this is not proof of absence of racism

any more than killing some 'suspicious' black kid is proof of racism


the racism question is fairly insignificant in the shooting death of an unarmed 17 year old


interesting though, that in a fight involving two people, where one was injured,,,,it seemed clearer that the one who did the injuring was responsible

I think most people want someone held similarly responsible in this teenagers death,,,

so,,,give me the privilege of an individual


while you maintain the responsibility of providing as if I am your dependent...?

so,,,give me the privilege of an individual


while you maintain the responsibility of providing as if I am your dependent...?

so perhaps, the 'Factions of North America' would be a better title for us,,,

its the internet age,, shop on line for the best rates,,,

amen,,, I think one of the gravest injustices to our culture was the sweeping philosophy that people 'dont' or 'cant' change,,,

if they hit you once,,
if they cheat on you once,,,
if they commit one crime,,,
I was 'born this way'


I believe people are capable of changing ANYTHING they want to change, but that some changes take more will and effort than others and take a strong motivation to undertake


my husband hit me, he sent me to the hospital,, EXACTLY ONCE,

we went through a time of seperation, while he got counseling and we came back better than ever without EVER having another incident

but thats because he was MOTIVATED to change, it can and does happen

there is not a way to explain everything all the time

some things just 'make sense' to us and other don't


I believe what I believe because it makes sense to me, it fits in with what I have experienced and observed for myself about life in general

now, this, I can agree on.....

What do you think the founders had in mind when they chose this name?

In what way were the states supposed to be 'united' as ooposed to 'seperate and individual'?


Whenever I hear opposition to federal government, I ponder the question why we need to be one entity if we really wish to be fifty seperate and individual ones?

perhaps he should run for supreme court then


lol

so anti fed,, but not necessarily anti government


kind of a let each state do what they want kind of guy

as opposed to an overlook the states kind,,,,,,

yeah, I guess their stage names never change regardless of marital status,,,its like their trademark


I researched and found Ms Lambert DOES actually have her husbands last name,, but she just continued to be known in country as Lambert,,,

I dont think thats true everywhere, I think its a state law thing that not all states follow. IT also depends, I think, upon whether we are speaking about JAILS or prisons.

Where I llved, you didnt get strip searched, for instance,,,if you were being held for court (Which is usually what they do for more minor offenses)and were placed in holding cells, but not in 'general population'

this is something that puzzles me about Mr Pauls fanfare

is he actually anti government?

or is he just anti FEDERAL government?

Does he want smaller FEDERAL interference and more STATE rights?

or just less government all around?

initially, offensive

until I re read

"Every detainee who will be admitted to the general population may be required to undergo a close visual inspection while undressed,” wrote Justice Anthony Kennedy for the Republican majority. "



I understand that precaution due to the GENERAL population being full of so many types of offenders

Now, that a non violent PROTESTOR, would be admitted into such a diverse prison population of offenders,,,,,

scars me much more than a strip search......

a court order to explain whether the administration thinks?

can an administration think? or is that something INDIVIDUALS do?

since when are their court orders that can demand a person share their thoughts?

Im imagining if he was there to introduce at a country show, he wasnt making fun of country

I think lambert and shelton (why do they use two different last names) are a bit sensitive,,,,isnt she the one who was also 'offended' that Chris Brown was finally allowed to perform again at the grammys (after a two year ban,,,,)?

time will tell,,,,

its a common go to whenever the courts question a law,,

who says he doesnt know

saying they shouldnt is not the same as saying they cant