I think most people would think it was great for people to be 'willing' to date a disabled person.

I just dont think those who havent or dont should be looked down upon for it as most people look for things in common with those they 'date' and are LESS LIKELY to date someone who is disabled.

That doesnt mean they never would, because they havent or dont, it just means they have not yet been around or met the disabled person they felt enough of a connection with to 'date'.

Im not aware of the concept even being around in biblical days,,,,,

so Im doubtful anyone was teaching about it,,,

HAAAA

master of the strawman strikes again,,,,

technically 18 and 19 year olds are of legal age to consent to a relationship with a fifty year old, and it happens, but MOST of the time it doesnt

I understand you and others date outside their ethnicity, so do I , but my point was that MOST dont

life doesnt have to be any more boring with someone similar than it is by ourself, if we are engaged in pursuing our interests,, it doesnt have to be boring at all

there are ways to experience and learn different t hings without 'dating' anyone,,,,,


I wouldnt want to date someone EXACTLY like me, but I would want us to have similar values and experiences to bond over and build upon,,,

on this, we agree

war always sucks,, for somebody,,,,

who knows, since I dont know of Jesus teaching any followers about 'rights'

nor do I propose to be Jesus or have followers,,,,,

I think we can only get involved with those we are around, and we are more likely to get involved with those we are most often around

its why MOST people arent dating a different race
and MOST height/age appropriate people arent dating 'little people'
and MOST fifty year olds arent dating teenagers,,,etc...

I think we also will match up by common interests and experiences, and I think the experience of someone without legs, for instance, would be different enough from my own to make me somewhat uncomfortable out the gate and to cause quite a big gap in how we both viewed the world or were able to come together to experience the world

not that it would be or should be an absolute chance killer, but its just not as much of a chance as with someone of a similar background or life experience,,,,

but, but,, but

congress approved Bushs bad life taking decision

and not OBamas limited life saving one,,,,

being admirable of one group doesnt necessarily dictate an offense to others, as long as nothing is said to insult other groups


I could post something about how amazing mothers are, but that wouldnt mean I didnt also find fathers amazing,,,,,

there is beauty in all cultures,, phillipine is definitely included

well, religious and non religious people often post on religious topics....

but that has nothing to do with whether THIS topic belongs more in a religious thread or a general thread

if YOU have a beef with my opinion about it,, perhaps YOU should stop responding to me,,,,,lol

whats good for the goose,,,,

The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution states that the government may not take the life, liberty or property of any person without due process


if it states this,, what is the 'due process' that takes soldiers lives in war?

its not judicial is it?

I Agree, its about believing in general, apparently

not believing as it applies to religion

,, so ,, maybe it should be in a GENERAL Forum and not a RELIGION forum,,,,,?

no permission and an 'urging' to do better in the future,, but no impeachment


http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d099:HC00365:@@@D&summ2=m&

there is no debate about someones 'right' to a belief

in a religion forum, it is pre supposed that the topic is about RELIGION,,ie religious beliefs,,,

whats being discussed is peoples personal choices on what and where their childrens interests are best served


perhaps it should be in a general discussion thread,,,,?

its idiocy to 'give up everything' for children

its an oxymoron, because children have needs, that cant be met with a parent who has given up
'everything'


parents have a delicate balance of providing and loving, and its not always about physical proximity,,,,,the debate has gone far off topic and gotten quite ridiculous,,,

Ronald Raegan,,, el dorado canyon

OBama can be wrong too, I think he was wrong about repealing DODT and not supporting DOMA, and several other things

but on this action , which has presidential precedence that did NOT result in impeachment

I think Obama is right,,,

but it will be up to the (majority democratic) senate to actually convict him of anything....


so, as usual, ,,,time will tell which opinions hold out,,,,