Topic: Are Chistians the Biggest Hypocrites?
messi_is_a_tim_1888's photo
Wed 03/18/15 11:33 AM
He never existed! Religions were fabricated to keep people under control. Prove me wrong without quoting a book that contradicts itself time and time again? Can you do that? Where's your proof? As I said, without quoting the bible! Have fun with that one?

CowboyGH's photo
Wed 03/18/15 11:42 AM
Edited by CowboyGH on Wed 03/18/15 11:46 AM

He never existed! Religions were fabricated to keep people under control. Prove me wrong without quoting a book that contradicts itself time and time again? Can you do that? Where's your proof? As I said, without quoting the bible! Have fun with that one?


Nobody can prove anything to you, unless you're willing to accept it. We couldn't prove to you the world is round without you willing to accept it as fact.


Nevertell1985's photo
Wed 03/18/15 11:55 AM
1 Cor 15...

messi_is_a_tim_1888's photo
Wed 03/18/15 12:04 PM


He never existed! Religions were fabricated to keep people under control. Prove me wrong without quoting a book that contradicts itself time and time again? Can you do that? Where's your proof? As I said, without quoting the bible! Have fun with that one?


Nobody can prove anything to you, unless you're willing to accept it. We couldn't prove to you the world is round without you willing to accept it as fact.


The World is round, as at least that's been proved! Christianity and Islam haven't been that's what i'm talking about here? You people spout verse after verse of the bible at people, thinking that you are all the chosen ones? Well how do you know that it's true? Where you there when all these miracles, etc happened? No you weren't, so how can you spout about something when even YOU don't know it's true? Could've been the greatest work of fiction ever written? Cos it fooled so many? Or it could be true to a point? Also if aliens are ever discovered, how will your religion solve that one? Answer me that, if you don't mind?

CowboyGH's photo
Wed 03/18/15 12:10 PM



He never existed! Religions were fabricated to keep people under control. Prove me wrong without quoting a book that contradicts itself time and time again? Can you do that? Where's your proof? As I said, without quoting the bible! Have fun with that one?


Nobody can prove anything to you, unless you're willing to accept it. We couldn't prove to you the world is round without you willing to accept it as fact.


The World is round, as at least that's been proved! Christianity and Islam haven't been that's what i'm talking about here? You people spout verse after verse of the bible at people, thinking that you are all the chosen ones? Well how do you know that it's true? Where you there when all these miracles, etc happened? No you weren't, so how can you spout about something when even YOU don't know it's true? Could've been the greatest work of fiction ever written? Cos it fooled so many? Or it could be true to a point? Also if aliens are ever discovered, how will your religion solve that one? Answer me that, if you don't mind?


The world being round was merely an example. Outside of pictures THEY show you, how do you know it is true? Other then by putting your faith in them as it being true as is case in point. No we spout out verse to people as this is the place to come and discuss such things. There's nothing special bout me lol, not a chosen one or other. Just a disabled good ole boy that has much to be thankful for :)

Again it is one's own personal choice, for all to most documented "history" could be works of fiction for all you truly know today. By no means am I saying it is or trying to disrupt something, just words for thought.

Nevertell1985's photo
Wed 03/18/15 12:15 PM
Messi,

I guess I don't know what you mean by "prove." Is there some sort of historical scientific method, because if there is you should write that dissertation today! But because there isn't a scientific method to apply to those past events, we have to work from the effects of those past events, while maintaining a skeptical eye if the ideal "proof" comes forward. What we 21st century people may assume is "contradiction" is actually something historians look for as they search for as evidence of the authenticity of sources...this rule is called similarity and dissimilarity.

But to name a few ancient authors who point to the effects of Jesus of Nazareth: Josephus and Pliny the Younger. The problem with your ad hoc oversimplification is that you do not seem to be aware that no one amongst the scholarly historical community - even those who share your skepticism for religion - who wishes to be taken seriously, would suggest that Jesus of Nazareth never existed.

There are plenty of reasons to criticize and rally against Christianity, and I agree with most of the complaints, especially when they are legitimate, but you have named something being relegated to silence even by those who agree with your critique of religion.

CowboyGH's photo
Wed 03/18/15 12:19 PM
Can't show you or reveal to you his godliness or anything related to "religion". But I can guarantee you he was a real living person flesh and blood.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus


Messi,

I guess I don't know what you mean by "prove." Is there some sort of historical scientific method, because if there is you should write that dissertation today! But because there isn't a scientific method to apply to those past events, we have to work from the effects of those past events, while maintaining a skeptical eye if the ideal "proof" comes forward. What we 21st century people may assume is "contradiction" is actually something historians look for as they search for as evidence of the authenticity of sources...this rule is called similarity and dissimilarity.

But to name a few ancient authors who point to the effects of Jesus of Nazareth: Josephus and Pliny the Younger. The problem with your ad hoc oversimplification is that you do not seem to be aware that no one amongst the scholarly historical community - even those who share your skepticism for religion - who wishes to be taken seriously, would suggest that Jesus of Nazareth never existed.

There are plenty of reasons to criticize and rally against Christianity, and I agree with most of the complaints, especially when they are legitimate, but you have named something being relegated to silence even by those who agree with your critique of religion.

Nevertell1985's photo
Wed 03/18/15 12:31 PM
Returning to the topic, though still 3 degrees of separation removed from the original, Jesus' humanity is specifically how and why he could and did become the firstfruits of the expected New Creation. We need to keep in mind the issues of the Council of Chalcedon: Jesus fully divine or fully human? Their answer was "Yes...both...inseparably." Yes, Jesus maintains his divinity, but the depth of his kenotic descent to earth extended to the necessity of his eventual death and thus his representational role as he took on the need to be delivered from the grave itself. Jesus is the firstborn of the New Creation and in becoming that demonstrates his divinity. Without the resurrection, Jesus is a failed Messiah.

Once again, I'm making an effort at describing the Christian faith...what you believe is your own business, I'm simply attempting to describe the ideal that Christians are called to, should believe in, and often fail at...to bring it back to the original question.

messi_is_a_tim_1888's photo
Wed 03/18/15 12:33 PM

Can't show you or reveal to you his godliness or anything related to "religion". But I can guarantee you he was a real living person flesh and blood.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus


Messi,

I guess I don't know what you mean by "prove." Is there some sort of historical scientific method, because if there is you should write that dissertation today! But because there isn't a scientific method to apply to those past events, we have to work from the effects of those past events, while maintaining a skeptical eye if the ideal "proof" comes forward. What we 21st century people may assume is "contradiction" is actually something historians look for as they search for as evidence of the authenticity of sources...this rule is called similarity and dissimilarity.

But to name a few ancient authors who point to the effects of Jesus of Nazareth: Josephus and Pliny the Younger. The problem with your ad hoc oversimplification is that you do not seem to be aware that no one amongst the scholarly historical community - even those who share your skepticism for religion - who wishes to be taken seriously, would suggest that Jesus of Nazareth never existed.

There are plenty of reasons to criticize and rally against Christianity, and I agree with most of the complaints, especially when they are legitimate, but you have named something being relegated to silence even by those who agree with your critique of religion.


messi_is_a_tim_1888's photo
Wed 03/18/15 12:35 PM
http://see_the_truth.webs.com/

messi_is_a_tim_1888's photo
Wed 03/18/15 12:37 PM
http://brotherofyeshua.com/TheThreeLies.htm

Conrad_73's photo
Wed 03/18/15 12:42 PM

Can't show you or reveal to you his godliness or anything related to "religion". But I can guarantee you he was a real living person flesh and blood.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus


Messi,

I guess I don't know what you mean by "prove." Is there some sort of historical scientific method, because if there is you should write that dissertation today! But because there isn't a scientific method to apply to those past events, we have to work from the effects of those past events, while maintaining a skeptical eye if the ideal "proof" comes forward. What we 21st century people may assume is "contradiction" is actually something historians look for as they search for as evidence of the authenticity of sources...this rule is called similarity and dissimilarity.

But to name a few ancient authors who point to the effects of Jesus of Nazareth: Josephus and Pliny the Younger. The problem with your ad hoc oversimplification is that you do not seem to be aware that no one amongst the scholarly historical community - even those who share your skepticism for religion - who wishes to be taken seriously, would suggest that Jesus of Nazareth never existed.

There are plenty of reasons to criticize and rally against Christianity, and I agree with most of the complaints, especially when they are legitimate, but you have named something being relegated to silence even by those who agree with your critique of religion.


and you think your Guaranty,and Wikipedia's is sufficient to base seventy years of one's Life on?


Nevertell1985's photo
Wed 03/18/15 01:03 PM
Edited by Nevertell1985 on Wed 03/18/15 01:05 PM
Ironically, Messi has proved my point about history and understanding contexts, etc.

Conrad,

It's an unavoidable conundrum of where we place our faith, or perhaps less "churchy," what story we are willing to believe. Personally, I have formally studied Christianity for 10 years and I am still coming to times where I ask myself that question. I'm not an overly emotive or excitable guy...but when I look at the history, asking the question, "Why did the Church begin?" There's not another story that takes the vast majority of the data into account and explains it with the simplicity a historian would look for. In the end, I have been convinced (not brainwashed or cohearsed) to bet my life on the seemingly impossible resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth. If he didn't resurrect, the Apostle Paul says Christians are to be pitied...if he did resurrect, then we will be vindicated as the world is redeemed. I think the story of Jesus of Nazareth presented by orthodox Christianity rings of truth and life.

In short, I don't count on my guarantee or Wikipedia's...but I think it's well worth the 70 yrs.

CowboyGH's photo
Wed 03/18/15 01:53 PM


Can't show you or reveal to you his godliness or anything related to "religion". But I can guarantee you he was a real living person flesh and blood.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus


Messi,

I guess I don't know what you mean by "prove." Is there some sort of historical scientific method, because if there is you should write that dissertation today! But because there isn't a scientific method to apply to those past events, we have to work from the effects of those past events, while maintaining a skeptical eye if the ideal "proof" comes forward. What we 21st century people may assume is "contradiction" is actually something historians look for as they search for as evidence of the authenticity of sources...this rule is called similarity and dissimilarity.

But to name a few ancient authors who point to the effects of Jesus of Nazareth: Josephus and Pliny the Younger. The problem with your ad hoc oversimplification is that you do not seem to be aware that no one amongst the scholarly historical community - even those who share your skepticism for religion - who wishes to be taken seriously, would suggest that Jesus of Nazareth never existed.

There are plenty of reasons to criticize and rally against Christianity, and I agree with most of the complaints, especially when they are legitimate, but you have named something being relegated to silence even by those who agree with your critique of religion.


and you think your Guaranty,and Wikipedia's is sufficient to base seventy years of one's Life on?




And there's many third party mentions/descriptions of the man Jesus Christ. In that link I gave, it offers different examples of such. But it is not my job to change your mind, nor am I trying lol. Just here having a discussion with some fellow people :)

CowboyGH's photo
Wed 03/18/15 01:56 PM

Returning to the topic, though still 3 degrees of separation removed from the original, Jesus' humanity is specifically how and why he could and did become the firstfruits of the expected New Creation. We need to keep in mind the issues of the Council of Chalcedon: Jesus fully divine or fully human? Their answer was "Yes...both...inseparably." Yes, Jesus maintains his divinity, but the depth of his kenotic descent to earth extended to the necessity of his eventual death and thus his representational role as he took on the need to be delivered from the grave itself. Jesus is the firstborn of the New Creation and in becoming that demonstrates his divinity. Without the resurrection, Jesus is a failed Messiah.

Once again, I'm making an effort at describing the Christian faith...what you believe is your own business, I'm simply attempting to describe the ideal that Christians are called to, should believe in, and often fail at...to bring it back to the original question.


First one has to realize what is ment through the term "god". Through out the scriptures it never mentions "human" except MAYBE in the newer translations that are translation of translations of translations lol.

God made "Man"... but this is obviously a mention of a "Gender" as the very next thing he's talking about making a woman. And God has told us, know ye not the ye are gods? It's only the human race that "separates" God from his creation. We are even called sons of God.

Nevertell1985's photo
Wed 03/18/15 02:24 PM
All throughout the synoptic gospels, but especially throughout John, the point is made clear, Jesus is fully human. "The Word (logos) became flesh (sarx)." It is suspected that John is reacting to the Gnostics, who believed Jesus was God only appearing to be a human.

The Greek Orthodox have a doctrine of theosis, which in essence points to the New Creation being "clothed" in the Holy Spirit, as Paul talks about when he speaks of resurrection. The belief is not that Creation becomes God, but that Creation (including humanity, with possible exception for those who refuse redemption) becomes enveloped by God. This is, of course, metaphoric language, however the point is that from the beginning, YHWH's purpose for Creation was to envelope Creation in the perichoresis or "circle dance" that is the Trinity. While God remains wholly other, he would permeate all things, while all Creation will partake in the kenotic relationship modeled by the Trinity. The holiness of God will remain and yet envelope the New Creation.

That being said, it is key for the gospel-writers to point to Jesus' humanity. He enters creation as a creature, though he was not a creature, he became a creature...bound to the creature's curse.

What I mean by "God" is the character attested to and revealed as YHWH in the OT scriptures and as the Father, Son, and Spirit in the NT. It is an assumption I, and most Christians, make that God is as God has revealed Godself to be. So, if God exists, I am talking about that God.

...and that God becoming fully human whilst maintaining his full divinity.

stuuubee's photo
Wed 03/18/15 02:46 PM
The fact is most people even Christians don't know the bible. Errors started by the early Catholic church persist today. WHEN YOU DIE YOU DON'T GO TO HEAVEN RIGHT AWAY BUT SLEEP. NO ONE GOES TO HEAVEN UNTIL CHRIST RETURNS. Jesus was to bring Lazarus back from the dead, and he used the word sleep. Jesus brought a littl e girl back to wife but was ridiculed by a crowd because he said she was sleeping.
We are attached to this earth,so we don't want to miss our friends, sunsets, and the life we have only known. But when Christ comes again it is for his saints....I corinthinians 15;53 Says the dead will rise first and we who are alive will meet CHrist in the clouds. Read 1 Thessalonians chapter 4 verse 16. Eccelesiastes 9 verses 5-7 say the dead know nothing. Psalm 104:29-30 : thou takest away their breath, they die and return to their dust. Thou sendest forth thy spirtit ...which is the breath of life....spirit means the life force....think of a light bulb...your body is the light bulb...when you die that life force, like electricity goes back to god not you.....the word soul means a lving breathing thing...it is not seperate.

So we see we return to dust ...look at all dead things : They return to dust.
wE KNOW THE Chritian religion is true because only it explains how life was created and many truths. Buddhists have worshipped Buddha but he says in his writing s not to worship him though people do.
The Quran is of the devil cause it says " Slay unbelievers where ever you find them" 9:5 This means anyone who is not a Muslim is to be KILLED.....THIS IS NOT OF A HOLY GOD......HINDUS , TAOISTS ETC CAN NOT EXPLAIN HOW LIF E WAS CREATED....ONLY THE BIBLE DOES THE MOST PLAUSIBLE JOB....DID COMPUTERS COME ABOUT BY EVOLUTION ? YOUR BODY IS A BILLION TIMES MORE COMPLICATED.....
ANOTHER ERROR IS THAT THE DEVIL IS SOME RED GUY WITH A PITCH FORK ...BUT READ THE BIBLE AND IT SAYS HE WAS BEATIFUL AND THAT TURNED HIM TO ARROGANCE.
i URGE ALL OF YOU TO READ WWW.AMAZINGFACTS.ORG LOOK UP IMMORTALITY OF THE SOUL AND JOE CREW RADIO SERMONS ON EVOLUTION....YOU WILL LEARN ALOT.

CowboyGH's photo
Wed 03/18/15 03:11 PM

All throughout the synoptic gospels, but especially throughout John, the point is made clear, Jesus is fully human. "The Word (logos) became flesh (sarx)." It is suspected that John is reacting to the Gnostics, who believed Jesus was God only appearing to be a human.

The Greek Orthodox have a doctrine of theosis, which in essence points to the New Creation being "clothed" in the Holy Spirit, as Paul talks about when he speaks of resurrection. The belief is not that Creation becomes God, but that Creation (including humanity, with possible exception for those who refuse redemption) becomes enveloped by God. This is, of course, metaphoric language, however the point is that from the beginning, YHWH's purpose for Creation was to envelope Creation in the perichoresis or "circle dance" that is the Trinity. While God remains wholly other, he would permeate all things, while all Creation will partake in the kenotic relationship modeled by the Trinity. The holiness of God will remain and yet envelope the New Creation.

That being said, it is key for the gospel-writers to point to Jesus' humanity. He enters creation as a creature, though he was not a creature, he became a creature...bound to the creature's curse.

What I mean by "God" is the character attested to and revealed as YHWH in the OT scriptures and as the Father, Son, and Spirit in the NT. It is an assumption I, and most Christians, make that God is as God has revealed Godself to be. So, if God exists, I am talking about that God.

...and that God becoming fully human whilst maintaining his full divinity.


The term "human" is secular.



Psalm 82:6

6 I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.



Psalm 82:1

82 God standeth in the congregation of the mighty; he judgeth among the gods.


Deuteronomy 10:17

17 For the Lord your God is God of gods, and Lord of lords, a great God, a mighty, and a terrible, which regardeth not persons, nor taketh reward:





CowboyGH's photo
Wed 03/18/15 03:16 PM

The fact is most people even Christians don't know the bible. Errors started by the early Catholic church persist today. WHEN YOU DIE YOU DON'T GO TO HEAVEN RIGHT AWAY BUT SLEEP. NO ONE GOES TO HEAVEN UNTIL CHRIST RETURNS. Jesus was to bring Lazarus back from the dead, and he used the word sleep. Jesus brought a littl e girl back to wife but was ridiculed by a crowd because he said she was sleeping.
We are attached to this earth,so we don't want to miss our friends, sunsets, and the life we have only known. But when Christ comes again it is for his saints....I corinthinians 15;53 Says the dead will rise first and we who are alive will meet CHrist in the clouds. Read 1 Thessalonians chapter 4 verse 16. Eccelesiastes 9 verses 5-7 say the dead know nothing. Psalm 104:29-30 : thou takest away their breath, they die and return to their dust. Thou sendest forth thy spirtit ...which is the breath of life....spirit means the life force....think of a light bulb...your body is the light bulb...when you die that life force, like electricity goes back to god not you.....the word soul means a lving breathing thing...it is not seperate


And is why we are given a new body in Christ. Nobody will go Heaven or be judged until the second coming of Christ.


Philippians 3:21

21 Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body, according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himself.





The fact is most people even Christians don't know the bible. Errors started by the early Catholic church persist today. WHEN YOU DIE YOU DON'T GO TO HEAVEN RIGHT AWAY BUT SLEEP. NO ONE GOES TO HEAVEN UNTIL CHRIST RETURNS. Jesus was to bring Lazarus back from the dead, and he used the word sleep. Jesus brought a littl e girl back to wife but was ridiculed by a crowd because he said she was sleeping.
We are attached to this earth,so we don't want to miss our friends, sunsets, and the life we have only known. But when Christ comes again it is for his saints....I corinthinians 15;53 Says the dead will rise first and we who are alive will meet CHrist in the clouds. Read 1 Thessalonians chapter 4 verse 16. Eccelesiastes 9 verses 5-7 say the dead know nothing. Psalm 104:29-30 : thou takest away their breath, they die and return to their dust. Thou sendest forth thy spirtit ...which is the breath of life....spirit means the life force....think of a light bulb...your body is the light bulb...when you die that life force, like electricity goes back to god not you.....the word soul means a lving breathing thing...it is not seperate.

So we see we return to dust ...look at all dead things : They return to dust.
wE KNOW THE Chritian religion is true because only it explains how life was created and many truths. Buddhists have worshipped Buddha but he says in his writing s not to worship him though people do.
The Quran is of the devil cause it says " Slay unbelievers where ever you find them" 9:5 This means anyone who is not a Muslim is to be KILLED.....THIS IS NOT OF A HOLY GOD......HINDUS , TAOISTS ETC CAN NOT EXPLAIN HOW LIF E WAS CREATED....ONLY THE BIBLE DOES THE MOST PLAUSIBLE JOB....DID COMPUTERS COME ABOUT BY EVOLUTION ? YOUR BODY IS A BILLION TIMES MORE COMPLICATED.....
ANOTHER ERROR IS THAT THE DEVIL IS SOME RED GUY WITH A PITCH FORK ...BUT READ THE BIBLE AND IT SAYS HE WAS BEATIFUL AND THAT TURNED HIM TO ARROGANCE.
i URGE ALL OF YOU TO READ WWW.AMAZINGFACTS.ORG LOOK UP IMMORTALITY OF THE SOUL AND JOE CREW RADIO SERMONS ON EVOLUTION....YOU WILL LEARN ALOT.


Nevertell1985's photo
Wed 03/18/15 04:01 PM
All language is secular...all language about God is at best metaphor. It is not as though "God is love" is an expression which constricts God to whatever is meant by the term John uses for "love." Where we cannot live to the ideal of the term, God is beyond, other, holy. Indeed to say Jesus was fully human and fully divine is to say that Jesus was and is the fullness of what it means to be human...all that falls short of Jesus is anti-human.

It's possible I'm not getting your point...it was not someone from outside of those who experienced and physically followed Jesus that claimed he was human...