geeez...call me stupid....way off....give me approx. 25 mins....I'll be back....lol...

there is no stupid!

smiles...

only just what be not meant to be.

The 2nd Question you asked about the 1week....that would be 7,000 years?

The 25 minutes in the 1 day construct, would equal 525,960,000 minutes of the 1000 years.

Therefore your answer is: 0.000000047 of a minute in the 1 day construct.

I love a woman with brains!

The answer is 17.36. The formula is ...

[25/(24x60)]x1000

7000 years does seem to ring true with other corresponding data to the same end or beginning point of time factored.

but sum days my brain just doesn't want me to do math, lol...

don't have a definitive just now.

but if 7000 years be so, than 70 weeks would be 49,000 years, which would match a major geological record of events upon earth.

and match many theories of repeating organic "mental mind" growth every seven years in the human body.

but it all has to match up to fit a "theory unbroken".

or to arrive at the understanding of all the factors that create the supposed "unbroken circle" of time and space construct.

also, the fact that historians have seemed to access history as "repeating", nearly exact same events, as overlayed timer and again, just with new modern tools, with just different people in those same exact "roles" creating the "new" but same events...

anyhow...

so that's like 3 "sames" at 17.35 years as 25 minutes in a time ratio of 1-1000...

so if that be so, than how long is a week, with 25 minutes as 17.35 years

only humbly asking due to many killed brain cells...

hehehe...

smiles.

Does that mean my second guess of 17.361111 was right??!!!

Math sucks....

Mr Hawking's is awaiting these simple numbers to be published in written form to finish his equations!

smiles.

it does appear the greater consensus doth agree with 17.36...

the "leap year" is a unknown factor...

but since they occur only once every 4 years, factoring without it still gives the needed numbers to factor a range of possible error...

but the question is, can those who came up with different answers. find the same conclusions, and then agree as well, to formulate a 100% concur of all.

Lmao..!!!!... Had my whole family doing the math...but really....25minutes is just that...25 mins... Cop out..!!!!lol

my bad.....don't wanna say cop out to loud....I'm either a racist or a cop hater.... Sic.... Lol..

i know!

that's why i asked other wise brains to factor it!

hehehe...

wise brains seek wise brains to know what wise brains don't know, lol...

precious precious precious.

use the bastet factor of .694 years per minute...she is correct...

and btw Romeo, that strategically placed brim of your hat (1 eye showing) is a dead giveaway that you are also a member of the illuminati...lol

Indeed you were correct! but Bastet wasn't guessing!

17.37 years is correct if 25 minutes are representing minutes (time) out of the 1000 years.


0.000000047 of a minute is correct if the 25 minutes is represent time in the 1 day construct.

Were does the 25 minutes come from; part of the 1000 years, or the 1 day construct? It is not defined in the original question; only 25 minutes.

The key word is "...in..." and on both sides of the equation represents the opposite side of the equation.

With time do we not need to look at a four dementional equation rather than three dementional?

it is perhaps better said, how long is 25 minutes in relation to 1 day, if 1 day equals 1000 years.

your correct...

could have been worded much better.

i'm still awaiting Romeo and the others with different answers...

to see if they as well can arrive at the same conclusion, to then factor the exact length of "short time" of repeating time cycles, which then easily fill in all the missing gaps in science of "long time"...

as can one "factor" time unlimited, as that cannot be factored...

but, if time rotates circular, just as we devised our clocks, and as the earth obviously does, then the beginning inception of each "short time stamp", should become apparent...

then, if all data is overlayed, it should to match up with all past re-occurring events.

to sea what time it is, so to speak, in unlimited time, versus "short time"...

and since the cosmos can be seen to be as gears of a clock, moving slowly just as our clocks do when watching them...

then these factors known should correlate with all the "astrological" or astronomers observations of the cosmic clock down thru time...

tying together the geological and astrological records being the end goal, hence then able to unlock the simple missing components of process of quantum theories, that have eluded thus far.

anyhow...

all input is magical.

and essential.



peace