Topic: Group Sues to Stop Mosque Near Ground Zero
Redykeulous's photo
Thu 08/05/10 07:13 PM

The way I look at it, and I hope you can hear the sarcasm, "Great, just what we need, another church."


ANOTHER CHURCH - well maybe they can be convinced to make it look like a Buddhist monestary - we don't have a lot of that kind of structure here - it would be change.

Oh - I know make them uses some part of the land for a memorial and list all the victims of 9/11 on it.. THEN all the loved ones of all the victims will have a common meeting ground - just a couple blocks from ground zero.

AND they can keep an ever sharp eye on the goings on around the place....spock


mightymoe's photo
Thu 08/05/10 07:19 PM

I wonder if a YMCA (the building is a community center in the manner of the Y, as I understand) on "ground zero" would cause such a ruckus on these forums. winking


young muslims counciling association? i think i would have a problem with that.

mightymoe's photo
Thu 08/05/10 07:21 PM




The word is still 'dhimmitude' ...


I guess you are angry because you percieve that the USA is surrendering to Islamic demands...that there is a move towards appeasment in by your government..that may be, considering that the US has bombed some Islamic countrys back into the stone age..a mosque seems like a small concession in exchange..


they can build a mosque anywhere in the country cept there... why don't we build a Japanese monument on pearl harbor?. lets build a tribute to Hitler at Auschwitz. how about a big tribute to Americans at Nagasaki and Hiroshima? and while were at it, maybe we can take the big statue of saddam and set it on top of the building? bad taste is bad taste. sorry you don't agree. maybe the families of the 2500 people that died there will agree.


Considering some of them were American Muslims I believe there will be support.

Plus there has to be enlightened families who realize that Muslims did not kill their family. Terrorists did.



muslim terroist... don't forget that

mightymoe's photo
Thu 08/05/10 07:22 PM


I wonder if a YMCA (the building is a community center in the manner of the Y, as I understand) on "ground zero" would cause such a ruckus on these forums. winking


Is it open to gays - if not you'll never see a good performance of the song - Y M CA - THERE.

On the other hand, maybe a good cooking school is needed - we can retrain all the out of work poeple who want to take back jobs from immigrants - fast order cook anyone? I vote for the big M.

better than what they're offering.

Dragoness's photo
Thu 08/05/10 07:28 PM





The word is still 'dhimmitude' ...


I guess you are angry because you percieve that the USA is surrendering to Islamic demands...that there is a move towards appeasment in by your government..that may be, considering that the US has bombed some Islamic countrys back into the stone age..a mosque seems like a small concession in exchange..


they can build a mosque anywhere in the country cept there... why don't we build a Japanese monument on pearl harbor?. lets build a tribute to Hitler at Auschwitz. how about a big tribute to Americans at Nagasaki and Hiroshima? and while were at it, maybe we can take the big statue of saddam and set it on top of the building? bad taste is bad taste. sorry you don't agree. maybe the families of the 2500 people that died there will agree.


Considering some of them were American Muslims I believe there will be support.

Plus there has to be enlightened families who realize that Muslims did not kill their family. Terrorists did.



muslim terroist... don't forget that


They are terrorists.

If we outlawed the religion of all terrorists, there would be none left.

Dragoness's photo
Thu 08/05/10 07:30 PM
It is a few blocks from ground zero anyway.

mightymoe's photo
Thu 08/05/10 07:30 PM






The word is still 'dhimmitude' ...


I guess you are angry because you percieve that the USA is surrendering to Islamic demands...that there is a move towards appeasment in by your government..that may be, considering that the US has bombed some Islamic countrys back into the stone age..a mosque seems like a small concession in exchange..


they can build a mosque anywhere in the country cept there... why don't we build a Japanese monument on pearl harbor?. lets build a tribute to Hitler at Auschwitz. how about a big tribute to Americans at Nagasaki and Hiroshima? and while were at it, maybe we can take the big statue of saddam and set it on top of the building? bad taste is bad taste. sorry you don't agree. maybe the families of the 2500 people that died there will agree.


Considering some of them were American Muslims I believe there will be support.

Plus there has to be enlightened families who realize that Muslims did not kill their family. Terrorists did.



muslim terroist... don't forget that


They are terrorists.

If we outlawed the religion of all terrorists, there would be none left.

no, in case you forgot, it was muslims in the name of allah that killed the 2500 people. on that same spot. were you not paying attention 0n 9/11?

Dragoness's photo
Thu 08/05/10 07:34 PM







The word is still 'dhimmitude' ...


I guess you are angry because you percieve that the USA is surrendering to Islamic demands...that there is a move towards appeasment in by your government..that may be, considering that the US has bombed some Islamic countrys back into the stone age..a mosque seems like a small concession in exchange..


they can build a mosque anywhere in the country cept there... why don't we build a Japanese monument on pearl harbor?. lets build a tribute to Hitler at Auschwitz. how about a big tribute to Americans at Nagasaki and Hiroshima? and while were at it, maybe we can take the big statue of saddam and set it on top of the building? bad taste is bad taste. sorry you don't agree. maybe the families of the 2500 people that died there will agree.


Considering some of them were American Muslims I believe there will be support.

Plus there has to be enlightened families who realize that Muslims did not kill their family. Terrorists did.



muslim terroist... don't forget that


They are terrorists.

If we outlawed the religion of all terrorists, there would be none left.

no, in case you forgot, it was muslims in the name of allah that killed the 2500 people. on that same spot. were you not paying attention 0n 9/11?


It was terrorist doing terrorism in the name of terrorism.

If we outlawed the religion of all terrorists , there would be no religion left to worship.

FearandLoathing's photo
Thu 08/05/10 07:39 PM







The word is still 'dhimmitude' ...


I guess you are angry because you percieve that the USA is surrendering to Islamic demands...that there is a move towards appeasment in by your government..that may be, considering that the US has bombed some Islamic countrys back into the stone age..a mosque seems like a small concession in exchange..


they can build a mosque anywhere in the country cept there... why don't we build a Japanese monument on pearl harbor?. lets build a tribute to Hitler at Auschwitz. how about a big tribute to Americans at Nagasaki and Hiroshima? and while were at it, maybe we can take the big statue of saddam and set it on top of the building? bad taste is bad taste. sorry you don't agree. maybe the families of the 2500 people that died there will agree.


Considering some of them were American Muslims I believe there will be support.

Plus there has to be enlightened families who realize that Muslims did not kill their family. Terrorists did.



muslim terroist... don't forget that


They are terrorists.

If we outlawed the religion of all terrorists, there would be none left.

no, in case you forgot, it was muslims in the name of allah that killed the 2500 people. on that same spot. were you not paying attention 0n 9/11?


Christian terrorists killed more than that during the Crusades.

mightymoe's photo
Thu 08/05/10 07:41 PM








The word is still 'dhimmitude' ...


I guess you are angry because you percieve that the USA is surrendering to Islamic demands...that there is a move towards appeasment in by your government..that may be, considering that the US has bombed some Islamic countrys back into the stone age..a mosque seems like a small concession in exchange..


they can build a mosque anywhere in the country cept there... why don't we build a Japanese monument on pearl harbor?. lets build a tribute to Hitler at Auschwitz. how about a big tribute to Americans at Nagasaki and Hiroshima? and while were at it, maybe we can take the big statue of saddam and set it on top of the building? bad taste is bad taste. sorry you don't agree. maybe the families of the 2500 people that died there will agree.


Considering some of them were American Muslims I believe there will be support.

Plus there has to be enlightened families who realize that Muslims did not kill their family. Terrorists did.



muslim terroist... don't forget that


They are terrorists.

If we outlawed the religion of all terrorists, there would be none left.

no, in case you forgot, it was muslims in the name of allah that killed the 2500 people. on that same spot. were you not paying attention 0n 9/11?


Christian terrorists killed more than that during the Crusades.


that was then... this is now....

mightymoe's photo
Thu 08/05/10 07:42 PM








The word is still 'dhimmitude' ...


I guess you are angry because you percieve that the USA is surrendering to Islamic demands...that there is a move towards appeasment in by your government..that may be, considering that the US has bombed some Islamic countrys back into the stone age..a mosque seems like a small concession in exchange..


they can build a mosque anywhere in the country cept there... why don't we build a Japanese monument on pearl harbor?. lets build a tribute to Hitler at Auschwitz. how about a big tribute to Americans at Nagasaki and Hiroshima? and while were at it, maybe we can take the big statue of saddam and set it on top of the building? bad taste is bad taste. sorry you don't agree. maybe the families of the 2500 people that died there will agree.


Considering some of them were American Muslims I believe there will be support.

Plus there has to be enlightened families who realize that Muslims did not kill their family. Terrorists did.



muslim terroist... don't forget that


They are terrorists.

If we outlawed the religion of all terrorists, there would be none left.

no, in case you forgot, it was muslims in the name of allah that killed the 2500 people. on that same spot. were you not paying attention 0n 9/11?


It was terrorist doing terrorism in the name of terrorism.

If we outlawed the religion of all terrorists , there would be no religion left to worship.

no, it was 5 muslims that did it...did you forget?

Dragoness's photo
Thu 08/05/10 07:46 PM









The word is still 'dhimmitude' ...


I guess you are angry because you percieve that the USA is surrendering to Islamic demands...that there is a move towards appeasment in by your government..that may be, considering that the US has bombed some Islamic countrys back into the stone age..a mosque seems like a small concession in exchange..


they can build a mosque anywhere in the country cept there... why don't we build a Japanese monument on pearl harbor?. lets build a tribute to Hitler at Auschwitz. how about a big tribute to Americans at Nagasaki and Hiroshima? and while were at it, maybe we can take the big statue of saddam and set it on top of the building? bad taste is bad taste. sorry you don't agree. maybe the families of the 2500 people that died there will agree.


Considering some of them were American Muslims I believe there will be support.

Plus there has to be enlightened families who realize that Muslims did not kill their family. Terrorists did.



muslim terroist... don't forget that


They are terrorists.

If we outlawed the religion of all terrorists, there would be none left.

no, in case you forgot, it was muslims in the name of allah that killed the 2500 people. on that same spot. were you not paying attention 0n 9/11?


It was terrorist doing terrorism in the name of terrorism.

If we outlawed the religion of all terrorists , there would be no religion left to worship.

no, it was 5 muslims that did it...did you forget?


It was actually more than 5 terrorist who did it in the name of terrorism.

Terrorists come in all shapes and sizes, religions and ethnicity, etc....

If we are going to hold these terrorists religion against them then we have to hold all other terrorists religion against them and restrict their churches and worship here too.

It cannot be one sided.

FearandLoathing's photo
Thu 08/05/10 07:47 PM









The word is still 'dhimmitude' ...


I guess you are angry because you percieve that the USA is surrendering to Islamic demands...that there is a move towards appeasment in by your government..that may be, considering that the US has bombed some Islamic countrys back into the stone age..a mosque seems like a small concession in exchange..


they can build a mosque anywhere in the country cept there... why don't we build a Japanese monument on pearl harbor?. lets build a tribute to Hitler at Auschwitz. how about a big tribute to Americans at Nagasaki and Hiroshima? and while were at it, maybe we can take the big statue of saddam and set it on top of the building? bad taste is bad taste. sorry you don't agree. maybe the families of the 2500 people that died there will agree.


Considering some of them were American Muslims I believe there will be support.

Plus there has to be enlightened families who realize that Muslims did not kill their family. Terrorists did.



muslim terroist... don't forget that


They are terrorists.

If we outlawed the religion of all terrorists, there would be none left.

no, in case you forgot, it was muslims in the name of allah that killed the 2500 people. on that same spot. were you not paying attention 0n 9/11?


Christian terrorists killed more than that during the Crusades.


that was then... this is now....


Not the point I was trying to make.

Every religious circle has 'terrorists' or 'extremists.' Saying that every Muslim or Islam is a terrorist is thick. Last I knew the extremist population of both of those religions was far less than that of Christianity.

Terrorists are terrorists regardless of ethnic background, a simple concept...that just about all of you continuously ignore.

willing2's photo
Thu 08/05/10 07:49 PM
Fact on this topic.

Muslim Terrorists did the 9-11.

mightymoe's photo
Thu 08/05/10 07:52 PM










The word is still 'dhimmitude' ...


I guess you are angry because you percieve that the USA is surrendering to Islamic demands...that there is a move towards appeasment in by your government..that may be, considering that the US has bombed some Islamic countrys back into the stone age..a mosque seems like a small concession in exchange..


they can build a mosque anywhere in the country cept there... why don't we build a Japanese monument on pearl harbor?. lets build a tribute to Hitler at Auschwitz. how about a big tribute to Americans at Nagasaki and Hiroshima? and while were at it, maybe we can take the big statue of saddam and set it on top of the building? bad taste is bad taste. sorry you don't agree. maybe the families of the 2500 people that died there will agree.


Considering some of them were American Muslims I believe there will be support.

Plus there has to be enlightened families who realize that Muslims did not kill their family. Terrorists did.



muslim terroist... don't forget that


They are terrorists.

If we outlawed the religion of all terrorists, there would be none left.

no, in case you forgot, it was muslims in the name of allah that killed the 2500 people. on that same spot. were you not paying attention 0n 9/11?


Christian terrorists killed more than that during the Crusades.


that was then... this is now....


Not the point I was trying to make.

Every religious circle has 'terrorists' or 'extremists.' Saying that every Muslim or Islam is a terrorist is thick. Last I knew the extremist population of both of those religions was far less than that of Christianity.

Terrorists are terrorists regardless of ethnic background, a simple concept...that just about all of you continuously ignore.

yea, i agree.. but we are talking about 9/11, when the buildings came down - not 1000 years ago, nothing in ireland, nothing to with anything but the muslim terrorists that hijacked the planes that killed close to 3000 people. Christians didn't kill those people, muslims did. if Christians did that, then i would feel the same about them.

mightymoe's photo
Thu 08/05/10 07:53 PM










The word is still 'dhimmitude' ...


I guess you are angry because you percieve that the USA is surrendering to Islamic demands...that there is a move towards appeasment in by your government..that may be, considering that the US has bombed some Islamic countrys back into the stone age..a mosque seems like a small concession in exchange..


they can build a mosque anywhere in the country cept there... why don't we build a Japanese monument on pearl harbor?. lets build a tribute to Hitler at Auschwitz. how about a big tribute to Americans at Nagasaki and Hiroshima? and while were at it, maybe we can take the big statue of saddam and set it on top of the building? bad taste is bad taste. sorry you don't agree. maybe the families of the 2500 people that died there will agree.


Considering some of them were American Muslims I believe there will be support.

Plus there has to be enlightened families who realize that Muslims did not kill their family. Terrorists did.



muslim terroist... don't forget that


They are terrorists.

If we outlawed the religion of all terrorists, there would be none left.

no, in case you forgot, it was muslims in the name of allah that killed the 2500 people. on that same spot. were you not paying attention 0n 9/11?


Christian terrorists killed more than that during the Crusades.


that was then... this is now....


Not the point I was trying to make.

Every religious circle has 'terrorists' or 'extremists.' Saying that every Muslim or Islam is a terrorist is thick. Last I knew the extremist population of both of those religions was far less than that of Christianity.

Terrorists are terrorists regardless of ethnic background, a simple concept...that just about all of you continuously ignore.
ignore it all you want, nobody but muslims did that.

Dragoness's photo
Thu 08/05/10 07:54 PM
Fact is that Saudi terrorists did 9/11 in the name of terrorism.

mightymoe's photo
Thu 08/05/10 07:54 PM

Fact on this topic.

Muslim Terrorists did the 9-11.

they seem to forget that....

mightymoe's photo
Thu 08/05/10 07:54 PM

Fact is that Saudi terrorists did 9/11 in the name of terrorism.

so you do kinda understand...

willing2's photo
Thu 08/05/10 07:55 PM

yea, i agree.. but we are talking about 9/11, when the buildings came down - not 1000 years ago, nothing in ireland, nothing to with anything but the muslim terrorists that hijacked the planes that killed close to 3000 people. Christians didn't kill those people, muslims did. if Christians did that, then i would feel the same about them.

drinker drinker drinker drinker drinker drinker drinker