100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Ron Paul | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Ron Paul's 2002 Predictions All Come True - Incredible Video! >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifJG_oFFDK0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Organicman7
on
Tue 10/29/13 04:23 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 My hat's off to another patriot! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to each their own
this is enough for me not to choose Ron Paul ,who survived a 16 year career, supposedly believing his job should be, essentially, doing nothing for anyone.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to each their own this is enough for me not to choose Ron Paul ,who survived a 16 year career, supposedly believing his job should be, essentially, doing nothing for anyone.. so,you believe that the Job of a Politician consists essentially in doling out what doesn't belong to him,once he has extorted it from someone else? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to each their own this is enough for me not to choose Ron Paul ,who survived a 16 year career, supposedly believing his job should be, essentially, doing nothing for anyone.. so,you believe that the Job of a Politician consists essentially in doling out what doesn't belong to him,once he has extorted it from someone else? no, I just don't believe someone should make a politicians money just to make sure nothing ever gets done for anyone,,, and I also don't buy into the 'extortion' analogy,, we have freedoms and protections here, although its not a perfect country as a par to it, we should all be contribuiting, that some can afford to contribute monetarily doesn't make them any less deserving of consideration or representation than those who cannot afford to,,, the tax is not a personal favor, its but one type of payment for the 'rent' of living where we live,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to each their own this is enough for me not to choose Ron Paul ,who survived a 16 year career, supposedly believing his job should be, essentially, doing nothing for anyone.. What do you mean? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Tue 10/29/13 11:02 AM
|
|
Yep, we've been given all kinds of freedoms and protections.... NDAA IRS and NSA spying Patriot Act Mandated healthcare Secret courts Unlawful taxes and laws Free speech zones gun free zones etc etc The question is, who are they for when only those subject to them are the ones paying but never receiving any benefit from them? So you want to tax those who are fortunate, motivated, lucky, earning, elderly, or profit makers to pay for those who choose not to be and simply needed an excuse..... And anyone who wants stability, freedom or an end to the tyranny of the banks and corruption in politics is bad, or not doing their job.....  Good choice! Great reasoning! LIBERALS!  Typical..... the one man who offers solutions without needing a think tank full of lawyers or former bank CEOs to make sense of things, values personal liberty over gov't control, and nobody listens.....until now...... when it's almost too late! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, we've been given all kinds of freedoms and protections.... NDAA IRS and NSA spying Patriot Act Mandated healthcare Secret courts Unlawful taxes and laws Free speech zones gun free zones etc etc The question is, who are they for when only those subject to them are the ones paying but never receiving any benefit from them? So you want to tax those who are fortunate, motivated, lucky, earning, elderly, or profit makers to pay for those who choose not to be and simply needed an excuse..... And anyone who wants stability, freedom or an end to the tyranny of the banks and corruption in politics is bad, or not doing their job..... Good choice! Great reasoning! LIBERALS! Typical..... the one man who offers solutions without needing a think tank full of lawyers or former bank CEOs to make sense of things, values personal liberty over gov't control, and nobody listens.....until now...... when it's almost too late! lol,, NO Is not a solution neither is 'let the states decide',,,, well, at least that theory seems in the past to have only benefitted a select few , so why is representing that select few any better than representing another select few? not really the huge difference that Im easily impressed with and , for someone to be getting paid to do a job,, just saying 'NO' doesn't sit well with me,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, we've been given all kinds of freedoms and protections.... NDAA IRS and NSA spying Patriot Act Mandated healthcare Secret courts Unlawful taxes and laws Free speech zones gun free zones etc etc The question is, who are they for when only those subject to them are the ones paying but never receiving any benefit from them? So you want to tax those who are fortunate, motivated, lucky, earning, elderly, or profit makers to pay for those who choose not to be and simply needed an excuse..... And anyone who wants stability, freedom or an end to the tyranny of the banks and corruption in politics is bad, or not doing their job..... Good choice! Great reasoning! LIBERALS! Typical..... the one man who offers solutions without needing a think tank full of lawyers or former bank CEOs to make sense of things, values personal liberty over gov't control, and nobody listens.....until now...... when it's almost too late! lol,, NO Is not a solution neither is 'let the states decide',,,, well, at least that theory seems in the past to have only benefitted a select few , so why is representing that select few any better than representing another select few? not really the huge difference that Im easily impressed with and , for someone to be getting paid to do a job,, just saying 'NO' doesn't sit well with me,,, That's because you have no concept of a Republic as opposed to a Democracy.....which we are not in the US! I don't think I care to participate in a world run by any with your view or that of your messiah It is unAmerican. You have both stated our constitution is not to your liking. I reject your opinions, bias, and hatred of the principles that made this country great |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, we've been given all kinds of freedoms and protections.... NDAA IRS and NSA spying Patriot Act Mandated healthcare Secret courts Unlawful taxes and laws Free speech zones gun free zones etc etc The question is, who are they for when only those subject to them are the ones paying but never receiving any benefit from them? So you want to tax those who are fortunate, motivated, lucky, earning, elderly, or profit makers to pay for those who choose not to be and simply needed an excuse..... And anyone who wants stability, freedom or an end to the tyranny of the banks and corruption in politics is bad, or not doing their job..... Good choice! Great reasoning! LIBERALS! Typical..... the one man who offers solutions without needing a think tank full of lawyers or former bank CEOs to make sense of things, values personal liberty over gov't control, and nobody listens.....until now...... when it's almost too late! lol,, NO Is not a solution neither is 'let the states decide',,,, well, at least that theory seems in the past to have only benefitted a select few , so why is representing that select few any better than representing another select few? not really the huge difference that Im easily impressed with and , for someone to be getting paid to do a job,, just saying 'NO' doesn't sit well with me,,, That's because you have no concept of a Republic as opposed to a Democracy.....which we are not in the US! I don't think I care to participate in a world run by any with your view or that of your messiah It is unAmerican. You have both stated our constitution is not to your liking. I reject your opinions, bias, and hatred of the principles that made this country great I don't want to be anyones version of American that means I have to put 'freedom ' before decency and caring about community nor did I or Obama ever say the constitution is 'not to' my 'liking' rejection I guess is a part of that AMerican freedom , as well as the freedom for everyone to have an opinion,, even if its deemed 'unamerican' to do so,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then there's still hope for America!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol, simplistic but not realistic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, we're back!  Texas GOP Poll: ‘Tea Party’ challenger beats Cornyn 46% to 33% A generic “Tea Party” candidate beats Sen. John Cornyn III (R.-Texas) a Oct. 26 Human Events/Gravis poll of Republican voters in Texas 46 percent to 33 percent for the GOP’s number two senator. http://www.humanevents.com/2013/10/28/texas-gop-poll-tea-party-candidate-beats-cornyn-46-to-33/ |
|
|
|
|
