Previous 1
Topic: Criminal (Jared Fogle)
oceanriderz's photo
Sat 10/24/15 11:54 AM
What would be the right sentence for him?

no photo
Sat 10/24/15 11:57 AM
Public execution ? smokin

misstina2's photo
Sat 10/24/15 12:27 PM
flowerforyou to have his subway cut in halfflowerforyou

no photo
Sat 10/24/15 12:55 PM

flowerforyou to have his subway cut in halfflowerforyou


:banana: hhhaa....

no photo
Sat 10/24/15 03:36 PM
oceanriderz,

Jarad of Subways to plead guilty to kiddie porn - Mingle2.com http://m.mingle2.com/topic/show/442165?page=1/

Got very heated & locked

no photo
Sat 10/24/15 03:47 PM

NATION
Ex-Subway pitchman Jared Fogle makes $1 million in payments to 10 victims

Christopher Doering, USATODAY

Matt Detrich, The Indiana Star
Jared Fogle, center, a former pitchman for Subway, is escorted to a car by police after appearing in federal court Wednesday on charges of child pornography and having sex with minors.
Jared Fogle, the former Subway restaurant pitchman, has paid out a total of $1 million in restitution to 10 of his 14 victims.

Fogle, who has agreed to plead guilty to child pornography charges and having sex with minors, has paid $100,000 to each of the 10 victims. Prosecutors expect the remaining four individuals to receive similar payments before Fogle is sentenced on Nov. 19. The funds came from $1.4 million put aside under the terms of a plea agreement.
Fogle faces a possible sentence of a minimum of five years in prison.
Fogle, a 38-year-old father of two, rose to national prominence when the Subway chain discovered he lost more than 200 pounds by eating their sandwiches and exercising. The restaurant giant featured him in their ads starting in 2000 and he continued working for the chain until July – the same month when authorities raided his Indianapolis home.
Court documents allege Fogle commissioned Russell Taylor, the executive director of his charity focused on childhood obesity, to produce pornography using at least a dozen underage victims, one as young as 6. He also flew several times to New York City to have sex with at least two underage girls.

USA TODAY
Ex-head of Jared Fogle foundation back in court

USA TODAY
Jared Fogle sought out teen sex, child porn

Fogle started his solicitation of adult prostitutes in 2007, the charging documents said. He frequently made travel plans for sex to coincide with his business trips.

USA TODAY
Voices: Jared Fogle — the monster next door

Ex-Subway pitchman Jared Fogle makes $1 million in payments to 10 victims http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/10/24/jared-fogle-subway-victims/74526806/


Sojourning_Soul's photo
Sat 10/24/15 05:16 PM

Either way he'll get to enjoy a few submarines and torpedoes with some heros where he's going bigsmile

Rock's photo
Sat 10/24/15 05:24 PM

What would be the right sentence for him?


I'm thinking, a 210 grain semi jacketed .45 calibre hollowpoint to the base of his skull.

no photo
Sat 10/24/15 05:33 PM
use a couple of rimfire rounds instead. less cleanup after

Rock's photo
Sat 10/24/15 05:46 PM

use a couple of rimfire rounds instead. less cleanup after



Sure... be all neat and tidy. :laughing:


msharmony's photo
Sat 10/24/15 07:41 PM
Edited by msharmony on Sat 10/24/15 07:44 PM
depends upon what he 'actually' did,,,

I'm still unclear of much except what he is alleged to have done,,,

jail is good enough, for me, for rapists,

unless the victim is prepubescent , in which case I think daily raping would be more suitable


I do think those who have reached the stage of 9th grade and later can 'consent' to sexual activities, personally,, but forced upon anyone, sex is more about power and humiliation and the victim deserves justice,,,

germanchoclate1981's photo
Sun 10/25/15 05:41 AM
Proof once again,
Guilty until proven financially flexible......frustrated
What's the point if they prosecute under the minimal extent of the law.
frustrated

no photo
Sun 10/25/15 08:52 AM
Sure the big, bad, bullies.. FBI are just picking on the chubby guy & his nerdy friend & their employers, who had knowledge, (including employers who are also mothers, who's children, Jarad tried to lure) ... Nope, it all because they dress funny & eat vegetable sandwiches.

There was no child porn on their computers & the age of consent has no conditions or restrictions, including solicitation of minors & solicitation to recruit children 15 & younger.

There were no confessions & the victims are just child wh@res, who must of enjoyed it, & or profited from it. Or just wanted Scooby Doo drugs for a backyard birthday party. Or they were so impressed by Jarad's stardom they used him to further their career in finger painting.
Therefore they are not worthy of any justice or financial restitution.

Read the links or about the two cases & stop making me laugh.. at the lunacy.

Conrad_73's photo
Sun 10/25/15 09:00 AM
Edited by Conrad_73 on Sun 10/25/15 09:02 AM

use a couple of rimfire rounds instead. less cleanup after

.46 rimfire,or 2.34 mm rimfire?laugh

msharmony's photo
Sun 10/25/15 10:50 AM
Edited by msharmony on Sun 10/25/15 10:51 AM
none is picking on Fogle

he is guilty of crimes that have penalties,, the question was only what the crime is to answer the question of what he should receive as a penalty'

the ACTUAL charges and court documents indicate his crimes are two things

https://lintvwlin.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/jaredfogle_allegations.pdf

1."receiving" child porn(which means someone gave him porn of minors which is anyone not yet 18

2. he traveled to have sex with a minor, who was 17 years of age



given those facts, my answer stands,, I do believe a girl at 17 can give consent, even if the law figures it otherwise, so I PERSONALLY don't feel there should be any penalty there


I also believe he obviously has a currently unacceptable attraction to teens,,,for which he should do some time and mental health assistance,,,,

msharmony's photo
Mon 10/26/15 11:50 AM
I am a female, I was a teen, I have a daughter, and girl cousins

whatever that has to do with anything

I still believe sex is sex and age is irrelevant once one is of a SEXUALLY ACTIVE age,, so long as both parties are consentual

I may personally be PISSED off at some grown man carrying on with my teen, but I still stand by my opinion that if teens are old enough to 'come out' and to be sexually active and to be expected at some point to become sexually active,, that is the point where there 'consent' is implied and aknowledged,, regardless the age of the other party,,,

no photo
Mon 10/26/15 12:12 PM

msharmony's photo
Mon 10/26/15 10:32 PM
Edited by msharmony on Mon 10/26/15 10:35 PM
nm

Rock's photo
Mon 10/26/15 10:45 PM
Edited by Rock on Mon 10/26/15 10:47 PM
.

msharmony's photo
Mon 10/26/15 10:49 PM


none is picking on Fogle

he is guilty of crimes that have penalties,, the question was only what the crime is to answer the question of what he should receive as a penalty'

the ACTUAL charges and court documents indicate his crimes are two things

https://lintvwlin.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/jaredfogle_allegations.pdf

1."receiving" child porn(which means someone gave him porn of minors which is anyone not yet 18

2. he traveled to have sex with a minor, who was 17 years of age



given those facts, my answer stands,, I do believe a girl at 17 can give consent, even if the law figures it otherwise, so I PERSONALLY don't feel there should be any penalty there


I also believe he obviously has a currently unacceptable attraction to teens,,,for which he should do some time and mental health assistance,,,,


Paralegal did you say?

1. Age of consent varies state to state. Some states have caveats in the age of consent laws.

2. Traveling to have sex with a person who has not reached age of majority (18), is a criminal violation of the Mann Act.

3. Kiddie porn. 17, is NOT the age of consent for pornographic images ANYWHERE in the United States.



yes, flattered that you should remember,,lol



I do believe a girl at 17 can give consent, even if the law figures it otherwise

'I do believe' was to clarify my personal belief about it, and 'even if' was to clarify my acknowledgment that the laws do not reflect my personal belief



Previous 1