Topic: Anti-Obama Signs On I-5 in Wa State Draw WH Threats | |
---|---|
Anti-Obama Signs On I-5 Near Seattle Draw WH Threats
You want to see something better than Burma Shave signs? These are Northbound on I-5 (88 miles south of Seattle). The federal government is now petitioning to have these signs removed, or Washington state will be denied additional monies for interstate highways. The State of Washington replied, they will secede from the Union rather than be intimidated.These are a matter of free speech paid for by a private citizen. It seems the Obama government uses intimidation and ignores the First Amendment when they want to silence someone. These signs are priceless. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Bravo for the man who created them ! Bravo for the state of Washington! This dude has been posting Pro-America signs for at least 25 years, that I have seen. This is the first time the Feds have threatened Wa State over his 1st Amendment Rights. |
|
|
|
Anti-Obama Signs On I-5 Near Seattle Draw WH Threats You want to see something better than Burma Shave signs? These are Northbound on I-5 (88 miles south of Seattle). The federal government is now petitioning to have these signs removed, or Washington state will be denied additional monies for interstate highways. The State of Washington replied, they will secede from the Union rather than be intimidated.These are a matter of free speech paid for by a private citizen. It seems the Obama government uses intimidation and ignores the First Amendment when they want to silence someone. These signs are priceless. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Bravo for the man who created them ! Bravo for the state of Washington! This dude has been posting Pro-America signs for at least 25 years, that I have seen. This is the first time the Feds have threatened Wa State over his 1st Amendment Rights. So, the OP repeats something posted on certain blogs. However, there is no evidence that the federal government ever threatened the state of Washington because of the signs, and there is no evidence that the state of Washington threatening to secede. What we have here is a hoax about the signs. |
|
|
|
You ever drive North I-5 and see the signs the man puts on his Private Property?
I have. Just cuz MSMBS don't report it, doesn't mean it ain't so. But, for bumping the thread, I will award a one-time free, |
|
|
|
More states should do the same.
![]() |
|
|
|
Bravo!!!!
I would like to see the actual communications between the State and the Feds. |
|
|
|
You ever drive North I-5 and see the signs the man puts on his Private Property? I have. Just cuz MSMBS don't report it, doesn't mean it ain't so. But, for bumping the thread, I will award a one-time free, The signs may be real, but the claim about the US government and the Washington state government are unfounded. It looks to me like the claim is just a hoax. |
|
|
|
You ever drive North I-5 and see the signs the man puts on his Private Property? I have. Just cuz MSMBS don't report it, doesn't mean it ain't so. But, for bumping the thread, I will award a one-time free, The signs may be real, Apology accepted. ![]() |
|
|
|
You ever drive North I-5 and see the signs the man puts on his Private Property? I have. Just cuz MSMBS don't report it, doesn't mean it ain't so. But, for bumping the thread, I will award a one-time free, The signs may be real, Apology accepted. ![]() I never said that the signs themselves were a hoax. I said, "What we have here is a hoax about the signs." |
|
|
|
You ever drive North I-5 and see the signs the man puts on his Private Property? I have. Just cuz MSMBS don't report it, doesn't mean it ain't so. But, for bumping the thread, I will award a one-time free, The signs may be real, Apology accepted. ![]() I never said that the signs themselves were a hoax. I said, "What we have here is a hoax about the signs." and so? Your the only one that seems to care. I'll take one hoax over Obama's many lies any day ![]() |
|
|
|
Hilarious,even if they don't sit in anyones Yard!
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Hilarious,even if they don't sit in anyones Yard! ![]() ![]() ![]() The signs are real. This guy has property that runs along I-5. He has made national news before about his pro-America agenda. |
|
|
|
Hilarious,even if they don't sit in anyones Yard! ![]() ![]() ![]() The signs are real. This guy has property that runs along I-5. He has made national news before about his pro-America agenda. even better!!! ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
This dude has been posting Pro-America signs for at least 25 years, that I have seen. This is the first time the Feds have threatened Wa State over his 1st Amendment Rights. Love it!!! |
|
|
|
So, the OP repeats something posted on certain blogs. However, there is no evidence that the federal government ever threatened the state of Washington because of the signs, and there is no evidence that the state of Washington threatening to secede. What we have here is a hoax about the signs. And as usual you would have egg on your face. There is a sign, not plural but one double sided sign. Liberal idiots have been arguing against it since 2010 but that is like the liberals declaring the world to be flat and denying anyone that states it is round. As for the Odumbo threat, no real proof but sounds about right, can't deny that it isn't within the scope of the little dictator's persona. And again no real proof that Washington State offered to secede, but then they did give Odumbo the finger over weed. And while they were not amongst the states that have filed petitions to secede, would seem like a logical response to a federal demand. But I do understand the Odumbo has made a new batch of KoolAid, refreshments are served. |
|
|
|
More states should do the same. ![]() I agree, not to seceding but to standing up to the federal government. Thanks be to the constitutional sheriffs that stand up for the people's rights. |
|
|
|
Edited by
alnewman
on
Mon 05/05/14 02:11 PM
|
|
The signs may be real, but the claim about the US government and the Washington state government are unfounded. It looks to me like the claim is just a hoax. That would be your theory, but based on the past actions of the little dictator, I would bet the other way. Wonder which government agency will attack the sign owner? |
|
|