Topic: Why don't you believe in another god?
Abracadabra's photo
Wed 06/16/10 01:36 PM
Edited by Abracadabra on Wed 06/16/10 01:37 PM

Simply put; The Bibles claims it is not in your nature as a human being to be good enough,.


This is one of the main reasons I totally reject those writings as having anything to do with our creator. To begin with, if that really were true, who's fault would that be? Obviously it would be the fault of the creator!

You can't created a bunch of souls who do not have it in their nature to be "good enough" and then BLAME them for that failing!

Do you see how utterly absurd this is. huh


A person who seeks independence from the God who sustains all spiritual life then cries foul they have to die spiritually, calling it unfair, is like a person who dies of thrist with a glass of water in front of him/her, blameing some other for the awlful punishment of dying by dehydration


You've totally missed the point. Slow never referred to anyone who seeks independence from any God. He simply stated that surely any truly benevolent God would indeed appreciate and be kind to any kind souls.

In fact, why should God have anything against a GOOD person who is an atheist? That person would indeed be doing GOOD things by their own choice (not because they are attempting to appease a God).

That should be viewed by God as an even more righteous person than someone who merely refrains from doing bad things just to get the glass of water in your hypothetical spiritual desert. :whao:

I personally worship and praise God in my own way. So in that sense I am not rejecting God, nor am I seeking spiritual independence. I simply reject the ancient dogma that we aren't good enough for God.

I personally think that's utter hogwash.

I'm perfectly good enough for God, thank you very much. :angel:


2sparrows's photo
Wed 06/16/10 01:41 PM

Sparrows wrote:

>(YOU HAVE INVENTED YOUR OWN VERSION OF CHRISTIANITY JUST SO YOU CAN REJECT IT, GOOD FOR YOU,AT LEAST YOU ARE NOT REJECTING THE REAL THING)<


So?

Christians just invent their own version of Christianity just so they can accept it. At least they aren't accepting anything real.

Where's the difference? spock


I am impressed! You are correct.There is no difference. But this topic was covered in a previous answer (censored & deleted) so to recap; Christianity cannot be judged by the actions and doctrines of "Hypocrite Christians". To do so would be judging by what is false. I have no arguement with you there.
So when you misquote what the Scriptures say you do the same as they...There is no difference.

The thing that is interesting; is that I have been reading and studying the Bible for (probably) more years than you have lived; a fact you seem to disrespect. When you stated the Quran was part of the Bible it was hugh indicator of your familiarity with the Bible. The point is for you to convince me that the God/The Bible/Christianity is wrong you are going to need to know more about these subjects.I will be more than happy to discuss anything about them, but "hearsay & making stuff up" becomes wearisome for me...unless you would like to deal with one hearsay fact or statement at a time...that I would be happy to do.

Abracadabra's photo
Wed 06/16/10 01:49 PM
Sparrows wrote:

>(YOU HAVE INVENTED YOUR OWN VERSION OF CHRISTIANITY JUST SO YOU CAN REJECT IT, GOOD FOR YOU,AT LEAST YOU ARE NOT REJECTING THE REAL THING)<


By the way Sparrows, I really do need to give you credit for recognizing the above.

Even you appear to recognize that it would be absurd for a benevolent God to judge people who genuinely don't believe in something, or who have misundersood it.

You may very well be right. Maybe I do misunderstand the whole Biblical picture. To me, the Bible tries to claim that I'm at odds with a Zeus-like God and that I need to accept the blood sacrifice of his son in order to win his love.

From my point of view, not only is the story absurd, but I also see absolutely no reason to believe that it is credible. Therefore I reject it in the same way that I reject the stories of Zeus.

So even by your standards, a truly benevolent God could not hold this against me. So I would be "saved" by the default of God's true benevolence.

I'll accept that. drinker

I won't hold God responsible for an utterly confusing and self-contradicting book that was written by a bunch of male-chauvinistic Hebrews.

2sparrows's photo
Wed 06/16/10 02:03 PM


Simply put; The Bibles claims it is not in your nature as a human being to be good enough,.


This is one of the main reasons I totally reject those writings as having anything to do with our creator. To begin with, if that really were true, who's fault would that be? Obviously it would be the fault of the creator!

You can't created a bunch of souls who do not have it in their nature to be "good enough" and then BLAME them for that failing!

Do you see how utterly absurd this is. huh


A person who seeks independence from the God who sustains all spiritual life then cries foul they have to die spiritually, calling it unfair, is like a person who dies of thrist with a glass of water in front of him/her, blameing some other for the awlful punishment of dying by dehydration


You've totally missed the point. Slow never referred to anyone who seeks independence from any God. He simply stated that surely any truly benevolent God would indeed appreciate and be kind to any kind souls.

In fact, why should God have anything against a GOOD person who is an atheist? That person would indeed be doing GOOD things by their own choice (not because they are attempting to appease a God).

That should be viewed by God as an even more righteous person than someone who merely refrains from doing bad things just to get the glass of water in your hypothetical spiritual desert. :whao:

I personally worship and praise God in my own way. So in that sense I am not rejecting God, nor am I seeking spiritual independence. I simply reject the ancient dogma that we aren't good enough for God.

I personally think that's utter hogwash.

I'm perfectly good enough for God, thank you very much. :angel:




Wow! talk about missing the point. Here it is in a different way:
God created you to have relationship with him, out of that relationship springs eternal life.(As it is in the physical world he created) But just in case one thinks eternal life comes from being good apart from God. The Bible clearly states it cannot be done.

Here is something for you to ponder on:
Adam & Eve had a relationship with God, but ever since they ate the fruit they were obsessed with right and wrong, good and evil. As is humankind today.

2sparrows's photo
Wed 06/16/10 02:18 PM


I won't hold God responsible for an utterly confusing and self-contradicting book that was written by a bunch of male-chauvinistic Hebrews.


Another worth pondering:
I think it may have been intentionally written that way.Because people see what they look for... the Bible has a unique sifting mechanism written into it.

Abracadabra's photo
Wed 06/16/10 02:28 PM
Edited by Abracadabra on Wed 06/16/10 02:29 PM

The Bible clearly states it cannot be done.


Why should I give a hoot what the Bible says? huh

Apparently you fell for the idea that the Bible represents "God's Word".

I personally don't believe the book is anyone nearly intelligent enough to be the word of any divine supreme being.


Here is something for you to ponder on:
Adam & Eve had a relationship with God, but ever since they ate the fruit they were obsessed with right and wrong, good and evil. As is humankind today.


I personally don't believe that story any more than I believe the stories of ancient Greek Mythology.

Here is something for you to ponder:

If God is all-wise then why does the Bible have this God always solving problems using utterly unwise and often quite violent ways? Also why do the stories within the Bible stand in such blatant contradiction with each other?

For example, the Bible has humankind becoming more and more disobedient to God until it apparently gets so out-of-control that God has to flood the entire planet save for a handful of questionable humans in an ark?

First off, this very story implies that God wasn't wise enough to see this coming and nip it in the bud before it got so far out of hand.

Secondly this is clearly a very violent solution. Not only does he kill all the people on Earth, including innocent babies and children, but he also wipes out all the poor innocent animals in the process. That was real smart. whoa

Also if this is the same God who you can pray to and ask him to magically cure your cancer then why couldn't he have just given all the sinners heart attacks? Or better yet just make them all sterile so they couldn't have any more children. Then the generations of sinners would have finally died off without having to drown innocent babies and children.

Clearly this Biblical God is not the least bit wise.

Then he promises some people some land, and after leading them through a desert for 40 years he finally shows them the real estate but it's already inhabited by a bunch of heathen. So God just tells his choosen people to murder all the heathens and once again kill all their women, children and babies too.

Again, if he knew this was coming whe didn't he just make the heathen sterile so they couldn't reproduce? Then by the time he finally found the piece of real estate there woudln't be any heathens on it.

The Bible says that God is unchanging and is the same yestersay, today and tomorrow. But not so according to the New Testament!

In the New Testament God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son as a sacrifical lamb to save the souls of men.

Well, hey. Is this the SAME God who once hated the world so much that he downed everyone out? huh

Why should I believe anything that's written in the Bible. It's clearly a bunch of conflicting stories that make no sense at all.

Even if I accept the "Crucifixion" of Jesus as the Son of God what does that say? It just means that I accept yet one more violent solution to God's problems.

I thought this God was supposed to be WISE? Solving everything with acts of violence doesn't seem very wise to me.

So I'll pass on believing that the Bible is the word of any "all-wise" God. It appears to me to be the writtings of bumbling idiots, not an all-wise supreme being.

Let's all HOPE that if we have a creator, that creator is far wiser than the idiots who wrote the Bible. flowerforyou

Abracadabra's photo
Wed 06/16/10 02:31 PM



I won't hold God responsible for an utterly confusing and self-contradicting book that was written by a bunch of male-chauvinistic Hebrews.


Another worth pondering:
I think it may have been intentionally written that way.Because people see what they look for... the Bible has a unique sifting mechanism written into it.


Well, if it sifts out sane reasonable people, then clearly I'll be sifted out every time I read it. drinker

s1owhand's photo
Wed 06/16/10 02:36 PM
sparrows,

being good cannot be separate from god. god is the essence of good.
anytime one is good then they commune with god. it is impossible to
be good apart from god by definition.

therefore any good or virtuous behavior....

no photo
Wed 06/16/10 07:13 PM


Well that's not true. You have to accept that Jesus Christ is your savior and love him before you get the gift.


You're absolutely RIGHT, it's not a FREE Gift at all!

People better read the FINE PRINT.

If you accept the Crucifixion of Jesus on your behalf that means that you totally condone the crucifixion be done on your behalf.

In other words, if you aren't willing to nail Jesus to the cross yourself, then you aren't willing to accept the sacrifice in YOUR NAME.

If you would have done anything at all to prevent the crucifixion, or even so much as refuse to be party to it, then you are rejecting the sacrifice on YOUR BEHALF.

I absolultely reject the crucifixion on my behalf. Without a doubt. I would not nail Jesus to the pole, nor would I condone having him nailed to the pole by someone on MY BEHALF.

Therefore I CANNOT accept or condone this 'sacrifice' for my sake.

As a matter of principle I would necessarily have no choice but to accept eternal damnation.

So even if the fable is true, I would could not be "saved" because I'm not willing to nail Jesus to the pole for my sake.

The only people who would go to this heaven would be the people who are willing to have Jesus nailed to a pole to pay for their sins. That would not include me.

I would have no choice but to refuse the offer. There's nothing FREE about it and the price is far too high to pay. I would need to condone the crucifixion of a supposedly totally innocent man on my behalf to save myself.

So the religion is utterly worthless to me even if it is true. This God would have rigged things to make it impossible for me to be "saved".

Have fun in Heaven! I guarantee you won't be seeing me there. waving


A thousand Amens to that.

I bow to your ability to tell it like it is.

no photo
Wed 06/16/10 07:19 PM


s1owhand; are you aware that the Bible disagrees with you?


rofl

The Bible disagrees with all religions that claim to believe in it.

So what else is new?


The Bible is just a bunch of scriptures combined to make a book. It can't agree or disagree with anyone.

Sheeeeesh.

2sparrows's photo
Wed 06/16/10 11:31 PM

sparrows,

being good cannot be separate from god. god is the essence of good.
anytime one is good then they commune with god. it is impossible to
be good apart from god by definition.

therefore any good or virtuous behavior....


This is the best thing you have said yet; this is excatly what the Bible says.You have captured the essence of the Gospel. Are you sure you don't want to change your mind?...lol.

The only thing left is; Who decides what is "good"? If you say you do; you declare yourself to be God, if you say God then you are subject to Him.

2sparrows's photo
Thu 06/17/10 12:21 AM


The Bible clearly states it cannot be done.


Why should I give a hoot what the Bible says? huh

Apparently you fell for the idea that the Bible represents "God's Word".

I personally don't believe the book is anyone nearly intelligent enough to be the word of any divine supreme being.


Here is something for you to ponder on:
Adam & Eve had a relationship with God, but ever since they ate the fruit they were obsessed with right and wrong, good and evil. As is humankind today.


I personally don't believe that story any more than I believe the stories of ancient Greek Mythology.

Here is something for you to ponder:

If God is all-wise then why does the Bible have this God always solving problems using utterly unwise and often quite violent ways? Also why do the stories within the Bible stand in such blatant contradiction with each other?

For example, the Bible has humankind becoming more and more disobedient to God until it apparently gets so out-of-control that God has to flood the entire planet save for a handful of questionable humans in an ark?

First off, this very story implies that God wasn't wise enough to see this coming and nip it in the bud before it got so far out of hand.

Secondly this is clearly a very violent solution. Not only does he kill all the people on Earth, including innocent babies and children, but he also wipes out all the poor innocent animals in the process. That was real smart. whoa

Also if this is the same God who you can pray to and ask him to magically cure your cancer then why couldn't he have just given all the sinners heart attacks? Or better yet just make them all sterile so they couldn't have any more children. Then the generations of sinners would have finally died off without having to drown innocent babies and children.

Clearly this Biblical God is not the least bit wise.

Then he promises some people some land, and after leading them through a desert for 40 years he finally shows them the real estate but it's already inhabited by a bunch of heathen. So God just tells his choosen people to murder all the heathens and once again kill all their women, children and babies too.

Again, if he knew this was coming whe didn't he just make the heathen sterile so they couldn't reproduce? Then by the time he finally found the piece of real estate there woudln't be any heathens on it.

The Bible says that God is unchanging and is the same yestersay, today and tomorrow. But not so according to the New Testament!

In the New Testament God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son as a sacrifical lamb to save the souls of men.

Well, hey. Is this the SAME God who once hated the world so much that he downed everyone out? huh

Why should I believe anything that's written in the Bible. It's clearly a bunch of conflicting stories that make no sense at all.

Even if I accept the "Crucifixion" of Jesus as the Son of God what does that say? It just means that I accept yet one more violent solution to God's problems.

I thought this God was supposed to be WISE? Solving everything with acts of violence doesn't seem very wise to me.

So I'll pass on believing that the Bible is the word of any "all-wise" God. It appears to me to be the writtings of bumbling idiots, not an all-wise supreme being.

Let's all HOPE that if we have a creator, that creator is far wiser than the idiots who wrote the Bible. flowerforyou


Dear Abracadabra;
I have already said I will be happy to discuss ONE statement at a time. You make a statement that may be true, untrue or 1/2 true then draw a conclusion, which again may be true, untrue or 1/2 true. You make the conclusion a premise and draw another conclusion, which becomes a statement of fact by which you draw another conclusion and so forth and so on..it goes on and on and on!!! For the sake of discussion I am only going to deal with first statement or question in your post from now on.
In this particular post it is:
"If God is all-wise then why does the Bible have this God always solving problems using utterly unwise and often quite violent ways?"
To answer;
You have "assumed" there is a problem to be solved. Why have you not viewed it as a premeditated process that takes into account the free choice of humankind?

To judge a thing as "un-wise' you must have all the facts past present and future about the thing.Obviously you do not posses such knowledge, therefore you cannot judge the "un-wiseness" of things that pertain to eternity.

"Violent ways" in this you refer to the flood drowning most all humankind.If you read you will see that God had Noah warn the people for 40 years there was a flood coming, but they refused to believe and drowned instead...And now you blame God? He gave them the freedom to choose as he does you. They chose drowning.If I give you freedom to do what you want, but warn you not to play in the street and a car runs you over...how is that my fault?

Even now you have a choice to make.

s1owhand's photo
Thu 06/17/10 03:44 AM

Simply put; The Bibles claims it is not in your nature as a human being to be good enough


Nonsense! Show me this claim!

The Bible says repeatedly that you can be good enough! Not only that, it describes in many ways how you should be good enough. That is the whole point of the Bible and, in my view, the value of it.

Sure it is literature and written by humans and full of difficult to interpret passages and vague descriptions. But it is humankind's initial attempts at wrestling with what is good and what is bad and how we define God. This is a very important book. One of the most widely read and influential texts ever written.

It is a constant struggle to be virtuous? Yes. Do you ever become as perfect as God no matter how hard you try as a human? No. But the Bible does not say anywhere that you must be Christian. One can follow the teachings of Christ without observing any of the rituals of any of the Christian religions. You don't have to go to church or "believe in Christ as savior" to be completely virtuous? More importantly simply saying you "believe in Christ" cannot make you a good person whether you sincerely believe Jesus is God or not.

How about Jews? How about Buddhists? How about Muslims? Most of the world is not Christian and since there are probably the same percentage of really good people in each religion that means most really good people are not even Christian. No god would punish them. Certainly not Jesus or the God of the old Testament.


Totage's photo
Thu 06/17/10 05:34 AM

As i'm here on this forum, and i've talked with many of you before, i feel as if i'm talking to primarily christians on this forum. However i know that i've also talked with other Mormons, Jews and Muslims.

My question is Why don't you believe in another god, or another worship of your god. For instance christianity has hundreds of different sub-sects, many of which believe that others will not reach salvation because of the alteration of their faith.

Ultimately it comes down to semantics. Do you believe in your ways of faith because of the way you were raised? Did you research all known religions before you made your decision? Do you believe that your religious "knowledge" is more right than another persons.

Ultimately, why do you believe that you are right?

To me, one religion is as false as the other. All religion is is personalized. We see more and more of people who no longer attend a church, but instead adhere to their own form of spiritual adhesion. They read their spiritual texts and then believe more in their own interpretation more than other scholars'.

Discuss.



I believe the only way is the Holy Bible. If it's not of the Bible, then it's not the truth. That's what I was born into and events in my life have reinforced my beliefs. It's a personal thing. If you're seeking the one true God, He will be revealed to you. If you are not open to finding the one true God, you will never find him. God gives us freewill to accept, reject, and even create our own version of Him.

2sparrows's photo
Thu 06/17/10 09:09 AM
Edited by 2sparrows on Thu 06/17/10 09:12 AM


Simply put; The Bibles claims it is not in your nature as a human being to be good enough


Nonsense! Show me this claim!




@ s1owhand

Almost a dozen passages come to mind scattered through out the Bible. Will (3) passages be enough to show you this claim?

(1)Mark 10:18 (where Jesus says): "No one is good except God alone"

(2)Romans 3:10-31 There is no one righteous, not even one......there is no one who does good not even one.....Therefore no one will be declared righteous in his sight by observing the law; rather through the law we become conscious of sin. But now a righteousness from God has been made known....This righteous from God comes through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. ....for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God..... Where then, is boasting? It is excluded...... for we maintain that man is justified by faith apart from observing the law...... Do we, then nullify the law by this faith? Not at all! Rather, we uphold the law.

(3)Ephesians 2:8-9 For it is by grace you have been saved,through faith - and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God - not by works, so no one can boast.

Abracadabra's photo
Thu 06/17/10 10:30 AM
Sparrows wrote:

You have "assumed" there is a problem to be solved. Why have you not viewed it as a premeditated process that takes into account the free choice of humankind?


Excuse me, but that is the problem according to the Bible.

You've just described the "problem" and act as if it doesn't exist. What sense does that make? Abslutely no sense at all.


To judge a thing as "un-wise' you must have all the facts past present and future about the thing.Obviously you do not posses such knowledge, therefore you cannot judge the "un-wiseness" of things that pertain to eternity.


Totally untrue. I am judging stories in a book in human terms based on the stories in the book. Period!

That is all that I'm doing. And it is my firm conclusion that these stories are totally unwise in that context.

What you are doing on the other hands, is merely assuming that there exists other information outside of the book that somehow justifies this God.

In other words, even you recognize that my conclusions are indeed correct given the actual information at hand.


"Violent ways" in this you refer to the flood drowning most all humankind.If you read you will see that God had Noah warn the people for 40 years there was a flood coming, but they refused to believe and drowned instead...And now you blame God? He gave them the freedom to choose as he does you. They chose drowning.If I give you freedom to do what you want, but warn you not to play in the street and a car runs you over...how is that my fault?


If you are a father of a child who is incapable of understanding the danger of playing in the street, and you allow that child to play in the street, then you are an incompetent and irresponsible parent. In fact, by our current laws you could be charged with abuse via neglect.

These lame excuses that you attempt to make up for this God simply don't wash. That are every bit as lame as the stories in the Bible, IMHO.


Even now you have a choice to make.


I already made my choice. I choose to reject the writings of the ancient Hebrews as being utterly ignorant, stupid, and foolish and therefore cannot possibly be the thoughts, words, or actions of any supreme all-wise deity. That story is every bit as stupid as the stories of Zeus and everyone accepts that those stories are stupid.

That is my choice sir.

You are welcome to chose whatever you like, but don't try to sell it to me because your sales pitches are utterly devoid of any value to me. They are just as short-sighted and lame as the Biblical stories IMHO.

msharmony's photo
Thu 06/17/10 10:50 AM


As i'm here on this forum, and i've talked with many of you before, i feel as if i'm talking to primarily christians on this forum. However i know that i've also talked with other Mormons, Jews and Muslims.

My question is Why don't you believe in another god, or another worship of your god. For instance christianity has hundreds of different sub-sects, many of which believe that others will not reach salvation because of the alteration of their faith.

Ultimately it comes down to semantics. Do you believe in your ways of faith because of the way you were raised? Did you research all known religions before you made your decision? Do you believe that your religious "knowledge" is more right than another persons.

Ultimately, why do you believe that you are right?

To me, one religion is as false as the other. All religion is is personalized. We see more and more of people who no longer attend a church, but instead adhere to their own form of spiritual adhesion. They read their spiritual texts and then believe more in their own interpretation more than other scholars'.

Discuss.



I believe the only way is the Holy Bible. If it's not of the Bible, then it's not the truth. That's what I was born into and events in my life have reinforced my beliefs. It's a personal thing. If you're seeking the one true God, He will be revealed to you. If you are not open to finding the one true God, you will never find him. God gives us freewill to accept, reject, and even create our own version of Him.



beautifully put

Abracadabra's photo
Thu 06/17/10 10:54 AM
Edited by Abracadabra on Thu 06/17/10 10:55 AM

Almost a dozen passages come to mind scattered through out the Bible. Will (3) passages be enough to show you this claim?

(1)Mark 10:18 (where Jesus says): "No one is good except God alone"


Well, there you go. Contradiction# 9873635277462573

Everyone knows that the Virgin Mother Mary was also without sin. You can't have Jesus being born from a vessle of Satan. So there's your contradiction.

The Bible constantly conflicts with its own stories and therefore no single verse like this can be trusted to have any merit on its own.

Besides, those people who are determined to make God and Jesus out to be monsters should truly be sorely asshamed of themselves.

Like Slowhand has clearly pointed out, for your belief to be true, you would necessarily be worshiping a God who condemns millions and even billions of perfectly righteous souls to either eternal damanation or perishing simply because they don't believe a book written by a bunch of Hebrew male-chuavinist pigs.

Moreover, if mankind is as lame as you claim who's fault would that be? It could only be the fault of the God who created them in the first place. So this doesn't say much for your God.

A good who creates inept beings just so he can judge them to be inept?

That doesn't even make any sense.

Moreover, if mankind does not have the ability to be good on his own, then what sense does it even make to claim that mankind would be responsible or guilty for being bad?

All you'd be saying is that no man is responsible for being bad because God created him to be bad. whoa

I'll tell you what's really going on.

The men who wrote Romans (and I doubt very much that it was Paul), were simply trying to convince the readers that no one is exempt from being a sinner and all must be 'saved', which at that time could only happen through the approval of the church.

So this was just a political ploy to use religion to make all men feel guilty and in need of salvation through the church.

Once again, this very scenario doesn't even make any sense at all in the context of an actual all-wise creator. Therefore it can only be the dubious plots of men who are trying to use religion to place the masses under their authority.

Anytime you read the Bible just ask yourself two simple questions:

1. Is this what an all-wise super-intelligent supreme being would do or say?

2. Is this what deceitful men would write who are trying to convince the masses that they need to come to their churches and worship their priests?

When I read the Bible in every passage the answers are crystal clear.

No, to #1, and a resounding YES, to #2.

Every time!

2sparrows's photo
Thu 06/17/10 11:02 AM
Edited by 2sparrows on Thu 06/17/10 11:17 AM

Sparrows wrote:

You have "assumed" there is a problem to be solved. Why have you not viewed it as a premeditated process that takes into account the free choice of humankind?


Excuse me, but that is the problem according to the Bible.

You've just described the "problem" and act as if it doesn't exist. What sense does that make? Abslutely no sense at all.

Why did you avoid the question?


To judge a thing as "un-wise' you must have all the facts past present and future about the thing.Obviously you do not posses such knowledge, therefore you cannot judge the "un-wiseness" of things that pertain to eternity.


Totally untrue. I am judging stories in a book in human terms based on the stories in the book. Period!

That is all that I'm doing. And it is my firm conclusion that these stories are totally unwise in that context.

What you are doing on the other hands, is merely assuming that there exists other information outside of the book that somehow justifies this God.

In other words, even you recognize that my conclusions are indeed correct given the actual information at hand.




>>>Your conclusions are incorrect by your own standards.(judging by human standards) & (actual information at hand) The information at hand states this is a spiritual matter.<<<


"Violent ways" in this you refer to the flood drowning most all humankind.If you read you will see that God had Noah warn the people for 40 years there was a flood coming, but they refused to believe and drowned instead...And now you blame God? He gave them the freedom to choose as he does you. They chose drowning.If I give you freedom to do what you want, but warn you not to play in the street and a car runs you over...how is that my fault?


If you are a father of a child who is incapable of understanding the danger of playing in the street, and you allow that child to play in the street, then you are an incompetent and irresponsible parent. In fact, by our current laws you could be charged with abuse via neglect.

These lame excuses that you attempt to make up for this God simply don't wash. That are every bit as lame as the stories in the Bible, IMHO.



>>>Again you 'assume then draw a conclusion from your assumption' The people in the flood were capable of understanding and chose not to believe<<<


Even now you have a choice to make.



I already made my choice. I choose to reject the writings of the ancient Hebrews as being utterly ignorant, stupid, and foolish and therefore cannot possibly be the thoughts, words, or actions of any supreme all-wise deity. That story is every bit as stupid as the stories of Zeus and everyone accepts that those stories are stupid.

That is my choice sir.

You are welcome to chose whatever you like, but don't try to sell it to me because your sales pitches are utterly devoid of any value to me. They are just as short-sighted and lame as the Biblical stories IMHO.



>>>I don't have to sell anything to you. If you would take the time with a open heart and mind to study and understand the scriptures for yourself it would sell it self. But you have not taken the time to educate yourself with the scriptures first hand,yet you feel qualified to attack them???
You will never understand them without asking God for his help...remember the "sifting mechanism"? ....It's ok to be skeptical, but not closed minded, and in this case since it is a spiritual matter...close hearted.<<<

Abracadabra's photo
Thu 06/17/10 11:03 AM

God gives us freewill to accept, reject, and even create our own version of Him.


Well, there you go. Stated in your own words.

If we create our own version of God, then we are indeed worshiping the only true God. There's no getting around it.

Therefore if someone rejects the Bible and insteads chooses a different religion to follow, then like Slowhand makes very clear, those people are also worshiping the one true God.

How you worship that God is irrelevant. You can believe in the Hebrew's version, you can believe in Zeus, or any other archetype you so desire. Because all pathways lead to God.

So worshiping the God depicted in the Bible is not 'wrong'. But holding that picture out to be the only true picture of God is wrong.

I have absolutely no problem with anyone who wants to worship Yahweh, or Jesus, or even Zeus for that matter. But as soon as they start trying to tell me that that picture of God is the only picture of the One True God, then they have gone off the deep end of insanity.

It's just one of many archetypes. That's all it is. The sooner people realize this the better for all mankind.