100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: I someone lives their life ... | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Well, most "Christians" as well as others would use the "doctrines of men" to condemm others. Read Romans 2 and make up your own mind.  Well, if Romans 2 is in contradiction with the scriptures of John then they only thing I can suggest is the hearsay rumors called the "New Testament" are inconsistent and in contradiction with themselves: [color=blue John 3: [16] For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. [17] For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. [18] He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. "but he that believeth not is condemned already" If it says otherwise in Romans 2 then these hearsay rumors are clearly ambiguous and cannot be trusted to speak truth. In fact, this is indeed my conclusion of this whole collection of fables from the beginning of the Old Testament to the revelations of John at the end of the New Testament. It's just contradictions and inconsistencies at every turn of the page the whole way through the cannon of stories. you cannot read the bible with a carnal mind and expect to understand it. every book in the bible is supported by one or more other books. some books you have to read and understand in order to know what another book is talking about. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, most "Christians" as well as others would use the "doctrines of men" to condemm others. Read Romans 2 and make up your own mind. Well, if Romans 2 is in contradiction with the scriptures of John then they only thing I can suggest is the hearsay rumors called the "New Testament" are inconsistent and in contradiction with themselves: [color=blue John 3: [16] For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. [17] For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. [18] He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. "but he that believeth not is condemned already" If it says otherwise in Romans 2 then these hearsay rumors are clearly ambiguous and cannot be trusted to speak truth. In fact, this is indeed my conclusion of this whole collection of fables from the beginning of the Old Testament to the revelations of John at the end of the New Testament. It's just contradictions and inconsistencies at every turn of the page the whole way through the cannon of stories. you cannot read the bible with a carnal mind and expect to understand it. every book in the bible is supported by one or more other books. some books you have to read and understand in order to know what another book is talking about.   Isn't that the very definition of circular logic? Sounds like one needs a retarded mind to "understand it". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, most "Christians" as well as others would use the "doctrines of men" to condemm others. Read Romans 2 and make up your own mind. Well, if Romans 2 is in contradiction with the scriptures of John then they only thing I can suggest is the hearsay rumors called the "New Testament" are inconsistent and in contradiction with themselves: [color=blue John 3: [16] For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. [17] For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. [18] He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. "but he that believeth not is condemned already" If it says otherwise in Romans 2 then these hearsay rumors are clearly ambiguous and cannot be trusted to speak truth. In fact, this is indeed my conclusion of this whole collection of fables from the beginning of the Old Testament to the revelations of John at the end of the New Testament. It's just contradictions and inconsistencies at every turn of the page the whole way through the cannon of stories. you cannot read the bible with a carnal mind and expect to understand it. every book in the bible is supported by one or more other books. some books you have to read and understand in order to know what another book is talking about. Isn't that the very definition of circular logic? Sounds like one needs a retarded mind to "understand it". No it's the same thing science practices. When something may have one evident towards such a thing it is considered a theory. Only when multiple evidences are found and found to be true all the time is it considered a scientific fact eg., it need multiple sources for such information to be claimed as fact. Same could apply to the books of the bible. Each book would be one evident, then another book another evident. Cause you also have to keep in mind one man didn't come up with all the books at once. All these books were written at different times in different places. Which through search were found and put together. They were not influenced by each other. Each book was written by a different person(s) at a different time. And again was all one day put together in one book of which we call the holy bible. |
|
|
|
|
