The fire broke out just before sunset in the Federation Tower, Russia's tallest building, located in Moscow City, a cluster of modern high-rise office buildings.

See the real inferno http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elq6iBFVMaI&feature=player_embedded

U tubebe comment Classic stuff


This building must be made out of supersonic east mars alien steel because as we all learned on 911, when a steel frame building burns for 45 minutes they implode with incredible force.  Those Russians are so smart. Or maybe Americans are just really, really, really dumb...

TommyDrake14 6 days ago 39
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elq6iBFVMaI&feature=player_embedded

More comments from users.


Oh my god, and the building did not collapse on its own footprint in free fall? Damn, this defies the laws of physics according to NIST, CIA, and the whole US gov.

llg4ever 4 hours ago 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elq6iBFVMaI&feature=player_embedded

i can't believe you would compare that to the WTC...hahahah


nice try tho...

Your right by the looks of it it burned hotter and it did burn alot longer than the twin towers. It also didnt turn into powder.

it was the top 2 floors of an unfinished building... not much powder there...

Not to mention there was not 10,000 gallons of jet fuel burning, or any weight above the fire...but other than that, exactly the same...

Inferno Heat, Not Impact, Brought Down Towers, Experts Say."

Bijal P. Trivedi
for National Geographic Today
September 17, 2001


But this official assertion brings us right back to the problem of fire from jet fuel and debris reaching a high enough temperature to weaken and collapse steel. Both Steven Jones, and an engineer from MIT cover the in-depth scientific impossibilities of fire bringing the gigantic North and South Towers down. But simpler logic works as well. If fire from kerosene (jet fuel) and office debris were sufficient equipment to bring a steel-frame building neatly down into its footprint, then why the need for the intensely sophisticated demolition industry? And all its fancy crews and engineering techniques? Why not, when a building needs tearing down, just spread some jet fuel on a few floors, light a match, and stand back for an hour or two? The notion is, of course, absurd. So why is it not also absurd in the case of the Twin Towers - which were designed specifically to support the impact of an airplane?

Read more
http://www.911hardfacts.com/report_08.htm

Must be a different type of steel in Russia

playing Engineer now?

actually Steel looses it rigidity at temperatures way below the melting point!
At about half of it!
But then you might have to go and work with it,to truly understand the Material!
You grasping at Straw that isn't even there!

Straw much?

one factor overlooked is that pesky 200,000 lb object traveling at 400 mph crashing into it..

other than that...

much later that day WTC7 feeling very much exposed got kinda lonely and decided to self destruct and Larry lived happily on the proceeds forever after...

Dont you love it when a plan comes together

you'd pancaked much earlier if one of those burning Towers fell on you!
Especially if your Sprinkler-System went out!

that is if you neglect to cite that building 7 was damaged by tower 1 falling, not to mention that it had a gravitational fire suppression system that did next to nothing in controlling the fires burning towards the bottom of the building.

there was no steady supply of water.. the water was held in a large tank and when it ran out that was it..

plus you had large containers of diesel fuel that were used to run back-up generators.. those tanks were breached and contents were gone..

aside from that.. I guess they could have planted enough explosives in that building from the time the first plane hit WTC 1 to when it collapsed causing the fires to break out in WTC 7..

a little dangerous to be walking around a burning building with a few thousand tons of thermite... in your pocket..

Truthers make me sick.

No . . . only some of them.

Its still standing!