1 3 Next
Topic: It's me or the dog, or it's me or the cat
longhairbiker's photo
Sat 09/19/09 06:30 AM

Hmmm....let's see....my cat, my best friend I've had for the past 20 years, or the woman I've known for 20 minutes?

There's no contest.

.....but she's drunk, flat on her back, legs in the air, rubbing herself, and going "Purrrrr, purrrrr, purrrrr"!!!

Mayhem_J's photo
Sat 09/19/09 06:32 AM
No kitty kitty...thats my pot pieeeee!!! Moooooooommm!!! Kitties being a dildo!!







Well mommy knows a certain little kitty kitty thats sleeping with her tonight!!

Mr_Music's photo
Sat 09/19/09 06:43 AM


Hmmm....let's see....my cat, my best friend I've had for the past 20 years, or the woman I've known for 20 minutes?

There's no contest.

.....but she's drunk, flat on her back, legs in the air, rubbing herself, and going "Purrrrr, purrrrr, purrrrr"!!!


Purr-haps (laugh ), but at least I can guarantee the cat will still be around later on.

krupa's photo
Sat 09/19/09 06:47 AM
Love my dogs dammnit! They will get fed before any bird I am humping. They get first dibs on the rubby.....and they have seating reserved on the sofa as well as the overstuffed arm chair w ottoman.

After all....they are the only women who wait happily for me to get out of the shower to lick the water off of my feet and flop down, belly up for me to rub thier nipples while I am dropping my morning deuce.

Until a lover can top that.....they gotta put up with the dogs.

no photo
Sat 09/19/09 07:17 AM
Edited by singmesweet on Sat 09/19/09 07:17 AM

Actually had a friend this happened to. He was allergic to cats. When they got married, they compromised. The cat is relegated to his finished basement. She can go down there and visit it anytime she wants. The cat is happy, just doesn't have the run of the whole house.

It was a deal-breaker tho. He wouldn't have married her if she hadn't agreed to it.


I know plenty of people who are allergic to cats who do just fine. They make medication for those types of things :wink:.

That being said, no I would not get rid of my pets because some guy wanted me to.

daniel48706's photo
Sat 09/19/09 07:48 AM
You missed my point completely. What I said boils down to one very simple thing: IT IS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR YOU TO BE IN LOVE WITH SOMEONE UNLESS YOU ARE WILLING TO COMPROMISE AND WORK THINGS THROUGH.

By definition compromising requires communication. So if you are not willing to communicate, then you are not truly in love.




That right there is why so many marriages are dying, instead of flourishing. If you have truly fallen in love with someone, then it doesnt matter what the issue is, you are going to be willing to work issues like "to have a cat, or not to have a cat, that is the question" out.

I honestly believe too many people nowadays do not have even the first inkling of what it means to be in love, or to love someone. They know lust all right, but not love.

But in regards to the ops question, if both people TRULY LOVE each other, not just lust each other, then they are going to be able to come to a solution. Whether it be by cordoning off a particular part of the house because one of you is allergic (seriously, why would YOU force the one you are supposed to be in love with to suffer being sick all the time), or agreeing to not get any more pets after this one passed away. Whatever the compromise, if you truly loved someone, then the compromise would not be difficult to attain.



In other words....theoretically, you would find out if they enjoy pets or not before you fall in love with them. Unless your the type that falls in love with someone before getting to know them. And at that point let them know that its not going to work out....and start a search for someone who does like your companion.




This is funny....you think that the reason marriages are dying is because of choices like this.
I would hope by the time you choose to marry someone, you already know what compramises you will have to make. I would hope that two years into the marriage, you decide to tell your SO that you cant stand animals, and that the family pet has to go. And then when the kids love the pet and dont want him to go, you side with the kids, thus ending in divorce.

Riiiiight!!

Maybe the key here is lack of communication. If you marry someone without knowing the simple things such as pet allergies, then its your own fault that it wont last. And you def shouldnt be getting married.

longhairbiker's photo
Sat 09/19/09 08:07 AM
There's nothing worse than having sex on the bed, you're on top, she's on the bottom, and her cat sneaks up behind you and starts licking your butt with that sandpaper tongue. Its a showstopper.

longhairbiker's photo
Sat 09/19/09 08:09 AM
Quit laughing! It tickles!

no photo
Sat 09/19/09 08:12 AM

There's nothing worse than having sex on the bed, you're on top, she's on the bottom, and her cat sneaks up behind you and starts licking your butt with that sandpaper tongue. Its a showstopper.


rofl rofl rofl

Dragoness's photo
Sat 09/19/09 08:21 AM
Loving animals is a prerequisite for me anyway. I do love animals and it says something about a persons character to me if they don't.

As for the take me or my dog thing, of course, that will definitely be, she was here before him and may be here after him so she stays.

:wink: laugh

HasidicEnforcer's photo
Sat 09/19/09 09:20 AM
You missed my point completely. What I said boils down to one very simple thing: IT IS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR YOU TO BE IN LOVE WITH SOMEONE UNLESS YOU ARE WILLING TO COMPROMISE AND WORK THINGS THROUGH.

By definition compromising requires communication. So if you are not willing to communicate, then you are not truly in love.



I do not think you mean to use the word Physically. "Physically" a person can do whatever they want. "Mentally" and "emotionally" people are stuck being whom they are. You can "physically" love someone, but "emotionally" be hurt by their actions.

And yes, you can be in love regardless even if there is no compromise. Trust me. That is an abusive relationship and plenty of people are in them solely because they love the person too much to leave.


Now, as for me....

Love me, love my Horsepony. :D

no photo
Sat 09/19/09 09:35 AM

Love my dogs dammnit! They will get fed before any bird I am humping. They get first dibs on the rubby.....and they have seating reserved on the sofa as well as the overstuffed arm chair w ottoman.

After all....they are the only women who wait happily for me to get out of the shower to lick the water off of my feet and flop down, belly up for me to rub thier nipples while I am dropping my morning deuce.

Until a lover can top that.....they gotta put up with the dogs.



I've seen it...it's true!

daniel48706's photo
Sat 09/19/09 09:36 AM
yes you can be IN LOVE in an abusive relationship or whatever with someone. but you can not FALL IN LOVE with that person etc etc tec. The difference is a matter of when it happens.

Lets say a guy sweet talks, dates and shows himself to be a dream coem true, and your fall in love with him (for the ladies of course lol), and you get married. a coupleyers down the road, he loses his job, gets depressed and starts drinking. comes home drunk and starts hitting you.

This is just a scenario, though it happens all the time. you will not stop being in love with the guy, I dont care who you are or anything. If yuo were truly in love witht he guy, then yuo still would be after all this abuse. HOWEVER, it doesnt mean you would be willing to stay with him does it?

And if he had been like this when yuo first met him, yo would never have fallenin love with him, would you?

My point is still the same. You can not fall in love with a person unless you have good communication and truly get to know them. Lust is a totally different matter completely.

HasidicEnforcer's photo
Sat 09/19/09 09:46 AM
and everything you just described is EMOTIONAL, not physical.

just sayin'

no photo
Sat 09/19/09 09:46 AM
I'm horrible allergic to fur and feathers.

Not asking anyone to get rid of their pets, I just wouldn't be able to date them for health reasons.

1 3 Next