Topic: Salaries and Benefits of US Congress Members
no photo
Sun 10/20/13 10:37 AM
U.S. Congress salaries and benefits have been the source of taxpayer unhappiness and myths over the years. Here are some facts for your consideration.

Rank-and-File Members:
The current salary (2013) for rank-and-file members of the House and Senate is $174,000 per year.

During the Constitutional Convention, Benjamin Franklin considered proposing that elected government officials not be paid for their service. Other Founding Fathers, however, decided otherwise.
From 1789 to 1855, members of Congress received only a per diem (daily payment) of $6.00 while in session, except for a period from December 1815 to March 1817, when they received $1,500 a year. Members began receiving an annual salary in 1855, when they were paid $3,000 per year.

Congress: Leadership Members' Salary (2013)
Leaders of the House and Senate are paid a higher salary than rank-and-file members.

Senate Leadership
Majority Party Leader - $193,400
Minority Party Leader - $193,400

House Leadership
Speaker of the House - $223,500
Majority Leader - $193,400
Minority Leader - $193,400

Members of Congress are also provided with an annual allowance intended to defray expenses related carrying out their congressional duties, including "official office expenses, including staff, mail, travel between a Member's district or state and Washington, DC, and other goods and services.


Riddle me this: Why do politicians spend millions of dollars for election to a job that pays $174,000. per year?

Drivinmenutz's photo
Sun 10/20/13 01:16 PM
I believe George Washington actually rejected the notion of Congress and the presidency receive any pay at first. He was then convinced otherwise when it was explained to him that only the wealthy will serve in congress and/or the presidency if one does not receive a paycheck. Washington, was the richest president in history, i 've been told, when you adjust his net worth for inflation. However, he supposedly spent a great deal of his own money paying for the revolutionary war. Always respected him for that.

Anyhow, I believe, that congressmen/women should not receive a pay rate larger than the median american salary, They should also have the same health benefits as the rest of the country and have to rely on social security for retirement. Furthermore a law should be made making it illegal to serve in congress at the same time you have money in the stock market.

no photo
Sun 10/20/13 06:53 PM

I believe George Washington actually rejected the notion of Congress and the presidency receive any pay at first. He was then convinced otherwise when it was explained to him that only the wealthy will serve in congress and/or the presidency if one does not receive a paycheck. Washington, was the richest president in history, i 've been told, when you adjust his net worth for inflation. However, he supposedly spent a great deal of his own money paying for the revolutionary war. Always respected him for that.

Anyhow, I believe, that congressmen/women should not receive a pay rate larger than the median american salary, They should also have the same health benefits as the rest of the country and have to rely on social security for retirement. Furthermore a law should be made making it illegal to serve in congress at the same time you have money in the stock market.


I think that full financial disclosure of all candidates should be mandatory for every year they serve in office.

d24's photo
Sun 10/20/13 07:05 PM


I believe George Washington actually rejected the notion of Congress and the presidency receive any pay at first. He was then convinced otherwise when it was explained to him that only the wealthy will serve in congress and/or the presidency if one does not receive a paycheck. Washington, was the richest president in history, i 've been told, when you adjust his net worth for inflation. However, he supposedly spent a great deal of his own money paying for the revolutionary war. Always respected him for that.

Anyhow, I believe, that congressmen/women should not receive a pay rate larger than the median american salary, They should also have the same health benefits as the rest of the country and have to rely on social security for retirement. Furthermore a law should be made making it illegal to serve in congress at the same time you have money in the stock market.


I think that full financial disclosure of all candidates should be mandatory for every year they serve in office.

Absolutely right! Alleoops every other working American Citizen has to.

Lpdon's photo
Mon 10/21/13 12:37 AM

U.S. Congress salaries and benefits have been the source of taxpayer unhappiness and myths over the years. Here are some facts for your consideration.

Rank-and-File Members:
The current salary (2013) for rank-and-file members of the House and Senate is $174,000 per year.

During the Constitutional Convention, Benjamin Franklin considered proposing that elected government officials not be paid for their service. Other Founding Fathers, however, decided otherwise.
From 1789 to 1855, members of Congress received only a per diem (daily payment) of $6.00 while in session, except for a period from December 1815 to March 1817, when they received $1,500 a year. Members began receiving an annual salary in 1855, when they were paid $3,000 per year.

Congress: Leadership Members' Salary (2013)
Leaders of the House and Senate are paid a higher salary than rank-and-file members.

Senate Leadership
Majority Party Leader - $193,400
Minority Party Leader - $193,400

House Leadership
Speaker of the House - $223,500
Majority Leader - $193,400
Minority Leader - $193,400

Members of Congress are also provided with an annual allowance intended to defray expenses related carrying out their congressional duties, including "official office expenses, including staff, mail, travel between a Member's district or state and Washington, DC, and other goods and services.


Riddle me this: Why do politicians spend millions of dollars for election to a job that pays $174,000. per year?


Because of the perks, if they are on the military committee they get to travel to any country with a military base, the PACS and Lobbyists who's job is to legally buy them off........ Even the honest will get corrupted after a few years. Plus public speaking fees they charge at up to $50,000 a speech. Their salary is just chump change to them.

Lpdon's photo
Mon 10/21/13 12:37 AM


I believe George Washington actually rejected the notion of Congress and the presidency receive any pay at first. He was then convinced otherwise when it was explained to him that only the wealthy will serve in congress and/or the presidency if one does not receive a paycheck. Washington, was the richest president in history, i 've been told, when you adjust his net worth for inflation. However, he supposedly spent a great deal of his own money paying for the revolutionary war. Always respected him for that.

Anyhow, I believe, that congressmen/women should not receive a pay rate larger than the median american salary, They should also have the same health benefits as the rest of the country and have to rely on social security for retirement. Furthermore a law should be made making it illegal to serve in congress at the same time you have money in the stock market.


I think that full financial disclosure of all candidates should be mandatory for every year they serve in office.


Ummm it is, the FEC makes sure of it.

oldhippie1952's photo
Mon 10/21/13 02:57 AM
You forgot to mention how they are exempt from social security and pay 1% of theirs for a luxury income of not less than $40,000 a year or so for just a short time in Congress. The highest social security is about $2,400 x 12 = 28,800 a year....rant

Drivinmenutz's photo
Mon 10/21/13 03:50 AM

You forgot to mention how they are exempt from social security and pay 1% of theirs for a luxury income of not less than $40,000 a year or so for just a short time in Congress. The highest social security is about $2,400 x 12 = 28,800 a year....rant

I thought they received 100% pay for life?

no photo
Mon 10/21/13 09:45 AM
This is a major problem with our representative government. They are not representing the people, they are representing themselves. Democrats and Republicans, no difference. They are like rats in a cheese factory, and we keep re-electing the vermin.:angry:

Lpdon's photo
Mon 10/21/13 05:27 PM


You forgot to mention how they are exempt from social security and pay 1% of theirs for a luxury income of not less than $40,000 a year or so for just a short time in Congress. The highest social security is about $2,400 x 12 = 28,800 a year....rant

I thought they received 100% pay for life?


Only after a certain amount of time in office and it's not full salary.............