Community > Posts By > JoshM1119

 
no photo
Thu 01/29/09 09:01 AM

Perhaps she's waitin for u to make that 1st physical move. Have u tried to give her a good night kiss? Have u tried to hold her hand? Give it a try. That or just come on out with how u feel about her to her. smokin


It can't be that easy can it? Wondering what someone is thinking can be solved by asking them what they're thinking??? lol. I suppose that could be simple, yet effective. Although I'm not quite sure how to bring it up.

no photo
Thu 01/29/09 08:56 AM
Good point, it crossed my mind but we usually split.

no photo
Thu 01/29/09 08:53 AM
Reaching out to strangers via cyberspace for advice isn't typically step one in my problem solving process, but in this case I'm completely stumped.

I recently met a girl through a mutual friend who I've been spending time with for just over a month. And when I say spending time I mean the occasional happy hour, dinner, movies, college basketball games, etc. Casual, of course, but some of those activities seem fairly date specific to me. But we do something usually 3 or 4 nights a week, it's just the two of us probably 70% of the time, and I pick her up, hold the door, etc. Conversation never lags, there's always a lot of laughs, and some VERY mild flirtation.

The problem is this: While the girl gives me butterflies every time I see her and she so distractingly occupies my thoughts all day every day, I just can't get a read on her. Sure, part of what makes women beautiful is their mysterious complexity, but when an unsuspecting boy gets tangled in such a web it can be a bit frustrating for the boy.

She's the one to call me at least half the time, but this is the fifth week and I haven't so much as held her hand. She's perfectly ok with going out to dinner and a movie one-on-one, but there hasn't been a good night kiss.

Please don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that I expect her to lay down and let me ravage her. In fact, for the first time as a 20-something that's not my goal. For the first time in a LONG time I genuinely like someone. But holding hands or a kiss on the cheek would signify to me that she's at least interested in being more than pals. If I'm headed in the right direction I don't mind waiting... I just hate to travel any further down the wrong path than I have to.

Is she oblivious to my feelings? Is she so bored that she's just using me for an excuse to get out once in a while? Am I a total wimp for not kissing her already? Is this situation as messed up as I think it is or am I just overly anxious?

Penny for your thoughts...

no photo
Tue 08/19/08 04:17 PM
"Might as well, I'm gonna catch hell when I get home anyway" - haha. Good stuff my man. keep up the good work.

no photo
Tue 05/06/08 07:24 PM
Well if it's a beta and its by itself, check the temperature. I think it should be somewhere around 80? Not sure... Check the size of the pellets, and try changing the water. If too much ammonia builds up it can cause sluggishness and a loss of appetite.

no photo
Tue 05/06/08 07:17 PM
As cute as it may be to personify a fish, it's not quite able to be depressed. What kind of fish is it? Where did you get the water for the new tank? When fish don't eat it's most often a parasitic infection.

no photo
Tue 05/06/08 06:45 PM
24 Atheist. Raised Christian, learned to think independently, studied the evidence extensively from all angles and do not believe in God, not because it's the 'cool' uncool thing to do, but because after examination it's the only logical conclusion. That's my two cents. lol

no photo
Fri 04/18/08 08:58 AM
If it were truely 'divinely inspired' would not its fidelity have been 'divinely preserved' over years of transcription? Surely a God who can create the world by speaking, monitor each and every one of us, read our private thoughts, and alter the laws of physics at his convenience SURELY could invoke something so simple as providence to retain the Good Book's integrity... Right?

This is a God that can do whatever He wants... He can create a 8-10 thousand year old earth, cause floods, cram animals onto an ark built by a 600 year old man that's not even large enough to contain two of every species of insect, flood the world at a rate that would have been equivalent to filling a glass of water with a fire hose, cover the ENTIRE planet with water and leave not one shred of geographical evidence behind.

He's also the same guy who started man by creating two individuals who, among other things, filled the planet with offspring eventually producing 6 recognized races in the world today, all with their own unique genetic fingerprints and characteristics adapted to their geographic point of origin... But he PROVIDED for that. Budding evolution? Of course not! He also created a lenghty fossil record that clearly indicates the evolution of every species on the planet, but that was only to throw off the unfaithful who question His authority. Of course that's not evolution at work. Evolution is a purely evil work of Satan himself which poisons the minds of our youth in science classes across the country.

Certain fundamentalists sit on a pew every Sunday and absorb that like a sponge, believing it completely. If only I had enough bridges to sell to them all...

This is an age of discovery and understanding. Take the ancient cultural influences with a grain of salt and understand that religion is just that... Ancient culture. No more real than bigfoot or the tooth fairy. However, millions and millions of people have never, to my knowledge, been slaughtered in the name of bigfoot or the tooth fairy...

no photo
Wed 04/02/08 03:41 PM
Hey man. Welcome. Pittsburgh here

no photo
Sat 03/29/08 09:03 PM
If I could taste myself I wouldn't be on here.

no photo
Sat 03/29/08 08:53 PM

It's really aggravating to be on this website and I see where I have mutual matches, yet rarely any of these guys are sending me messages. And I'm too shy to go ahead and send one, but more importantly I'm a bit old fashioned and think that it should be the guy breaking the ice.
Another thing, I really want a good text in my profile. It's so hard for me to describe who I am because it seems like I'm trying to convince guys how...worthy I am. I used to hate seeing a profile that read,"If you want to know me, message me" but I can see how that could work better. I mean, I'm like other women. I could say how much I love to laugh, how I want a guy who won't cheat and isn't a drunk, how good a person I am, but you know, who ever says otherwise?




To be noticed, you must first be noticable and worth noticing. That's not to suggest in any way that you're not. But they would be prerequisites. Adjust your technique. Maybe it is uncomfortable to email these guys. Sure, some of them won't email you back. That's never good for the ego. But none of them will respond if you never reach out...

Also, consider 'Hey, how are you' before hopefully describing your perfect man. Most guys hear the laundry list and head for the hills. Find some common ground to start conversation. These sites facilitate bombardments of emails, and the people you're noticing are being noticed by others. They have to choose the best of the bunch to respond to. Find something interesting to comment about and you're far more likely to get responses. Maybe some will turn into dates, maybe some will turn into friendships. Either way, what have you got to lose?

no photo
Sat 03/29/08 08:41 PM


Hmmm. Well, the question is what do you mean by "dating"?

If dating actually means, well, dating...don't call more than twice a week, and don't see each other more than maybe once a week. How long is too long? Honestly, I don't think it matters since there's nothing wrong with dating multiple girls--or guys, depending--at a time. Dating's supposed to be the relaxed, get-to-know-you-and-have-fun stage. Going into Relationship mode too early is virtually always deadly. So losing touch is up to you, if you've found someone new or just lose interest.

Now if by dating you mean *relationship*...that's different entirely. Obviously you don't want to let your significant other feel alone, left out or rejected. But in this case too it's a matter of disgression. How much attention is too much, how much is too little, and how much is exactly right, is going to vary from person to person.

Keep in mind that love is not a destination, but a journey. That includes constantly discovering, re-discovering, and re-re-discovering, your lover...and yourself. I don't think the question is really how much time is too much, but whether you can be a mature, adult human being and all that implies.

Since you're a guy, one more note: though it's essential to learn to be sensitive in matters of love, that doesn't mean you must become less masculine somehow. "Sensitive" and "manly" are *not* antonyms.

Hope this helps. Cheers! smokin
-MarsNS


Josh And Mars , your both genius man

Thanks 4 the input


No problem my man. Best of luck to you!

no photo
Sat 03/29/08 08:39 PM

setting up someone you're dating, in order to test their fidelity?


It's been my experience that if you're at the point where you're considering such super-sleuth activity, the relationship's already flatlined. Before I'd learned to avoid prolonged and painful seperation I'd test the other's fidelity using setups. And I was always disappointed and outraged.

It's just a cold hard truth that when you suspect cheating, either you're right, or you're cheating. Cheaters know what they themselves are capable of and they tend to be paranoid that everyone else is capable of the same. The rest of us have a pretty keen eye for detecting those subtle differences when someone we know intimately is straying. So if you suspect it, save yourself the time, effort, and embarassment of conducting a sting operation. Just pack up and move on.

no photo
Sat 03/29/08 08:33 PM

Hmmm. Well, the question is what do you mean by "dating"?

If dating actually means, well, dating...don't call more than twice a week, and don't see each other more than maybe once a week. How long is too long? Honestly, I don't think it matters since there's nothing wrong with dating multiple girls--or guys, depending--at a time. Dating's supposed to be the relaxed, get-to-know-you-and-have-fun stage. Going into Relationship mode too early is virtually always deadly. So losing touch is up to you, if you've found someone new or just lose interest.

Now if by dating you mean *relationship*...that's different entirely. Obviously you don't want to let your significant other feel alone, left out or rejected. But in this case too it's a matter of disgression. How much attention is too much, how much is too little, and how much is exactly right, is going to vary from person to person.

Keep in mind that love is not a destination, but a journey. That includes constantly discovering, re-discovering, and re-re-discovering, your lover. I don't think the question is really how much time is too much, but whether you can be a mature, adult human being and all that implies.

Since you're a guy, one more note: though it's essential to learn to be sensitive in matters of love, that doesn't mean you must become less masculine somehow. "Sensitive" and "manly" are *not* antonyms.

Hope this helps. Cheers! smokin
-MarsNS


Well said

no photo
Sat 03/29/08 08:30 PM

If you were dating someone and things were going very well, how long would be "too long" in terms of staying in touch (e.g., phone, text, email, etc.) between real dates?


That would depend on distance, conflicting schedules, and any other pertinent circumstances. Also, 'too long' is subjective and could only be defined by the person in question. But strictly personal opinion, I feel that if we've labeled it 'dating,' it would be reasonable to expect to see that person at least once a week.

However, some people will maintain just enough contact to hold interest without progressing the relationship so they can keep what they've got on the hook while seeing if they can reel in something bigger and better.

My advice? Analyze the situation and all the specifics involved. Try to figure out A. if it's working for you, and B. if it's working for them. Usually one's 'gut feeling' is pretty accurate. Good luck.

no photo
Mon 03/24/08 05:49 PM

since when is rape funny?


Since its inception.

no photo
Sun 03/09/08 03:47 PM
lol thanks!

no photo
Sun 03/09/08 03:44 PM
As a devout Pastafarian and worshipper of the Flying Spaghetti Monster I would like to urge others to join me in politely insisting that the administrator add 'Pastafarian' to the list of religious afiliations. As the church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster has many members world wide, I'm sure I'm not the only oppressed pastafarian in this community deprived the privilege of expressing my true religious beliefs.

As our founder, Bobby Henderson, firmly asserted in the letter to the Kansas Board of Education, regarding the inclusion of Intelligent Design in their Science Curriculum, "I think we can all look forward to the time when these three theories are given equal time in our science classrooms across the country, and eventually the world; One third time for Intelligent Design, one third time for Flying Spaghetti Monsterism, and one third time for logical conjecture based on overwhelming observable evidence."

Should we not have the same right here?

www.venganza.org


no photo
Sun 03/09/08 02:22 PM
Jeannie, interesting post. Our perception of reality, based solely on sensory data, is just a model of what we believe to be true. When we have a gap in understanding, we automatically fill in the blanks. (Think optical illusions and how they work) This feature, coupled with ignorance, can create all kinds of fantastic dilusions that can, in many situations, be counter productive, and harmful. (Waco TX, Northern Ireland, Muslim Radicals, etc.)

As our collective knowledge increases through technology and research, we can eliminate more and more gaps, however, tradition and culture seem to have a firm hold on a large majority of the population who insist on believing in their own version of deity when evidence clearly indicates no such thing exists.

Personally, I think you can tell me that the flying spaghetti monster exists, and I wouldn't be able to prove you wrong, but it'd be pretty unreasonable for you to expect the rest of the world to blindly accept your point of view.

no photo
Tue 01/22/08 08:58 AM
lol thanks! drinker

Previous 1 3 4