100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Anarchy | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Do you think it would work? I think it has a possibility, of course you would have sides of people getting together and bringing in their own government but you would also have the "loner's" on the side going about their own way. Within reason of course this would have a failure possibility after all the years of democracy that has been followed it would be difficult to grow accustomed to having absolutely no government, but again out of that you would have your "colonies" and within them would be some sort of government. I think it possibily could work, it would take awhile to get used too but it has that possibility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
democracy...where???
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It could work...this...democracy isn't working to well...of course people would want to make leaders...and take sides...we would just revert back to the way it was sooner or later
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do you think it would work? I think it has a possibility, of course you would have sides of people getting together and bringing in their own government but you would also have the "loner's" on the side going about their own way. Within reason of course this would have a failure possibility after all the years of democracy that has been followed it would be difficult to grow accustomed to having absolutely no government, but again out of that you would have your "colonies" and within them would be some sort of government. I think it possibily could work, it would take awhile to get used too but it has that possibility. Anarchy is what brough the dark ages... I guess some don't care how much evil they impose on the masses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do you think it would work? I think it has a possibility, of course you would have sides of people getting together and bringing in their own government but you would also have the "loner's" on the side going about their own way. Within reason of course this would have a failure possibility after all the years of democracy that has been followed it would be difficult to grow accustomed to having absolutely no government, but again out of that you would have your "colonies" and within them would be some sort of government. I think it possibily could work, it would take awhile to get used too but it has that possibility. No government at all means a total chaos of violence , drugs .....etc . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do you think it would work? I think it has a possibility, of course you would have sides of people getting together and bringing in their own government but you would also have the "loner's" on the side going about their own way. Within reason of course this would have a failure possibility after all the years of democracy that has been followed it would be difficult to grow accustomed to having absolutely no government, but again out of that you would have your "colonies" and within them would be some sort of government. I think it possibily could work, it would take awhile to get used too but it has that possibility. No government at all means a total chaos of violence , drugs .....etc . But within that you have to add the morals people already have, not everyone would resort to violence and drugs. I think a lot would still lead noble lives, no government does not mean total chaos...that is just what you have been taught to keep you voting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do you think it would work? I think it has a possibility, of course you would have sides of people getting together and bringing in their own government but you would also have the "loner's" on the side going about their own way. Within reason of course this would have a failure possibility after all the years of democracy that has been followed it would be difficult to grow accustomed to having absolutely no government, but again out of that you would have your "colonies" and within them would be some sort of government. I think it possibily could work, it would take awhile to get used too but it has that possibility. No government at all means a total chaos of violence , drugs .....etc . But within that you have to add the morals people already have, not everyone would resort to violence and drugs. I think a lot would still lead noble lives, no government does not mean total chaos...that is just what you have been taught to keep you voting. No...voting is a privilege & an obligation. You have to have core beliefs in your living to be able to make correct choices. I find it funny that people like to bash those who they disagree with yet they can't seem to see the speck in their own eye when it comes to their own party. One of our founders said this... A nation that will not be ruled by God will be ruled by tyrants. There is no such thing as obtuse living. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do you think it would work? I think it has a possibility, of course you would have sides of people getting together and bringing in their own government but you would also have the "loner's" on the side going about their own way. Within reason of course this would have a failure possibility after all the years of democracy that has been followed it would be difficult to grow accustomed to having absolutely no government, but again out of that you would have your "colonies" and within them would be some sort of government. I think it possibily could work, it would take awhile to get used too but it has that possibility. No government at all means a total chaos of violence , drugs .....etc . But within that you have to add the morals people already have, not everyone would resort to violence and drugs. I think a lot would still lead noble lives, no government does not mean total chaos...that is just what you have been taught to keep you voting. No...voting is a privilege & an obligation. You have to have core beliefs in your living to be able to make correct choices. I find it funny that people like to bash those who they disagree with yet they can't seem to see the speck in their own eye when it comes to their own party. One of our founders said this... A nation that will not be ruled by God will be ruled by tyrants. There is no such thing as obtuse living. I'm sorry? You seem to of missed the question. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do you think it would work? I think it has a possibility, of course you would have sides of people getting together and bringing in their own government but you would also have the "loner's" on the side going about their own way. Within reason of course this would have a failure possibility after all the years of democracy that has been followed it would be difficult to grow accustomed to having absolutely no government, but again out of that you would have your "colonies" and within them would be some sort of government. I think it possibily could work, it would take awhile to get used too but it has that possibility. No government at all means a total chaos of violence , drugs .....etc . But within that you have to add the morals people already have, not everyone would resort to violence and drugs. I think a lot would still lead noble lives, no government does not mean total chaos...that is just what you have been taught to keep you voting. No...voting is a privilege & an obligation. You have to have core beliefs in your living to be able to make correct choices. I find it funny that people like to bash those who they disagree with yet they can't seem to see the speck in their own eye when it comes to their own party. One of our founders said this... A nation that will not be ruled by God will be ruled by tyrants. There is no such thing as obtuse living. I'm sorry? You seem to of missed the question. No...you seem to think that people could live better without govt. I disagree... there needs to be a system of laws for people's protection & someone to uphold them. No people has ever lived without some form of govt. Our system is a good one...it's the politicians who corrupt it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do you think it would work? I think it has a possibility, of course you would have sides of people getting together and bringing in their own government but you would also have the "loner's" on the side going about their own way. Within reason of course this would have a failure possibility after all the years of democracy that has been followed it would be difficult to grow accustomed to having absolutely no government, but again out of that you would have your "colonies" and within them would be some sort of government. I think it possibily could work, it would take awhile to get used too but it has that possibility. No government at all means a total chaos of violence , drugs .....etc . But within that you have to add the morals people already have, not everyone would resort to violence and drugs. I think a lot would still lead noble lives, no government does not mean total chaos...that is just what you have been taught to keep you voting. No...voting is a privilege & an obligation. You have to have core beliefs in your living to be able to make correct choices. I find it funny that people like to bash those who they disagree with yet they can't seem to see the speck in their own eye when it comes to their own party. One of our founders said this... A nation that will not be ruled by God will be ruled by tyrants. There is no such thing as obtuse living. I'm sorry? You seem to of missed the question. No...you seem to think that people could live better without govt. I disagree... there needs to be a system of laws for people's protection & someone to uphold them. No people has ever lived without some form of govt. Our system is a good one...it's the politicians who corrupt it. Minus the politicians and you have the people truly leading, again this goes back to the morals I spoke of earlier. Somalia currently lives without government, they are currently ran by warlords but they weren't always ran that way. There doesn't need to be a system, system's become corrupt and overtime fail the one's they are said to protect as has happened countless times in history and still happens today. People need to protect themselves and those they care about, no one needs to protect people from what most already know to be bad and/or wrong. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do you think it would work? I think it has a possibility, of course you would have sides of people getting together and bringing in their own government but you would also have the "loner's" on the side going about their own way. Within reason of course this would have a failure possibility after all the years of democracy that has been followed it would be difficult to grow accustomed to having absolutely no government, but again out of that you would have your "colonies" and within them would be some sort of government. I think it possibily could work, it would take awhile to get used too but it has that possibility. No government at all means a total chaos of violence , drugs .....etc . But within that you have to add the morals people already have, not everyone would resort to violence and drugs. I think a lot would still lead noble lives, no government does not mean total chaos...that is just what you have been taught to keep you voting. No...voting is a privilege & an obligation. You have to have core beliefs in your living to be able to make correct choices. I find it funny that people like to bash those who they disagree with yet they can't seem to see the speck in their own eye when it comes to their own party. One of our founders said this... A nation that will not be ruled by God will be ruled by tyrants. There is no such thing as obtuse living. I'm sorry? You seem to of missed the question. No...you seem to think that people could live better without govt. I disagree... there needs to be a system of laws for people's protection & someone to uphold them. No people has ever lived without some form of govt. Our system is a good one...it's the politicians who corrupt it. Minus the politicians and you have the people truly leading, again this goes back to the morals I spoke of earlier. Somalia currently lives without government, they are currently ran by warlords but they weren't always ran that way. There doesn't need to be a system, system's become corrupt and overtime fail the one's they are said to protect as has happened countless times in history and still happens today. People need to protect themselves and those they care about, no one needs to protect people from what most already know to be bad and/or wrong. Oh please.... tell those lies to people who are killed maimed & bullied by thugs on the streets every day. Tell that to the worker who isn't treated fairly. Oh I could go on... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
sam53
on
Sun 07/06/08 06:52 AM
|
|
No government at all means a total chaos of violence , drugs .....etc . But within that you have to add the morals people already have, not everyone would resort to violence and drugs. I think a lot would still lead noble lives, no government does not mean total chaos...that is just what you have been taught to keep you voting. Remember Katrina and all the looting, stealing and crimes . Without laws and a government in place, we shall have a jungle where people turn to real MONSTERS .  .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
sam53
on
Sun 07/06/08 06:54 AM
|
|
Without laws and a government , you see the real humans : big fish eat small fish .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without laws and a government , you see the real humans : big fish eat small fish . I agree..govt. has it's place... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's kind of like a child who does something wrong and isn't punished for it, how will he ever know that their are consequences for his actions? Same goes for a society w/o a government. The government is like the parents enforcing the rules, and w/o that, it would turn into chaos. Greed, selfishness,and violence would take over because people could get away with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minus the politicians and you have the people truly leading, again this goes back to the morals I spoke of earlier. Somalia currently lives without government, they are currently ran by warlords but they weren't always ran that way. There doesn't need to be a system, system's become corrupt and overtime fail the one's they are said to protect as has happened countless times in history and still happens today. People need to protect themselves and those they care about, no one needs to protect people from what most already know to be bad and/or wrong. ... and Belgium hasnt had a government for 6 months. I dont remember hearing about anarchy in Brussels, do you? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh I could go on... You normally do 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minus the politicians and you have the people truly leading, again this goes back to the morals I spoke of earlier. Somalia currently lives without government, they are currently ran by warlords but they weren't always ran that way. There doesn't need to be a system, system's become corrupt and overtime fail the one's they are said to protect as has happened countless times in history and still happens today. People need to protect themselves and those they care about, no one needs to protect people from what most already know to be bad and/or wrong. ... and Belgium hasnt had a government for 6 months. I dont remember hearing about anarchy in Brussels, do you? The courts , the law enforcement agencies , all the ministries , the army , the police , all the intelligence agencies .....etc were working as normal . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minus the politicians and you have the people truly leading, again this goes back to the morals I spoke of earlier. Somalia currently lives without government, they are currently ran by warlords but they weren't always ran that way. There doesn't need to be a system, system's become corrupt and overtime fail the one's they are said to protect as has happened countless times in history and still happens today. People need to protect themselves and those they care about, no one needs to protect people from what most already know to be bad and/or wrong. ... and Belgium hasnt had a government for 6 months. I dont remember hearing about anarchy in Brussels, do you? The courts , the law enforcement agencies , all the ministries , the army , the police , all the intelligence agencies .....etc were working as normal . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Very true, but my point was that you dont need a government to prevent the rise of anarchy.
|
|
|
|
|
