IED and Iraq and Afghanistan might give ya a little Clew!

source it please

go look for it yerself!

Thought so

You THUNK?


BTW,your Knee hurtin' yet?


Seen any Spies about lately?

It is impossible to pay any real attention to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan without hearing some mention of Iran's involvement.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2007-01-30-ied-iran_x.htm

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/IraqCoverage/story?id=1692347&page=1#.T1fJsnkU9Qw

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/26/world/middleeast/us-says-parts-smuggled-to-iran-used-in-ieds.html

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/five-charged-in-iranian-smuggling-network-linked-to-iraq-ieds/

I could post dozens more. This thread has people who either are absolutely ignorant or completely dishonest.

No one was ever able to lay this on Irans door even though they have tried every form of propaganda they can to convince us Iran is some type of threat.

Trust me if they had smokeing gun proof like they did in Iraq. ( ) We would allready be on the beaches.

You just got smoking gun proof from several different news agencies and you still deny it. There is much more. You said provide evidence and I did. All you have in response is BS.

Its not smokeinggun proof its like me being quoted that I think Israel has an atomic bomb.

You didn't even go to the websites or read the material. If you had you would have read ...

"Four men have been arrested in Singapore on charges of breaking American export-control laws by smuggling 6,000 radio frequency modules through Singapore to Iran beginning in 2007. At least 16 of the devices, bought from a Minnesota company, were found in unexploded bombs in Iraq in 2008, 2009 and 2010. "

among other "smoking gun" type events.

At least you make it clear that the truth means nothing to you. You just have an axe to grind.

I have no ax to grind I am all to familier with all the Iraq war lies to buy into everything that comes down the pipe.

Remember the Nigerian yellowcake fable? The mobile weapons labs? Come on man you gona buy all that garbage again?

Seriously if Iran realy wanted to make trouble why would they smuggle garage door openers? A few stingers would send our choppers down as we did to the soviets eh?

actually That "Fable" wasn't a Fable at all!
Research it again!
But I ain't surprised that your Smirking Source would tell you that it were a Fable!

Give me a break

In early October 2002, George Tenet called Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley to ask him to remove reference to the Niger uranium from a speech Bush was to give in Cincinnati on October 7. This was followed up by a memo asking Hadley to remove another, similar line. Another memo was sent to the White House expressing the CIA's view that the Niger claims were false; this memo was given to both Hadley and National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice.[18] [19] [20]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niger_uranium_forgeries

yep,550tons of Yellow-Cake removed from Iraq,and processed in Canada!
Besides Saddam's Man tryuing to buy more from Niger,regardless what Plame and Wilson claim!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/ns/world_news-mideast_n_africa/t/secret-us-mission-hauls-uranium-iraq/

The last major remnant of Saddam Hussein's nuclear program — a huge stockpile of concentrated natural uranium — reached a Canadian port Saturday to complete a secret U.S. operation that included a two-week airlift from Baghdad and a ship voyage crossing two oceans.



The removal of 550 metric tons of "yellowcake" — the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment — was a significant step toward closing the books on Saddam's nuclear legacy. It also brought relief to U.S. and Iraqi authorities who had worried the cache would reach insurgents or smugglers crossing to Iran to aid its nuclear ambitions.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2006/04/wowie_zahawie.html

Wowie Zahawie
Sorry everyone, but Iraq did go uranium shopping in Niger.

By Christopher Hitchens|Posted Monday, April 10, 2006, at 4:43 PM ET



In the late 1980s, the Iraqi representative to the International Atomic Energy Agency—Iraq's senior public envoy for nuclear matters, in effect—was a man named Wissam al-Zahawie. After the Kuwait war in 1991, when Rolf Ekeus arrived in Baghdad to begin the inspection and disarmament work of UNSCOM, he was greeted by Zahawie, who told him in a bitter manner that "now that you have come to take away our assets," the two men could no longer be friends. (They had known each other in earlier incarnations at the United Nations in New York.)


Have some Cake on me!

Granted, I haven't read anything here other than the original post, I think we should be worried about what the US intentions are in this conflict

"So there's a robber outside your house that says he wants to rob you, and he's putting together a gun," McCain. "You wait until he gets the gun? So what we need to do is make it clear to the Iranians that if they reach a certain point, a red line, and we agree with the Israelis on that red line."

There is a nation outside your door. They shout "DEATH TO AMERICA"
and are collecting centrifuges capable of producing nuclear weapon
material. They say they are not interested in making a bomb but
refuse offers of free "non-bomb grade" nuclear material and
processing.

They test missiles which are able to carry nuclear warheads.

They help others kill some of your citizens in terrorist and
military attacks with IEDs.

You wait until they get the ability to make a real nuclear weapon?

Will Israel strike Iran in 2012? It’s a simple question, but with extremely complicated answers.Everyone you ask hasa different opinion. But most people don’t have sources like my guest this past weekend on GPS, Ronen Bergman.Bergman is the senior political and military analyst for Israel’s most widely read daily newspaper. He joined me from Tel Aviv. Here’s an excerpt of our conversation:
Fareed Zakaria : Let’s start with the bottom line. You believe that it is likely that there will be an Israeli strike onIran?
Ronen Bergman : Yes.After speaking with many of the Israeli leaders and chiefs of the intelligence and the military, I have come to the conclusion that there is a strong likelihood that Israel will strike Iran during 2012, because Iran is getting too close to what was coined by Minister of Defense Ehud Barak as the “zone of immunity.”
This is this specific point on the timeline, after which Iran nuclear sites are going to become immune to an Israeli strike. According to Israeli latest intelligence assessment, Iran is something like nine months away from entering this so-called zone of immunity.
Therefore, there are many in Israel who believe that Israel should take the initiative and strike before, because sanctions do not yield the results that Israel hoped they would result in.
http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/04/will-israel-will-strike-iran-in-2012/
While both the United States and Israel now agree that Iran is covertly working towards developing a nuclearweapon, they disagree about where is the point ofno return, i.e., at what time an outside power will be able to militarily prevent Iran from “going nuclear.” For Israel, there are two red lines. The first is when the Iranians develop the necessary know-howand enriched uranium to develop a nuclear weapon. The second is when Iran is able to successfully move its nuclear program into bunkers deep enough to prevent Israeli weaponry from being able to feasibly destroy it.
For the Americans, these red lines are different. For one, the Obama administration has been wishy-washy about whether it will accept an Iran with the capability to assemble a nuclear weapon, as long as it does not actually build one. Japan is one such country capable of doing so, and many EU nations have at least privately declared that they would be willing to accept such a situation if the Iranians agreed not to go “all the way.” Secondly, the United States has greater military capabilities than Israel. With its more powerful “bunker buster” missiles , stealth fighters, aircraft carriers, and refueling capabilities, it has the ability to strike more hardened Iranian targets.
And herein lies the major debate taking place in Israel, the United States, and around the world: how long will the Jewish state be willing to wait for alldiplomatic options to be exhausted before it takes the unwanted, but in its eyes necessary decision to launch a preemptive strike onIran’s nuclear program? According to Netanyahu’s AIPACspeech this week, he will not wait much longer.

No one is waiting. Much has been done already to curb the Iranian
program...



http://news.yahoo.com/accidental-blast-iranian-arms-depot-kills-17-173652586.html