Previous 1
Topic: Obama Delivering 290,000 Illegals To U.S. Homes
no photo
Sat 07/05/14 11:13 AM
Edited by alleoops on Sat 07/05/14 11:16 AM
Border Meltdown: Obama Delivering 290,000 Illegals To U.S. Homes

The vast majority of 50,000 unaccompanied youths and children who have illegally crossed the Texas border during the last few months have been successfully delivered by federal agencies to their relatives living in the United States, according to a New York Times article.

A second New York Times article reports revealed that officials have caught an additional 240,000 Central American migrants since April, and are transporting many of them to their destinations throughout the United States.

The deluge of 290,000 illegals — so far — are exploiting legal loopholes that allow them to get temporary permits to stay in the United States.

Experts say that President Barack Obama’s administration has failed to close the loopholes and is unlikely to deport more than a small percentage of the illegals, despite the high unemployment rates among American Latino, African-American and white youths, and the strapped budgets of many cities and towns.

The president’s policy has caused protests by frightened citizens in towns such as Murrieta. But Obama’s allies — such as La Raza, an ethnic lobby for Latinos — are eager to escalate the conflict and to paint the protestors as racists. Those protests may escalate before the November elections.

Both New York Times articles described the border-crossing illegal aliens as “immigrants.” In fact, “immigrants” is the term for people who legally migrate into the United States.

Few of the illegal immigrants are high-school graduates, or have skills that would allow them to earn more than they cost to federal, state and local taxpayers.

Officials have not said where they’ve delivered the adults or youth illegals, but pro-American activists are keeping track of some locations, including San Diego, Calif.

Officials have defended the administration’s catch-and-release policy, which critics say is inviting more Central Americans to cross the border in the hope of being arrested by the border patrol.




no photo
Sat 07/05/14 12:09 PM
Edited by alleoops on Sat 07/05/14 12:15 PM
Feds dumping hundreds of undocumented immigrants at Arizona bus stops.

The immigrants, mostly from Central America, are crossing the border in Texas, which can't cope with them. So they're being sent to Arizona, which has more processing capacity. It's unclear whether the transfers will continue, but the Arizona governor is furious.
Coming soon to a city near you. Habla Espanol?

msharmony's photo
Sat 07/05/14 01:58 PM
Edited by msharmony on Sat 07/05/14 02:00 PM
I read so many complaining, but few offering solutions

deportation is a process that involves money too , yes?

imprisonment , involves money?

so how are the american people going to deal with 'illegal' in a way that wont cost them money,, which seems to be the primary concern,,,,,?

do we put all resources into the new 'illegal immigrants' or do we first try to figure out what to do with those who are living amongst us?

what should have priority?

no photo
Sat 07/05/14 02:27 PM

I read so many complaining, but few offering solutions

deportation is a process that involves money too , yes?

imprisonment , involves money?

so how are the american people going to deal with 'illegal' in a way that wont cost them money,, which seems to be the primary concern,,,,,?

do we put all resources into the new 'illegal immigrants' or do we first try to figure out what to do with those who are living amongst us?

what should have priority?


Enforcing and protecting the border should be priority. Who knows how many terrorist and diseases have crossed it...so far.

msharmony's photo
Sat 07/05/14 02:29 PM
all of it is enforcing and protecting

but which part is most important, keeping out more?

if so, than why would amnesty be a bad idea for those already here,,,,?


forget going after them to focus energies on keeping anymore from coming in?

no photo
Sat 07/05/14 02:33 PM

all of it is enforcing and protecting

but which part is most important, keeping out more?

if so, than why would amnesty be a bad idea for those already here,,,,?


forget going after them to focus energies on keeping anymore from coming in?


Got to stop the bleeding before one can heal the wound. We haven't done that.

Lpdon's photo
Sat 07/05/14 05:46 PM
Deporting doesn't cost NEARLY what it costs to keep them here, print and run them then kick their a$$ back to Mexico then make it to where they can never gain legal citizenship.

Not to mention Illegal is Illegal.

Lpdon's photo
Sat 07/05/14 05:47 PM
Because you don't reward someone for breaking the law.

no photo
Sat 07/05/14 06:24 PM
Dumpem back in Mexico and fire a few shots over their heads.
Adios amigos

Lpdon's photo
Sat 07/05/14 06:51 PM
Why not, Mexico technically declared war with us last week, flying into us airspace and shooting at American.citizens, Federal Agents.

Nyteplay's photo
Sun 07/06/14 11:26 PM
Would that be considered an act of war or a terrorist attack? Deportation does not work- the majority of illegals cross the border again. Amnesty is a bad idea and a bad policy. It's akin to giving a child a cookie after bad behavior. As a country, we need to address both sides of the issue. Let's first secure our borders, starting with the states that are hardest hit by the influx of illegals. Electric fences, guard dogs, land mines etc. Use whatever works to prevent this mass incursion. Secondly, go after those that are all ready here. Round em up, write em up, and lock em up. It may cost the taxpayers money but in the end, it's cheaper than uninsured illegals requiring medical care,school districts absorbing the costs of illegal enrollment, or risking a serious TB outbreak
No easy answers but we need to create a solution to the problem. I agree all bleeding stops eventually- one of two ways-one either bleeds out and dies or the cut clots and stos
Just saying

Sojourning_Soul's photo
Mon 07/07/14 05:56 AM
Edited by Sojourning_Soul on Mon 07/07/14 06:04 AM

all of it is enforcing and protecting

but which part is most important, keeping out more?

if so, than why would amnesty be a bad idea for those already here,,,,?


forget going after them to focus energies on keeping anymore from coming in?


It costs MUCH MORE to taxpayers in the long run for the "continuing" support of these illegals than to ship them back or close, strengthen, and secure the border!

We could use the BILLIONS, perhaps TRILLIONS, spent on the failed "war on drugs" and foriegn aid to countries that hate us, to do the job quite efficiently!

metalwing's photo
Tue 07/08/14 12:14 AM

Would that be considered an act of war or a terrorist attack? Deportation does not work- the majority of illegals cross the border again. Amnesty is a bad idea and a bad policy. It's akin to giving a child a cookie after bad behavior. As a country, we need to address both sides of the issue. Let's first secure our borders, starting with the states that are hardest hit by the influx of illegals. Electric fences, guard dogs, land mines etc. Use whatever works to prevent this mass incursion. Secondly, go after those that are all ready here. Round em up, write em up, and lock em up. It may cost the taxpayers money but in the end, it's cheaper than uninsured illegals requiring medical care,school districts absorbing the costs of illegal enrollment, or risking a serious TB outbreak
No easy answers but we need to create a solution to the problem. I agree all bleeding stops eventually- one of two ways-one either bleeds out and dies or the cut clots and stos
Just saying


Good Post!

The fence around the White House works well!

HoneyFly's photo
Tue 07/08/14 01:11 AM
One day - an outbreak will take place & everyone will be moving to Mexico.

TBRich's photo
Tue 07/08/14 05:19 AM
A terrible mess, shame Obama has to follow the LAW passed by Bush.

no photo
Tue 07/08/14 07:08 AM

I read so many complaining, but few offering solutions

deportation is a process that involves money too , yes?

imprisonment , involves money?

so how are the american people going to deal with 'illegal' in a way that wont cost them money,, which seems to be the primary concern,,,,,?

do we put all resources into the new 'illegal immigrants' or do we first try to figure out what to do with those who are living amongst us?

what should have priority?



the money that is being spent should be spent on enforcing existing laws. I have also read more recently that the number who will actually be permitted to stay is much smaller. It is not a racial issue (to me anyway) but an issue of respect for our country's laws and borders. Crossing illegally and defying our policies is not a good start......offerring solutions? I believe the solutions are outlined in the CFR.

no photo
Tue 07/08/14 07:15 AM


Would that be considered an act of war or a terrorist attack? Deportation does not work- the majority of illegals cross the border again. Amnesty is a bad idea and a bad policy. It's akin to giving a child a cookie after bad behavior. As a country, we need to address both sides of the issue. Let's first secure our borders, starting with the states that are hardest hit by the influx of illegals. Electric fences, guard dogs, land mines etc. Use whatever works to prevent this mass incursion. Secondly, go after those that are all ready here. Round em up, write em up, and lock em up. It may cost the taxpayers money but in the end, it's cheaper than uninsured illegals requiring medical care,school districts absorbing the costs of illegal enrollment, or risking a serious TB outbreak
No easy answers but we need to create a solution to the problem. I agree all bleeding stops eventually- one of two ways-one either bleeds out and dies or the cut clots and stos
Just saying


Good Post!

The fence around the White House works well!


well I do agree that until we start sending people back the message will be that they can stay. That, along with a stepped up legal processing of legal immigrants would be a start. As long as so much effort has to go into enforcement tho', it is harder to devote more effort to legal processing. Which is not fair to the REAL immigrants who are waiting.....legally.

But the Central Americans and Mexicans need to understand that we have quotas for every nationality and only so many from one region or another can come here in a year. I think we need to see our neighbors respecting our policies. Big time.

no photo
Tue 07/08/14 07:17 AM

all of it is enforcing and protecting

but which part is most important, keeping out more?

if so, than why would amnesty be a bad idea for those already here,,,,?


forget going after them to focus energies on keeping anymore from coming in?


because harmony they are felons for one thing, and if they are not deported the message remains that it OK and it is NOT

It is also not fair to those who are immigrating legally.

We need, as well, to teach corporations a lesson, that hiring illegals will not be profitable for them in the long run. Corporations who do the hiring are the biggest problem (with the ones already here)

Conrad_73's photo
Tue 07/08/14 07:25 AM
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/un-wants-refugee-status-central-americans-coming-us-illegally


U.N. Wants Refugee Status for Central Americans Coming to U.S. Illegally
July 8, 2014 - 9:06 AM
By ALBERTO ARCE and MARCOS ALEMAN, Associated Press


SAN JOSE, Costa Rica (AP) — United Nations officials are pushing for many of the Central Americans fleeing to the U.S. to be treated as refugees displaced by armed conflict, a designation meant to increase pressure on the United States and Mexico to accept tens of thousands of people currently ineligible for asylum.

Officials with the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees say they hope to see a regional agreement on that status Thursday when migration and interior department representatives from the U.S., Mexico, and Central America meet in Nicaragua. The group will discuss updating a 30-year-old declaration regarding the obligations nations have to aid refugees..............noway

adj4u's photo
Tue 07/08/14 08:06 AM
Edited by adj4u on Tue 07/08/14 08:11 AM


yep the piranha intro to the rio grande is looking like a viable option


i guess they could start using the fema concentration camps and using
them as a labor force

until it is made an undesirable destination for illegals they will
continue to come illegally


the number of illegals in this country could become an invading force
to arm themselves an violently take over this country if not for the
armed citizens of this country that could rapidly become a local
militia as the word is intended to be used in the second amendment


one gun control law i can get behind and support you must be a legal
citizen to buy a weapon

Previous 1