Then again there is "The Third Way"

THE FUNCTION OF POVERTY
The standard of living of the average American has to decline...
- Paul Volcker, Chairman of The Federal Reserve, New York Times, 18 October
1979, p.1, Volcker Asserts U.S Must Trim Living Standard.
'Money is power'. Well, to be precise, it's the gap between the rich and poor
that counts. The objective of the elite is to maintain the capitalist structure as it
is with one vital difference. There will be no middle class in the New World Order.
Under public-private partnership, the middle class, free markets, and consumer
choice will be replaced with a neo-feudal society in which the Money Trust
dictates to an impoverished populace through a supranational technocracy. This
is international socialism, run for the benefit of the financial elite who own the
economy and control the emerging continental Politburos. The polite name for it
is 'The Third Way', but less deferential commentators call it 'corporate fascism'.
The corporations need government to restrict consumer choice in the market
place, allowing the cartel to determine what we can buy, sell, or even do in our
own homes. The 'Third Way' is the path to utopia for our self-appointed
philosopher kings, advocated by the likes of Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, and Gerhard
Schroder - their senior political puppets. There is no difference between
ostensibly right and left wing political parties about the eventual destination,
even if they appear to be travelling at different speeds towards it.
Real power, then, is achieved when the ruling class controls the material
essentials of life, granting and withholding them as if they were privileges, as
George Orwell reflected:
From the moment when the machine first made its appearance it was clear to
all thinking people that the need for human drudgery, and therefore to a great
extent for human inequality, had disappeared. If the machine were used
deliberately for that end, hunger, overwork, dirt, illiteracy, and disease could be
eliminated within a few generations But it was also clear that an all-around
increase in wealth threatened the destruction... of a hierarchical society. In a
world in which everyone worked short hours, had enough to eat, lived in a house
with a bathroom and a refrigerator, and possessed a motorcar or even an
airplane, the most obvious and perhaps the most important form of inequality
would already have disappeared. If it once became general, wealth would confer
no distinction. Such a society could not long remain stable. For if leisure and
security were enjoyed by all alike, the great mass of human beings who are
normally stupefied by poverty would become literate and would learn to think for
themselves; and when once they had done this, they would sooner or later
realize that the privileged minority had no function, and they would sweep it
away. In the long run, a hierarchical society was only possible on a basis of
poverty and ignorance... It is deliberate policy to keep even the favoured groups
somewhere near the brink of hardship because a general state of scarcity
increases the importance of small privileges and thus magnifies the distinction
between one group and another... The social atmosphere is that of a besieged
city, where the possession of a lump of horseflesh makes the difference between
wealth and poverty.

America is not failing the 1%

One has to ask the questions


Who Benefits from building Prisons and Military Weapons?

and

Who Benefits from spending on Education and Welfare?

thats good for you,, you are not Zimmerman and he was not you, he had no 'extensive training' and no certifications , he was just a want to be cop with no real legal authority over anyone,,,

and there is no court that would say you have the right to put your hands on me because Im 'suspicious',,thats a different standard than a citizens arrest to actually 'stop a crime in progress'.....

which version is that?

how do you 'get up in someones face' from behind?

the pictures I saw were of blood on the back of his bald head,,blood runs down, its called gravity.

Im not a cop, so I dont stop crimes, take people into custody, investigate crimes , interview suspects, restrain people,,,and I have no legal right as a citizen to do any of those things either,,,,

lets wait on the evidence,,,,

lol, we will wait for what the evidence finds, in regards to how soon after the conversation he 'backed off',,,,,,

all we KNOW is , (according to zimmerman while on the phone)

treyvon changed directions, crossed the street , and ran,,,,and that Zimmerman was at that point FOLLOWING HIM,,,,

actually, he hasnt.

wanna be tough guy? is that why he changed directions, crossed the street, AND ran? doesnt sound like someone trying to be tough,,(especially while on the phone with a girl, the prime time tough guys show off...)


on the other hand, getting out the car to follow around someone 'suspicious' and 'on drugs' (who turns out to not be on drugs at all) so they dont 'get away',, is pretty tough guyish....

those names have PROFESSIONAL awards under their belt,,,,,,and are behind other major successes in their business

just not the same as lovitz...


kanye in maybe ten years has a net worth of 90 mill

in a couple decades, I doubt Lovits has even 20


spike lee is not current anymore either, but still see him as an award winning director,,,,

I love Adam. I just see Lovitz as the kato kaelin of comedy,, mostly friend to alot of stars who put him on in their projects.