Topic: Complete global financial collapse
ThomasJB's photo
Sun 05/03/09 09:28 AM
What would a complete global financial collapse look like? Assuming no official currencies world wide suddenly held no value. Would governments be able to keep control or would the world fall into chaos and anarchy? Would it cause nations to attack each other? Would we begin to share everything or would the world die with all the necessary materials to maintain life at our grasp because of our unwillingness to share?

catwoman96's photo
Sun 05/03/09 09:36 AM
good question

TJN's photo
Sun 05/03/09 09:37 AM
Maybe thats what the worlds leaders are wanting so they can get their global currency.

catwoman96's photo
Sun 05/03/09 09:42 AM
i think we wouldnt share. people would become even greedier. if possible

adj4u's photo
Sun 05/03/09 10:19 AM
imo those that be

are trying to do just that

and that would speed up their agenda

you cant have a one world govt till
you have a one world economy
and
you cant have a one world economy till
economies you are merging equal out with each other
and
you cant equal out those economies till
you spread the jobs around

just a thought

but hey

what do i know

nogames39's photo
Sun 05/03/09 10:51 AM
Edited by nogames39 on Sun 05/03/09 10:54 AM
It will cause the stop of the trade for a little while. Socialist countries, such as ours, will go to war, as they need someone to parasit on. Capitalist countries won't, unless they will be attacked.

As soon as a new medium of exchange is found, the trade would resume.

There is never any need for neither world government, nor single world money, these are the desires of the socialists. They need these desperately, because the scam has almost stopped working, and they need something to extend their undeserved quality of life.

Whenever you hear that, remember, that the root usefulness of anything "single" or "wolrdwide", is that there is no other choice, no escape. Be it world currency, or world government, the purpose is to force everyone into something they rather not participate. So, this is the dark force.

We just had world collapse. We should thank china for first, continuing the trade while they already know that the dollars they getting are worthless. And secondly, for doing what they do to promptly create a new medium of exchange, so that the trade can continue, that being their efforts to elevate reminbi to the status of world reserve currency.

The truth is dark, but not as dark as some suggest, and we are the bad guys.

adj4u's photo
Sun 05/03/09 10:59 AM
tell that to the one europe experiment

euros

single north american currency in the talks

it will be continental first

then it will go global

unless the people can stop it


nogames39's photo
Sun 05/03/09 11:07 AM
Don't worry, it will fail quickly. The important thing about Amero, or whatever they are going to call it when it will be announced, is what you do in it's first days.

The strategic goal of Amero, would be to establish a "no escape" monetary situation in North America, where not only a US persons, but also Canadian and Mexicans are all make their pockets available to the wealth extraction by inflation.

The tactical goal would be to default on a dollar, because when they roll out Amero, they will exchange 1 new Amero to , uh, I don't know, may-be 10000 dollars. The point? The point is that after a short while Amero will become just as worthless as dollar, so, if 10000 was the number then your wealth was reduced 10000 times, while your debts were reduced 10000 as well.

So, it is the same as if Obama ordered everyone with savings to pay the debts of those in the hole, without any kind of compensation in the future. This is the true meaning of the tactical goal of Amero.

ThomasJB's photo
Sun 05/03/09 11:50 AM
Would governments continue to exist? Without money would the office of the U.S. President hold any power or influence? How would militaries continue? Assuming they still have people willing to serve, obviously they have a stockpile of armaments, but their would be no resupply. Would they continue to be force after their armaments run out?

nogames39's photo
Sun 05/03/09 12:02 PM
Presidents don't need any money to rule. Just like kings, they only need money or special privileges to pay their guards. The rest will be forced to do what is necessary.

Money, is an instrument of free exchange. There is nothing free about government power.

ThomasJB's photo
Sun 05/03/09 12:06 PM
Money is power and without it, there is only brute force to maintain power and influence.

nogames39's photo
Sun 05/03/09 01:07 PM

Maybe thats what the worlds leaders are wanting so they can get their global currency.


There is certainly some of that in the mix. Governments always create crises, to put through the measures they desire, as supposed cures for the crises.