Community > Posts By > alleoops

 
no photo
Fri 02/16/18 03:43 PM
Well, so happy that you looked that up and retorted it to us here.

no photo
Fri 02/16/18 02:42 PM
I think that Mueller should go to Russia and arrest them.smile2

no photo
Fri 02/16/18 02:26 PM
Run Erick Run! Oprah as VP! Yea!!

no photo
Fri 02/16/18 02:20 PM
Edited by alleoops on Fri 02/16/18 02:24 PM
Non-Story. Just more liberal garbage.

Charles, I like the way you make the headline all caps.
Stands out and makes it look shocking. On the next one
try adding some extra symbols like ~~```!!!!, you know
make it look real sensational!!
laugh

no photo
Fri 02/16/18 02:16 PM
How many millions did this cost us? No American will be charged and
the Russians will not be extradited. A waste of time and money.
Anyone that thinks this leads to Trump is a blithering Idiot to
say the least.

no photo
Fri 02/16/18 01:08 PM



I still say we should polygraph them both.drug test them as well ..and we should be able to because after all "They work for us"..which makes us their employer..and we should be able to request this being done..and see the results for ourselves..spock


polygraph & drug test ???
are you kidding, how about something as easy as releasing tax records ???

Trump is the first one since Nixon to refuse, 40 some years ago
"They work for us" keep dreaming about that...

Poly for Trump ????
the expense for the broken needles alone
would rival the new defense budget...laugh


Easy as releasing tax returns? The IRS can't even keep up with their e-mails.


and then plead the 5th? laugh

no photo
Fri 02/16/18 12:51 PM



Over the course of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the number of civilian deaths has been staggering. In Afghanistan, more than 26,000 civilians are estimated to have died since the war began in 2001. In Iraq, conservative tallies place the number of civilians killed at roughly 160,500 since the U.S. invasion in 2003. Others have put the total closer to 500,000.

But as U.S. involvement in each nation has dropped off in recent years, killings much closer to home, in Mexico, have steadily, if quietly, outpaced the number of civilian deaths in Afghanistan and Iraq combined.

Last week, the Mexican government released new data showing that between 2007 and 2014 — a period that accounts for some of the bloodiest years of the nation’s war against the drug cartels — more than 164,000 people were victims of homicide. Nearly 20,000 died last year alone, a substantial number, but still a decrease from the 27,000 killed at the peak of fighting in 2011.

Over the same seven-year period, slightly more than 103,000 died in Afghanistan and Iraq, according to data from the United Nations and the website Iraq Body Count.

To be sure, the homicides documented in Mexico cannot all be linked directly to the drug war, and distinguishing drug-war violence from the raw totals can be fraught with challenges. Many murders are never investigated, and the Mexican government has not issued annual figures on organized-crime-style homicides — those believed to be the work of cartels — since 2010. Even when it did, such data was often knocked for being untrustworthy.

Some counts have blamed the drug war for as much as 55 percent of all homicides. Others have put the estimate as low as 34 percent. Yet those figures have likewise been criticized as unreliable. For example, someone killed by a high-caliber or automatic firearm would be counted as a victim of organized crime, but if they were strangled or stabbed to death, they would not necessarily be considered a casualty of the drug war.

“In any of this data, a lot of dead people are not counted,” said Molly Molloy, a border and Latin American specialist at New Mexico State University. Molloy has focused her research on counting the dead in Mexico, and in an interview with FRONTLINE said, “The violence engendered by the system as a whole in Mexico is so huge and affects so many people in various violent ways, I think you have to look at the murders as a whole, because how are you going to separate them?”

Whatever the true number, organized-crime-style killings continue to represent a substantial and lingering threat throughout Mexico. That danger was only underscored this month with the prison escape of Joaquín Guzmán Loera, the drug kingpin known as “El Chapo” (Shorty) who is widely considered among the most responsible for the violence there.


What does this information have to do with Holder or his role in cartels IN AMERICA?
I'm sure if you look around long enough you'll figure it out all on your own, I'm so tired of your hypocrisy I really don't wanna talk with you about anything anymore...


laugh I know what you mean...frustrated

no photo
Fri 02/16/18 08:53 AM



no photo
Fri 02/16/18 07:48 AM
A well used liberal "Smoke and diversion" tactic. Won't work
because they got nothing else.

no photo
Fri 02/16/18 06:01 AM
laugh Bring out the Rolling Heads
rofl rofl rofl
rofl rofl rofl




no photo
Thu 02/15/18 05:39 PM

argument involves anger. Im not angry at anyone here, why would I argue with them?

And why would I argue about whether we're arguing. It's pretty distracting from the topic, I think.

I will let them speak for themselves, and I will take their comments and contributions as signs of discussion.




laugh See, your arguing about arguing.slaphead

no photo
Thu 02/15/18 05:25 PM






Then a law banning gun purchasing or guns altogether would be fruitless.
whoa


I agree. However, regulation is a different story than ban. I dont and would never support banning driving because some dont follow the laws and cause accidents. But I would also never support not having the laws on account of not being able to ensure noone would ever break them or cause accidents.

We dont allow the blind to drive. We should not be allowing the unstable to have guns.


The unstable are not allowed to buy guns now. So why are you arguing
with yourself?
whoa


apparently they are .. kind of the point of this discussion


discussion?.....more like an argument.


not for me.


It is for everyone else.

no photo
Thu 02/15/18 05:18 PM




Then a law banning gun purchasing or guns altogether would be fruitless.
whoa


I agree. However, regulation is a different story than ban. I dont and would never support banning driving because some dont follow the laws and cause accidents. But I would also never support not having the laws on account of not being able to ensure noone would ever break them or cause accidents.

We dont allow the blind to drive. We should not be allowing the unstable to have guns.


The unstable are not allowed to buy guns now. So why are you arguing
with yourself?
whoa


apparently they are .. kind of the point of this discussion


discussion?.....more like an argument.

no photo
Thu 02/15/18 05:16 PM


On 3 August 2016, 7km above Alaska's Aleutian Islands, a research plane captured something mysterious: An atmospheric aerosol particle enriched with the kind of uranium used in nuclear fuel and bombs.

It's the first time scientists have detected such a particle just floating along in the atmosphere in 20 years of plane-based observations.

Uranium is the heaviest element to occur naturally on Earth's surface in an appreciable amount. Normally it occurs as the slightly radioactive isotope uranium-238, but some amount of uranium-235, the kind humans make bombs and fuel out of, occurs in nature. Uranium-238 is already rare to find floating above the Earth in the atmosphere. But scientists have never before spotted enriched uranium, a sample uranium containing uranium-235, in millions of research plane-captured atmospheric particles.

"One of the main motivations of this paper is to see if somebody who knows more about uranium than any of us would understand the source of the particle," scientist Dan Murphy from NOAA told me. After all, "aerosol particles containing uranium enriched in uranium-235 are definitely not from a natural source," he writes in the paper, published recently in the Journal of Environmental Radioactivity.

Murphy has led flights around the world sampling the atmosphere for aerosols. These tiny particles can come from polution, dust, fires and other sources, and can influence things such as cloud formation and the weather. The researchers spotted the mystery particle on a flight over Alaska using their "Particle Analysis by Laser Mass Spectrometry" instrument. They considered that perhaps the signature came from something weird, but evidence seems to point directly at enriched uranium.

They were not intending to look for radioactive elements. "The purpose of the field campaign was to obtain some of the first global cross-sections of the concentration of trace gases and of dust, smoke, and other particles in the remote troposphere over the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans," according to the paper.

But where the particle came from is a mystery. It's pretty clear it came from recently made reactor-grade uranium, the authors write (AKA, not from Fukushima or Chernobyl). Perhaps from burnt fuel contaminated with uranium, they thought. They tried to trace it to a source using the direction of the wind - but their best estimate pointed vaguely to Asia. Higher probability areas include some parts of China, including its border with North Korea, and parts of Japan.

You don't need to worry about atmospheric radiation from just one particle, though. "It's not a significant amount of radioactive debris by itself," Murphy said. "But it's the implication that there's some very small source of uranium that we don't understand."

One author, Thomas Ryerson from NOAA, told me that he needs other scientists' help. "We're hoping that someone in a field that's not intimately associated with atmospheric chemistry can say 'a-ha!' and give us a call."

http://www.sott.net/article/377303-Enriched-uranium-found-floating-above-Alaska

On a somewhat related note:

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ancient-nuclear-reactor/


Probably a Kim Jong Un snow flake.

no photo
Thu 02/15/18 05:13 PM


Then a law banning gun purchasing or guns altogether would be fruitless.
whoa


I agree. However, regulation is a different story than ban. I dont and would never support banning driving because some dont follow the laws and cause accidents. But I would also never support not having the laws on account of not being able to ensure noone would ever break them or cause accidents.

We dont allow the blind to drive. We should not be allowing the unstable to have guns.


The unstable are not allowed to buy guns now. So why are you arguing
with yourself?
whoa

no photo
Thu 02/15/18 05:10 PM


Aliens only want those from the Northern Hebei Province of China.:tongue:


Only if they are cats.

biggrin

no photo
Thu 02/15/18 05:06 PM
Aliens only want those from the Northern Hebei Province of China.:tongue:

no photo
Thu 02/15/18 05:03 PM
Then a law banning gun purchasing or guns altogether would be fruitless.
whoa

no photo
Thu 02/15/18 02:33 PM
Let's hope Soros doesn't have many birthdays left.

no photo
Thu 02/15/18 10:20 AM

So sad. My heart bleeds for parents whose wards were involved.
Insecurity is a global menace, though wears different masks in different places.
However,this commando style assaults by high school or former high school juveniles on former or present colleagues show that the young are fast losing touch with the human milk of kindness.
What devilish mindset!
I fault the break down in the family system.


I agree and much of that is the result of drug use. Until we get a handle on drugs we are fighting a loosing battle.

1 2 4 6 7 8 9 24 25