911 WTC1 - New video shows explosions. This was a planned demolition.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uKqPQauRZQ&feature=player_embedded

Lol confusing a backdraft for an explosion

I saw several explosions.... with fire.

That building was not slowing down.

Face the reality.

It was bombed.

Videos can be so doctored. I'll stick to eyewitness accounts, sorry.

There are many "eye witness" accounts of people who heard and saw explosions.

So, yeh, I agree.

lmao..

at one point in the video the collapsing corner of the building has already gone well past the 'puff' of smoke..

good lord

Yep -- it is free falling to the ground, not "pancake collapsing"

From structural damage not explosives.

I wonder why no one cares about what the fireman on the scene heard and saw.

ouie Cacchioli, was one of the first firefighters to enter the South Tower as it burned. A 20-year veteran of the fire department, Cacchioli told People Weekly: 3
I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there were bombs set in the building.

Eyewitness Jeff Birnbaum, president of Broadway Electrical Supply Co., New York, recalled events in the South Tower:
When we got to about 50 feet from the South Tower, we heard the most eerie sound that you would ever hear. A high-pitched noise and a popping noise made everyone stop. We all looked up. At the point, it all let go. The way I see it, it had to be the rivets. The building let go. There was an explosion and the whole top leaned toward us and started coming down. 4

Eyewitness Neil deGrasse Tyson recounted his recollection of explosions at the onset of the collapses in an e-mail he sent to his family on the day after the attack:
I hear a second explosion in WTC 2, then a loud, low-frequency rumble that precipitates the unthinkable -- a collapse of all the floors above the point of explosion. First the top surface, containing the helipad, tips sideways in full view. Then the upper floors fall straight down in a demolition-style implosion, taking all lower floors with it, even those below the point of the explosion. 5
...
As I dress for survival: boots, flashlight, wet towels, swimming goggles, bicycle helmet, gloves, I hear another explosion followed by a now all-too familiar rumble that signaled the collapse of WTC 1, the first of the two towers to have been hit. I saw the iconic antenna on this building descend straight down in an implosion twinning the first.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/eyewitnesses.html

So you want us to believe they used silent explosives, didn't need to gut the building unlike what is done in demolitions, detonated from the top unlike demolitions, calculated the exact point of impact to start the demolition, and failed so hard at the demolition that debris fell into surrounding buildings instead of imploding? Did I miss anything?

Dear Chaz, I don't care what you beleive. I'm just telling it like it obviously is.

All that stuff you mention above is done for a professional demolition.
Which this was not.


This was a terrorist attack by the BANKSTERS CABAL using explosives.

OMG!

So where did they find silent explosives that defied physics? If they were not wrapped how did they keep things from shooting everywhere? If they didn't tear down walls how did they get them on the supports? How did they know the point of impact? How did they installation and wire them with no ones knowledge?

I'm not going to discuss the "how" of all the details with you simply because I am not the one who did the job.

Why don't you ask them how they did it if you really want to know.

That makes your argument about as good as saying it was a spaghetti monster.

911 = Mossad Job. Lets get these scumbags.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aKj6uJ5Mt4&feature=BFa&list=FL3fy-3GlodSxU7EWsJ--VoA


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeW-CRYr2u0&list=FL3fy-3GlodSxU7EWsJ--VoA&index=41&feature=plpp_video

So we are in agreement it's a spaghetti monster right?