when they write "I'm looking for an intelligent guy" in their profiles, what they seem to really mean is "I'm looking for a guy who will cater to my biological urges and take care of my kids, present and future." And that's not the same thing at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodness...I think youve been meeting the wrong women. From the sounds of women you describe having contact with this would be my question; or why in the world would you pick them in the first place? Or; maybe they are not all that impressed with your intlligence combined with your personality. I tend to agree if someone is suggesting you need to be more like Ward Cleaver maybe they are suggesting you get a "job" if nothing else and office to go to to get out of their hair so they don't have to listen to you 24/7. Nobody has ever had to listen to me 24/7 -- I'm always the "listener," and my partner does 90% of the talking. And I've had "jobs" where I was at an office, or something along those lines, and it hasn't made a bit of difference. The Ward Cleaver reference is intended to convey a guy who unquestioningly carries out the prerequisite husband/father role with no hint of an inkling that there might be other alternatives. It isn't about that, it has never been about that, not for me, anyway. It's about the idea that (with one exception) I've been unable to find a partner who didn't feel the need to define herself as an adjunct to other people. The point of the thread is that, when they write "I'm looking for an intelligent guy" in their profiles, what they seem to really mean is "I'm looking for a guy who will cater to my biological urges and take care of my kids, present and future." And that's not the same thing at all.  why cant an INTELLIGENT Man be a generous lover and caretaker as well?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodness...I think youve been meeting the wrong women. From the sounds of women you describe having contact with this would be my question; or why in the world would you pick them in the first place? Or; maybe they are not all that impressed with your intlligence combined with your personality. I tend to agree if someone is suggesting you need to be more like Ward Cleaver maybe they are suggesting you get a "job" if nothing else and office to go to to get out of their hair so they don't have to listen to you 24/7. Nobody has ever had to listen to me 24/7 -- I'm always the "listener," and my partner does 90% of the talking. And I've had "jobs" where I was at an office, or something along those lines, and it hasn't made a bit of difference. The Ward Cleaver reference is intended to convey a guy who unquestioningly carries out the prerequisite husband/father role with no hint of an inkling that there might be other alternatives. It isn't about that, it has never been about that, not for me, anyway. It's about the idea that (with one exception) I've been unable to find a partner who didn't feel the need to define herself as an adjunct to other people. The point of the thread is that, when they write "I'm looking for an intelligent guy" in their profiles, what they seem to really mean is "I'm looking for a guy who will cater to my biological urges and take care of my kids, present and future." And that's not the same thing at all. why cant an INTELLIGENT Man be a generous lover and caretaker as well? I'm not saying he can't. I'm just saying I'd appreciate it if people would stop lying to me about what they wanted in a relationship. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Haha and > just seeing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we can reason against truth[living in peace with one another]without seeing walking in our biases of what we think to comprehend. the more study I delve into it seems there is not a lot of footing for much of any ones theories of thought mine inclusive. no digs intended just throwing it out there. Haha! ?????? sorry everyone jus seeing how to work this thing. What do u mean instructions? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
took a look wow nice site, I like that it is off the wall magnificent!!!
|
|
|
|
|
