Topic: Clinton slapped with racketeering lawsuit | |
---|---|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Wed 03/25/15 05:07 PM
|
|
Hillary Clinton slapped with racketeering lawsuit It's the email controversy that won't die for Hillary Clinton. The former secretary of state has been hit with a racketeering lawsuit from Freedom Watch, a conservative group, that accuses her of failing to produce documents as required by the Freedom of Information Act, The Hill reports. The suit was filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It claims Clinton used private email in order to sell access to other officials, which in return got her donations for the Clinton Foundation. http://sanfrancisco.suntimes.com/national-politics/7/72/849955/hillary-clinton-slapped-racketeering-lawsuit When you consider yourself above the law as the Clinton's do it's easy to say you have done nothing wrong with a straight face. But then there is nothing straight about Bill and Hitlary..... how do you tell? Oh right! Her lips were moving! |
|
|
|
This reminds me of ' White Water ' all those years ago. And some of the media saying ' she is just the wife '
Then Bill Clinton's sex scandals (4-5.. 10, who knows). And some of the media saying, ' Hillary is a dutiful wife'. Then backing & trying to cover Obama too & some of the media saying 'She doing the stand by your man thing again ' . I guess now, it's ' Oh no, not Hillary , she wouldn't do that ' ![]() |
|
|
|
Saw the thread title, and was hoping to read, that clinton was being investigated under the RICO act.
That, woulda made my day. |
|
|
|
Hillary Clinton slapped with racketeering lawsuit It's the email controversy that won't die for Hillary Clinton. The former secretary of state has been hit with a racketeering lawsuit from Freedom Watch, a conservative group, that accuses her of failing to produce documents as required by the Freedom of Information Act, The Hill reports. The suit was filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It claims Clinton used private email in order to sell access to other officials, which in return got her donations for the Clinton Foundation. http://sanfrancisco.suntimes.com/national-politics/7/72/849955/hillary-clinton-slapped-racketeering-lawsuit When you consider yourself above the law as the Clinton's do it's easy to say you have done nothing wrong with a straight face. But then there is nothing straight about Bill and Hitlary..... how do you tell? Oh right! Her lips were moving! had the post only contained the first two words.It would have been great reading. |
|
|
|
Hillary Clinton slapped with racketeering lawsuit It's the email controversy that won't die for Hillary Clinton. The former secretary of state has been hit with a racketeering lawsuit from Freedom Watch, a conservative group, that accuses her of failing to produce documents as required by the Freedom of Information Act, The Hill reports. The suit was filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It claims Clinton used private email in order to sell access to other officials, which in return got her donations for the Clinton Foundation. http://sanfrancisco.suntimes.com/national-politics/7/72/849955/hillary-clinton-slapped-racketeering-lawsuit When you consider yourself above the law as the Clinton's do it's easy to say you have done nothing wrong with a straight face. But then there is nothing straight about Bill and Hitlary..... how do you tell? Oh right! Her lips were moving! had the post only contained the first two words.It would have been great reading. Which one? ![]() |
|
|
|
Reads as yet another nuisance lawsuit. Designed to be all fluff and smoke, and no fire.
Accusing someone of NOT having evidence which would have proved them guilty? Hardly an idea based in American principles. |
|
|
|
Reads as yet another nuisance lawsuit. Designed to be all fluff and smoke, and no fire. Accusing someone of NOT having evidence which would have proved them guilty? Hardly an idea based in American principles. and what American principles is she upholding? you seem to sneer when people say they don't like her, but i have yet to see any info from you other than avoiding the topics by sneaking in sideviews of the OP... typical democrat maneuvering... |
|
|
|
America, never fails to amaze me? The only western country where someone can be slapped with a lawsuit, for racketeering and also announce that they're running for President as well? Crazy!
|
|
|
|
America, never fails to amaze me? The only western country where someone can be slapped with a lawsuit, for racketeering and also announce that they're running for President as well? Crazy! because of how quickly the stupid public forgets... ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
She's gone from shredding Whitewater documents to shredding e-mails and lying about it.
She can't be bothered with truths, facts and evidence. She's running for president for gods sake. ![]() |
|
|
|
Reads as yet another nuisance lawsuit. Designed to be all fluff and smoke, and no fire. Accusing someone of NOT having evidence which would have proved them guilty? Hardly an idea based in American principles. and what American principles is she upholding? you seem to sneer when people say they don't like her, but i have yet to see any info from you other than avoiding the topics by sneaking in sideviews of the OP... typical democrat maneuvering... I didn't say anything about what principles SHE might or might not be upholding. Accusing someone of a crime, with ZERO supporting proof, and expecting other Americans to simply accept the accusation, is EXTREMELY anti-American. |
|
|
|
Edited by
mightymoe
on
Wed 04/15/15 08:45 PM
|
|
Reads as yet another nuisance lawsuit. Designed to be all fluff and smoke, and no fire. Accusing someone of NOT having evidence which would have proved them guilty? Hardly an idea based in American principles. and what American principles is she upholding? you seem to sneer when people say they don't like her, but i have yet to see any info from you other than avoiding the topics by sneaking in sideviews of the OP... typical democrat maneuvering... I didn't say anything about what principles SHE might or might not be upholding. Accusing someone of a crime, with ZERO supporting proof, and expecting other Americans to simply accept the accusation, is EXTREMELY anti-American. ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
If Nixon were alive I bet he would be thinking ...'if only I recorded those damn watergate conversations on my own personal tape recorder I could have erased them and never had to resign'.
|
|
|
|
If Nixon were alive I bet he would be thinking ...'if only I recorded those damn watergate conversations on my own personal tape recorder I could have erased them and never had to resign'. ![]() |
|
|
|
clintons dont think they are above the law, they ARE above the law as shown by history. couple of dirt bags but everytime something bad about them surfaces just as quickly it gets swept under the rug and forgot about. hillary has so much dirt i cant believe she would even run for president. theyre both crooks and if she does become president, thats my cue to get out of this country. picture a female obama on steroids and you have hillary.
|
|
|