In case you are wondering just how warped Liberalism is, here is a great example. The family of a 19-year old who was killed while robbing a Waffle House say that he’s the victim.

He didn'��t have to die, he was a respectable boy.” – Family

It's obvious that this is one of those religious black families people talk about, because black folks love the Lord, and are the most religious people in America. They call an armed robber, “respectable.”

That’s why black teens are committing crimes at an alarming rate, mostly attack other blacks.

Here is the video of a respectable black teen demanding breakfast in the form of all the cash in the register:

As reported here:


The family of 19-year-old Dante Williams, shot while attempting to rob a Waffle House in South Carolina, say that Williams didn’t have to die and was a “respectable boy.”

The incident, caught on security cameras, shows Williams and Jawan Craig enter the Spartanburg Waffle House, point a gun at the cashier, and demand the cash in the register.

Justin Harrison, a concealed carry permit holder, was sitting at the bar area. ��They'��re yelling everybody get down, get down�� and I’m not getting on the floor. I am not going to be a victim, Harrison recalls.

After Harrison refuses to get down, Williams starts to approach him but Harrison stands up and fires multiple shots at Williams. Harrison then turns to Craig who tries to wrestle the gun away but is unable to and ends up fleeing. Police later arrested him and charged him with armed robbery.

This was the only time. If I am going to fight it was that one time. He was approaching me and I saw that as him engaging me,�� Harrison says.

The narrative of the Liberals will be how bad that gun was that shot and killed Dante Williams, as he was just trying to have breakfast.

http://www.rightwingnews.com/crime/family-of-dead-robber-says-hes-the-victim-video/

yep,a Victim of his own stupidity!

They won't sue.
Suing means having to show up at court and register.
How many of his family have outstanding warrants?

Kid was just following the family tradition.

narrative is that crime doesn't pay, unless its the white collar kind,,,

introduce a gun into a situation, as far as I am concerned, and you introduce the opportunity to die

what else will one do in the presence of an armed person 'approaching' them,, except take the life that might take theirs

and the last man standing will be the one in the right, cause both then have reasonable 'fear' for their lives

guns are trouble, in my opinion, for that reason,,, they (perhaps rightfully) place the gunholders life in more danger than might have been present without it


so

although material things should NEVER be worth someones life,,,


live by the gun, die by the gun or the next best fatal defense your target has,,,

Thar shed be a law agin criminals possessing fararms.

Oh, they is, y'all says?

Guess dimbob didn't git the note.

Now, he can live, oh, idiot's dead?

Karma be a reel mo-fo, no?

yep, this gun toter got dead

doesn't happen for all gun toters

but karma does get them one way or the other, the longer they 'be' loving their own ignorance, hatred, and GUNS,,,,

The person who put dog down be hero.

Possibly saving many lives.

We citizens need higher capacity weaponry of defense against ghetto rats of his kind.

seems hero physically threatened more lives than 'dog'

but whatever, karma doesn't distinguish,, we wont 'be' suffering no more graffiti and drug use from one more teen..lol

but one more bully will continue to live by his gun, bullying and intimidating girlfriends and wives and police,


and reep his own consequences

just as these males with guns did,,,,,,,

Ive made peace, live by your gun, die by your gun, or the next fatal resource your target can muster,,,

I would applaud a hero who put down a menace, with prejudice and lethal force.

I would dare bet the clientele did applaud the hero.

if only putting down 'menaces' were legal

I suspect the boards would be much less lively,,lol

ANYWHO,,,,,


karma LOVES those who love death and guns,,,,

I suppose you're partially right.

Liberal menaces might be missed here for a minute.

This is perhaps one of the most pathetic tirades I have read yet, to actually instill that one should just be a victim can only be attributed to one incapable of growing up and accepting responsibility, the mark of enslavement, not forced enslavement but one that volunteers to be enslaved.

Within the realm of natural law, the antithesis of each other are labeled as force and violence. To those that refuse the prospect of balance in life, they equate both as one and the same, but they aren't, force is beneficial and moral, violence is enslaving and immoral. When violence is initiated upon another, it is their obligation and duty to resist with force to restore the imbalance and the peace. Force resides within the realm of moral man, violence is instilled and endorsed within the realm of the immoral. The immoral not only endorses the violence but equally purports that defense using force is equally evil, ill understanding the natural law of balance.

Force is the ability to do work, something very unfamiliar to the entitlement crowd. Force is taking a plate from the cupboard and placing it on the table, a beneficial act. Force is taking action and moving through life up to and including the right to use force, a moral right, to defend oneself from violence, both the violence and the denial of defense are an immoral act.

And under what pretense do you equate slavery to peace? Do you actually understand either?