100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: IF YOU ARE MASTER MIND THEN PROOF IT..... | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
I am still waiting for someone to produce five American pennies from two pairs of American pennies. Does devaluation of the currency come into play, as we all know a penny is no longer worth a full penny. So if devaluation is factored into your 4 pennies, how many more will you need to bring the total to full value...one or two more perhaps...that way we could have 5 or 6 more...  Besides economic value, how about copper value and production costs? I was reading something the other day that stated it costs 2.41 cents to make a penny. In that case... 2+2=9.64 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numbers are always a universal language. 2 + 2 always = 4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Traumer
on
Sat 04/13/13 07:21 PM
|
|
I am still waiting for someone to produce five American pennies from two pairs of American pennies. Does devaluation of the currency come into play, as we all know a penny is no longer worth a full penny. So if devaluation is factored into your 4 pennies, how many more will you need to bring the total to full value...one or two more perhaps...that way we could have 5 or 6 more... Besides economic value, how about copper value and production costs? I was reading something the other day that stated it costs 2.41 cents to make a penny. In that case... 2+2=9.64 Well...we do have a brand new form of math at long last! Make a formal announcement to the Press and you're up for a Nobel in Mathematical values for integers based upon the devaluation of the raw materials to produce money...CLAP! CLAP!   (Don't forget, I recognized your value first!! )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If 2 + 2 = 5, I won't use pennies.
I'll use 100 dollar bills! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If 2 + 2 = 5, I won't use pennies. I'll use 100 dollar bills! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am still waiting for someone to produce five American pennies from two pairs of American pennies. Does devaluation of the currency come into play, as we all know a penny is no longer worth a full penny. So if devaluation is factored into your 4 pennies, how many more will you need to bring the total to full value...one or two more perhaps...that way we could have 5 or 6 more... Besides economic value, how about copper value and production costs? I was reading something the other day that stated it costs 2.41 cents to make a penny. In that case... 2+2=9.64 Well...we do have a brand new form of math at long last! Make a formal announcement to the Press and you're up for a Nobel in Mathematical values for integers based upon the devaluation of the raw materials to produce money...CLAP! CLAP! (Don't forget, I recognized your value first!! )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numbers are always a universal language. 2 + 2 always = 4. yea, but a mathematical trick obtain whish say 2+2=5 it is also based on the formula (a-b)^2=a^2+b^2-2ab. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numbers are always a universal language. 2 + 2 always = 4. yea, but a mathematical trick obtain whish say 2+2=5 it is also based on the formula (a-b)^2=a^2+b^2-2ab. That's why Maths is so useful! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am still waiting for someone to produce five American pennies from two pairs of American pennies. Does devaluation of the currency come into play, as we all know a penny is no longer worth a full penny. So if devaluation is factored into your 4 pennies, how many more will you need to bring the total to full value...one or two more perhaps...that way we could have 5 or 6 more... Besides economic value, how about copper value and production costs? I was reading something the other day that stated it costs 2.41 cents to make a penny. In that case... 2+2=9.64 Already looks more like Brass than Nickel!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now the waiting time has been end, I am going to prove it thats 2+2=5
friends just come and see how to provf it ........... ..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW WE ARE GOING TO PROOF THAT 2 2=5.
Let we take a value, 20=20 applying -ve sin on both sides, -20=-20 which can be written as, 16-36=25-45 adding (9\2)^2 on both sides we get, 4^2 (9\2)^2-36 =5^2 (9\2)^2-45 which is formula of (a-b)^2, then we can get, (4-(9\2))^2=(5-(9\2))^2 now taking root on both sides we get, 4-(9\2)=5-(9\2) since here in both sides (9\2) then it is cancel out and then we can written as, 2 2=5 proved. which was i promise with you. Now what do you think. Friends if u like me, then send a friend request. For chatting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW WE ARE GOING TO PROOF THAT 2 2=5. Let we take a value, 20=20 applying -ve sin on both sides, -20=-20 which can be written as, 16-36=25-45 adding (9\2)^2 on both sides we get, 4^2 (9\2)^2-36 =5^2 (9\2)^2-45 which is formula of (a-b)^2, then we can get, (4-(9\2))^2=(5-(9\2))^2 now taking root on both sides we get, 4-(9\2)=5-(9\2) since here in both sides (9\2) then it is cancel out and then we can written as, 2 2=5 proved. which was i promise with you. Now what do you think. Friends if u like me, then send a friend request. For chatting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, friends here the mingle not show the 'positive' sin. Then i think you undrstood.
Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is a useless equation...That's all, don't let it go to your head.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let we take a value,
20=20 applying -ve sin on both sides, -20=-20 or, 16-36=25-45 adding (9\2)^2 on both sides we get, 4^2 + (9\2)^2-36 =5^2 + (9\2)^2-45 which is formula of (a-b)^2, then we can get, (4-(9\2))^2=(5-(9\2))^2 now taking root on both sides we get, 4-(9\2)=5-(9\2) since here in both sides (9\2) then it is cancel out and then we can written as, 2 + 2=5 proved. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You did not apply the distributive property properly to all terms. The proof is flawed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
1Cynderella
on
Sun 04/14/13 06:52 AM
|
|
16-36=25-45
(4)^2-36=(5)^2-45 (4)^2-36+(9/2)^2=(5)^2-45+(9/2)^2 [adding (9/2)^2 to both sides] (4)^2-2*4*(9/2)+(9/2)^2=(5)^2-2*5*9/2+… (4-9/2)^2=(5-9/2)^2 4-9/2=5-9/2 OR 4=5 OR 2+2=5 So yes this formula itself proves 1=2=3=4=5=6=7=8=9 to infinity, but in an ambiguous way, if not exactly illegal. The jury is still out and probably always will be. I still say ask Will Hunting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
oldhippie1952
on
Sun 04/14/13 09:13 AM
|
|
You did not apply the distributive property properly to all terms. The proof is flawed. same thing, rethink this line (4)^2-2*4*(9/2)+(9/2)^2=(5)^2-2*5*9/2+… |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You did not apply the distributive property properly to all terms. The proof is flawed. same thing, rethink this line (4)^2-2*4*(9/2)+(9/2)^2=(5)^2-2*5*9/2+… I'm sure you're right, but can't even look at it anymore Hippy. It's making my brain cry.   And it's reminding me that there was A REASON I never become a mathe...magician.  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't khow what it effect on people. But we khow that it is my work it take a loss of period of time then it comes.
And it is correct that's the proof of 2 2=5. It is also based on all rule of mathamatics. Thank you have a nice day. . By. SHESH NATH . HERE THIS LESSION OF MINGLE IS END. |
|
|
|
|
