100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
| Topic: Bradley Manning Supports ISIS, Taxpayers Are Paying For His | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
The Islamic State has exactly one redeeming quality. It is highly unlikely to return the affections of progressives like Bradley Manning, the traitor who leaked thousands of sensitive documents, almost certainly getting Americans and their allies killed. Instead of receiving the prompt execution he so obviously requires, Manning is undergoing sex change procedures at public expense and penning witless diatribes in The Guardian, where he makes it plain that even when unrequited, his love for America’s enemies remains true. He does not want us to fight ISIS.
Attacking Isis directly, by air strikes or special operations forces, is a very tempting option available to policymakers, with immediate (but not always good) results. Unfortunately, when the west fights fire with fire, we feed into a cycle of outrage, recruitment, organizing and even more fighting that goes back decades. This is exactly what happened in Iraq during the height of a civil war in 2006 and 2007, and it can only be expected to occur again. And avoiding direct action with Isis can be successful. For instance, in 2009 and 2010, forerunners to the Isis group attacked civilians in suicide and car bombings in downtown Baghdad to try and provoke American intervention and sectarian unrest. But they were often not effective in their recruiting efforts when American and Iraqi forces refused (or were unable) to respond, because the barbarity and brutality of their attacks worked against them. When we did respond, however, the attacks were sold to the Sunni minority in Iraq as a justified response to an occupying government favoring the Shia government led by former prime minister Nouri al-Maliki. How then to deal with the establishment of a rabidly aggressive Islamic terror state that would make Iran look almost benevolent by comparison? Let Isis succeed in setting up a failed “state” – in a contained area and over a long enough period of time to prove itself unpopular and unable to govern. This might begin to discredit the leadership and ideology of Isis for good. Sure, just look at the Soviet Union. It only took 70 years for it to collapse of its own dysfunctional ideology — with a little Cold War help from Reagan and Thatcher. Or Afghanistan becoming a terrorist state and hub to train for attacks against the US. Unfortunately, the Islamic State could be expected to use weapons of mass destruction including nuclear weapons against the West within a few years, given the oil wealth of the region and their fanatical disregard for anything but Islam, including real world consequences. Why does the liberal elite Guardian readership listen to the policy advice of a mentally ill former Army private who committed treason? Because he committed treason. Also, the sex change business makes him appealing to progressives at a personal level. http://www.rightwingnews.com/terrorism/bradley-manning-calls-letting-isis-succeed/ Why hasn't this TRAITOR been executed yet? I got even a better idea, lets transfer him into Iraq and drop him right in the middle of ISIS territory and see what happens as soon as he says he is a she. LOL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why would anyone waste good ink printing anything Manning has to say?
 ...Is he thinking of becoming Hillary's running mate or something?....First female President, first transgender Vice President?....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Islamic State has exactly one redeeming quality. It is highly unlikely to return the affections of progressives like Bradley Manning, the traitor who leaked thousands of sensitive documents, almost certainly getting Americans and their allies killed. Instead of receiving the prompt execution he so obviously requires, Manning is undergoing sex change procedures at public expense and penning witless diatribes in The Guardian, where he makes it plain that even when unrequited, his love for America’s enemies remains true. He does not want us to fight ISIS. Attacking Isis directly, by air strikes or special operations forces, is a very tempting option available to policymakers, with immediate (but not always good) results. Unfortunately, when the west fights fire with fire, we feed into a cycle of outrage, recruitment, organizing and even more fighting that goes back decades. This is exactly what happened in Iraq during the height of a civil war in 2006 and 2007, and it can only be expected to occur again. And avoiding direct action with Isis can be successful. For instance, in 2009 and 2010, forerunners to the Isis group attacked civilians in suicide and car bombings in downtown Baghdad to try and provoke American intervention and sectarian unrest. But they were often not effective in their recruiting efforts when American and Iraqi forces refused (or were unable) to respond, because the barbarity and brutality of their attacks worked against them. When we did respond, however, the attacks were sold to the Sunni minority in Iraq as a justified response to an occupying government favoring the Shia government led by former prime minister Nouri al-Maliki. How then to deal with the establishment of a rabidly aggressive Islamic terror state that would make Iran look almost benevolent by comparison? Let Isis succeed in setting up a failed “state” – in a contained area and over a long enough period of time to prove itself unpopular and unable to govern. This might begin to discredit the leadership and ideology of Isis for good. Sure, just look at the Soviet Union. It only took 70 years for it to collapse of its own dysfunctional ideology — with a little Cold War help from Reagan and Thatcher. Or Afghanistan becoming a terrorist state and hub to train for attacks against the US. Unfortunately, the Islamic State could be expected to use weapons of mass destruction including nuclear weapons against the West within a few years, given the oil wealth of the region and their fanatical disregard for anything but Islam, including real world consequences. Why does the liberal elite Guardian readership listen to the policy advice of a mentally ill former Army private who committed treason? Because he committed treason. Also, the sex change business makes him appealing to progressives at a personal level. http://www.rightwingnews.com/terrorism/bradley-manning-calls-letting-isis-succeed/ Why hasn't this TRAITOR been executed yet? I got even a better idea, lets transfer him into Iraq and drop him right in the middle of ISIS territory and see what happens as soon as he says he is a she. LOL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Islamic State has exactly one redeeming quality. It is highly unlikely to return the affections of progressives like Bradley Manning, the traitor who leaked thousands of sensitive documents, almost certainly getting Americans and their allies killed. Instead of receiving the prompt execution he so obviously requires, Manning is undergoing sex change procedures at public expense and penning witless diatribes in The Guardian, where he makes it plain that even when unrequited, his love for America’s enemies remains true. He does not want us to fight ISIS. Attacking Isis directly, by air strikes or special operations forces, is a very tempting option available to policymakers, with immediate (but not always good) results. Unfortunately, when the west fights fire with fire, we feed into a cycle of outrage, recruitment, organizing and even more fighting that goes back decades. This is exactly what happened in Iraq during the height of a civil war in 2006 and 2007, and it can only be expected to occur again. And avoiding direct action with Isis can be successful. For instance, in 2009 and 2010, forerunners to the Isis group attacked civilians in suicide and car bombings in downtown Baghdad to try and provoke American intervention and sectarian unrest. But they were often not effective in their recruiting efforts when American and Iraqi forces refused (or were unable) to respond, because the barbarity and brutality of their attacks worked against them. When we did respond, however, the attacks were sold to the Sunni minority in Iraq as a justified response to an occupying government favoring the Shia government led by former prime minister Nouri al-Maliki. How then to deal with the establishment of a rabidly aggressive Islamic terror state that would make Iran look almost benevolent by comparison? Let Isis succeed in setting up a failed “state” – in a contained area and over a long enough period of time to prove itself unpopular and unable to govern. This might begin to discredit the leadership and ideology of Isis for good. Sure, just look at the Soviet Union. It only took 70 years for it to collapse of its own dysfunctional ideology — with a little Cold War help from Reagan and Thatcher. Or Afghanistan becoming a terrorist state and hub to train for attacks against the US. Unfortunately, the Islamic State could be expected to use weapons of mass destruction including nuclear weapons against the West within a few years, given the oil wealth of the region and their fanatical disregard for anything but Islam, including real world consequences. Why does the liberal elite Guardian readership listen to the policy advice of a mentally ill former Army private who committed treason? Because he committed treason. Also, the sex change business makes him appealing to progressives at a personal level. http://www.rightwingnews.com/terrorism/bradley-manning-calls-letting-isis-succeed/ Why hasn't this TRAITOR been executed yet? I got even a better idea, lets transfer him into Iraq and drop him right in the middle of ISIS territory and see what happens as soon as he says he is a she. LOL Come on,don't hold back,out with that Information you are holding back! Innuendo are tiresome! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Come on,don't hold back,out with that Information you are holding back! Innuendo are tiresome!  !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Fri 09/19/14 10:33 AM
|
|
I may even try to comment on this drivel if I can stop laughing long enough 
I'll just concentrate on the beautiful Leigh  .... but them my heart starts pounding.....
I'm pickled either way! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why would anyone waste good ink printing anything Manning has to say? ...Is he thinking of becoming Hillary's running mate or something?....First female President, first transgender Vice President?....
 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why would anyone waste good ink printing anything Manning has to say? ...Is he thinking of becoming Hillary's running mate or something?....First female President, first transgender Vice President?....
I hope prison justice takes its course on this POS. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Islamic State has exactly one redeeming quality. It is highly unlikely to return the affections of progressives like Bradley Manning, the traitor who leaked thousands of sensitive documents, almost certainly getting Americans and their allies killed. Instead of receiving the prompt execution he so obviously requires, Manning is undergoing sex change procedures at public expense and penning witless diatribes in The Guardian, where he makes it plain that even when unrequited, his love for America’s enemies remains true. He does not want us to fight ISIS. Attacking Isis directly, by air strikes or special operations forces, is a very tempting option available to policymakers, with immediate (but not always good) results. Unfortunately, when the west fights fire with fire, we feed into a cycle of outrage, recruitment, organizing and even more fighting that goes back decades. This is exactly what happened in Iraq during the height of a civil war in 2006 and 2007, and it can only be expected to occur again. And avoiding direct action with Isis can be successful. For instance, in 2009 and 2010, forerunners to the Isis group attacked civilians in suicide and car bombings in downtown Baghdad to try and provoke American intervention and sectarian unrest. But they were often not effective in their recruiting efforts when American and Iraqi forces refused (or were unable) to respond, because the barbarity and brutality of their attacks worked against them. When we did respond, however, the attacks were sold to the Sunni minority in Iraq as a justified response to an occupying government favoring the Shia government led by former prime minister Nouri al-Maliki. How then to deal with the establishment of a rabidly aggressive Islamic terror state that would make Iran look almost benevolent by comparison? Let Isis succeed in setting up a failed “state” – in a contained area and over a long enough period of time to prove itself unpopular and unable to govern. This might begin to discredit the leadership and ideology of Isis for good. Sure, just look at the Soviet Union. It only took 70 years for it to collapse of its own dysfunctional ideology — with a little Cold War help from Reagan and Thatcher. Or Afghanistan becoming a terrorist state and hub to train for attacks against the US. Unfortunately, the Islamic State could be expected to use weapons of mass destruction including nuclear weapons against the West within a few years, given the oil wealth of the region and their fanatical disregard for anything but Islam, including real world consequences. Why does the liberal elite Guardian readership listen to the policy advice of a mentally ill former Army private who committed treason? Because he committed treason. Also, the sex change business makes him appealing to progressives at a personal level. http://www.rightwingnews.com/terrorism/bradley-manning-calls-letting-isis-succeed/ Why hasn't this TRAITOR been executed yet? I got even a better idea, lets transfer him into Iraq and drop him right in the middle of ISIS territory and see what happens as soon as he says he is a she. LOL ISIS will turn on and kill whoever they want. They are fanatical and not rational. They are a worse and more sadistic enemy then the old Al-Qaeda and unfortunately we don't have a leader in office who can adequately take care of these a$$hats. But he will send over 3,000 troops into Africa to fight Ebola. Go Figure. He is the reason ISIS is as big as they are now. ISIS Obama's big legacy! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Sat 09/20/14 04:27 AM
|
|
Why would anyone waste good ink printing anything Manning has to say? ...Is he thinking of becoming Hillary's running mate or something?....First female President, first transgender Vice President?....
I hope prison justice takes its course on this POS. So, you think Hitler should have been allowed to continue his slaughter of the Jews? All Manning did was expose the slaughter of innocents conducted by faulty war policies by the US, but instead of changing their policies they, with the power of govt, thru the media, turned the tables and crucified him/her instead......after he released the info to the public that they refused to correct. It wasn't that what he/she did was wrong, or helped the enemy in any way...... that thinking is media hype and BULLSHITE.... it was that he/she exposed the govt wrongs, and since govt controls the media, it's easy and obvious who is going to be the sacrificial sheep in the outcome. Because you have the power doesn't make your actions right or just. It's funny how some believe that anyone informing the public of govt atrocities, crimes, theft and corruption is always made out as the villain thru controlled media...... and people will buy it! The power of media! Mannings sin was stupidity, not criminal! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why would anyone waste good ink printing anything Manning has to say? ...Is he thinking of becoming Hillary's running mate or something?....First female President, first transgender Vice President?....
I hope prison justice takes its course on this POS. So, you think Hitler should have been allowed to continue his slaughter of the Jews? All Manning did was expose the slaughter of innocents conducted by faulty war policies by the US, but instead of changing their policies they, with the power of govt, thru the media, turned the tables and crucified him/her instead......after he released the info to the public that they refused to correct. It wasn't that what he/she did was wrong, or helped the enemy in any way...... that thinking is media hype and BULLSHITE.... it was that he/she exposed the govt wrongs, and since govt controls the media, it's easy and obvious who is going to be the sacrificial sheep in the outcome. Because you have the power doesn't make your actions right or just. It's funny how some believe that anyone informing the public of govt atrocities, crimes, theft and corruption is always made out as the villain thru controlled media...... and people will buy it! The power of media! Mannings sin was stupidity, not criminal! you're contradicting yourself a bit there!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why would anyone waste good ink printing anything Manning has to say? ...Is he thinking of becoming Hillary's running mate or something?....First female President, first transgender Vice President?....
I hope prison justice takes its course on this POS. So, you think Hitler should have been allowed to continue his slaughter of the Jews? All Manning did was expose the slaughter of innocents conducted by faulty war policies by the US, but instead of changing their policies they, with the power of govt, thru the media, turned the tables and crucified him/her instead......after he released the info to the public that they refused to correct. It wasn't that what he/she did was wrong, or helped the enemy in any way...... that thinking is media hype and BULLSHITE.... it was that he/she exposed the govt wrongs, and since govt controls the media, it's easy and obvious who is going to be the sacrificial sheep in the outcome. Because you have the power doesn't make your actions right or just. It's funny how some believe that anyone informing the public of govt atrocities, crimes, theft and corruption is always made out as the villain thru controlled media...... and people will buy it! The power of media! Mannings sin was stupidity, not criminal! you're contradicting yourself a bit there!
Not really Con. Manning was an idiot thinking he could make a difference without a powerful ally..... and the people failed him! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why would anyone waste good ink printing anything Manning has to say? ...Is he thinking of becoming Hillary's running mate or something?....First female President, first transgender Vice President?....
I hope prison justice takes its course on this POS. So, you think Hitler should have been allowed to continue his slaughter of the Jews? All Manning did was expose the slaughter of innocents conducted by faulty war policies by the US, but instead of changing their policies they, with the power of govt, thru the media, turned the tables and crucified him/her instead......after he released the info to the public that they refused to correct. It wasn't that what he/she did was wrong, or helped the enemy in any way...... that thinking is media hype and BULLSHITE.... it was that he/she exposed the govt wrongs, and since govt controls the media, it's easy and obvious who is going to be the sacrificial sheep in the outcome. Because you have the power doesn't make your actions right or just. It's funny how some believe that anyone informing the public of govt atrocities, crimes, theft and corruption is always made out as the villain thru controlled media...... and people will buy it! The power of media! Mannings sin was stupidity, not criminal! you're contradicting yourself a bit there!
Not really Con. Manning was an idiot thinking he could make a difference without a powerful ally..... and the people failed him! No he is a traitor who was having a gender crisis and several emotional issues. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why would anyone waste good ink printing anything Manning has to say? ...Is he thinking of becoming Hillary's running mate or something?....First female President, first transgender Vice President?....
I hope prison justice takes its course on this POS. So, you think Hitler should have been allowed to continue his slaughter of the Jews? All Manning did was expose the slaughter of innocents conducted by faulty war policies by the US, but instead of changing their policies they, with the power of govt, thru the media, turned the tables and crucified him/her instead......after he released the info to the public that they refused to correct. It wasn't that what he/she did was wrong, or helped the enemy in any way...... that thinking is media hype and BULLSHITE.... it was that he/she exposed the govt wrongs, and since govt controls the media, it's easy and obvious who is going to be the sacrificial sheep in the outcome. Because you have the power doesn't make your actions right or just. It's funny how some believe that anyone informing the public of govt atrocities, crimes, theft and corruption is always made out as the villain thru controlled media...... and people will buy it! The power of media! Mannings sin was stupidity, not criminal! What does Manning have to do with Hitler? And no I don't, just like I don't think Saddam and his pshycho sons should have been able to continue to slaughter innocent people, so there's a damn good reason to step in. There wasn't any wrongs, only edited and clipped bits and pieces he provided, which wasn't the whole story. BTW Bradley is a HE. I don't give a $**** what the damn freak want us to call HIM. If he was that concerned, I can think of two moon bat Congressmen who would have loved to meet with him like that idiot Paul or Dennis Kookinich, instead of leaking classified material right into the hands of the enemy were fighting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manning gets no pass from me...He is a traitor...The biggest motivating factor in why he became a turn coat was probably the fact that he was salivating over the prospect of getting into the pants of Julian Assange ...The idiots are the ones who issued the military clearance that Manning needed to gain access to classified documents and they should be dealt with accordingly...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manning gets no pass from me...He is a traitor...The biggest motivating factor in why he became a turn coat was probably the fact that he was salivating over the prospect of getting into the pants of Julian Assange ...The idiots are the ones who issued the military clearance that Manning needed to gain access to classified documents and they should be dealt with accordingly... And the ones who let him keep his clearance after he assaulted a female enlisted service member and got violent with several others. There were a million warning signs with this POS. He should have got the firing squad (which is still legal for a member of the military who commits treason btw). |
|
|
|
|
