1 2 3 4 6 Next
Topic: Atheists, agnostics, score highest on religion test
davidben1's photo
Fri 10/15/10 10:46 PM
awh...

indeed cowboy, but one 'took the guideline', or the bait, for what be of "sin"?

but recall, did it not say, "what be sin for one be not sin for another"?

so, than even with just this one statement adhered to, no one human could use the "book", to define what was sin for another human being to do?

but, self did not listen to the cd, to find out for itself what the singer was "feeling", or had to say, because at the first brains conclusion such was sin, it offically closed it's mind, so again, it did not deduct this for itself, with any open mind, but with a closed mind to it's fellow man?

and, since it deemed said cd as "sin", then it hath as well no choice but to deem cd maker, singer, and other buyer's as "sinful"?

hence, even using less deducting for itself, but rather basing them on what itself first heard was as "sin", from another mortal, as indeed, the good book never mentioned cd's, and which were of sin, and which were not?


CowboyGH's photo
Fri 10/15/10 10:52 PM

awh...

indeed cowboy, but one 'took the guideline', or the bait, for what be of "sin"?

but recall, did it not say, "what be sin for one be not sin for another"?

so, than even with just this one statement adhered to, no one human could use the "book", to define what was sin for another human being to do?

but, self did not listen to the cd, to find out for itself what the singer was "feeling", or had to say, because at the first brains conclusion such was sin, it offically closed it's mind, so again, it did not deduct this for itself, with any open mind, but with a closed mind to it's fellow man?

and, since it deemed said cd as "sin", then it hath as well no choice but to deem cd maker, singer, and other buyer's as "sinful"?

hence, even using less deducting for itself, but rather basing them on what itself first heard was as "sin", from another mortal, as indeed, the good book never mentioned cd's, and which were of sin, and which were not?




Sin is disobedience to our father. If one acts opposite upon what our father has told us, then it is a sin. Man doesn't define sin, sin is disobedience to our father. Therefore bottom line sin is disobedience to the word.

davidben1's photo
Fri 10/15/10 11:23 PM
cowboy?

your words...

"it would only be logical to listen to our father in hopes to receive the gift of heaven."
__________________________________________________________

your own statement says you "follow a guideline", or "listen" to "our father", to "get the gift of heaven"

and the reason you "follow this guideline", that you believe be the purpose of the book?

TO GET SOMETHING FOR YOURSELF?

for you?

is not that a total "self motive"?

or motive for self good most?

so your motive for yourself, and your own gain most, is going to determine how you define EVERYTHING YOU HEAR AND READ, within the brain itself.

so what you read into these things, could indeed be because you are reading as thru that filter, or motive?

do as you wish of course, but it would behoove you to at least consider "yourself" as your own father, rather than to believe "something else" is your father in a figmented way?

why?

your gonna fall prey to many "other's leading you", or telling you "how to get to heaven", and since we know you wish to logically deduct things for yourself, than this would not allow you to do so?

in other words, YOU THINK ABOUT HEAVEN, and use your OWN BRAIN, with no ouside words, to decide what YOU THINK IT IS, and use your own brain to figure out what YOU THINK "GOD" IS, and use your own brain to decide what YOU THINK COULD GET A PERSON A ADMITTANCE TICKET?

see, if heaven could be bought or sold, then it would be no different than any other commodity of earth, such as food, concert tickets, viagra...

to buy something, is no different than PAYING FOR IT?

now, i could say to my neighbor, i will work for you, for so many days, for your concert tickets?

so, i have paid no "money", but i still purchased the concert tickets, even though i worked for them?

so, do you think that some place called "heaven" could be "purchased"?

whether with money or deeds, it would still be a purchase?

but indeed, you called heaven a "gift"?

and indeed, text declared heaven a gift.

so, how doth one propose that it need to do any specific thing, to get a "gift"?

if i hold out my hand, and say this watch is my gift to you, but you must do this for me, then it was not a "gift", but rather a purchase?

does it not say, that no man can earn his way to heaven?

so it seems as though "somebody" as your guide is not giving you the full scoop, but rather wishes to have a follower of themself, by creating the notion that you need guidence from the "father"?

that no different than a mob boss, dangling a carrot before his minion's to get what he wants for himself?

and you propose the creator of the cosmos doth the same?

even who you profess to be your leader, declared "i and the father are one"....

and, any that follow christ are to do as he did aren't they?

so, if "i and the father are one", that would mean the human self is it's OWN BOOS?

indeed you are doing exactely what you say you are not doing, by trying to say you do not follow a guideline, as any that "follow the book", have to follow a guideline, MORE than one that follow's no book?




CowboyGH's photo
Sat 10/16/10 12:26 AM

cowboy?

your words...

"it would only be logical to listen to our father in hopes to receive the gift of heaven."
__________________________________________________________

your own statement says you "follow a guideline", or "listen" to "our father", to "get the gift of heaven"

and the reason you "follow this guideline", that you believe be the purpose of the book?

TO GET SOMETHING FOR YOURSELF?

for you?

is not that a total "self motive"?

or motive for self good most?

so your motive for yourself, and your own gain most, is going to determine how you define EVERYTHING YOU HEAR AND READ, within the brain itself.

so what you read into these things, could indeed be because you are reading as thru that filter, or motive?

do as you wish of course, but it would behoove you to at least consider "yourself" as your own father, rather than to believe "something else" is your father in a figmented way?

why?

your gonna fall prey to many "other's leading you", or telling you "how to get to heaven", and since we know you wish to logically deduct things for yourself, than this would not allow you to do so?

in other words, YOU THINK ABOUT HEAVEN, and use your OWN BRAIN, with no ouside words, to decide what YOU THINK IT IS, and use your own brain to figure out what YOU THINK "GOD" IS, and use your own brain to decide what YOU THINK COULD GET A PERSON A ADMITTANCE TICKET?

see, if heaven could be bought or sold, then it would be no different than any other commodity of earth, such as food, concert tickets, viagra...

to buy something, is no different than PAYING FOR IT?

now, i could say to my neighbor, i will work for you, for so many days, for your concert tickets?

so, i have paid no "money", but i still purchased the concert tickets, even though i worked for them?

so, do you think that some place called "heaven" could be "purchased"?

whether with money or deeds, it would still be a purchase?

but indeed, you called heaven a "gift"?

and indeed, text declared heaven a gift.

so, how doth one propose that it need to do any specific thing, to get a "gift"?

if i hold out my hand, and say this watch is my gift to you, but you must do this for me, then it was not a "gift", but rather a purchase?

does it not say, that no man can earn his way to heaven?

so it seems as though "somebody" as your guide is not giving you the full scoop, but rather wishes to have a follower of themself, by creating the notion that you need guidence from the "father"?

that no different than a mob boss, dangling a carrot before his minion's to get what he wants for himself?

and you propose the creator of the cosmos doth the same?

even who you profess to be your leader, declared "i and the father are one"....

and, any that follow christ are to do as he did aren't they?

so, if "i and the father are one", that would mean the human self is it's OWN BOOS?

indeed you are doing exactely what you say you are not doing, by trying to say you do not follow a guideline, as any that "follow the book", have to follow a guideline, MORE than one that follow's no book?






Yes for me, you, and everyone else in the world. The relation with the father is a personal relationship. It's not a you and I, you and him, her and I, not it's you and the father.

Heaven is a reward, not a given. So of course people will do things not in vein but do them in hopes to receive this gift. Regardless if it's for possibly getting the gift of heaven it is still nevertheless done out of love and compassion for this person.

CowboyGH's photo
Sat 10/16/10 12:31 AM


cowboy?

your words...

"it would only be logical to listen to our father in hopes to receive the gift of heaven."
__________________________________________________________

your own statement says you "follow a guideline", or "listen" to "our father", to "get the gift of heaven"

and the reason you "follow this guideline", that you believe be the purpose of the book?

TO GET SOMETHING FOR YOURSELF?

for you?

is not that a total "self motive"?

or motive for self good most?

so your motive for yourself, and your own gain most, is going to determine how you define EVERYTHING YOU HEAR AND READ, within the brain itself.

so what you read into these things, could indeed be because you are reading as thru that filter, or motive?

do as you wish of course, but it would behoove you to at least consider "yourself" as your own father, rather than to believe "something else" is your father in a figmented way?

why?

your gonna fall prey to many "other's leading you", or telling you "how to get to heaven", and since we know you wish to logically deduct things for yourself, than this would not allow you to do so?

in other words, YOU THINK ABOUT HEAVEN, and use your OWN BRAIN, with no ouside words, to decide what YOU THINK IT IS, and use your own brain to figure out what YOU THINK "GOD" IS, and use your own brain to decide what YOU THINK COULD GET A PERSON A ADMITTANCE TICKET?

see, if heaven could be bought or sold, then it would be no different than any other commodity of earth, such as food, concert tickets, viagra...

to buy something, is no different than PAYING FOR IT?

now, i could say to my neighbor, i will work for you, for so many days, for your concert tickets?

so, i have paid no "money", but i still purchased the concert tickets, even though i worked for them?

so, do you think that some place called "heaven" could be "purchased"?

whether with money or deeds, it would still be a purchase?

but indeed, you called heaven a "gift"?

and indeed, text declared heaven a gift.

so, how doth one propose that it need to do any specific thing, to get a "gift"?

if i hold out my hand, and say this watch is my gift to you, but you must do this for me, then it was not a "gift", but rather a purchase?

does it not say, that no man can earn his way to heaven?

so it seems as though "somebody" as your guide is not giving you the full scoop, but rather wishes to have a follower of themself, by creating the notion that you need guidence from the "father"?

that no different than a mob boss, dangling a carrot before his minion's to get what he wants for himself?

and you propose the creator of the cosmos doth the same?

even who you profess to be your leader, declared "i and the father are one"....

and, any that follow christ are to do as he did aren't they?

so, if "i and the father are one", that would mean the human self is it's OWN BOOS?

indeed you are doing exactely what you say you are not doing, by trying to say you do not follow a guideline, as any that "follow the book", have to follow a guideline, MORE than one that follow's no book?






Yes for me, you, and everyone else in the world. The relation with the father is a personal relationship. It's not a you and I, you and him, her and I, not it's you and the father.

Heaven is a reward, not a given. So of course people will do things not in vein but do them in hopes to receive this gift. Regardless if it's for possibly getting the gift of heaven it is still nevertheless done out of love and compassion for this person.

===========================================
so, how doth one propose that it need to do any specific thing, to get a "gift"?

if i hold out my hand, and say this watch is my gift to you, but you must do this for me, then it was not a "gift", but rather a purchase?
============================================

Gifts are earned to a degree. For example, you have a wife that gets you a watch for your honeymoon. Now this GIFT was EARNED through how you treated her and gave her through the year. In all reality, no gift is given without it being earned in one way or other. And yes we can't "buy" our way into heaven, but it is EARNED by your good deads. Which cannot be done out of vein in order just to receive the gift. It needs to be done out of love, that's what is rewarded the compassion and showing of love. Not the act itself.

davidben1's photo
Sat 10/16/10 12:37 AM
lol....

cowboy...

that which annull itself, shall be anulled.

msharmony's photo
Sat 10/16/10 08:17 AM
Edited by msharmony on Sat 10/16/10 08:20 AM
so,,,is employment earned or purchased


for certainly it is not my employers GIFT, yet there are certain things an employer looks for to place an employee out of all the other employees who apply


is allowing someone entrance into my home a gift, no, but if my home were a heaven I might think differently

yet, gift or not, noone would think twice if I said I didnt permit everyone and anyone into my home just because

there is a certain standard and peace I wish in my home which precludes that I use certain judgments in who will enter, and they cant PURCHASE their way in with money nor are they purchasing their way in by being the type of person I permit in, they are simply meeting a standard that has been preset for MY HOME

if one wishes to learn about science , they cant just imagine it up in their brains, they have to read about it in a SCIENCE book,

if I want to know who MLK was, it would be foolish for me to sit and imagine what I THINK he might have been, instead of reading about what he said and what he did in a BOOK


books are good,,,reading is good, and neither of those things limits ones ability to use their own brain,,,,,they actually embellish the inventory of resources the brain has ,,,,

davidben1's photo
Sat 10/16/10 09:18 AM
lol...

books are indeed good, for nothing hath even implied they are not.

but that which believe that "god" tells them "what to do", thru a book, being used the same thought process that lennon's assassin used, the same thinking process that a "suicide bomber" use, the same process that "ronald reagen's: would be assassin used, the same process of mental thinking that the "tides foundation" "glenn beck follower" would be assassin used, for those that believe any "reading material" is either OF GOD, or NOT OF GOD, use a "biased brain filter", and are then prey to "believing" that "god" told them to do something, showing they have given up any true belief that they indeed have control OVER THEMSELF, but are as somehow guided by a "book", UNTO WHAT CERTAIN ACTION'S TO COMMIT...

this in itself, degenerate the TOTAL LOGICAL DEDUCITNG ABILITIES OF ANY HUMAN BRAIN, for in due time, following this same "thinking process", it is longer accessed, nor even matters, HOW THIS ACTION WILL EFFECT "ALL OTHER FELLOW MAN", for if one follow a BOOK, believing this book as the "supreme authority" over self, AS TO WHOM BE "GOOD OR EVIL", then these indeed, MOST IF IT BE SAID THIS BOOK "COMMAND YOU", to do as this, AND THIS BE AS "GOD SPEAKS", then such will indeed question less the "negative effect" of their own action upon their fellow man...


1 2 3 4 6 Next