Topic: Who leaves if either cheats?
no photo
Sun 02/17/13 02:31 PM

In answer to the question, if two people agree to be monogamous and one of them cheats, they have broken the contract, at which point the agreement and any rider that went along with it, becomes null and void.

All bets (and agreements) are off at that point.

If not, and you’re lovers who are renting with the lease signed by both, who would move out if a complete break down occurs? And likewise, if you’re married “without children” to consider, and you have a mortgage, which spouse would stay; the one who could afford to pay the monthly notes on the residence, even if they are the adulterer?

Would your decision about who leaves even be based on the financial aspects of your relationship, or would the offender automatically have to move out as punishment for their error in judgment?


In answer to the above questions, they have nothing to do with who cheated on who, unless these particular issues were covered in the contract/agreement.

If your cheating partner did not want to move out and neither did you, then you could just become roommates, or the agreement to be monogamous would be null and void. This means that you could both date other people even if neither of you want to move out.

If you take the drama and emotionalism out of it, it just boils down to a breached contract or agreement.



so in actuality it's best to have signed contracts of agreements regarding what is acceptable behavior and what isn't, before cohabiting together... because there are those who under normal circumstances behave logically regarding any and all situations they encounter, but who on the other hand, once faced with this type of emotional/psychological burning might not conduct themselves as calmly as they know they should...

no photo
Sun 02/17/13 02:37 PM

Well, technically she wasn't "cheating" on me because I was involved with a woman that was seeing someone else as well and she told me about him but she was telling some lies about how it was "over" with him when it wasn't and it just came to the point one night when I couldn't handle it anymore and I had to tell her that I didn't think that we should see each other anymore. I had put up with a hell of a lot from that woman and had kept taking her back but if she wanted to be with someone else he could have her and good luck to him.


sorry to hear about this unfortunate experience, tawt... you do attract the most entertaining of women... exciting for a time... until reality sinks in... I do enjoy reading about your life from the honestly blunt perspective that you proffer it... flowerforyou

no photo
Sun 02/17/13 02:43 PM

Or, is his behavior permissible, so long as he doesn't neglect you?


I find the idea of having to get permission from someone else for my "behavior" to be an infringement on my self expression. I would not impose that on my significant other.

When you have a contract or agreement to be monogamous that means not to have sex with anyone else. Unless that agreement includes details on how you should behave then you have no right to demand he have permission to flirt, fantasize, chat or exchange pictures.

If you want to get your partner's attention away from that then you need to go to work on that.

Freedom is paramount. Don't be a jealous controlling tyrant. That will drive someone away from you. Learn how to attract rather than putting a choke hold on a person.



I actually don't have the strength or desire for choke holds, and allowed my ex to live as he pleased throughout the entire 18 years of our marriage... preventing others self expression isn't my thing... however, back in the day, when I still believed in love, honor, and obey, I assumed that when people get married monogamy is implied, not literally contracted...

no photo
Sun 02/17/13 02:48 PM






Will you both salvage this relationship and forgive the adulterer, or separate?


at this point in my life, I am no longer a late teen or college age nor would my partner be

I expect them to have better control of their impulses at this stage in life, and would be upfront about that expectation from get go,,,,

If there is no marriage, I am done. If we have taken vows, I may consider counseling and trying to salvage the relationship.

If Im staying, its not just for show, I stay and try to work it out.

IF we live together and are renting, neither needs to leave. We become roommates living seperate lives. IF there is a mortgage and we are married, the courts decide who leaves.

Legally, if two people sign a lease or a mortgage, they will both be responsible for the terms of that contract, until a court decides otherwise. I wouldnt move out of anyplace so long as I had a contract to pay for it.thats why I prefer monthly rentals,,lol,, but I can endure a year long lease if necessary.

I EXPECT from a partner honesty and faithfulness. Its not negotiable even if it is forgivable.

I consider cheating to be anything involving Penetration.

Fantasies, flirting, cyber chatting and pictures,,etc, are not cheating to me, but they are red flags that the relationship needs work. Kissing is not always cheating, unless its initiated by your partner, or repetitive, or mutual. (It is possible to be taken off guard by someone elses kiss)

of course, I am personally against cheating. I have been desperate enough to consider 'consentual cheating' or 'swinging' in the past. Thank goodness I came to my senses before the opportunity arose though.. If its love and commitment , there is no room for anyone else.


I like your point of view too, msharmony, we think very similarly, but may I ask... if your spouse is interacting in subtly sensual ways with others, by flirting, fantasizing, chatting, exchanging pics... and this indicates your relationship needs work... how can you bring a man's attention back from the edge like this? Is it really possible, once he's tasted this extent of freedom within the bounds of matrimony, for him to relent and give up the others he is seeking attention from? Or, is his behavior permissible, so long as he doesn't neglect you?



It has to start with communicating over, and over, and over. Peoples needs from each other change over time as does what they can give and they have to communicate that honestly with each other. That is why it would be important to me to revisit the expectations of the relationship with each other and assess whether we both were still in it to win it,, so to speak. No one person can maintaine it alone, so we would BOTH have to be involved in whatever efforts necessary to eliminate whatever the motivation was to start seeking attention elsewhere. IF that motivation cant be successfully eliminated, it would depend upon the overall health and happiness of our relationship before I would decide to move on. IF I had a great guy in all other areas . a great provider, great with and to the kids, smart and good to me and honest ,,,,,I may be able to accept the flaw of flirtatiousness or whatever.

IT all comes down to the details. Is he a disrespectful and inconsiderate jerk, or just a naturally flirtatious person? Is he misleading other women into thinking there could be a relationship(in which case he is an inconsiderate jerk), or is he flirting with women in a way that doesnt imply any other than attraction?


Okay, I get you now... and I quite agree too... thank you for expounding further... flowerforyou

no photo
Sun 02/17/13 03:16 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Sun 02/17/13 03:22 PM


Or, is his behavior permissible, so long as he doesn't neglect you?


I find the idea of having to get permission from someone else for my "behavior" to be an infringement on my self expression. I would not impose that on my significant other.

When you have a contract or agreement to be monogamous that means not to have sex with anyone else. Unless that agreement includes details on how you should behave then you have no right to demand he have permission to flirt, fantasize, chat or exchange pictures.

If you want to get your partner's attention away from that then you need to go to work on that.

Freedom is paramount. Don't be a jealous controlling tyrant. That will drive someone away from you. Learn how to attract rather than putting a choke hold on a person.



I actually don't have the strength or desire for choke holds, and allowed my ex to live as he pleased throughout the entire 18 years of our marriage... preventing others self expression isn't my thing... however, back in the day, when I still believed in love, honor, and obey, I assumed that when people get married monogamy is implied, not literally contracted...


My "suggestion" was not really aimed at you, it was meant to be general advice.

If it is understood and agreed by both parties, then it is a contract. Sometimes it is even contained within the vows.

People should be more aware of the contracts they enter into in their daily lives. Most of them are unwritten.






no photo
Sun 02/17/13 03:21 PM


In answer to the question, if two people agree to be monogamous and one of them cheats, they have broken the contract, at which point the agreement and any rider that went along with it, becomes null and void.

All bets (and agreements) are off at that point.

If not, and you’re lovers who are renting with the lease signed by both, who would move out if a complete break down occurs? And likewise, if you’re married “without children” to consider, and you have a mortgage, which spouse would stay; the one who could afford to pay the monthly notes on the residence, even if they are the adulterer?

Would your decision about who leaves even be based on the financial aspects of your relationship, or would the offender automatically have to move out as punishment for their error in judgment?


In answer to the above questions, they have nothing to do with who cheated on who, unless these particular issues were covered in the contract/agreement.

If your cheating partner did not want to move out and neither did you, then you could just become roommates, or the agreement to be monogamous would be null and void. This means that you could both date other people even if neither of you want to move out.

If you take the drama and emotionalism out of it, it just boils down to a breached contract or agreement.



so in actuality it's best to have signed contracts of agreements regarding what is acceptable behavior and what isn't, before cohabiting together... because there are those who under normal circumstances behave logically regarding any and all situations they encounter, but who on the other hand, once faced with this type of emotional/psychological burning might not conduct themselves as calmly as they know they should...


Contracts do not have to be signed to be legal, although in court it certainly helps. It never hurts to get it in writing, but in relationships it at least needs to be understood.

Pre-nuptial agreements are used in some cases.






no photo
Sun 02/17/13 03:29 PM



In answer to the question, if two people agree to be monogamous and one of them cheats, they have broken the contract, at which point the agreement and any rider that went along with it, becomes null and void.

All bets (and agreements) are off at that point.

If not, and you’re lovers who are renting with the lease signed by both, who would move out if a complete break down occurs? And likewise, if you’re married “without children” to consider, and you have a mortgage, which spouse would stay; the one who could afford to pay the monthly notes on the residence, even if they are the adulterer?

Would your decision about who leaves even be based on the financial aspects of your relationship, or would the offender automatically have to move out as punishment for their error in judgment?


In answer to the above questions, they have nothing to do with who cheated on who, unless these particular issues were covered in the contract/agreement.

If your cheating partner did not want to move out and neither did you, then you could just become roommates, or the agreement to be monogamous would be null and void. This means that you could both date other people even if neither of you want to move out.

If you take the drama and emotionalism out of it, it just boils down to a breached contract or agreement.



so in actuality it's best to have signed contracts of agreements regarding what is acceptable behavior and what isn't, before cohabiting together... because there are those who under normal circumstances behave logically regarding any and all situations they encounter, but who on the other hand, once faced with this type of emotional/psychological burning might not conduct themselves as calmly as they know they should...


Contracts do not have to be signed to be legal, although in court it certainly helps. It never hurts to get it in writing, but in relationships it at least needs to be understood.

Pre-nuptial agreements are used in some cases.



I agree... see how easy it is to understand each other... :wink:

TawtStrat's photo
Sun 02/17/13 04:02 PM


Well, technically she wasn't "cheating" on me because I was involved with a woman that was seeing someone else as well and she told me about him but she was telling some lies about how it was "over" with him when it wasn't and it just came to the point one night when I couldn't handle it anymore and I had to tell her that I didn't think that we should see each other anymore. I had put up with a hell of a lot from that woman and had kept taking her back but if she wanted to be with someone else he could have her and good luck to him.


sorry to hear about this unfortunate experience, tawt... you do attract the most entertaining of women... exciting for a time... until reality sinks in... I do enjoy reading about your life from the honestly blunt perspective that you proffer it... flowerforyou



Thanks. Maybe I have bad taste in women or maybe "nice" girls aren't interested in getting involved with me or maybe it's that I just take the atitude that having a girlfriend is better than being alone even if they are the sort of women that a lot of other men would avoid like the plague or maybe it's all of those things. I'm not sure. I don't know but I am prepared to put up with quite a lot from women and probably get on better with women that are a bit naughty, rather than prim and proper types I guess. I'm a bit of a rogue and a misfit anyway and I've always found people that aren't just "normal" interesting. I see myself as being like a sort of Scottish Jack Keroak, if you know what I mean.

Truncated's photo
Sun 02/17/13 04:09 PM
We would have to split. Maybe down the road with some understanding we could get back together, but not in the situation at hand. I'd leave to keep it simple. - That said, I'm a loner at heart and essentially wouldn't live with my partner. It's a rare find; someone who loves you and you love them that understand this way of life. That's why I'm here: looking for 1 in 6 billion. :tongue:

no photo
Sun 02/17/13 04:22 PM
Edited by AthenaRose2 on Sun 02/17/13 04:24 PM



Well, technically she wasn't "cheating" on me because I was involved with a woman that was seeing someone else as well and she told me about him but she was telling some lies about how it was "over" with him when it wasn't and it just came to the point one night when I couldn't handle it anymore and I had to tell her that I didn't think that we should see each other anymore. I had put up with a hell of a lot from that woman and had kept taking her back but if she wanted to be with someone else he could have her and good luck to him.


sorry to hear about this unfortunate experience, tawt... you do attract the most entertaining of women... exciting for a time... until reality sinks in... I do enjoy reading about your life from the honestly blunt perspective that you proffer it... flowerforyou



Thanks. Maybe I have bad taste in women or maybe "nice" girls aren't interested in getting involved with me or maybe it's that I just take the atitude that having a girlfriend is better than being alone even if they are the sort of women that a lot of other men would avoid like the plague or maybe it's all of those things. I'm not sure. I don't know but I am prepared to put up with quite a lot from women and probably get on better with women that are a bit naughty, rather than prim and proper types I guess. I'm a bit of a rogue and a misfit anyway and I've always found people that aren't just "normal" interesting. I see myself as being like a sort of Scottish Jack Keroak, if you know what I mean.


:laughing: you're response makes me giggle, tawt, because you're so adorable... you lay yourself on the line and all else be damned... I admire your self acceptance, and enjoy the stories you tell, I'm also not in any way saying that you have bad taste in women.. naughty women can be far more exciting than straight laced any day, I'm sure... :wink: besides, with you being a bit of a rogue and a misfit, while finding people that aren't quite "normal" more interesting... we tend to have more in common... as I've never fancied myself to be all that "sane" either... lol... so please, continue telling us your wonderful stories, and I'll continue telling mine as well... flowerforyou

Toodygirl5's photo
Sun 02/17/13 04:26 PM
If I am living with my spouse, and he cheated on me, I would split up, with both will sell our home and split the difference. I do not do Livin Men, so I would have to me married. A man can not cheat on a woman, if she is Not his wife. IMHO

no photo
Sun 02/17/13 04:32 PM

We would have to split. Maybe down the road with some understanding we could get back together, but not in the situation at hand. I'd leave to keep it simple. - That said, I'm a loner at heart and essentially wouldn't live with my partner. It's a rare find; someone who loves you and you love them that understand this way of life. That's why I'm here: looking for 1 in 6 billion. :tongue:


Definite needle in a haystack... and I can appreciate your philosophy and attitude... flowerforyou

no photo
Sun 02/17/13 04:35 PM

If I am living with my spouse, and he cheated on me, I would split up, with both will sell our home and split the difference. I do not do Livin Men, so I would have to me married. A man can not cheat on a woman, if she is Not his wife. IMHO


Interesting... I've never thought of a lover having sex with another person other than his lover as not cheating on the original lover... flowerforyou

Toodygirl5's photo
Sun 02/17/13 04:47 PM
Edited by Toodygirl5 on Sun 02/17/13 04:52 PM


If I am living with my spouse, and he cheated on me, I would split up, with both will sell our home and split the difference. I do not do Livin Men, so I would have to me married. A man can not cheat on a woman, if she is Not his wife. IMHO


Interesting... I've never thought of a lover having sex with another person other than his lover as not cheating on the original lover... flowerforyou


Yep, many people do not think of it that way. I do and always have. The couple Not married, have No real committment to one another. The man is as much another woman's as he is to the woman, he is livin with, Not married too.laugh :tongue:

no photo
Sun 02/17/13 05:38 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Sun 02/17/13 05:39 PM



If I am living with my spouse, and he cheated on me, I would split up, with both will sell our home and split the difference. I do not do Livin Men, so I would have to me married. A man can not cheat on a woman, if she is Not his wife. IMHO


Interesting... I've never thought of a lover having sex with another person other than his lover as not cheating on the original lover... flowerforyou


Yep, many people do not think of it that way. I do and always have. The couple Not married, have No real committment to one another. The man is as much another woman's as he is to the woman, he is livin with, Not married too.laugh :tongue:


This is not really true. If a couple agree to be monogamous even if they are not married, and one of them breaks that agreement and basically lies about it, then he or she has "cheated." It is a breach of their agreement.

This is especially true if they are living together as a couple. It is a lie and a betrayal unless the couple both agree that they are not agreeing to be exclusive.

Yes, you can "cheat" on your lover.


DaySinner's photo
Sun 02/17/13 06:05 PM
Edited by DaySinner on Sun 02/17/13 06:15 PM
You’re living with your significant other, either as lovers or as spouses, while trusting that you’re both being monogamous, one of you cheats. The relationship is okay up to this point, and the non-adulterer has little reason to suspect there is a problem in the relationship that might tempt the other to stray, so it’s unexpected and causes a serious wound in the heart of the faithful partner. Now, what do you do as a direct result of this breach in your love?
I would feel foolish for trusting. I think the relationship is doomed at that point. Maybe it would continue as a different kind of relationship.

If you decide to remain together, do you try to regain the trust you had before the incident, and become closer to each other, never to cheat again? Or might you stay together not so much for love at this point, but for financial/economic reasons, because in today’s economy it’s easier to live well with two incomes instead of just one, and you can even separate in the residence by having your own rooms, perhaps even having an open agreement now, where either partner is free to meet someone else and move on?
I can imagine people being happy with this arrangement. I have a hard time picturing it for myself.

If not, and you’re lovers who are renting with the lease signed by both, who would move out if a complete break down occurs? And likewise, if you’re married “without children” to consider, and you have a mortgage, which spouse would stay; the one who could afford to pay the monthly notes on the residence, even if they are the adulterer?
Difficult to answer. Whatever is legal/decided by a judge is best, with effort put toward simplicity.

Would your decision about who leaves even be based on the financial aspects of your relationship, or would the offender automatically have to move out as punishment for their error in judgment?
I don't believe in punishing infidelity. It would not help me deal with what happened. It is the fact that it happened that is painful, not so much who is at fault.

Or, in this day and age when our sexual behavior is touted as being open and easily accessible, now that it’s the acceptable norm to just “love the one we’re with”, is it wiser to expect that cheating might occur in any relationship, so we go into one already prepared to overlook this activity?
I don't believe in forcing people to behave. I want my trust to mean something. I want our love to be the reason for fidelity, not the fear of doing wrong.

And what do you consider cheating to be? Can flirting be a form of cheating? And if so, should people in committed relationships be free to flirt with others?
I don't think flirting is cheating, although it can hurt my feelings. What is or isn't ok depends on what is most important to the couple.
There is a danger in thinking too much about what is or isn't ok in detail. It can kill the romance.

mikaxel80's photo
Sun 02/17/13 07:07 PM
Edited by mikaxel80 on Sun 02/17/13 07:09 PM

You’re living with your significant other, either as lovers or as spouses, while trusting that you’re both being monogamous, one of you cheats. The relationship is okay up to this point, and the non-adulterer has little reason to suspect there is a problem in the relationship that might tempt the other to stray, so it’s unexpected and causes a serious wound in the heart of the faithful partner. Now, what do you do as a direct result of this breach in your love?

Will you both salvage this relationship and forgive the adulterer, or separate?

If you decide to remain together, do you try to regain the trust you had before the incident, and become closer to each other, never to cheat again? Or might you stay together not so much for love at this point, but for financial/economic reasons, because in today’s economy it’s easier to live well with two incomes instead of just one, and you can even separate in the residence by having your own rooms, perhaps even having an open agreement now, where either partner is free to meet someone else and move on?

If not, and you’re lovers who are renting with the lease signed by both, who would move out if a complete break down occurs? And likewise, if you’re married “without children” to consider, and you have a mortgage, which spouse would stay; the one who could afford to pay the monthly notes on the residence, even if they are the adulterer?

Would your decision about who leaves even be based on the financial aspects of your relationship, or would the offender automatically have to move out as punishment for their error in judgment?

Or, in this day and age when our sexual behavior is touted as being open and easily accessible, now that it’s the acceptable norm to just “love the one we’re with”, is it wiser to expect that cheating might occur in any relationship, so we go into one already prepared to overlook this activity?

What do you Minglers think about cheating, are you for, or against it?

And what do you consider cheating to be? Can flirting be a form of cheating? And if so, should people in committed relationships be free to flirt with others?



Well let me put it as this. Our leaders say war is the last option. So if my wife or girlfriend cheats I will try to work it out by any means necessary. If not, go into the next stage. After all i am with that person for better or for worse. Call me old fashioned but that's the way i see it

TexasScoundrel's photo
Sun 02/17/13 08:23 PM
My last relationship ended because she cheated. She called me, crying and begging for me to forgive her and I did. My job keeps me away from home most of the time, she's very young and I'd expected her to have a moment of weakness at some point. You just can't expect a young, healthy woman to be celibate for long. We agreed to a few simple rules and did our best to move on unaffected. We didn't talk about it again until...

It happened again, within a month, with the same person. She again called me, crying and begging to be forgiven. But, I knew this time I couldn't just forgive her. This time she had to prove to me I was the one she truly wanted to be with. I told her this time she had to earn my forgiveness. She said she'd do whatever I asked. I told her to write down her confession, everything she did wrong, how it hurt me, how it had damaged our relationship and the steps she'd take to prevent it from happening again.

In three months, she hadn't written a single word. So, I decided that our relationship wasn't important to her and I left. I have not felt any emotional pain over this. That may be due to me feeling confident about the way I handled it. I still think it was the best solution.

She and I still talk (we have a small child together) and we still have sex from time to time. But, I don't love her anymore. I won't get involved in her problems unless they involve our son. I have drawn a line and it will not be crossed. She is a toy and I play with her when I'm in the mood. She knows this and accepts it. I'm sure that's how she wants it because she doesn't ask for more and is always available when I want her.

no photo
Mon 02/18/13 02:37 AM



If I am living with my spouse, and he cheated on me, I would split up, with both will sell our home and split the difference. I do not do Livin Men, so I would have to me married. A man can not cheat on a woman, if she is Not his wife. IMHO


Interesting... I've never thought of a lover having sex with another person other than his lover as not cheating on the original lover... flowerforyou


Yep, many people do not think of it that way. I do and always have. The couple Not married, have No real committment to one another. The man is as much another woman's as he is to the woman, he is livin with, Not married too.laugh :tongue:


It's good to know this, so if I get a boyfriend who becomes my fiance I'll know it's cool for him to cheat on me because we haven't made it legal with a signed document yet... of course as soon as does he's free to keep racing his feet out of my door... to be another woman's left overs... :laughing: drinker

no photo
Mon 02/18/13 02:57 AM

You’re living with your significant other, either as lovers or as spouses, while trusting that you’re both being monogamous, one of you cheats. The relationship is okay up to this point, and the non-adulterer has little reason to suspect there is a problem in the relationship that might tempt the other to stray, so it’s unexpected and causes a serious wound in the heart of the faithful partner. Now, what do you do as a direct result of this breach in your love?
I would feel foolish for trusting. I think the relationship is doomed at that point. Maybe it would continue as a different kind of relationship.

If you decide to remain together, do you try to regain the trust you had before the incident, and become closer to each other, never to cheat again? Or might you stay together not so much for love at this point, but for financial/economic reasons, because in today’s economy it’s easier to live well with two incomes instead of just one, and you can even separate in the residence by having your own rooms, perhaps even having an open agreement now, where either partner is free to meet someone else and move on?
I can imagine people being happy with this arrangement. I have a hard time picturing it for myself.

If not, and you’re lovers who are renting with the lease signed by both, who would move out if a complete break down occurs? And likewise, if you’re married “without children” to consider, and you have a mortgage, which spouse would stay; the one who could afford to pay the monthly notes on the residence, even if they are the adulterer?
Difficult to answer. Whatever is legal/decided by a judge is best, with effort put toward simplicity.

Would your decision about who leaves even be based on the financial aspects of your relationship, or would the offender automatically have to move out as punishment for their error in judgment?
I don't believe in punishing infidelity. It would not help me deal with what happened. It is the fact that it happened that is painful, not so much who is at fault.

Or, in this day and age when our sexual behavior is touted as being open and easily accessible, now that it’s the acceptable norm to just “love the one we’re with”, is it wiser to expect that cheating might occur in any relationship, so we go into one already prepared to overlook this activity?
I don't believe in forcing people to behave. I want my trust to mean something. I want our love to be the reason for fidelity, not the fear of doing wrong.

And what do you consider cheating to be? Can flirting be a form of cheating? And if so, should people in committed relationships be free to flirt with others?
I don't think flirting is cheating, although it can hurt my feelings. What is or isn't ok depends on what is most important to the couple.
There is a danger in thinking too much about what is or isn't ok in detail. It can kill the romance.


hi Sinner, nice to see you on the threads again... I like what you said... "I want my trust to mean something. I want our love to be the reason for fidelity." "There is a danger in thinking too much about what it or isn't okay."

To me, it's hard to see the gray area in a totally committed relationship when the two are also physically connected... Trust and mutual respect is what really binds it together, for me. And I think that if my partner/lover is flirting with others to garner more attention than what he gets from me, then he is disrespecting our level of commitment to each other, while also bringing shame down on our heads as others look on and ridicule the man for being a skirt chaser, and the woman for accepting his wild ways... Since being online I've learned a lot about modern day relationships and what people expect from each other... and although I won't judge and condemn others views, I also won't change mine just to be accepted by the crowd. When I love someone I would never want to hurt their heart by behaving improperly, because my actions can spur their reactions, and it never ends well when love has been offended...