Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Topic: Who's behind the Boston Marathon bombings? 4 theories.
Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Wed 04/24/13 11:52 AM Edited by Jeanniebean on Wed 04/24/13 11:53 AM
and thankfully noone else lost their lives,,, Im doubting bostonites are mad about that,, or that that makes them 'sheeple' What makes them sheeple is that they willingly would give up their rights at the drop of a hat, because they have been terrorized. And then the feds and the police terrorize them like storm troopers invading their homes with guns. And I am betting there are a few Bostonites that are mad about that, but because of the heightened state of frenzy the feds and police were in, citizens are more terrified of them than of any suspected terrorist. I know I would be. its their RIGHT to agree to being protected too,,,,,most people who have a desire to LIVE are gonna welcome someone trained in protection under the circumstances,,,,,,,, I would be grateful to be safe,, whether my neighbor came over to ensure my safety , or whether it was someone with a 'title' like cop or ofed,,,, safe is safe and sometimes it does make SENSE to forego arguing about 'rights' and who is doing what, to allow others to be safe or help keep you safe,,, Spoken like a true sheep. The sad fact is, they are gonna do what they are gonna do and there is not much a citizen can do about it. They have little choice when a bunch of armed military men demand to come in and search their homes.

msharmony Joined Mon 08/31/09 Posts: 61041	Wed 04/24/13 11:53 AM
I wish I could interview each and every person who had their house searched just to find out how they felt about that. How would you feel if armed militarized Cops would demand access to your Premises in contravention of any constitutional Rights? Guess that's just how those People felt when they knocked on their Doors! It's a miracle none of those "Lawenforcers" got shot! is that the way it went down? really? cause the way I understand it boston is a pretty tight community.... and they have a PROCESS that they went through where media was first used to WARN and ADVISE people, cops were dispatched to protect people, and feds were later added to catch the 'terrorists' if armed cops came to my door after someone had just BOMBED the local park,, I would figure that perhaps that person was NEARBY, and they needed to do their job,,,,

msharmony Joined Mon 08/31/09 Posts: 61041	Wed 04/24/13 11:53 AM
and thankfully noone else lost their lives,,, Im doubting bostonites are mad about that,, or that that makes them 'sheeple' What makes them sheeple is that they willingly would give up their rights at the drop of a hat, because they have been terrorized. And then the feds and the police terrorize them like storm troopers invading their homes with guns. And I am betting there are a few Bostonites that are mad about that, but because of the heightened state of frenzy the feds and police were in, citizens are more terrified of them than of any suspected terrorist. I know I would be. its their RIGHT to agree to being protected too,,,,,most people who have a desire to LIVE are gonna welcome someone trained in protection under the circumstances,,,,,,,, I would be grateful to be safe,, whether my neighbor came over to ensure my safety , or whether it was someone with a 'title' like cop or ofed,,,, safe is safe and sometimes it does make SENSE to forego arguing about 'rights' and who is doing what, to allow others to be safe or help keep you safe,,, Spoken like a true sheep. a sheep with some balance between common sense and logic and emotion,,,,

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Wed 04/24/13 11:57 AM
The reality is, there is not much a citizen can do at the time when armed military or swat teams demand to come in and search your home. I wonder how friendly they would be if you asked for a search warrant? I bet not very. You can rationalize all you want, but it is still a perfect "reasonable" excuse for practicing martial law. This whole incident was a drill. People were told to "be calm" before any bomb at all even went off. Why?

msharmony Joined Mon 08/31/09 Posts: 61041	Wed 04/24/13 11:58 AM
ask the alleged people who were told that or the alleged folks who supposedly said it

mightymoe Joined Sun 11/19/06 Posts: 37362	Wed 04/24/13 11:59 AM
I wish I could interview each and every person who had their house searched just to find out how they felt about that. How would you feel if armed militarized Cops would demand access to your Premises in contravention of any constitutional Rights? Guess that's just how those People felt when they knocked on their Doors! It's a miracle none of those "Lawenforcers" got shot! is that the way it went down? really? cause the way I understand it boston is a pretty tight community.... and they have a PROCESS that they went through where media was first used to WARN and ADVISE people, cops were dispatched to protect people, and feds were later added to catch the 'terrorists' if armed cops came to my door after someone had just BOMBED the local park,, I would figure that perhaps that person was NEARBY, and they needed to do their job,,,, our rights weren't based on "extigent circumstances", they were based on keeping the government from oppressing us. as you know, they(the government) decide what extigent circumstances are, then they decide how many rights of ours they can trample... we have no control or say in these matters, they have it all...

msharmony Joined Mon 08/31/09 Posts: 61041	Wed 04/24/13 12:04 PM
I wish I could interview each and every person who had their house searched just to find out how they felt about that. How would you feel if armed militarized Cops would demand access to your Premises in contravention of any constitutional Rights? Guess that's just how those People felt when they knocked on their Doors! It's a miracle none of those "Lawenforcers" got shot! is that the way it went down? really? cause the way I understand it boston is a pretty tight community.... and they have a PROCESS that they went through where media was first used to WARN and ADVISE people, cops were dispatched to protect people, and feds were later added to catch the 'terrorists' if armed cops came to my door after someone had just BOMBED the local park,, I would figure that perhaps that person was NEARBY, and they needed to do their job,,,, our rights weren't based on "extigent circumstances", they were based on keeping the government from oppressing us. as you know, they(the government) decide what extigent circumstances are, then they decide how many rights of ours they can trample... we have no control or say in these matters, they have it all... our rights werent based on much of anything but ideals that the people interpret and the laws enforce,,,, thats why we have courts, to interpret how the details pertain to our rights extigent details seem to me, to have warranted the actions taken to keep boston residents safe,,,,,, people pick and choose the parts of the constitution that suit their complaints but the constitution does actually have a right based upon circumstances The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, UNREASONABLE ,,, thats an adjective that specifies the type , extigent circumstances is one way to say a search is reasonable,,,,

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Wed 04/24/13 12:04 PM
I wish I could interview each and every person who had their house searched just to find out how they felt about that. How would you feel if armed militarized Cops would demand access to your Premises in contravention of any constitutional Rights? Guess that's just how those People felt when they knocked on their Doors! It's a miracle none of those "Lawenforcers" got shot! is that the way it went down? really? cause the way I understand it boston is a pretty tight community.... and they have a PROCESS that they went through where media was first used to WARN and ADVISE people, cops were dispatched to protect people, and feds were later added to catch the 'terrorists' if armed cops came to my door after someone had just BOMBED the local park,, I would figure that perhaps that person was NEARBY, and they needed to do their job,,,, our rights weren't based on "extigent circumstances", they were based on keeping the government from oppressing us. as you know, they(the government) decide what extigent circumstances are, then they decide how many rights of ours they can trample... we have no control or say in these matters, they have it all... We do have the right to object. We do have the right to voice our objections or sue them for trampling on our rights, but how many individuals will take the effort to do that? Who will speak out and object with all the emotional rhetoric and terror the media is producing? Now they are talking about placing cameras EVERYWHERE. BIG BROTHER is getting a foot hold one small town at a time.

msharmony Joined Mon 08/31/09 Posts: 61041	Wed 04/24/13 12:07 PM
I wish I could interview each and every person who had their house searched just to find out how they felt about that. How would you feel if armed militarized Cops would demand access to your Premises in contravention of any constitutional Rights? Guess that's just how those People felt when they knocked on their Doors! It's a miracle none of those "Lawenforcers" got shot! is that the way it went down? really? cause the way I understand it boston is a pretty tight community.... and they have a PROCESS that they went through where media was first used to WARN and ADVISE people, cops were dispatched to protect people, and feds were later added to catch the 'terrorists' if armed cops came to my door after someone had just BOMBED the local park,, I would figure that perhaps that person was NEARBY, and they needed to do their job,,,, our rights weren't based on "extigent circumstances", they were based on keeping the government from oppressing us. as you know, they(the government) decide what extigent circumstances are, then they decide how many rights of ours they can trample... we have no control or say in these matters, they have it all... We do have the right to object. We do have the right to voice our objections or sue them for trampling on our rights, but how many individuals will take the effort to do that? Who will speak out and object with all the emotional rhetoric and terror the media is producing? Now they are talking about placing cameras EVERYWHERE. BIG BROTHER is getting a foot hold one small town at a time. what reason would a person have in those circumstances to object to a search? its not like their daughter jaywalked, or someone heard them yell at the child AN ATTACK had occurred on the citizens of that community,, the attackers were at large in that area,,, what is unreasonable or why would I object to someone coming around my home to make sure Im safe?

mightymoe Joined Sun 11/19/06 Posts: 37362	Wed 04/24/13 12:09 PM Edited by mightymoe on Wed 04/24/13 12:10 PM
I wish I could interview each and every person who had their house searched just to find out how they felt about that. How would you feel if armed militarized Cops would demand access to your Premises in contravention of any constitutional Rights? Guess that's just how those People felt when they knocked on their Doors! It's a miracle none of those "Lawenforcers" got shot! is that the way it went down? really? cause the way I understand it boston is a pretty tight community.... and they have a PROCESS that they went through where media was first used to WARN and ADVISE people, cops were dispatched to protect people, and feds were later added to catch the 'terrorists' if armed cops came to my door after someone had just BOMBED the local park,, I would figure that perhaps that person was NEARBY, and they needed to do their job,,,, our rights weren't based on "extigent circumstances", they were based on keeping the government from oppressing us. as you know, they(the government) decide what extigent circumstances are, then they decide how many rights of ours they can trample... we have no control or say in these matters, they have it all... We do have the right to object. We do have the right to voice our objections or sue them for trampling on our rights, but how many individuals will take the effort to do that? Who will speak out and object with all the emotional rhetoric and terror the media is producing? Now they are talking about placing cameras EVERYWHERE. BIG BROTHER is getting a foot hold one small town at a time. what reason would a person have in those circumstances to object to a search? its not like their daughter jaywalked, or someone heard them yell at the child AN ATTACK had occurred on the citizens of that community,, the attackers were at large in that area,,, what is unreasonable or why would I object to someone coming around my home to make sure Im safe? how are you not safe?

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Wed 04/24/13 12:10 PM
I wish I could interview each and every person who had their house searched just to find out how they felt about that. How would you feel if armed militarized Cops would demand access to your Premises in contravention of any constitutional Rights? Guess that's just how those People felt when they knocked on their Doors! It's a miracle none of those "Lawenforcers" got shot! is that the way it went down? really? cause the way I understand it boston is a pretty tight community.... and they have a PROCESS that they went through where media was first used to WARN and ADVISE people, cops were dispatched to protect people, and feds were later added to catch the 'terrorists' if armed cops came to my door after someone had just BOMBED the local park,, I would figure that perhaps that person was NEARBY, and they needed to do their job,,,, our rights weren't based on "extigent circumstances", they were based on keeping the government from oppressing us. as you know, they(the government) decide what extigent circumstances are, then they decide how many rights of ours they can trample... we have no control or say in these matters, they have it all... our rights werent based on much of anything but ideals that the people interpret and the laws enforce,,,, thats why we have courts, to interpret how the details pertain to our rights extigent details seem to me, to have warranted the actions taken to keep boston residents safe,,,,,, people pick and choose the parts of the constitution that suit their complaints but the constitution does actually have a right based upon circumstances The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, UNREASONABLE ,,, thats an adjective that specifies the type , extigent circumstances is one way to say a search is reasonable,,,, The martial law lock down and search of everyone's homes was unreasonable in my opinion. Of course sheeple who are terrified and who expect their government to protect them from the bad guy all the time, think its perfectly reasonable to let storm troopers come into their homes with guns and search with or without permission or a warrant. But just try to defy any of these storm troopers and see how fast they turn their guns on you. See how you are treated if you refuse to allow them to search your house. They will treat you like a combatant terrorist.

mightymoe Joined Sun 11/19/06 Posts: 37362	Wed 04/24/13 12:18 PM
I wish I could interview each and every person who had their house searched just to find out how they felt about that. How would you feel if armed militarized Cops would demand access to your Premises in contravention of any constitutional Rights? Guess that's just how those People felt when they knocked on their Doors! It's a miracle none of those "Lawenforcers" got shot! is that the way it went down? really? cause the way I understand it boston is a pretty tight community.... and they have a PROCESS that they went through where media was first used to WARN and ADVISE people, cops were dispatched to protect people, and feds were later added to catch the 'terrorists' if armed cops came to my door after someone had just BOMBED the local park,, I would figure that perhaps that person was NEARBY, and they needed to do their job,,,, our rights weren't based on "extigent circumstances", they were based on keeping the government from oppressing us. as you know, they(the government) decide what extigent circumstances are, then they decide how many rights of ours they can trample... we have no control or say in these matters, they have it all... We do have the right to object. We do have the right to voice our objections or sue them for trampling on our rights, but how many individuals will take the effort to do that? Who will speak out and object with all the emotional rhetoric and terror the media is producing? Now they are talking about placing cameras EVERYWHERE. BIG BROTHER is getting a foot hold one small town at a time. what reason would a person have in those circumstances to object to a search? its not like their daughter jaywalked, or someone heard them yell at the child AN ATTACK had occurred on the citizens of that community,, the attackers were at large in that area,,, what is unreasonable or why would I object to someone coming around my home to make sure Im safe? how are you not safe? they told people to stay in doors, where it's safe... i can understand it if they actually see something that makes them suspicious that he may be in your home, like a broken window, open door, anything like that... but just to barge in and search your home, even though you've told them he's not there, and there is no sign of him?

smart2009 Joined Tue 02/17/09 Posts: 1474	Wed 04/24/13 07:51 PM
New information emerged Wednesday from U.S. officials that the name of one of the Boston Marathon bombing suspects had been added to a U.S. government terrorist database long before the explosions.

smart2009 Joined Tue 02/17/09 Posts: 1474	Wed 04/24/13 07:53 PM
Russia warned that we were backing the terrorists in Syria and we shouted them down. . Now it appears they warned us twice about the boston bomber and we did not listen. It is a sad day when you can get more reliable info from the Russians than from our own government. How on earth do we happen to be on the side of al-Qaeda in Syria? Crazy! I am tired of my lying Government, Democrats and Republicans alike.

metalwing Joined Fri 11/14/08 Posts: 26218	Thu 04/25/13 01:36 AM
New information emerged Wednesday from U.S. officials that the name of one of the Boston Marathon bombing suspects had been added to a U.S. government terrorist database long before the explosions. The FBI claims they misspelled his name.

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Thu 04/25/13 01:53 AM


Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Thu 04/25/13 01:57 AM
The most disturbing thing about the Boston Bombing incident is the martial law and the illegal search of citizens homes afterwards. How do we, the public, even know if those two guys had anything to do with it? How would we know if this was just another false flag or drill for martial law? They attempted it after Katrina and went around confiscating law abiding citizens guns who were just wanting to stay and protect their homes from looters. I don't like where this attitude is going. The media painted a picture that the citizens were all so happy to have their homes searched. I doubt that was the case. i was wondering about that... no search warrants, but ok to go in anyway? so what if i said no? Too bad. They ordered people out of their homes while they searched. That is the authority of the patriot act in action. I think all of them should sue the local law enforcement, but I doubt it that would do any good. People will just be wimps about it. Sheeple. its not patriot act,, its called extigent circumstances,, a matter of public safety,, where the time to obtain warrants would place the public at further risk,,,, still think Einstein's Theory of Relativity applying to Morality?

HappyBun Joined Sun 04/14/13 Posts: 417	Thu 04/25/13 10:46 AM
The Boston bombings could just be revenge for American and Nato Foreign Policy around the world.

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Thu 04/25/13 10:57 AM
The Boston bombings could just be revenge for American and Nato Foreign Policy around the world. the bombing of Grozny by NATO in 3535!

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Thu 04/25/13 11:26 AM Edited by Jeanniebean on Thu 04/25/13 11:27 AM
Russia warned that we were backing the terrorists in Syria and we shouted them down. . Now it appears they warned us twice about the boston bomber and we did not listen. It is a sad day when you can get more reliable info from the Russians than from our own government. How on earth do we happen to be on the side of al-Qaeda in Syria? Crazy! I am tired of my lying Government, Democrats and Republicans alike. We (the CIA) created al-Qaeda. Without al-Qaeda there would be no permanent "war on terror" to keep the citizens terrified enough to give up all their rights to privacy and guns and illegal searches. to msharmony: who askED "why would anyone refuse to allow a search?" The answer: Because we have a right to privacy and should be protected against illegal searches. WE DON'T HAVE TO HAVE A REASON TO REFUSE. If they don't have a search warrant, they should gracefully STAY THE HELL OUT. We don't need a reason to say no to an illegal search.