100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: More From The Ferrells In Ferguson | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Nahhhh...I said no such thing. You have fallen victim to a current plague running rampant on the internet: believing that I am The Person in Charge of Everything. I am not an owner/employee of American Flag Supply, whose website I provided for the citation. While I AM a powerful woman, I am NOT the person/one of the persons who wrote the U.S. Codes, nor the ones which apply to the flag. To date, I have never served as Commander-in-Chief of our Armed Forces, so I've not been able to modify The Codes, either. Thank you for mistaking me for one of them, though; it's quite the compliment. 
Sure did and I personally do not believe you to be in charge of absolutely anything, and I mean absolutely. And your declaratory statement have put you into complete ownership of Title 4, chapter 1, Clause 8(a). Remember you were going to listen and correct their actions based on that "code". But I find Title 4, Chapter 3, Clause 73: In case of the prevalence of a contagious or epidemic disease at the seat of government, the President may permit and direct the removal of any or all the public offices to such other place or places as he shall deem most safe and convenient for conducting the public business. Wonder where he has in mind? You keep quoting me to make some of your posts, almost as if you are responding to something I've said, and then you run off on your own tangents which have nothing to do with the price of tea in China, nor anything I've written. Quite confusing, as a matter of fact...so, in the future if you'd like to respond to something I've actually written, feel free to quote me. If you're simply looking for a soapbox, you don't need my assistance to put you up on it.
Gotta give it to you, you catch on quick. But from your presentment is seems your response it that you don't understand what you have written. Is that how we are to take it? And just to let you know, this is a public forum where one presents a view and others respond with either a confirmation of the same view or with an opposing view. I go either way, but the majority of the time it's opposing. Quote you, not likely but to use the quote function as a means of allowing those reading the thread to fully understand what I am addressing, that is just to insure their is no confusion. And believe me I am fully aware of where I am and to even remote to consider this place to be a soapbox would be ludicrous. There are much better audiences for that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nahhhh...I said no such thing. You have fallen victim to a current plague running rampant on the internet: believing that I am The Person in Charge of Everything. I am not an owner/employee of American Flag Supply, whose website I provided for the citation. While I AM a powerful woman, I am NOT the person/one of the persons who wrote the U.S. Codes, nor the ones which apply to the flag. To date, I have never served as Commander-in-Chief of our Armed Forces, so I've not been able to modify The Codes, either. Thank you for mistaking me for one of them, though; it's quite the compliment.
Sure did and I personally do not believe you to be in charge of absolutely anything, and I mean absolutely. And your declaratory statement have put you into complete ownership of Title 4, chapter 1, Clause 8(a). Remember you were going to listen and correct their actions based on that "code". But I find Title 4, Chapter 3, Clause 73: In case of the prevalence of a contagious or epidemic disease at the seat of government, the President may permit and direct the removal of any or all the public offices to such other place or places as he shall deem most safe and convenient for conducting the public business. Wonder where he has in mind? You keep quoting me to make some of your posts, almost as if you are responding to something I've said, and then you run off on your own tangents which have nothing to do with the price of tea in China, nor anything I've written. Quite confusing, as a matter of fact...so, in the future if you'd like to respond to something I've actually written, feel free to quote me. If you're simply looking for a soapbox, you don't need my assistance to put you up on it.
Gotta give it to you, you catch on quick. But from your presentment is seems your response it that you don't understand what you have written. Is that how we are to take it? And just to let you know, this is a public forum where one presents a view and others respond with either a confirmation of the same view or with an opposing view. I go either way, but the majority of the time it's opposing. Quote you, not likely but to use the quote function as a means of allowing those reading the thread to fully understand what I am addressing, that is just to insure their is no confusion. And believe me I am fully aware of where I am and to even remote to consider this place to be a soapbox would be ludicrous. There are much better audiences for that. Yes...MY point exactly. You are confusing those very readers and causing confusion *their* by continuing to quote me as if you are addressing anything I have written. Thank you for getting it...and for doing it one more time, to further prove the point I'd already made. I'll presume we are done, now, since you have agreed with me that it is pointless to quote (so others won't be confused), when NOT addressing what the quoted person has written.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes...MY point exactly. You are confusing those very readers and causing confusion *their* by continuing to quote me as if you are addressing anything I have written. Thank you for getting it...and for doing it one more time, to further prove the point I'd already made. I'll presume we are done, now, since you have agreed with me that it is pointless to quote (so others won't be confused), when NOT addressing what the quoted person has written.
Really, still don't get it, eh? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gotta give it to you, you catch on quick. But from your presentment is seems your response it that you don't understand what you have written. Is that how we are to take it? And just to let you know, this is a public forum where one presents a view and others respond with either a confirmation of the same view or with an opposing view. I go either way, but the majority of the time it's opposing. Quote you, not likely but to use the quote function as a means of allowing those reading the thread to fully understand what I am addressing, that is just to insure their is no confusion. And believe me I am fully aware of where I am and to even remote to consider this place to be a soapbox would be ludicrous. There are much better audiences for that. Whoa, I'd better catch up on my reading. Doesn't understand genius and abstract thinking? oh. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
fleta_n_mach
on
Fri 10/24/14 03:13 PM
|
|
Sure you did and what authority, some code. Is that supposed to mean something? Where did they get that authority, I didn't give it to them as I never possessed it in order to give it away. This is a republic, a government of the people, by the people and for the people. It is a government of delegated powers from the people. So if the people do not possess the power, it can never be delegated to the government, so code means absolutely nothing. So if a people wants to fly the flag upside down, that is their right. I agree, Looks like NOT, only if you are under duress. And when you look at Title 4, Chapter 10: "Any rule or custom pertaining to the display of the flag of the United States of America, set forth herein, may be altered, modified, or repealed, or additional rules with respect thereto may be prescribed, by the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States, whenever he deems it to be appropriate or desirable; and any such alteration or additional rule shall be set forth in a proclamation." So if a servant can modify it at will, the masters may do what they please, it doesn't mean anything. No. Appears like you are all over the place twisting "codes" to your will. You don't look like Obama to me either. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sure you did and what authority, some code. Is that supposed to mean something? Where did they get that authority, I didn't give it to them as I never possessed it in order to give it away. This is a republic, a government of the people, by the people and for the people. It is a government of delegated powers from the people. So if the people do not possess the power, it can never be delegated to the government, so code means absolutely nothing. So if a people wants to fly the flag upside down, that is their right. I agree, Looks like NOT, only if you are under duress. And when you look at Title 4, Chapter 10: "Any rule or custom pertaining to the display of the flag of the United States of America, set forth herein, may be altered, modified, or repealed, or additional rules with respect thereto may be prescribed, by the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States, whenever he deems it to be appropriate or desirable; and any such alteration or additional rule shall be set forth in a proclamation." So if a servant can modify it at will, the masters may do what they please, it doesn't mean anything. No. Appears like you are all over the place twisting "codes" to your will. You don't look like Obama to me either. Twisting, nah, ignoring, but it is to my will as codes mean nothing without consent and I don't. And no I'm Odumbo nor desire to be. I also am not a statist nor psychopathic and definitely not a servant. I am master of my own destiny and subservient to none. It is truly remarkable at how so many choose ignorance over the truth and will go to great lengths to somehow convince themselves that all is right with their world. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
fleta_n_mach
on
Fri 10/24/14 03:37 PM
|
|
oooooooooooh, It's the "no consent" thingie....
fine, you could theoretically win all arguments on that basis now. 
you may have some facts that are worthy, as the rest of our opinions are our own, as is yours. Happy debating. ps I do not consent. |
|
|
|
|
