Topic:
Jon Lovitz On Obama
|
|
all I remember is how famous he made the 'liar' character,,,,,
nothing else really stands out about him,, so he is a person with an opinion,,,,,Im sure he has met his share of folks who would say the same of him,,, |
|
|
|
Topic:
Delegate Count
|
|
|
|
Topic:
seriously?
|
|
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/virginia-teacher-arrested-allegedly-firing-blanks-students-164758793.html
A Virginia teacher has been charged with 12 felony counts after allegedly pulling a blank firing gun on his students and firing several times. "One for each student who was in there. And basically the charges result of inciting fear into the students," Washington County Sheriff Fred Newman told KSDK.com. The incident occurred just days after the five-year-anniversary of the Virginia Tech shootings, during which 32 people were shot by a mentally ill student. The Kingsport Times reports that Manuael Ernest Dillow, 60, was teaching a welding glass at an Abingdon, Virginia, vocational school when he reportedly "gathered" the attention of his students by forcing them to line up. "He then pulled a 'blank firing handgun,' black in color, from the back waistband of his pants and discharged the weapon between four and ten shots in the direction of the line of the students," according to a police statement. "The 'report' of the firearm was similar to that of a firearm that fires a projectile, thus placing the students in fear, according to statements. No students were physically injured as a result of the incident." Sheriff Newman said Dillow apparently borrowed the gun, which is not capable of shooting actual bullets, from another school department. The Washington County Sheriff's Office says the charges levied against Dillow are all class 6 felonies, each punishable by up to five years in prison and a $2,500 fine. Dillow has since been released on a $20,000 bond. The police department has not yet said why Dillow allegedly fired the blanks at the students, but he has been removed from his teaching position while the investigation continues. |
|
|
|
probably not the only one,,,
but IM sure many of us admire nice and wouldnt mind it being in there somewhere however , if 'nice' is the only adjective that comes to mind,, it will probably become boring,,, as will any other adjective that stands alone to describe someone,,, |
|
|
|
Topic:
Zimmerman Released!
Edited by
msharmony
on
Tue 04/24/12 12:21 AM
|
|
This whole situation so upsets me. I see both sides of this story and know the truth lies somewher in an area that probably neither side really wanted to go. I have lived across the USA and too many people are living in constant fear that thugs, drug dealers, gang bangers and bigots are taking over. Kids run in cliques/teams/packs/ gangs, call it what you like, sometimes because they want to but too often because there is saftey in numbers and little respect that ANYONE is living by anything but the law of the jungle even in small towns. Most of us have little real respect for police officers and their ability to fairly defend us when it gets right down to it. Most of us have had at least one run in with an officer that was rude at best and abusive if not full of excuses about why they can not enforce the law or what we think the laws are. Sad part is it seems the only people that really are guaranteed protection are the criminals. Victims have to pay for their own attorneys, investigators, and in many cases protection if they survive the initial crime. Citizens can't go down and report a crime and be guaranteed that anything will be done. I don't think there are clean hands on either side of this story. This law that they claim allows self protection has a lot of holes in it and invites abuse and tradgedy. I think it encourages people who are already scared to think they can interpret self defense much more widley than really exists. I think Zimmerman was already angry or he would not have been out after dark, carrying a weapon, running down a person the size of an adult and challengeing his right to be on a public area even if he felt it was "his" neighborhood and the person did not belong. There are several things that suggest he had a problem with boundries and keeping his temper in check. How he got a gun permit makes me wonder and i find it hard to believe anyone actually authorized him to be doing a neighborhood watch. While I get the concept of neighborhood watch the operative word is to watch not try to be a wanna be cop and trying to question, harrass, detain, or arrest anyone or most especially use deadly force. While a lot of people think he is going to skate on this I think if he does not have a massive legal team researching, documenting, and argueing his side it is likely that he will end up in jail or at least being sued civally and eiter are going to trash his and his families life. Especially from where it appears he was directly told to desist and let those who are trained handle it. For all intents and purposes he has trashed his life and even if he does not find himself charged he will will have to look over his shoulder the rest of his life. The press will never let this drop and some nut case will probably compound what is already a disaster. Should a 17 year old, even a less than angelic teen, give up his life because someone does not like his look? Or tried to defend himself wheather verbally or physically from someone who is not clearly a police officer? No way. If someone came up on me in the dark you can bet your britches if all I have is a can of tea and a bag of skittles I am going to knock hell out of them and do my best to get away In reality I think Zimmerman bit off more than he could chew. This kid had no fear, or eveidrntly any supervision, keeping him from running the streets after dark by jimself and that misplaced bravado cost him his life. If it had not been Zimmerman it would sooner or later been someone else. While I feel the parents pain I can not understand why they did not do exactlyu what I did with my teens which was to stand on their neck anytime they even tried to run the streets after twilight. And believe me that is not easy to do as a single parent much less as two parents who should have insisted that he be accompanied by an adult that had the self control and the common sense not to walk around dressed like a thug and not at least try to defuse the situation with a reasonable explanation of who they were and why they had a right to be doing what they were doing. My teens had jobs, an dates, and school activities of all sorts but I would not have dreamed of them going to a store for anthing at that time of night unaccompamied. And a kid who had been proved to have and attitude with authority? NO WAY. My "kids".are in the second half of their thirties, Veterans and world tr4avelors and they still don't "stroll" around solo without and ID and a cell phone to get help. And no they don't knuckle under to every big mouth bully who trys to treat them like a second class citizwen because of the color of their skin or their age then or now but they had the common sense to defuse a situation from a distance. To me it is a tradgedy that this teen had not been required to carry a cell phone and call 911 and report he was being followed or to go to a business or safe house if it meant that the parents had to get off their duff and go pick him up. I raised my teens and 20 somethings in the mean streets of Atlanta and I made a point of making sure that where ever they went people knew who they were and where they belonged. I had the legit neighborhood watch captains on a first name basis with my kids and they were not allowed to wear "thug" clothes no matter how much they thought they were cool. Was it fun checking behind my kids and being called a meanest Mom in the world, and worse, or have sullen teens pouting at times because I told them they would not cease to exist because they didn't go tto certain parties/hang out ect. like the other kids? Or yanking their priveleges when they "tested" the rules? Not really. At times it really felt like a forced march riding herd on them and keeping an eye on who they were friends with. It was embarrassing and aggravateing having even adults tell me how old fashioned I was when I was knocking myself out giving my kids every opportunity I could manage. Defintely was a drag staying up late making sure they were not sneaking out or stuck at home when they were gorunded. But it sure beats the alternative these parents are going through. While they are blameing everyone else sooner or later they are going to have to face their part in this and I would not give them good odds of getting through this when the cameras go away and there are no more marches showing them sympathy. And the oportunist that are leading the marches will not bother to stand by them or help them once the headlines fade. Their pain will go on for a lifetime. I agree with everything except the parents responsibility. EVeryone is not the same. Hoodies are wool long sleeve sweaters with hoods, not thug clothes, in the rain they are more than appropriate and have nothing to do with someones right to harass someone else. This teen did have a cell phone, but a seventeen year old male who is from the hood probably has no reason to believe that calling the police about someone 'following' them would result in any action whatsoever. I think this would have only happened 'sooner or later' if another person had profiled his appearance, gone out their way to follow him and confront him, in the dark and the rain. I dont feel the parents have the responsibility in this. He was old enough to drive a car, and old enough to walk alone at seven pm, which is around the time he was going to and coming from the store. My teen son went out unassisted when he was seventeen, that did not make it my responsibility if someone decided to approach and kill him. HE actually was already on a college campus in another state before he was eighteen, so he had no ADULTS piggybacking his moves. I had to trust him at some point,, seventeen is as good an age as any. and it depends upon the teen too, this teen had already saved his dad from a fire , so he was probably mature enough to handle a walk to the neighborhood store. |
|
|
|
Topic:
HUNGER GAMES
|
|
I did go see Hunger Games... I was a bit disappointed. Was hyped up too much for the end result. I am glad I seen it. I felt that way about Twilight,,, no accounting for the taste of mainstream teens,,lol hopefully the acting in Hunger games will be better,,, The studios probably figured the teens in the theater would be concentrating more on their texting and not paying attention to the acting on screen. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
nice is considerate of others ,,,its making the extra effort to (at the minimum) not harm ot hurt others or (at the maximum) to make others feel good at all times,,,
|
|
|
|
lets hope
1st , I think living is harder than dying and 2nd, Im opposed to the premeditated/planned ending of human life,,, |
|
|
|
Topic:
Zimmerman Released!
|
|
haaa
so when are yall signing up to execute all the white weed smoking graffiti artists? |
|
|
|
Topic:
Remember everyone
|
|
'the one'?
the devil,,,? |
|
|
|
smh...
lazy thinkers,, all about the instant and immediate desire,,, |
|
|
|
Topic:
Nice hardly works
|
|
Girls/Women say the want nice guys to do anything and everything with, but this isn't true. I have yet to meet a girl who wants a nice guy since I am him. I always hear how girls/women say that some "dick" broke their heart again No, they do not want a nice guy. They want a good man. See, that's where they ( and you) are going wrong. Some people get it, some are still trying to figure it out. brilliance a GOOD man who knows how and when to be 'nice' and how and when to be 'firm' (no jokes here,,,lol) |
|
|
|
Topic:
Nice hardly works
|
|
Girls/Women say the want nice guys to do anything and everything. I always hear how girls/women say that some "dick" broke again That would have to hurt. Crazy b!tches..... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
I see them both as human, and imperfect I dont believe they are lying whenever they talk, I do beleive they believe in what they say they do,,,, I also believe they have to be cautious of how to or whether to present everything about those beliefs before they are in office where they can do something about htem. Of course they're lying! Remember when Obama made promises like having the troops home in 6 months, closing Guantanamo, uniting the country etc? An overwhelming majority of politicians lie their bottoms off to get elected or reelected. the problem with such 'promises' is they cant be guaranteed a promise should never be made under those conditions when people are so literal without a disclaimer like "I promise to be in Florida tomorrow', as opposed to 'I promise to be in Florida tomorrow IF the flights go as planned and nothing happens to me or any loved ones before then,,,' but most people understand that things can happen that are unexpected and cause 'promises' to go unfulfilled,,, we can never guarantee what others will do and decisions like those are based on the actions of HUNDREDS in government I look forward to the day when candidates dont promise what will happen, just what they will 'work' towards,, |
|
|
|
Topic:
HUNGER GAMES
|
|
I did go see Hunger Games... I was a bit disappointed. Was hyped up too much for the end result. I am glad I seen it. I felt that way about Twilight,,, no accounting for the taste of mainstream teens,,lol hopefully the acting in Hunger games will be better,,, |
|
|
|
Topic:
Ex'd Out
|
|
Recently I was dateing someone and all signs were that things were good. Attentive, communicateing frequently, suggesting future plans I am thinking hey finally I have reason to be hopeful. Then BAM the Ex has a medical crisis and all bets are off if I don't want to look the other way while he plays "Hero" until she kicks him to the curb again. Any ideas why people do this? I can see why it is smart not to date someone who is still walking wounded but why do people trash theri current life to chase after something they say has been done for years? I thought it was unique to me but several gal pas have told me they have run into this also so wonder if anyone has any thoughts on the subject? sometimes if people were friends when they broke up, they decide to maintain the friendship,,,depending upon the circumstances, I would find that admirable and feel more secure with someone that had that type of (platonic) loyalty,,, IF I was secure enough to know it was platonic I broke up with my first husband whom I had grown up with and had a child with and I still loved him dearly and platonically. He also became ill and I was around to check in on him. |
|
|
|
I see them both as human, and imperfect
I dont believe they are lying whenever they talk, I do beleive they believe in what they say they do,,,, I also believe they have to be cautious of how to or whether to present everything about those beliefs before they are in office where they can do something about htem. |
|
|
|
Topic:
A question of tolerance...
|
|
I think people confuse tolerance with agreement
tolerance: 1.The ability or willingness to tolerate something, in particular the existence of opinions or behavior that one does not necessarily...: "religious tolerance" tolerate 1.Allow the existence, occurrence, or practice of (something that one does not necessarily like or agree with) without interference. IN every day life, most of us tolerate plenty in our own homes, such 'tolerance' is not seen as as much a requirement I am tolerant of smoking in public I am not tolerant of smoking in my home,,,, |
|
|
|
Well I cant possibly say this any better than a poster from the linked sight.. Sadly most Republicans will blame Obama rather then look at the years 2001 to January 2009. Romney and his handlers as well as the Republican party care about one thing, getting elected or re-elected. The Republican party will change history as many times as needed to insure the voters are given the same big lie. It was Goering who said if you tell the people the same big lie often enough the lie becomes a truth. Obama inherited a mess from Bush, yet you ask a Republican "what about Bush" and the common reply is "Who is Bush". You do not see Bush off the Crawford range, you do not see him endorsing anyone. He is a plague best left hidden. Thank you for a great piece Mr. Krugman. 3 years and 3 months in office. 2 years with an overwhelming dumbocrat congress.. spending spending spending lost our AAA credit rating.. the dollar is virtually worthless.. his financial reform plan has the banks bigger than they ever were.. making more money than they ever had.. go ahead blame Bush.. you are gonna lose real bad with this strategy.. congress spends, presidents approve spending,,, raw numbers are easy to manipulate,, without considering population growth and other factors I dont think the per capita spending has seen the increase people try to claim it has,,, and has probably declined the RAW numbers, of course (as population grows) have probably seen quite a bit of growth,,, |
|
|
|
Topic:
HUNGER GAMES
|
|
Hmmm...something familiar: teens forced to fight each other to the death until only one remains...why does that sound so familiar? Oh yeah! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-T7yPJVvXw I remember several plots like this one the lottery was a story about harvest season and someone having their 'ticket' pulled to be sacrificed lord of the rings also made me think of the children killing children theme,,,,, |
|
|