100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
|
|
|
snoops is a liberal website... it may or may not be in the new bill, but it was in the original bill, and thats what obama wants, so it can be easier for him to be a dictator. they revise it 100 times, then they sneak that crap in there. the original bill didnt even require a chip, it was referring to keeping a registry of medical devices not mandating a chip |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Sunday March 21, 2010 the Senate Healthcare bill HR3200 was passed and signed into law the following Tuesday. Like I said before, there are a legion of horrible and just plain evil aspects to this bill and I’m sure you’ve heard a lot them by now. I don’t want to discount them but what cannot be missed here is this new law now opens a prophetic door on a magnitude not seen since the reformation of Israel. This new law requires an RFID chip implanted in all of us. This chip will not only contain your personal information with tracking capability but it will also be linked to your bank account. And get this, Page 1004 of the new law (dictating the timing of this chip), reads, and I quote: “Not later than 36 months after the date of the enactment”. It is now the law of the land that by March 23rd 2013 we will all be required to have an RFID chip underneath our skin and this chip will be link to our bank accounts as well as have our personal records and tracking capability built into it. In just a minute I’m going to show you the black and white of the law itself and you can see it with your own eyes and wonder why an event of this magnitude which is nothing less than seismic in nature is met with little more than silence in the Christian community. Is it now starting to dawn on you just where exactly we are in prophecy? I’ll ask that question again in a minute and follow up on it, but now I want to show you the law itself. I’ve downloaded a PDF copy of HR3200 from the government’s website so what I’m about to show you is from the bill itself its nothing that I’ve written. You can access it all and see it all for yourself straight from the source itself: H.R. 3200 section 2521, Pg. 1001, paragraph 1. The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘is or has been used in or on a patient; ‘‘and is— ‘‘a class III device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.” http://polidics.com/news/another-hidden-secret-in-obamacare-rfid-chip-implants.html http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/microchip.asp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Sunday March 21, 2010 the Senate Healthcare bill HR3200 was passed and signed into law the following Tuesday. Like I said before, there are a legion of horrible and just plain evil aspects to this bill and I’m sure you’ve heard a lot them by now. I don’t want to discount them but what cannot be missed here is this new law now opens a prophetic door on a magnitude not seen since the reformation of Israel. This new law requires an RFID chip implanted in all of us. This chip will not only contain your personal information with tracking capability but it will also be linked to your bank account. And get this, Page 1004 of the new law (dictating the timing of this chip), reads, and I quote: “Not later than 36 months after the date of the enactment”. It is now the law of the land that by March 23rd 2013 we will all be required to have an RFID chip underneath our skin and this chip will be link to our bank accounts as well as have our personal records and tracking capability built into it. In just a minute I’m going to show you the black and white of the law itself and you can see it with your own eyes and wonder why an event of this magnitude which is nothing less than seismic in nature is met with little more than silence in the Christian community. Is it now starting to dawn on you just where exactly we are in prophecy? I’ll ask that question again in a minute and follow up on it, but now I want to show you the law itself. I’ve downloaded a PDF copy of HR3200 from the government’s website so what I’m about to show you is from the bill itself its nothing that I’ve written. You can access it all and see it all for yourself straight from the source itself: H.R. 3200 section 2521, Pg. 1001, paragraph 1. The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘is or has been used in or on a patient; ‘‘and is— ‘‘a class III device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.” http://polidics.com/news/another-hidden-secret-in-obamacare-rfid-chip-implants.html http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/microchip.asp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think its just a case of picking battles. NAACP And a whole host of other groups and radio stations are all over this already. The racial element makes it too hot an issue for OBama at this time after all the accusations flown at him behind going to Wrights church or admonishing the cop who arrested a black professor for trying to get into his own home.
People are sensitive when you even bring up race, OBama is playing this one smart. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"The dispatcher is heard trying to discourage Zimmerman, asking, "Are you following him?.. Okay, we don't need you to do that."" he wanted to kill that kid... he didn't want to follow orders... overzealous dipchit that should have never had a gun. and these neighbor watches, they are not police, they just supposed to watch, and call the police if necessary. he should be hanged for taking that boys life. it wouldnt bring that poor child back but , it might give the parents some closure if there was at least some APPEARANCE that a real investigation would happen and charges would be filed,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Mon 03/19/12 03:18 PM
|
|
Police recordings made the night a self-appointed neighborhood watch captain allegedly shot and killed an unarmed 17-year-old boy outside his stepmother's home sent the boy's mother screaming from the room and prompted his father to declare, "He killed my son," according to a family representative.
The series of emergency and non-emergency calls to police depict the apparent progression of events on Feb. 26 that led to the watch captain, George Zimmerman, 28, who is white, allegedly shooting Trayvon Martin, a high-school junior who is black, as the teen made his way home with a bag of Skittles and a can of iced tea. The contents of the calls and the family's reaction to them were recounted to ABC News by a representative of the boy's family, Ryan Julison, and ABC News affiliate WFTV published excerpts from the 911 calls. On one call to a non-emergency dispatch number, according to Julison, Zimmerman says, "He's checking me out," and then, "This guy looks like he's on drugs, he's definitely messed up." "There's a real suspicious guy. This guy looks like he's up to no good, on drugs or something," Zimmerman can be heard telling the dispatcher. "These a**holes always get away," he adds. The dispatcher is heard trying to discourage Zimmerman, asking, "Are you following him?.. Okay, we don't need you to do that." Within minutes, however, 911 calls are being made to police reporting the two are fighting. "They're wrestling right in the back of my porch," one frantic caller says. "The guy's yelling help and I'm not going out." On a second call someone's screams for help can be heard and what sounds like two gunshots. The caller's boyfriend shouts, "Get down," and after the second apparent gunshot the shouts for help cease, Julison told ABC News. "There's gun shots. Uh, I'm pretty sure the guy is dead out here, holy sh**," a caller says into the phone. One witness describes Zimmerman after the shooting. "He's out there with a flashlight. The guy is raising his hands up saying he shot the person," the caller said more at : http://abcnews.go.com/US/treyvon-martin-neighborhood-watch-shooting-911-tapes-send/story?id=15937881 my heart goes out to these families, their lives have been uprooted senselessly,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wow got to love the race cards they pull right? Someone doesn't like Obama so it has to be because he is black. It can't be because they don't like democrats or they just don't like his policies or one of an infinite other reasons. I swear its like being back in Junior high. You have some snacks or something and a black kid you don't know approaches you and your friends and asks for some. As you tell them know they say "its because I am black!". Umm. no its because I don't know you and I am a kid with very little money so the snacks I buy are for me. racism, sexism,nationalism are real they are hard to address and aknowledge sometimes but they are much more than just 'cards' so it is just easier just to scream "RACIST" and be done with it, especially when they disagree with the MIC.... sometimes that happens too like people just calling welfare recipients lazy and being done with it there are usually more complex issues at hand,but racism can be one of the complex SOCIAL issues that tie into political choices,,,, but i haven't heard any liberal say maybe he doesn't like obama's policies, or the chinese influx of crap barry crams into the US, they just say he's racist... I never know if Im perceived as liberal or conservative, but I have posted before that people sometimes dont like his policies. Question arises when they have personal resentment against the MAN(as opposed to his policies) and they justify it with policies that other presidents before him followed as well (without earning equivalent hatred for it). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wow got to love the race cards they pull right? Someone doesn't like Obama so it has to be because he is black. It can't be because they don't like democrats or they just don't like his policies or one of an infinite other reasons. I swear its like being back in Junior high. You have some snacks or something and a black kid you don't know approaches you and your friends and asks for some. As you tell them know they say "its because I am black!". Umm. no its because I don't know you and I am a kid with very little money so the snacks I buy are for me. racism, sexism,nationalism are real they are hard to address and aknowledge sometimes but they are much more than just 'cards' so it is just easier just to scream "RACIST" and be done with it, especially when they disagree with the MIC.... sometimes that happens too like people just calling welfare recipients lazy and being done with it there are usually more complex issues at hand,but racism can be one of the complex SOCIAL issues that tie into political choices,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we all have the right to 'believe'
beliefs are in our heads, whatever they are, noone can stop them or mandate what they must be it is our ACTIONS and WORDS we dont always have a right to,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wow got to love the race cards they pull right? Someone doesn't like Obama so it has to be because he is black. It can't be because they don't like democrats or they just don't like his policies or one of an infinite other reasons. I swear its like being back in Junior high. You have some snacks or something and a black kid you don't know approaches you and your friends and asks for some. As you tell them know they say "its because I am black!". Umm. no its because I don't know you and I am a kid with very little money so the snacks I buy are for me. racism, sexism,nationalism are real they are hard to address and aknowledge sometimes but they are much more than just 'cards' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
is the vote something people must pay for now?
why should income change the right to vote? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Barry Is Now Irish Also?
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sun 03/18/12 11:18 PM
|
|
he was Scottish last year... you know scotland and ireland(northern) are both in the UK right? so thats like saying he had relatives in Ohio AND Indiana,,,,big deal not such an anomaly at all,,, my ancestry is a mix of scot, west indie, weat africa, and native american,,,,so I could find something to bond over in any of those places too,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
things go up and down, it really depends on what range of years people choose to compare for instance I may have made 60000 in 2000 40000 in 2005 and make 50000 now,,, in 2012 i could compare now to the year 2000 and say its gotten worse, but I could compare it to 2005 and say its gotten better,,, No the think is he is looking at the country as a whole and you are looking at yourself. I can speak from personal experience also as to the huge change after the election year. I graduated in 2008 the year of the election. I graduated in the spring and pretty much everyone got a job. Then in 2009 he took office and pretty much all the EEs that graduated the year after me were jobless for over a year. Some were even emailing me asking if my company was hiring. It wasn't since as soon as he took office he canceled our contracts and we lost 1k people at my facility. I mean I could look at it as if he didn't do that I never would have went abroad and met my gf. I also am making more money at this new job I just got, but I am not doing what I wanted to do. I was at my old job though. I could actually be working as an engineer overseas by now if I was still at my old job as I told them I wanted to go and they were starting some training to facilitate that. So yea that could have been my only chance to fulfill that dream. your personal experience is one of millions and it is unfortunate, but not everyones is as unfortunate and some are downright better I wasnt comparing personal experiences, though I would gather there are some gm employees who are downright thrilled with some of the choices that were made since 'he took office', who would suggest that things being better for them meant things in general were better,.,,, I was making the point that numbers out of context and 'raw' can be compared to suggest an improvement or a lack of improvement just by picking and choosing which numbers to use but those raw numbers are not a clear indication of whether something is better or worse in any general sense, they only imply better or worse as it relates to the two things being compared i think what you are really saying is that your closing your eyes to what is going on around you, and only see what you want to see as it pertains to you. no, Im saying my eyes are open to logic, and I see MORE than just one side of what others portray about their perspective,,,, i would argue that... if you cannot see the country is worse now than it was 4 years ago, then your eyes are closed...is the job market better or worse? is the oil prices cheaper than 4 years ago? has the exports gotten bigger? has the housing crisis gotten better? are people opening new business and beefing up the economy? show me something that has been done in the last 4 years that helped ... and don't say obamacare, because that is going to break the country, but you don't see that either. well, lets pick some details then from approximately 2007-2010 we were in a RECESSION, "a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in real gross domestic product (GDP), real income, employment, industrial production, and wholesale-retail sales".[1][nb 1] WHICH MEANS,, four years ago , in march 2008 we were already in a decline,,,during a time where BUSH administration would have input into the us budget and policies (his last budget ended october 2009) so, the decline from 2008 until 2010 would be fairly indisputable and mostly have nothing to do with the current administration then, if we compare apples to apples and take the numbers from late 2009 (when this administration would have budget and polic authority) we would find the following gdp 3.5 % growth thrid quarter 2009, 2% growth third quarter 2010,2.5% growth in third quarter 2011 COMPARE WITH .3% decrease in third quarter of 2008 ANALYSIS: GDP improving real income real median income in 2009 was 51,050 and in 2010 was 50,046 COMPARE WITH 52,687 in 2008 and 53,356 in 2009 ANALYSIS: Real income declining employment 10/09 10.2% unemployment, 10/10 9.6% unemployment 10/11 9.0 unemployment COMPARE WITH: 6.5 percent unemployment in 2008 ANALYSIS: after a 3.7 percent increase during BUsh final budget the rate began to decrease for OBamas first two budgets at a fairly stead .6 percent annually ANALYSIS: Employment rates getting better industrial production according to http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/revisions/current/revchart1.gif industrial production declined steadily from 2007-2009 and has been steadily increasing since ANALYSIS: Industrial production increasing SO, in comparing these four details (gdp, income, employment, production) three of the four factors have actually IMPROVED ,,,,a long way to go to further prove how a position can be supported by numbers depending upon how well we choose the factors and numbers to compare,,, Ok you can't say the budget causes unemployment. You are saying everything pre 2010 was Bush's fault. I am a prime example of who presidental policies directly relate to lay offs. AT my facility alone in 2009 within 6 months of him taking office 1000 layoffs. Can't blame that on Bush or any budget. He could change what he wanted once he took office in 09 Im not saying fault, that was the point Im actually debating as intellectually ingenuous, especially when several of the things that are claimed to have gotten worse have, in fact, not gotten worse at all,, no, Im saying that one measure of good and bad is a recession or a depression,, and I used the factors commonly compared to define those situations BUsh didnt leave office until 2009, and many of the side effects of the budget he would have entered would affect the economy and therefore jobs as well So I start at the end of the 2009 budget because I Have no other specific date to use in 2009 to measure what would have truly signaled the passing from Bush policies to Obama policies,,and thats not even considering congress who is really in charge but,,,that was the tone of the post I was referring to, placing OBama to blame for some factors which were not supposedly 'as good' as four years ago he hasnt been president four years , so I thought starting at that point was inconsistent,,,,so I started in 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think when we speak about it in the context of american history, we are speaking about race in terms of ancestral identity and not nationality though,,,, in terms of american history/definition,, race has very specific boxes to 'check' and most americans still do,,,,,, i always check "prefer not to answer"... being white in this country is a drawback now... haaaaaaaaaaaaaaa well, its your right to not choose a box (but people still know and treat us accordingly) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which not one can be blamed on the sitting president. So I guess we are complaining about past presidents who made this all possible? we? no, i live in the present, not the past...whoevers fault it is, obummer has had plenty of time to straighten something out, and he didn't do it. bush might have dropped the ball, but obama kicked it out of bounds. the numbers dont support that some of the things have been getting better and some have been getting worse,,,there is really no general rating system which can be used to define it in absolute terms,,,, i agree, there is none... but my rating system says he flopped out. lol..touche and mine says its amazing what hes done with what little he had to work with,,,, glad i could be of service 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Creation vs. Evolution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which not one can be blamed on the sitting president. So I guess we are complaining about past presidents who made this all possible? we? no, i live in the present, not the past...whoevers fault it is, obummer has had plenty of time to straighten something out, and he didn't do it. bush might have dropped the ball, but obama kicked it out of bounds. the numbers dont support that some of the things have been getting better and some have been getting worse,,,there is really no general rating system which can be used to define it in absolute terms,,,, i agree, there is none... but my rating system says he flopped out. lol..touche and mine says its amazing what hes done with what little he had to work with,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
And Ron Paul..............
|
|
Ron Paul works in Washington EXACTLY like every other politician... And he has for over 30 years. Every Ron Paul supporter has stated power and Congress corrupts and they think he is immune. Not accoding to his voting history, or the fact that h does his job without pay. How corrupt is that?? WHAT JOB does he do without pay 
How many doctors do you know of in this century that delivered babies without recompense even occassionally. he could not make a living if he did that. What I think you are referring to is he did not charge those with federal insurance because he refused federal money, which is also admirable. HE still received money though, from the patients who could pay or had private insurance. True, and he never refused a patient due to their inability to pay as well. I doubt that as well. I guarantee that is not true. Proven and documented..... even refused to let patients leave a hospital without being treated when they were turned out for no insurance, or refused by other Drs. Your guarantees are as good as your reseach. IM curious how he 'refused'? Can I be pointed in the direction of this research? IN America, as far as I know, a patient coming into a hospital for treatment without an appointment is generally in an emergency room which cant turn them away,,,,,, Private hospitals can and do, as well as those who receive gov't subs in some cases. If I felt better I would look up one example that was made an issue.... it was used in an RP ad as well, with the patient commenting how they had been refused by their Dr and RP took over their care even tho they couldn't pay. I see. Why would someone enter a PRIVATE hospital with no means to pay,,,,? seems odd but kudos to him when and if he stepped in to intercede (was he standing in the admitting room when they were turned away?) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of which not one can be blamed on the sitting president. So I guess we are complaining about past presidents who made this all possible? we? no, i live in the present, not the past...whoevers fault it is, obummer has had plenty of time to straighten something out, and he didn't do it. bush might have dropped the ball, but obama kicked it out of bounds. the numbers dont support that some of the things have been getting better and some have been getting worse,,,there is really no general rating system which can be used to define it in absolute terms,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think when we speak about it in the context of american history, we are speaking about race in terms of ancestral identity and not nationality though,,,,
in terms of american history/definition,, race has very specific boxes to 'check' and most americans still do,,,,,, |
|
|
|
|
Previous
