100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: IF YOU ARE MASTER MIND THEN PROOF IT..... | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
I agree
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no mathematical proof that 2+2=5. The alleged "proof" is the result of mathematical errors. It is not technically an error, it is more a mathematical trick, you can achieve it by rounding numbers. Any math geek could argue for days on its legitimacy I am sure. The question should not be does 2+2=5, but instead WHEN does (or can you make) 2+2=5? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Someone who don't know the difference between proof and prove is calling us out as potential idiots.... I am good with it. Allow me to clue you in to English... Prove it. Not....proof it. Just saying. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M I right or M I right.? TOingg tOingg tOingg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With my proof, some people are agree and some people are not agree. I want to say that just see my proof with carefully, it is also agree by different -2 teachers.
When we solve mathematical questions then that rule are apply, after every moment saw in maths questions then its proof occour. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M I right or M I right.? TOingg tOingg tOingg . sona kitana sona hai, sone jayasa mera man............. . . . . . Yeh song suni ho aap.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With my proof, some people are agree and some people are not agree. I want to say that just see my proof with carefully, it is also agree by different -2 teachers. When we solve mathematical questions then that rule are apply, after every moment saw in maths questions then its proof occour. Teachers? I knew that the USA has some lousy teachers, but I didn't know that such a problem existed in other nations. I already demonstrated that the alleged "proof" that 2+2=5 is mathematically flawed. Although it is true that the square of 0.5 equals the square of -0.5 (which is part of the alleged "proof"), it is not true that one can merely eliminate both squarings and get two quantities of equal value. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teachers? I knew that the USA has some lousy teachers, but I didn't know that such a problem existed in other nations. I already demonstrated that the alleged "proof" that 2 2=5 is mathematically flawed. Although it is true that the square of 0.5 equals the square of -0.5 (which is part of the alleged "proof"), it is not true that one can merely eliminate both squarings and get two quantities of equal value. As the (a-b)^2 is equal to (b-a)^2 and also the value of (0.5)^2 is equal to that of (-0.5)^2 and also squre root of a^2 is equal to 'a'. On the basis of these rules my proof is correct. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Toodygirl5
on
Thu 04/25/13 03:40 PM
|
|
In my math, after charging interest, 2+2 would equal 6.  Really, the attempted 'proof' of 2 + 2 = 5 is based on a distorted type of Trigonometry. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Dodo_David
on
Thu 04/25/13 04:04 PM
|
|
Teachers? I knew that the USA has some lousy teachers, but I didn't know that such a problem existed in other nations. I already demonstrated that the alleged "proof" that 2 2=5 is mathematically flawed. Although it is true that the square of 0.5 equals the square of -0.5 (which is part of the alleged "proof"), it is not true that one can merely eliminate both squarings and get two quantities of equal value. As the (a-b)^2 is equal to (b-a)^2 and also the value of (0.5)^2 is equal to that of (-0.5)^2 and also squre root of a^2 is equal to 'a'. On the basis of these rules my proof is correct. Although it is true that (0.5) squared is equal to (-0.5) squared, it is still a mathematical error to assume that one can simply remove the squaring because squaring takes place on both sides of the "equal" sign. In short, you keep repeating the same math mistake while claiming that you have proven that 2+2=5. Let's make a deal. Give me the name and contact information of a college algebra professor who agrees with you, and I will ask that person to explain your alleged "proof". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no mathematical "proof" of any kind in the real world where 2+2=5.
Playing games is one thing and tricks to amuse are another, but real math doesn't allow such silliness. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OP sounds like Obama tax math: 1 tax + 1 tax = 3 taxes. And this is how he'll pay for Obamacare!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Dodo_David
on
Thu 04/25/13 05:39 PM
|
|
NOW WE ARE GOING TO PROOF THAT 2 2=5. Let we take a value, 20=20 applying -ve sin on both sides, -20=-20 which can be written as, 16-36=25-45 adding (9\2)^2 on both sides we get, 4^2 (9\2)^2-36 =5^2 (9\2)^2-45 No, you do not get 4^2(9/2)^2-36= 5^2(9/2)^2-45 by adding (9/2)^2 to both sides of 16-36=25-45. Instead, you get (9/2)^2 + 4^2 - 36 = (9/2)^2 + 5^2 - 45. 9/2=4.5 4.5^2=20.25 So, the real equation that you get is 20.25+16-36=20.25+25-45 which gives you 36.25-36=45.25-45 which gives you 0.25=0.25 which is formula of (a-b)^2, No, it is not. then we can get, (4-(9\2))^2=(5-(9\2))^2 Wrong again. You don't get that. By the way, (4-(9\2))^2=(5-(9\2))^2 is the same as (-0.5)^2=(0.5)^2. Now (-0.5)^2=(0.5)^2 comes out as 0.25=0.25 now taking root on both sides No, you can't just remove the "square" from each side of (4-(9\2))^2=(5-(9\2))^2. The rules of algebra won't allow it. Attempting to remove the "square" from both sides of (4-(9\2))^2=(5-(9\2))^2 would be the same as attempting to remove the "square" from both sides of (-0.5)^2=(0.5)^2 we get, 4-(9\2)=5-(9\2) You get that only if you violate the rules of algebra. since here in both sides (9\2) then it is cancel out and then we can written as, 2 2=5 proved. which was i promise with you. Now what do you think. I think that it is beneficial to take and to pass a course in college algebra. I did that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Might be the real reason why we're here. Arguing a dumb math problem rather than seeking a mate.
Excuse me while I leave this tread.(It has a knot in it) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OP sounds like Obama tax math: 1 tax + 1 tax = 3 taxes. And this is how he'll pay for Obamacare! Lol I was thinking the same thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
so y'all been spitting to the sky and catchin' in yer mouth ~ cool
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With my proof, some people are agree and some people are not agree. I want to say that just see my proof with carefully, it is also agree by different -2 teachers. When we solve mathematical questions then that rule are apply, after every moment saw in maths questions then its proof occour. ALL I KNOW IS THAT IF I HAD TO GO OVER MATH PROBLEMS LIKE THIS ALL THE TIME, I WOULD RATHER BE SINGLE THEN BE WITH A GUY THAT THINKS HE CAN CONVINCE ME THAT 2+2=5. I BELIEVE THIS GUY SHOULD GO TO A COLLEGE MATH TEACHER AND SEE WHAT HE WOULD SAY. I PROMISE HE WOULD FLUNK THAT CLASS REAL QUICK!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With my proof, some people are agree and some people are not agree. I want to say that just see my proof with carefully, it is also agree by different -2 teachers. When we solve mathematical questions then that rule are apply, after every moment saw in maths questions then its proof occour. Something that is not allowed in Maths! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By mistake. . . Hahahahaha. . . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let we take a value, 20=20 applying -ve sin on both sides, -20=-20 or, 16-36=25-45 adding (9\2)^2 on both sides we get, 4^2 (9\2)^2-36 =5^2 (9\2)^2-45 [qoute] which is formula of (a-b)^2, in both sides as we see. You cann't ignore this. (4-(9\2))^2=(5-(9\2))^2 now taking root on both sides as we see that squre in both sides,then in the root property squre is cancel. The we get this term.. 4-(9\2)=5-(9\2) as we see that in above equation both sides have a same term -(9\2) therefore it is cancel out, as we khow in mathematics. You cann't say that it is not a rule. Now we get, 4=5 which is... 2 2=5 it is not real and true but we can prove it, in mathematics form. |
|
|
|
|
